Dillhunt v. Theriault et al
Plaintiff: William Dillhunt
Defendant: Sgt. Theriault, Nancy Martin, Superintendent and Sgt. Perry
Case Number: 9:2007cv00412
Filed: April 17, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Presiding Judge: Frederick J. Scullin
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 55 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER: Ordered that Magistrate Judge Peebles' 51 Report-Recommendation is Accepted and Adopted in its entirety; Ordered that Defendants' 41 motion for summary judgment is Granted in its entirety; Ordered that Pla intiff's 6 Amended Complaint is Dismissed with prejudice, except for his claim alleging that Defendants violated DOCS' Directive No. 4422, which is dismissed without prejudice; Ordered that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(d), Plaintiff shall have Thirty (30) Days from the date of this Decision and Order in which to file a claim in State Court alleging that Defendants violated DOCS' Directive No. 4422. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 12/15/09. (order served on plaintiff by regular mail) (mnc)
August 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 51 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDED that 41 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Sgt. Theriault, Nancy Martin, Sgt. Perry, Superintendent be GRANTED and that plaintiff's amended complaint be DISMISSED in its entirety. Objections to R&R due by 9/15/2009 Case Review Deadline 9/21/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 8/31/09. {report-recommendations served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dillhunt v. Theriault et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Dillhunt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt. Theriault
Represented By: James Seaman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy Martin
Represented By: James Seaman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Superintendent
Represented By: James Seaman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sgt. Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?