Cases 1 - 10 of 97,173
Adkins v. Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institute
as 2:2024cv14134
Plaintiff:
Alfonzo Damien Adkins
Respondent:
Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lora v. Swaney
as 2:2024cv00061
Petitioner:
Jose Lora
Respondent:
Warden G. Swaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Woodside et al
as 3:2024cv01213
Plaintiff:
Darrion Brown
Defendant:
Lt Woodside, C/O Cook, Pinckneyville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swanson v. Warden
as 1:2024cv01176
Petitioner:
Benjamin Godwin Swanson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex et al
as 0:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant:
Little Sandy Correctional Complex and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yung v. Adams et al
as 1:2024cv03304
Petitioner:
John Yung
Respondent:
N.Y.C Mayor Adams, Warden and Commissioner of NYC Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson, John D. v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv14133
Plaintiff:
John David Wilson, Jr and John David Wilson
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Rickey R Armour
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stead v. Christiansen
as 2:2024cv11183
Petitioner:
Michael Stead
Respondent:
Warden John Christiansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nicholson v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Leon Nicholson
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Zook, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
