Clarke v. Azar et al
Plaintiff: Nigel Clarke
Defendant: Alex Azar, II, Kathy C. Hochul, Howard C. Zucker and Eric Adams
Case Number: 9:2023cv01193
Filed: September 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Andrew T Baxter
Referring Judge: Glenn T Suddaby
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2023 Filing 6 JUDGMENT entered dismissing the action with prejudice in accordance with the November 1, 2023 Decision and Order of Judge Suddaby.{judgment served via regular mail on plaintiff} (nas)
November 1, 2023 Filing 5 Notification to Superintendent of Filing - Provided Superintendent at Sing Sing Correctional Facility with notice of instant action and a copy of Plaintiff's #3 Inmate Authorization Form. USDC/NYND Finance Dept notified. (nas )
November 1, 2023 Filing 4 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) as frivolous, and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk is directed to terminate all of the defendants and close this case. Signed by U.S. District Judge Glenn T Suddaby on November 1, 2023. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
September 20, 2023 Filing 3 INMATE AUTHORIZATION FORM by Nigel Clarke. (nas )
September 20, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Nigel Clarke (Attachments: #1 account statement)(nas )
September 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eric Adams, Alex Azar, II, Kathy C. Hochul, Howard C. Zucker filed by Nigel Clarke. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Exhibit(s), #3 Exhibit(s), #4 cover letter; civil cover sheet, #5 envelope)(nas )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clarke v. Azar et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nigel Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alex Azar, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kathy C. Hochul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howard C. Zucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Eric Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?