Radlinsky v. Astrue
Richard Radlinsky |
Michael J. Astrue |
3:2010cv01416 |
November 22, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Binghamton Office |
Broome |
David R. Homer |
Neal P. McCurn |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER that plaintiffs motion for judgmenton the pleadings (Doc. No. 10) is hereby DENIED, and the Commissioners motionfor judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 11) is hereby GRANTED. The Clerk isinstructed to close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Neal P. McCurn on 9/13/2012. (see) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Radlinsky v. Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Richard Radlinsky | |
Represented By: | Laurie M. Ceparano |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.