Sorrentino v. Melecio
Petitioner: Bernard J. Sorrentino
Respondent: Commissioner Annucci and Phil Melecio
Case Number: 9:2022cv00486
Filed: May 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E Kahn
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to withdraw, Dkt. No. #3 , is GRANTED and the Petition is DISMISSED without prejudice. ORDERED that the Clerk shall send to Petitioner a 42 U.S.C. 1983 prisoner pro se packet for his reference. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on July 7, 2022. {order and 1983 packet served via regular mail on petitioner}(nas)
June 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Letter in response to #2 Order by Bernard J. Sorrentino. (nas)
June 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Clerk is respectfully directed to update the caption to reflect the proper respondent. ORDERED, that the Clerk is directed to provide Petitioner with a blank 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas petition and a blank 42 U.S.C. 1983 prisoner pro se civil forms packet. ORDERED, that Petitioner must either (1) file an amended habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 OR (2) move to voluntarily dismiss his petition if he wishes to pursue a separate pro se civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. 1983, within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of the instant action without further order of the Court, Habeas Rule 4. ORDERED, that upon the filing of any amended petition under 28 U.S.C. 2254 or motion to voluntarily dismiss, the Clerk shall forward the file in this matter to the Court for further review. No answer to the petition will be required from the Respondent until Petitioner has submitted the amended petition, and the Court has had the opportunity to review his arguments.Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 15, 2022. ( Notice of Compliance Deadline 7/15/2022, Case Review Deadline 7/18/2022){order and blank forms served via regular mail on petitioner} (nas)
May 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00- receipt # SYR060815) filed by Bernard J. Sorrentino.(nas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sorrentino v. Melecio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Bernard J. Sorrentino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Commissioner Annucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Phil Melecio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?