Noakes v. Syracuse University
Plaintiff: John Noakes
Defendant: Syracuse University
Case Number: 5:2018cv00043
Filed: January 8, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Syracuse Office
County: Onondaga
Presiding Judge: David N Hurd
Referring Judge: David E Peebles
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Education
Cause of Action: 20 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Syracuse University (Filing fee $400 receipt number 4243625) filed by John Noakes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt for payment of filing fee)(sfp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Noakes v. Syracuse University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Noakes
Represented By: Joshua A. Engel
Represented By: Catherine H. Josh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Syracuse University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?