Wright v. Superintendent

Wright v. Superintendent

Petitioner:	Leon F. Wright
Respondent:	Superintendent
Case Number:	9:2012cv01861
Filed:	December 19, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Prisoner Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Therese Wiley Dancks
Presiding Judge:	Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 25, 2017	Filing 52 ORDER adopting 51 Report and Recommendations. The petition (Dkt. No. 1 ) is DENIED AND DISMISSED as time-barred. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue because petitioner failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 2/25/17. (Copy served on petitioner via regular mail)(rjb, )
June 28, 2016	Filing 33 ORDER: ORDERED that OMH provide Respondent with copies of Petitioner Wright's mental health treatment records covering any and all mental health services provided to Wright at the Central New York Psychiatric Center and DOCCS correctional facil ities, for the period beginning on March 10, 2010, through October 23, 2012. ORDERED that Respondent serve a copy of this Order on OMH by mail within five (5) days of filing. ORDERED that OMH provides Respondent with copies of the records ordered herein within thirty (30) days of receipt of a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 6/28/16. (served on petitioner by regular mail)(alh, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 25, 2017

Filing 52 ORDER adopting 51 Report and Recommendations. The petition (Dkt. No. 1 ) is DENIED AND DISMISSED as time-barred. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue because petitioner failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Signed by Judge Brenda K. Sannes on 2/25/17. (Copy served on petitioner via regular mail)(rjb, )

June 28, 2016

Filing 33 ORDER: ORDERED that OMH provide Respondent with copies of Petitioner Wright's mental health treatment records covering any and all mental health services provided to Wright at the Central New York Psychiatric Center and DOCCS correctional facil ities, for the period beginning on March 10, 2010, through October 23, 2012. ORDERED that Respondent serve a copy of this Order on OMH by mail within five (5) days of filing. ORDERED that OMH provides Respondent with copies of the records ordered herein within thirty (30) days of receipt of a copy of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 6/28/16. (served on petitioner by regular mail)(alh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright v. Superintendent
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Leon F. Wright
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?