Brown v. State of Michigan et al
| Antrel Vonique Brown, Antrell Vonique Brown and Islamic Ali |
| Deputy Wardens, Business Office, Classification Directors, Mail Room Campbell, DCS, Mental Health Records, State Department of Corrections, State of Michigan, Brett Coney, RUMS, Danyelle Dobbins, Wardens, Librarians, Sulyot, Heidi E. Washington, Assistant Deputy Wardens and Curizon |
| 9:2021cv00072 |
| January 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Gary L Sharpe |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1406(a), the Clerk of the Court transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court advise the Clerk of the Eastern District of Michigan of the entry of this Decision and Order and provide all information necessary for the Clerk of that District to electronically access the documents filed in this action. The Court hereby waives the fourteen-day waiting period provided for in Local Rule 83.6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 3/9/2021. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas, )
|
| Filing 6 Submission in support of #1 Complaint by Antrel Vonique Brown. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law, #2 envelope)(nas, ) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER REOPENING CASE: This action was administratively closed due to plaintiff's failure to comply with the filing fee requirements, and plaintiff was directed to respond to the Order if s/he wished to pursue this action. Plaintiff has now responded. The Clerk is directed to reopen this action and restore it to the Court's active docket. Authorized by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 2/16/2021. {text order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas )
|
| Filing 4 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Antrel Vonique Brown. (nas, ) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Antrel Vonique Brown. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(nas, ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER Directing Administrative Closure with Opportunity to Comply with Filing Fee Requirement: ORDERED that, because this action was not properly commenced, the Clerk is directed to administratively close this action. ORDERED that, if plaintiff desires to pursue this action, he must, within 30 days of the filing date of this Order, either (1) pay the $402.00 filing fee in full; or (2) submit a completed and signed IFP application. ORDERED that, in the event plaintiff chooses to file an IFP application, it must be accompanied by a signed inmate authorization form in accordance with the Court's Local Rules. Signed by Senior Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/22/2021. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas )
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT: Against Assistant Deputy Wardens, Business Office, Classification Directors, Brett Coney, DCS, Deputy Wardens, Danyelle Dobbins, Librarians, Mail Room Campbell, Mental Health Records, RUMS, State Department of Corrections, State of Michigan, Sulyot, Wardens, Curizon, and Heidi E. Washington. Filed by Antrel Vonique Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Copy of Michigan State Court Complaint - Part 1, #2 Exhibit Copy of Michigan State Court Complaint - Part 2, #3 Exhibit - Copy of USDC Eastern District of Michigan's Order and Judgment, #4 Mailing Envelope)(rep, ) Modified on 3/9/2021 (nas, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
