Kameisha v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Michael John Kameisha
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 5:2012cv01324
Filed: August 24, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Syracuse Office
County: Oswego
Presiding Judge: Andrew T. Baxter
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MEMORANDUM & ORDER that the Court GRANTS the Commissioner's motion for judgment, ECF No. 12, and DENIES Kameisha's motion to reverse the hearing officer's decision or remand for further hearing, ECF No. 11. Signed by Judge William G. Young on 4/3/2015. (see)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kameisha v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael John Kameisha
Represented By: Kenneth R. Hiller
Represented By: Jaya A. Shurtliff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?