Jones v. The People of the State of New York
| Jones |
| The People of the State of New York |
| Shariff A. Jones |
| 9:2016cv00448 |
| April 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Cayuga |
| David N Hurd |
| David E Peebles |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
JUDGMENT entered pursuant to the Decision and Order of the Honorable Judge David N. Hurd, dated the 4th day of May, 2016. (served on petitioner by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing 2
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that The petition, Dkt. No. 1, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust available state court remedies. ORDERED, that no certificate of appealability ("COA") shall issue in this case because petitioner has failed to make a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2). Any further request for a COA must be addressed to the Court of Appeals (Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)). Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 5/4/16. (served on petitioner by regular mail)(alh, )
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Shariff A. Jones. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(nas, )
|
|
Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SYR045731 (nas, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
