Smith v. Superintendent

Smith v. Superintendent

Petitioner:	Jeremie Smith
Respondent:	Superintendent
Case Number:	9:2013cv00454
Filed:	April 24, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Prisoner Office
County:	Seneca
Presiding Judge:	Andrew T. Baxter
Presiding Judge:	David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 29, 2014	Filing 33 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that pursuant to the Memorandum Decision of the Hon. James K. Singleton, Jr., United States District Judge, dated May 28, 2014, that Smith's 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as untim ely. 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(1)(D); Bolarinwa, 593 F.3d at 232. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Banks v. Dretke, 540 U.S. 668, 705 (2004) ("To obtain a certificate o f appealability, a prisoner must 'demonstrat[e] that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encourag ement to proceed further.' " (quoting Miller-El, 537 U.S. at 322, 327 (2003))). Any further request for a Certificate of Appealability must be addressed to the Court of Appeals. See FED. R. APP. P. 22(b); 2D CIR. R. 22.1. (ptm) (Copy served on petitioner by regular mail)
March 20, 2014	Filing 28 ORDER PROVIDING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING REGARDING EQUITABLE TOLLING BASED ON MENTAL ILLNESS: ORDERED THAT Smith has 30 days, or up to and including April 21, 2014, to file a supplemental brief detailing his equitable tolling claim. Smith must su pport his claim with evidence that his "particular disability constituted an 'extraordinary circumstance' severely impairing [his] ability to comply with the filing deadline, despite [his] diligent efforts to do so." Bolarinw a, 593 F.3d at 232. If Smith does not comply, or if he fails to come forward with sufficient evidence that equitable tolling is warranted, this Court will dismiss his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as untimely. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Respondent has 30 days from the filing of Smith's supplemental briefing to file its response. (Supplemental Brief due by 4/21/2014) Signed by Judge James K. Singleton on 3/20/2014. (ptm) (Copy served on petitioner by regular mail)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 29, 2014

Filing 33 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that pursuant to the Memorandum Decision of the Hon. James K. Singleton, Jr., United States District Judge, dated May 28, 2014, that Smith's 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as untim ely. 28 U.S.C. 2244(d)(1)(D); Bolarinwa, 593 F.3d at 232. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Banks v. Dretke, 540 U.S. 668, 705 (2004) ("To obtain a certificate o f appealability, a prisoner must 'demonstrat[e] that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court's resolution of his constitutional claims or that jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encourag ement to proceed further.' " (quoting Miller-El, 537 U.S. at 322, 327 (2003))). Any further request for a Certificate of Appealability must be addressed to the Court of Appeals. See FED. R. APP. P. 22(b); 2D CIR. R. 22.1. (ptm) (Copy served on petitioner by regular mail)

March 20, 2014

Filing 28 ORDER PROVIDING FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING REGARDING EQUITABLE TOLLING BASED ON MENTAL ILLNESS: ORDERED THAT Smith has 30 days, or up to and including April 21, 2014, to file a supplemental brief detailing his equitable tolling claim. Smith must su pport his claim with evidence that his "particular disability constituted an 'extraordinary circumstance' severely impairing [his] ability to comply with the filing deadline, despite [his] diligent efforts to do so." Bolarinw a, 593 F.3d at 232. If Smith does not comply, or if he fails to come forward with sufficient evidence that equitable tolling is warranted, this Court will dismiss his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as untimely. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Respondent has 30 days from the filing of Smith's supplemental briefing to file its response. (Supplemental Brief due by 4/21/2014) Signed by Judge James K. Singleton on 3/20/2014. (ptm) (Copy served on petitioner by regular mail)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Superintendent
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jeremie Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?