Walker v. Schult et al
Plaintiff: Ellis Walker
Defendant: Deborah G. Schult, Russell Perdue, David Salamy, Sepanek, David Porter, Anne Mary Carter, Steven Wagner, J.L. Norwood and Harley Lappin
Case Number: 9:2011cv00287
Filed: March 16, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 299 JUDGMENT entered dismissing the action in accordance with the December 16, 2022 Text Order of US Magistrate Judge Stewart. (nas )
October 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 293 DECISION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application for Costs pursuant to Rule 54(b)(1) (Dkt. No. 279 ) is hereby GRANTED IN PART as noted further herein, and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants' Letter-Motion seeking a sta y of enforcement of the Judgment and costs taxed in this case (Dkt. No. 292 ) is GRANTED, and enforcement of the Judgement and costs is hereby stayed pending the resolution of Defendants appeal to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on October 2, 2020. (rep)
March 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 214 DECISION AND ORDER that defendant's 191 motion in limine is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; defendants' 192 request for a jury visit is DENIED; that defendants' 193 motion to exclude Dr. Gilligan is DENIED; plaintiff's [ 194] motion in limine is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; plaintiff's 201 request for judicial notice is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and the parties' 208 joint request for leave to bring electronic equipment and demonstrative evidence is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge David N. Hurd on 3/13/2019. (sal )
December 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 77 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 72 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion (Dkt. No. 67 ) for partial summary judgment is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 12/11/14. (alh, )
March 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 33 DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED that 30 Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety. ORDERED that 25 Motion to Dismiss is granted and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 3/27/12. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Schult et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ellis Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deborah G. Schult
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Russell Perdue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Salamy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sepanek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Anne Mary Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Steven Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J.L. Norwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harley Lappin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?