Yates v. N.Y. State Dep. Corr Ser et al
| Phillip Yates |
| N.Y. State Dep. Corr Ser, Anthony Annucci, Greene Corr Facility, Brian Smith, Smith, FHSD, Carl Koenigsmann, Prue, Geletta, S. Reilly, D. Feliciano, Robinson and Connell |
| 9:2017cv01227 |
| November 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Greene |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| David E. Peebles |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that in the above entitled action, the case is DISMISSED and judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant as against the Plaintiff, in accordance with the TEXT ORDER of the Honorable Lawrence E. Kahn, U. S. District Judge, dated January 25, 2021. (Copy served via regular and certified mail on Phillip Yates at 128 Charine Drive, Goose Creek, SC 29445 and on Michael Yates at 303 West 111th Street, #1B, New York, NY 10026-4029). (rep)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED, that Michael Yates' Third Substitution Motion (Dkt. No. 73 ) is DENIED without prejudice to renew within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk shall ser ve a copy of this Decision and Order on Defendant and Michael Yates in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 24, 2020. (Copy served via regular and certified mail, parcel no. 7002 0860 0002 2501 5132 on Michael Yates at 303 West 111th Street, Suite 1B, New York, NY 10026-4029)(rep) Modified on 9/24/2020 to note Michael Yates' name and address (rep).
|
|
Filing
70
DECISION AND ORDER: It is hereby ORDERED that Michael Yates' renewed motion for substitution (Dkt. No. 67 ) is DENIED without prejudice to renew within ninety days of the date of the within Order; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Decision and Order on Defendant and Michael Yates in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on January 17, 2020. (Copy served via regular and certified mail, parcel no. 7014 1200 0001 3023 4822 on Michael Yates at 303 West 111th Street, Suite 1B, New York, NY 10026-4029)(rep) Modified on 1/17/2020 to note Yates' address (rep).
|
|
Filing
66
DECISION AND ORDER: It is ORDERED that Michael Yates' motion for substitution (Dkt. No. 63) is DENIED without prejudice to renew within ninety days of the date of the within Order; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall s erve a copy of this Decision and Order on Defendant and Michael Yates in accordance with the Local Rules. The Clerk of the Court shall also send Mr. Yates a copy of this District's Pro Se Manual and this District's Local Rules. Signed by Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on September 19, 2019. {Copy sent via regular mail to Michael Yates along with a copy of the Local Rules and Pro Se Handbook via regular mail at 303 West 111th Street, Suite #1B, New York, NY 10026-4029}. (rep) Modified on 9/19/2019 to clarify docket text regarding service of this Order (rep).
|
|
Filing
32
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 26 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 17 ) is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 8/6/18. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
