Smith v. Target Corporation
Plaintiff: Nancy J. Smith
Defendant: Target Corporation
Case Number: 5:2022cv00058
Filed: January 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: David N Hurd
Referring Judge: Miroslav Lovric
2 Judge: Glenn T Suddaby
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mandatory Mediation. Deadline for Mediator Selection is 3/23/2022. Deadline for completion of Mandatory Mediation is 6/13/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on 2/23/2022. (jdp )
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 UNIFORM PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Anticipated length of trial: 5. Joinder of Parties due by 4/22/2022. Amended Pleadings due by 4/22/2022. Discovery due by 1/13/2023. Plaintiffs Expert Disclosure Deadline is 10/17/2022. Defendants Expert Disclosure Deadline is 11/29/2022. Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline is 12/14/2022. Motions to be filed by 2/28/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on 2/23/2022. (jdp )
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 TEXT ORDER: On or before 5/9/2022, all parties shall file status reports regarding the progress of the litigation. A telephone conference is scheduled for 6/6/2022 at 11:00 a.m. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on 2/23/2022.(jdp )
February 23, 2022 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Anastasia M. McCarthy on behalf of Target Corporation (McCarthy, Anastasia)
February 23, 2022 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric: an initial conference was held on 2/23/2022. Pretrial deadlines were discussed and set. A telephone conference is scheduled for 6/6/2022 at 11:00 a.m. Appearances: M. Goris, Esq. for the Plaintiff and A. McCarthy, Esq. for the Defendant. (jdp )
February 16, 2022 Filing 11 CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN Proposed Case Management Order by Target Corporation. (Briandi, Jody)
February 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Order - That, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 455, the undersigned disqualifies himself from presiding over this matter. That the Clerk shall reassign this matter to another District Judge. That the case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge David N. Hurd. That the case remains assigned to the Honorable Miroslav Lovic, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 2/7/2022. (jel, )
February 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe for all further proceedings. Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 2/22/2022. (pjh, )
February 2, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE from Clerk of Court John M. Domurad re: potential conflict in this case. Responses from parties, if any, are due no later than 2/16/2022. Case will be randomly reassigned to a different District Judge. (drm)
January 25, 2022 CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY: The #6 FRCP 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement reflects that there is no corporate parent. Clerk modified the docket text to correct the record. (pjh, )
January 24, 2022 Filing 7 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Target Corporation. (Briandi, Jody)
January 24, 2022 Filing 6 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Target Corporation (Briandi, Jody) Modified on 1/25/2022 Document reflects that there is no corporate parent. Clerk corrected the record. (pjh, ).
January 24, 2022 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Target Corporation Of Notice of Removal on Plaintiff (Briandi, Jody)
January 24, 2022 Filing 4 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Telephone Conference set for 2/23/2022 at 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 2/16/2022. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (pjh, )
January 21, 2022 Filing 3 ANSWER to the State Court Complaint filed by Target Corporation in Onondaga County Supreme Court. (pjh, )
January 21, 2022 Filing 2 STATE COURT COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff in Onondaga County Supreme Court. (pjh, )
January 21, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Onondaga County Supreme Court, case number 006473-2021 (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-5778798) filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Index of the State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - State Court Answer, #4 Exhibit D - Defendant's Demand for Specific Relief and Affidavit of Service, #5 Exhibit E - Plaintiff's Demand, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(pjh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Target Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy J. Smith
Represented By: Mark D. Goris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Target Corporation
Represented By: Jody E. Briandi
Represented By: Anastasia M. McCarthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?