Fudge v. Onondaga County et al
| Anthony Fudge |
| Joel Cardone, Onondaga County, William Jones, Timothy Hines, Metz, Fredericka Mendolia, David Brown, Darren McLaughin, Todd Shields, William June, Richard McCarron, Lauren Lapaglia, William Fitzpatrick and Cox |
| 5:2011cv00525 |
| May 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Syracuse Office |
| Erie |
| David N. Hurd |
| George H. Lowe |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER as 57 and 66 Motions for Summary Judgment. ORDERED that the County of Onondaga defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; the City of Syracuse defendants' motion for sum mary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; Plaintiff's claims against defendant William Jones are DISMISSED; plaintiff's equal protection claims are DISMISSED; plaintiff claims against Onondaga County Sheriff's office Deputi es Himes, Mendolia, McLaughlin, Shields, and Cox are DISMISSED; plaintiff's claims against City of Syracuse Officers Brown and Cordone are DISMISSED; plaintiff's excessive force/failure to intervene claims against Onondaga County Sheriff's Deputy June and Sergeant McCarron, and City of Syracuse Officer Metz remain for trial.. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/19/2014. [copy of MDO sent by regular mail to plaintiff] (lah)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
