Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Walker v. Schult
as 20-2415
Defendant:
Steven Wagner, Associate Warden, FCI Ray Brook, Anne Mary Carter, Associate Warden, FCI Ray Brook, J. L. Norwood, Regional Director and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jackii Sepanek, Counselor, FCI Ray Brook and Deborah G. Schult, Warden, FCI Ray Brook
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ellis Walker
Walker v. Schult
as 16-3460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Ellis Walker
Defendant:
J. L. Norwood, Regional Director and Harley Lappin, Director, Bureau of Prisons
Defendant - Appellant:
Deborah G. Schult, Warden, FCI Ray Brook, Russell Perdue, Warden, FCI Ray Brook, David Salamy, Unit Manager, FCI Ray Brook and others
Walker v. Recktenwald
as 1:2012cv01103
Petitioner:
Ellis Walker
Respondent:
Warden Recktenwald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Walker v. Schult et al
as 12-1806
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ellis Walker
Defendant - Appellee:
Deborah G. Schult, Warden, FCI Ray Brook, Russell Perdue, Warden, FCI Ray Brook, David Salamy, Unit Manager, FCI Ray Brook and others
Walker v. Schult et al
as 9:2011cv00287
Plaintiff:
Ellis Walker
Defendant:
Deborah G. Schult, Russell Perdue, David Salamy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2011cv00090
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
ELLIS WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walker v. Division of Child Support Enforcement et al
as 4:2010cv00171
Plaintiff:
William Ellis Walker
Defendant:
Division of Child Support Enforcement, Michael R. Harvey, Betty Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Schult
as 9:2009cv00055
Petitioner:
Ellis Walker
Respondent:
Deborah G. Schult
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellis Walker v. USA
as 08-1032
Petitioner - Appellant:
ELLIS WALKER
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
