Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31521
Plaintiff: ANDY JONES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shelby v. Lynn et al
as 3:2022cv00196
Plaintiff: Jeffry K. Shelby
Defendant: Jonathan Lynn, Robert Andy Jones, Shane Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Armando Zulveta v. Larmore Landscape Associates
as 19-1458
Defendant / Appellee: LARMORE LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATES, INC., WILLIAM LARMORE, BEN BUTNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARMANDO DESPAIGNE ZULVETA
Mitchell v. City Of Chicago et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv07357
Defendant: MICHAEL MCDERMOTT, JACK WILKINS, K Gross and others
Plaintiff: Kehinda Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ZULVETA v. LARMORE LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00888
Plaintiff: ARMANDO DESPAIGNE ZULVETA
Defendant: WILLIAM LARMORE, SILVESTRE ORBE, MODESTO PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilmore v. Carey et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00020
Plaintiff: Furman Gilmore
Defendant: Joseph Carey, Shania Yannonie, Andy Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Colvin
as 4:2014mc00966
Plaintiff: Andy Jones
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Jones v. Holland et al
as 6:2013cv00126
Petitioner: Andy Jones
Respondent: J. C. Holland and City of Clarksdale Miss.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Olson v. Jones
as 1:2012cv00104
Respondent: Ernest Andy Jones
Petitioner: Randall Dean Olson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USA
as 2:2011cv00168
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Andy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?