Bender v. Astrue

Bender v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Robin M. Bender
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	6:2009cv00880
Filed:	August 3, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Utica Office
County:	Oneida
Presiding Judge:	George H. Lowe
Presiding Judge:	Thomas J. McAvoy
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 15, 2010	Filing 19 DECISION AND ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommendations. Pltf's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the case is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405 (g) for further administrative proceedings consistant with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/15/10. (sfp, )
November 29, 2010	Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted, the Commissioner's motion be denied, the decision of the Commissioner be reversed, and the case be remanded pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) for further administrative proceedings. It is ORDERED that Objections to this R&R are due by 12/13/2010. Failure to timely file objections or to request an extension of such time waives the right to appeal any subsequent Order by the District Court adopting the recommendations contained herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 11/29/2010. (mae)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 15, 2010

Filing 19 DECISION AND ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommendations. Pltf's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed and the case is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405 (g) for further administrative proceedings consistant with the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/15/10. (sfp, )

November 29, 2010

Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted, the Commissioner's motion be denied, the decision of the Commissioner be reversed, and the case be remanded pursuant to sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) for further administrative proceedings. It is ORDERED that Objections to this R&R are due by 12/13/2010. Failure to timely file objections or to request an extension of such time waives the right to appeal any subsequent Order by the District Court adopting the recommendations contained herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 11/29/2010. (mae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bender v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin M. Bender
Represented By:	Peter W. Antonowicz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?