Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Sexton v. Department of Homeless Services
as 26-1502
Plaintiff:
CHARLES H.M.S. SEXTON
Defendant:
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA, WESTHAB, INC., PROJECT RENEWAL and others
Wellington v. The City of New York
as 26-1448
Plaintiff:
MERCY WELLINGTON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, a municipal entity, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Lt. DARRYL E. FONTAINE, (Tax ID 937820) and others
Haskins v. Tisch et al
as 1:2026cv02787
Plaintiff:
Tyquan Haskins
Defendant:
Jessica S Tisch, Eric Adams, NYPD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Khan v. New York City
as 26-1201
Plaintiff:
RAFFIQUE N. KHAN
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NYPD Officer MATTHEW S. BESSEN, NYPD Officer JOSEPH ASTARITA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lee et al v. Saporito et al
as 1:2026cv02141
Plaintiff:
Frederick Donnell Lee
Defendant:
Todd J. Saporito, Flex Spas, Ann Ogalu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muharrem Balkanli et al v. State of New York et al
as 1:2026cv02444
Plaintiff:
Muharrem Balkanli and We the People
Defendant:
State of New York, City of New York, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Balkanli v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv00840
Plaintiff:
Muharrem Balkanli
Defendant:
United States, Donald John Trump, U.S. Immigration Custom Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wexler v. Schwartz, et al
as 3:2026cv02092
Defendant:
ira schwartz, abraham schwartz, Tzirel Schwartz and others
Plaintiff:
Marshall Abraham Wexler
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Donlon v. City of New York
as 26-370
Plaintiff:
THOMAS G. DONLON
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, ERIC ADAMS, TANIA KINSELLA, individually and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
