Thompson v. Superintendent

Thompson v. Superintendent

Petitioner:	Craig Thompson
Respondent:	Superintendent
Case Number:	9:2023cv00863
Filed:	July 19, 2023
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge:	Brenda K Sannes
Referring Judge:	Daniel J Stewart
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
July 28, 2023	Filing 2 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Decision and Order and the petition upon respondent and the Attorney General of the State of New York in accordance with Section XIII, Rule 1.1(d) of the Local Rules. ORDERED that the respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition and provide the Court with the relevant records, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that petitioner may, but is not required to, file a reply within thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent's limited answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on July 28, 2023. (Attachments: #1 copy of petition, #2 copy of atty affirmation, #3 copy of memo, #4 copy of exhibits)[response due by Superintendent served on 7/28/2023, answer due 10/26/2023] (nas)
July 19, 2023	Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00- receipt #500000668) filed by Craig Thompson. (Attachments: #1 attorney affirmation, #2 memo of law with exhibits, #3 Exhibit(s), #4 cover letter, #5 envelope)(nas )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 28, 2023

Filing 2 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Decision and Order and the petition upon respondent and the Attorney General of the State of New York in accordance with Section XIII, Rule 1.1(d) of the Local Rules. ORDERED that the respondent shall file and serve an answer to the petition and provide the Court with the relevant records, within ninety (90) days of the date of this Decision and Order. ORDERED that petitioner may, but is not required to, file a reply within thirty (30) days of the filing date of respondent's limited answer. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on July 28, 2023. (Attachments: #1 copy of petition, #2 copy of atty affirmation, #3 copy of memo, #4 copy of exhibits)[response due by Superintendent served on 7/28/2023, answer due 10/26/2023] (nas)

July 19, 2023

Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5.00- receipt #500000668) filed by Craig Thompson. (Attachments: #1 attorney affirmation, #2 memo of law with exhibits, #3 Exhibit(s), #4 cover letter, #5 envelope)(nas )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Superintendent
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Craig Thompson
Represented By:	Danielle Neroni
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Superintendent
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?