King v. Adamek et al
| Cameron King |
| Jason L. Adamek, Kenneth C. Shortt, David Ambrose, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, John Doe #5 and John Doe #6 |
| 9:2021cv01320 |
| December 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Gary L Sharpe |
| Daniel J Stewart |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Brittany M. Haner on behalf of Jason L. Adamek, David Ambrose, Kenneth C. Shortt (Haner, Brittany) |
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER RE #8 Letter Request: Defendants' request for an extension of time to answer the complaint is GRANTED. Jason L. Adamek, David Ambrose, Kenneth C. Shortt answer due 3/3/2022. Authorized by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 1/28/2022. (meb)
|
| Filing 8 Letter Motion from Lauren R. Eversley for Jason L. Adamek requesting Extension of answer deadline submitted to Judge Stewart . (Eversley, Lauren) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren Rose Eversley on behalf of Jason L. Adamek (Eversley, Lauren) |
| ***Answer due date updated for Jason L. Adamek answer due 2/1/2022; David Ambrose answer due 2/1/2022; Kenneth C. Shortt answer due 2/1/2022. (nas, ) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Kenneth C. Shortt on January 18, 2022, filed by Cameron King. (Agnew, Amy) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on David Ambrose on January 18, 2022, filed by Cameron King. (Agnew, Amy) |
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Jason L. Adamek on January 18, 2022, filed by Cameron King. (Agnew, Amy) |
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference set for 3/10/2022 at 9:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 3/3/2022. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (meb) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Jason L. Adamek. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Shortt, #2 Summons Issued as to Ambrose)(meb) (Main Document 2, Attchment 1, and Attachment 2 replaced on 12/10/2021 with a version with the correct case number) (meb). |
| TEXT NOTICE: Although the plaintiff herein has named John Doe defendant(s) in the Complaint, the Clerk's Office will not issue summons(es) for service of process on a John Doe defendant(s) at this time. In the event plaintiff wishes to pursue the claims against this defendant, plaintiff shall take reasonable steps to ascertain their identity. When plaintiff determines the identity of the John Doe defendant(s), plaintiff may seek to amend the pleading to add the properly named defendant(s) pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 15 and summons(es) will be issued at that time. (meb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Jason L. Adamek, David Ambrose, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3, John Doe #4, John Doe #5, John Doe #6, Kenneth C. Shortt (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-5739122) filed by Cameron King. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(meb) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/10/2021 with a version with the correct case number) (meb). (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/10/2021 with a version with the correct case number) (meb). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
