Gilmore v. Schenectady County Sheriffs et al
Plaintiff: Dale Gilmore
Defendant: Schenectady County Sheriffs, Smith, Sergeant Guido, Gangurem, Cellino and Dean
Case Number: 9:2017cv01349
Filed: December 14, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Schenectady
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Presiding Judge: David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 63 DECISION AND ORDER: Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. It is ORDERED that 1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff's second amended complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety; and 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 8/21/2019. (Copy served via regular mail)(meb)
February 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff's IFP Application (Dkt. No. 10 ) is GRANTED; 2. The Clerk of the Court shall provide the superintendent of the facility designated by plaintiff as his current location with a copy of plaintiff& #039;s Inmate Authorization (Dkt. No. 11), and notify the official that this action has been filed and that plaintiff is required to pay to the Northern District of New York the statutory filing fee of $350 in installments, over time, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915; 3. The Clerk shall provide a copy of plaintiff's Inmate Authorization (Dkt. No. 11) to the Financial Deputy of the Clerk's Office; 4. Plaintiff's denial of access to the courts claims SURVIVE initial revi ew and require a response from the individual defendants; 5. Plaintiff's remaining claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1); 6. The Clerk shall terminate "Schenectady County Sheriff's" as a defendant in this action; 7. The Clerk is directed to add "Officer "Doe'" to the docket as a defendant; 8. The Clerk shall issue summonses and forwa rd them to the U.S. Marshal for service of process upon Officer Smith, Sgt. Guido, Sgt. Gangurem, Sgt. Cellino, and Capt. Dean; the Clerk shall forward a copy of the summons and complaint by mail to the Office of the Schenectady County Attorney, together with a copy of this Decision and Order; 9. A response to the complaint shall be filed by defendants or their counsel as provided for in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 10. Plaintiff must take reasonable steps through discovery to ascertain the identity of Officer "Doe"; 11. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 5 ) is DENIED without prejudice to renew at a later stage of this proceeding; 12. Plaintiff's motion seeking preliminary injunctive relief (Dkt. No. 6 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 2/8/18. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gilmore v. Schenectady County Sheriffs et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dale Gilmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schenectady County Sheriffs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sergeant Guido
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gangurem
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cellino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?