Jordan v. Department of Justice et al
Gigi Jordan |
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Investigations, United States Department of Health and Human Services and The Attorney General of the United States |
1:2015cv01028 |
February 13, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Nassau |
Ronnie Abrams |
Other Statutory Actions |
18 U.S.C. ยง 3771 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 OPINION & ORDER: It is critical to our system of justice that the Government treat the victims of federal crimes with fairness, respect, and dignity. The CVRA requires as much, as does common courtesy and good prosecutorial practice. The scope of the CVRA, however, is not limitless. It, for example, applies only to those "directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense," is limited in part by what is "reasonable," and may in no way &quo t;be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the (Government]." In this case, even accepting all the allegations as true, where Jordan was given a reasonable opportunity to confer with the Government about the only crimes for whic h she is a victim--none of which have yet been charged-she is entitled to no more. The Government's motion to dismiss the Petition is thus granted and the Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to close the case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 3/29/2016) (cf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.