Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Sorrentino v. Melecio
as 9:2022cv00486
Petitioner:
Bernard J. Sorrentino
Respondent:
Commissioner Annucci and Phil Melecio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latimer v. The State of New York Green Haven Correctional Facility et al
as 7:2021cv01275
Defendant:
Sgt. Muzelly, John Doe Superintendent, Det. Sgt. Rossi and others
Plaintiff:
Corey A. Latimer, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latimer v. The State of New York Green Haven Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2021cv00394
Defendant:
Sgt. Muzelly, Sgt. Rossi, The State of New York Green Haven Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Corey A. Latimer, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. D.O.C.C.S. et al
as 1:2020cv01682
Defendant:
Lowerre, D.O.C.C.S., Officer Killinger and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Annucci et al
as 1:2019cv01188
Defendant:
CO., Ms. . Saunders, Shields, Superintendent . Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Jamah Grant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez et al v. Annucci et al
as 6:2019cv06226
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez, Eugene Bowling and William Cason
Defendant:
All correction staff et. al., Superintendent J. Noeth and Commissioner Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Dinello
as 18-1572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Carlos Abreu
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Maximillian, Dr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Dinello, Nurse L. Young, DSA A. Lamanna and others
Shepherd v. Annucci
as 9:2017cv00548
Petitioner:
Eon Shepherd
Respondent:
Commissioner Annucci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sioleski v. Capra
as 17-251
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert R. Sioleski
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent M. Capra
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Commissioner Annucci
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
