Smith v. Collins et al
Plaintiff: Osmondo D. Smith
Defendant: Karen Collins, The City of New York, Department of Correction, Hayes, Gibbs, Mikell and Patterson
Case Number: 1:2015cv00216
Filed: January 12, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Queens
Presiding Judge: Paul A. Engelmayer
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 OPINION & ORDER re: 21 AMENDED MOTION to Dismiss filed by Department of Correction, The City of New York, Hayes, Mikell, Patterson, Gibbs, Karen Collins, 16 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint filed by The Ci ty of New York, Hayes, Patterson, Gibbs, Karen Collins. The Court adopts the Report in full. For the reasons articulated in the Report, the Court dismisses Smith's claim against the City of New York, with leave to amend. The Court denies the motion to dismiss Smith's claims against the individual defendants. The case remains referred to Judge Francis for pretrial supervision, including, as relevant now, for the purpose of setting a deadline for any amended pleading and/or setting a discovery schedule. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 21 and 16. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 2/26/2016) (kko)
March 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 10 OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, the Court dismisses Smith's claims against the New York City Department of Correction; directs the Clerk of Court to serve this order on the New York City Department of Correction and the New York Ci ty Law Department; respectfully requests that the remaining defendants (i.e., the City of New York, Warden Collins, Deputy Warden Hayes, Security Captain Gibbs, Officer Mikell, and Officer Patterson) waive service of summons; and denies Smith' ;s request for counsel, without prejudice to his renewing that request at a later date. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Waiver of Service due by 4/27/2015. (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 3/25/2015) (kl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Collins et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Osmondo D. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Karen Collins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The City of New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Department of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gibbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mikell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?