Pitter v. Target Corporation et al
| Shantoy Pitter |
| Samantha Muller, Michael D'Aloia, Brandon Lee, Matthew Permaul, Michelle Partlow and Target Corporation |
| 1:2020cv00183 |
| February 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Mae A D'Agostino |
| Christian F Hummel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 RETURN RECEIPT received as to Shantoy Pitter re #3 Notice of Pro Se Handbook and Notice Issued. (sfp, ) |
| Filing 4 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE REGARDING JUDGE D'AGOSTINO CASE DISPOSITION PILOT - Please refer to the Individual Rules and Practices of the Hon. Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge, for guidance regarding the Case Disposition Pilot. http://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/sites/nynd/files/DAgostino_03142016.pdf. [Mailed to Pro Se Pltf.] (sfp, ) |
| Filing 3 PRO SE HANDBOOK, LOCAL RULES and NOTICE issued and mailed to Pro Se Pltf. (sfp, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Shantoy Pitter. Motions referred to Christian F. Hummel. (sfp, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Michael D'Aloia, Brandon Lee, Samantha Muller, Michelle Partlow, Matthew Permaul, Target Corporation filed by Shantoy Pitter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit-EEOC Letter, #2 Exhibit-Medical Records, #3 Envelope)(sfp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
