Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Stevenson, et al. v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
as 23-4338
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AYANA STEVENSON, DAVID AMBROSE and LISA RAMIREZ
Defendant / Appellant:
SIRIUS XM RADIO INC.
Stevenson, et al. v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
as 23-4018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AYANA STEVENSON, DAVID AMBROSE and LISA RAMIREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
SIRIUS XM RADIO INC.
Stevenson et al v. Sirius XM Radio Inc.
as 3:2023cv02367
Plaintiff:
Ayana Stevenson, David Ambrose and Lisa Ramirez
Defendant:
Sirius XM Radio Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ambrose v. Boston Globe Media Partners LLC
as 1:2022cv10195
Plaintiff:
David Ambrose
Defendant:
Boston Globe Media Partners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King v. Adamek et al
as 9:2021cv01320
Plaintiff:
Cameron King
Defendant:
Jason L. Adamek, Kenneth C. Shortt, David Ambrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambrose v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
as 3:2020cv00949
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and SSA-Email Notification
Plaintiff:
David Ambrose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Donnell Bledsoe v. Stockton Police Department, et al
as 20-16972
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONNELL BLEDSOE
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID AMBROSE, MARSHALL COLE, MATTHEW THURLOW and others
(PS) Bledsoe v. City of Stockton Police Dept.
as 2:2020cv01654
Defendant:
City of Stockton Police Dept., David Ambrose, Walt Vancil and others
Plaintiff:
Donnell Bledsoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ambrose v. The Kroger Co.
as 4:2020cv04009
Plaintiff:
David Ambrose
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ambrose v. Barbour County Police Phil Ferguson et al
as 5:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Deputy Gonzales, Barbour County Police Phil Ferguson, Todd Lawrence and others
Plaintiff:
Michael David Ambrose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
