In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff: Claudia Andrade, Kimberly Thompson, Shawntae Rollings, Ioana F Olteanu, Jody Kennedy, Alexis Rinas, Diane Thomas, Krystelyn Morishita, Christin H. Downs, Christine Lorenz, Trinda Morrison, Amber Spear, Jencenta Fomeche, Leslie Strader, Tiffany Steele, Mitch G. Allen, Jamika Dotson, Ms Suannet Velazquez, Marissa Bonita Lee, Martha E Cota, Chenine Sandoval, July Cortez, Danielle Dominie, Tiffany Roeling, Annesley DeGaris, Jaquayla Kelly, Keri Karnopp, Sheila Estrada, Sara Klabunde, Alphaann Lobato, Danielle Bailey, Jessica Santoro, Ashley MacDonald, Jamie Roach, Kenisha Cannon, Brandi Garrity, Donald L. Benthusen, Tawana Hill-Brooks, Toyana Robinson, Sheresa Bownds, Rheanne Martin, Joshua Stewart, Darlene A Peterson, Elina Lloyd, Jonathan Doyle, Jr., LaShallah Bailey, Jessica Giddens, Jamaica R. Noland, Alicia Barrera, Casey Thurman, Carina Perez, Melissa Ciantae Williams, Brandie Duryea, Gina Beldon, Jessica Young, Sara Falcon, June Davis, Nakita Williams, Sonja Zimmerman, Yvette Thames, Angelique Neptune, Jesse Young, Shawn Grande, Christina Knipp, Leanndra Couvillion, Emily Fauntleroy, Chardey Johnson, Elda Rivera-Coca, Carol Scherrer, Irma Ivette Perez, Stephanie Meza, Lourdes Gonzalez, Tiffany Abernathy, Judy Hamilton, Shakemeia Johnson, Ericia Johnson, Rita Miller, Martina Tyler, Sherry Nelson, Mariah Kight, Shedella V. Jessee, Stephanie Summarell, Adam McLaughlin, Ms. Jessica Fountaine, Jessica Penot, Natacha Dupervil, Joni Powell, Heather Coville, Sofia Ramos-Cruz, Stephanie Campbell, Cristina Pena, Jeff Dangar, Latasha Morss, Jasmine Torres, Tiffany Dawn Eaton, Terry Pittman, Samantha Wright, Katrina Harris-Kemp, Stephanie Corley, George Druckenmiller, Rachel Hermosillo, Laureen Green, Brittnie Riley, Leandra Lovett, Jennifer G Donoway, Kristen Jones, Randi Williams, Janelle Hubert, Candace Butler, Kimberlee Ross, Ashley Elms, Crystal M. Smith, Jessica Brown, Katrina Glass, Gabina Mendoza, Nicole Johnson, Maitai Garcia, Whittney Junker, Cynthia Childers, Robyn J Short, Shelby Spain, Lotoya Vickers, Breanna Welke, Brian Sunny, Peggy Susanne Barrett, Celeste Plucha, Jessica T Balogh, Joanna Trujillo, Sabrina Anderson, Deena D. Driscoll, Melanie Shotzbarger, Janell Egloff, Felicia Duncan, Emily Hernandez, Alicia Torres, Cynthia Solano, Whitney Suggs, Hilkka Griffith, Britney Ellison, Charlencia Waters, Jamie Radack, DeShawn McMillian, Angela Benson, Jasmin Ellis, Kellye R. Norris-Barghothi, Megan Temple, Emma Ellizabeth Reel, Leah Laskan, Hilda Murphree, Patricia Munoz, Shanda Modlin, Stephanie Lentz, Karen L. Davis, Amanda Thompson, Robert Harmer, Nanette Sasser, Patricia Moss, Yolanda Peterson, Telarra Johnson, Curtiss Melder, Donniesha Allen, Staci Durbala, Melissa Louise Davis, Kandie Shade, Kareem Saunders, Mindy Silvas, Michael Parrish, Kristina Marie Crisel, Ciara Parnell, Carolyn La-Crockett, Sherita Jackson, Stephanie Birdsong, Jessica Solis, Rachel Dollins, Ashley Korbe, Jessica M. Freret, Sarah Spurlock, Christina Kohler, Jaime Weiler, Tiffany Bounds, Spring Jarrell, Dawn Marie Covert, CRYSTAL MILLER, Amber Thompson, Abigail Urban, Jessica M. Matlock, Christina Taylor-riendeau, Kara Seachord, Darci Henderson, Richard Petry, Linda Baca, Brandy Wiggins, Jeffrey Whittington, Brandon Dunn, Willie D. McLead, Gloria A Stroud, Augustin Ruiz, Ivy Vincent, Kenya Briggs, Katrina Witherspoon, Evanna Ferguson, Roberta Delloyd, Lavue Pearson, Jacqueline Knous, Symonne Jett, Carol Erwin, Heather Williams, Jamie Lee Harris, Melissa Stewart, Cecilia Gamez, Jennifer Petty, Kimberly Horton, Joseph Pfeifer, Melissa Gooch, Sheena Montano-Padilla, Yevonda Williams, Sarah Roque, Ricci Jones, Vanessa Mercado, Patricia Hamlett, Clarese Chevelle Weathers, Lindsey D. Stepp, Natalie Harrison, Carenia Williams, Lesley Renteria, Brandon Sweet, Shunta Lynn Hall, Cassandra Block, Nadia Lopez, Alanna Miles, Kelly L. Daniel, Lyndsey H Wilson, Vincent Smith, Aisha Boykin, Scott Boynton, Shelly Chapman, Philip Elson, Tara D Hicks, Marlena Alvarez, Sandra Harmon, Shiva Krupa, Denise Mrgudich, Kimberly A. Sharples, Shelley Chow, Tiara Pettis, Lee Ann Jacoby, Doris Cummins, Rebecca Straughan, Meia Crow, Taylor Erickson, Gail Lorraine, Genelle Seward, Alexandra Marin, Tina King, Mercedes Jimenez, Amanda Vanhook, Travis Comtois, Megan Leis, Jessica Rivera, Bonita Hernandez, Erika Patterson, Alejandra Huerta, Keisha Roberson, Angela Boeske, Samantha Capaldo, Danielle J. Melnyk, Kevin Peets, Ashley Delespin, Gary Furner, Amy Adams, Jennifer Melder, Melissa Monroe, Michelle Mattes, Shaunte Davis, Jionnis Lewis, Sarah Wood, Giovanna A. Alvarez, Erlen Jimenez, Kelly Biondo, Meghan Lance, Amber Foster, Kassandra Gomez, Andrea Wackler, Ashlee A. Hamilton, Jessica S Rice, Jennifer Vezina, Maya Wofford, Muire McKinley, Catherine Surber, Jaimee Varsalone, Stacy Piper, Kathleen K O'Brien, Katie Rourk, Amy Demrovsky, Leah Wade, Lori Walton, Elizabeth Koop, Lori Gahr, Justin Vaughn Harris, Wendy Roberts, Tawanda S Ball, Sokha Thon, Kelly Heffington, Amy Edwards, Lester Harmon, Devon Druckenmiller, Kisha Bailey, Lakeisha R. McLeod, Christy Washington, Danielle Hiza, Sandra Gideon, Tiffany Currie, Amanda Leigh Walsh, Tammy Delaughter, Nathan Smith, Julie Aase, Rebekah Brazil, Yasmen Featherstone, Amber Wagner, Erica Henley, Ishani Dias, Tatum Davignon, Autumn Tincher, Ulises Baca Almanza, Angela Gilman, Shannon Balthazor, Angelina Medina, Megan Johnson, Latoya Redo, Vernetta Davis, Sara E. Bahat, Ashton Anderson, Pauline Bocalan, Rebecca Burton, Nell Dewey, Lisa Estes, Miranda Roberson, Falisha Robinson, Crystal Jackson, Constance Edwards, Margaret J. Ponce, Shelondia D Winston, Maryssa Starr Hux, Bethanie Kellione, Kara Carter, Shannon Santiago, Kathryn Cordell, Misty Martin, Athena Condich, Elise A Martins, Jesus Lopez, Rebecca L Mehrer, Kayla Villarreal, Hope Ingle, Anthony Dean Howell, Terri Silva, KeVonne Union, Amber Denny, Teresa Zubia, Angela Kinnard, Tiffany M Yarborough, Wendy Reagan, Carla M Tellis, Jennifer Huntley, Sarah Whitaker, Natalie Gonzalez, Daphne Delee, Kara Lamp, Vanessa Flathers, Amy Ash, Nicole Dorsey, Constance Nelson, Faun R. Cope, Michael Esposito, Jennifer Whittington, Rebecca Nelson, Ashley Crowley, Byron Anderson, Alejandra Ursua, Carliss Wooten-Griffin, Alicia Sloan, Melissa K. Taylor, Lori Burns, Amanda Leonard, Deniece James, Fiordaliza Murel-Osorio, Vicky Lankford, Brooke A. Montiforte, Melissa Sigmon, Dentrisha White, Kim Kammerdiener, Yessica Cano, LaShaundra Matthews, Rebecca Foret, Sparkle Spears, Keesha L. Odom, Kathryn Janicke, Stephanie Reyes, Karina Hernandez, Stephanie Adams, Ashley Wallace, Janae Hill, Patricia Brewer, John Serrano, Brooke Larrimore, Unity Boyle, Stephanie Hall, Rebecca Curran, Amanda Blair, Paul O'Brien, Tammi Picard, Shanterrica Ogarro, Kristen Korbus, Carly Boudreaux, Amanda Barrett, Jacquelyn Goetz-Moffitt, Kathy Pigott, Ronshelle Arvie, Kevin Crawford, Jay Strickland, April Janda, Jazme' D. Reed, Katey Daughtery, Tamara Embler, Kacie Dugas, Elizabeth Sellers, Melissa Ferguson, Raquel Demorest, Jeannette Akers, Laura M Mulhall, Shecaniah Phelps, Misty Long, Lindsay Crain, Michelle Dragon, Kaylee Stringham, Cherie Sperato, Iesha Paris, Joyce Booth, Marvetta T. Davis, Melissa Sullivan, Mayra Villegas, Amber Lefler, Christina Raye Starkey, Jennifer Mitchell, Stephanie Talbert, Taminika Williams, Danna Salvaleon-Cua, Brynn Smith, Naza Keserovic, Sharon LaPlante, April Harrier, Sara Barker, Tiffany Lopez, Amy Vanham, Sharie Warmack, Delvina Spahe, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Susan Chruszcyzyk, Tony Ramirez, Geneva Alexander, Morran Brown, Christina Ozaroff, Ashley Bonanno, Mikea Grubb, Brittany Cool, Victoria Genao, Shawna Hules, Sarah Janney, Jennifer S. Wilson, Kerri Jo Milner, Nicole Bloor, Larissa Brown, Solomiya Melnychuk, Kenneth Clarke, Josie Borelli, Rebecca Grimaldi, Jessica Jackson, Lashawn Marie Davis, Amanda Till, Natalie Rich, Rody Clark, Kendra Lange, James McLoskey, Carolyn Rader, Candace Fuller, Leila H. Watson, Christie Thies, Crystal Starling, Ashley Rhodes, Elizabeth Moore, Mezel Tyler, Kandace R. Galatas, Alison Harrison, Tanee Chappell, Erika Castellano, Sharon Norcott, Timara Louden, Dilsia Mejia, Sandra O Rangel, Brianna Cobb, Jennifer Kohlbrecher, Jamie L. Andrews, Chelsea DelPape, Kathleen Cosmas, Matthew W Walker, Christina Drake, Jamie Leigh Waddell, Trisha N. Shuttleworth, Ashlee D'Jan Blodgett, Tracy Yurksaitis, Gina M. Cunningham, Dawn Stephens, Lucero Freedom, Sonya Ruiz, Michelle Howell, Danyale R. Pinckard, Vanessa Londono, Natasha Rogers, Sheri Michelle Pike, Christy Hilton, Matilda Galvan, Vivian Dinis, Brooke Kap, Mary Katherine Garcia, Kati-An Cook, April Eye, Mary Williams, Misty Murphy, Christa Mccoy, Olivia West, Leslie A. Hartley, Teneera Cunningham, Martha Sanchez, Michelle M. Denison, Geoffrey Sandler, Candice Ditalia, Angelica L. Torres, Tina Roberts, Deanna Wofford Schmidt, Chelsey Day, Nicole Hathcock, Rachel Coughanour, Misty McDowell, Rebekah Humbard, Desiree Hansen, Cynica Taft, Stephanie Barta, Cassie McGrane, Stephanie A. Meadows, Tanya Dunn, Megan Strong, Elizabeth M. Troha, Delina Coleman, Melany Gayle McCann, Nneka Harris, Lauren Troxell, Christie L. Hayes, Chenille Israel, Tracy Clark, Sally McAdam, Ngoc Tran, Alyssa Stoffer, Daejah Terrell, Sonya Omar, Bonnie Lynne Danner, Angela Stephens, Peggy Green, Kelly J. Cook, Kristy Wash, Somer White, Amanda G Sledge, Michael Grimaldi, Dwan Alexander, Tara Custer, Megan Slone, David Goddard, Jennifer Cook-Hoots, Jennifer L. Springer, Felicia S Keene, Ursler West, Kimberly Greenfield, Jody Slaughter, Carrie Dunlap, Magan Brawner, Samantha Hogue, Kami M Hickman, Claudette Eaton, Humaira Mahmood, Marciela Barrera, Michelle Parlante, Kamiria Morris, Penny Ridley, Carey Flint, Christie Young, Carolyn Cutler, Shanea Roundtree, Jessica Johnson, Amalia Beltran, Korrina Martin, Christina Giovanni, Ray Cordero, Danelia Vargas, Guida Socorro Mendoza, Krysti Lee McLain, Heidi Williams, Kari Roberts, Tricia Prendergast, Nicole Almeida, Michelle Ramos, Kelly Matthews, Alicia Henry, Shawna Adkins, Cristina Acuna, Sara Oviedo-Perez, Jacqueline Martinez, Luciana Offlee, Lisa Jackey, Stacy Bell, Bobbi Wilson, Brooke Horn, Samantha Berry Garner, Lisa Dempsey, Petite Smothers-Taylor, Suzanne L. Roskos, Shae L Thomas, Tara Allen, Wade Bunting, Casey Slone, Candace Shepard, Shiann A. Intres, Amber Seachrist, Melissa Jones, Delsa Bere, Nakita White, Letreil Jackson, Stephanie L. Lawler, Dina Abbott, April Jordan, Kristie B. Donovan, Jean Love-Morris, Maison Bacque-Alexander, Mellissa Naylor, Bernice Cantrell, Erica Parks, Kimberly Guider, Julie Deal, Kimberly Welborn, Alishia Warrick, James Hicks, Courtney Wood, Lynn Schroeder, Eric Joseph, Tara Waldal, Princess Moore, Kayla Shepherd, Niki Becker, Antoinette Gaines, Ashley Fleming, Brooke A. Quinn, Pamela Basden, Jennifer A. Perry, Heba Al-Khafaji, Denecia Banks, Amber Nicole Sebastian, Terrell Hunt, Cristina Castillo, Michaela Ramsey, Jonna Day, Latrese Mixon, Rosanna Martinez, Harmony A Taylor, Leslie Gillis, Alexandria Larison, Rosalind Collado, Darci Hughes, Shaniqua E. Murphy, Candence Johnson, Christi Howard-Williams, Jenny L. Klocek, Ola Cheyenne Carney, Rokeisha Maldon, Alicia Ellis, Nancy Macias, Detective Stephanie Sanchez, Lynne Frey, Danielle Lynch, Breanne Beck, Nicole Dobbs, Rachel Havermale, Kenyetta Brown, Sheila Bradshaw, Ashley Tranfaglia, Alicia Hurt, Juliana O'Brien, Lauren Kenner, Tana Session, Katherine Sanders, Amy Linnell, Mandy Davis, Kira Balius, Emily Vestal, Robert M. Gabbard, Allysa Baxley, Jamie Wimberly, Samantha Jo Majors, Meghan Prichard, Malia Carter, Erin Joy Slaght, Autumn Hardy, Janice Benson, Amanda Hendrickson, Sarah Morris, Stevie Robinett, Candice Nutter, Brianna Franklin-Spey, Sonya Watson, Jasmine Blair, Desiree Iniguez, Keisha Johnson, Sarah L. Maughan, Andrea Penaflor, Jose Martinez, Latoya S. Jones, Kefah Salem, Alyxe Smith, Brittany Casey, Chelsea N. Maholmes, Kristen Filicko, Elizabeth Stouder, Sabrina Sikes, Maria Pikula, Lisa Roach, Imari Hawkins, Jasmin Grayson, Nicole Sara Hemme, Rolanda Ware, Randyl Lacombe, Jacquelyn Schlee, Anna Nicole Lowe, Angelica Ferretiz, Summer Mote, Michael Wood, Sylvana M. Phillips, Kimberly Anderson, Karah Aliene Caudle, Sabrina Minor, Laura Rains, Elizabeth Marquez, Dinah Shaw, Brittany Richter, Amy Fennell, John Taylor, Heather Magagi-Ali, Keren Dimas, Stacie Estey, Laverna Binford, Alexis Wharton, Tegan Kirby, Alicia Sandy, Tiffany Blundell, Esther Shalitzky, Toddella Brown, Jennifer Rowland, Brandi Falls, Stephanie Devocht, Courtney Wade, Clarice Snow, Kimberly Clifford, Alysa Heil, Deborah Wooten Foster, Bridgett Lane, Lisa P. Bryant, Nichole Kreeger, Roger Teague, Celina Martin, Melissa Price, Adeline Moore, Josette Underwood, Jeffrey Dishong, Ashleigh French, Susan Phares-Aldrich, Cara Lawson, Tiffany Flores, Ann R. Nowrang, Denielle Davenport, Jessica Reed, Zabrinah Brown, Michelle McBride, Christin Sterling, Jennifer Haywood, Anna Rowland, Amanda Neff, Noelle Fanjoy, Carolyn Loveland, Victor Hernandez, Michael Harrison, Amy Richards-Robinett, Miriam Ibrahim, Jodie Chaney, Kalaki Clarke, Cherelle Johnson, Brittany Thompson, Karen McLoud, Sara Ann Dewolf, Heather Huntoon, Hayley Goncalves, Shariece Wilson, Yadira Sanchez, Lynn Riggs, Andrew Valdez, Alicia Groning, Jennifer Briskey, Valerie Arias, Diana Henry, Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, Ana Sanchez, Renee Moline, Tamara Hillmer, Ashley Clement, Nichole Miller, Jessica Warren, Stefani Johnson, Euyetoyuia Johnson, Korto Tawse-Butha, Nikita King, Stacey Gabrielle Symonds, Patricia Spraggins, Channelle Coleman, Brittany Veach, Melissa Spann, Stephanie Denise Barnett, Tyler Scott Johnson, Nicole Minghelli, William Merritt, Daniel Sanders, Noel Ossman, April Ferrao, Natalia Burga, Robin Fetterolf, Shawn Platt, Pepper Gale, Luke Armstrong, Ariann Knox, Crystal Moore, Leticia Marie Rivera, Jessica L. White, Nicole Ellison, Dena Simons, Sulma Arandi, Karlie Denton, Kenzie Barlow, Susan McIntosh, Alisha Wooten, Dominique Dawson, Brianna Backer, Isaura Manzo-Mendez, Louise Griffin, Carol Turner, Diane Swosinski, Hillary Whittington, Katie L Gobeli, Yvonia Blaize, Marylyn Espinoza, Jessi Sargent, Carey Okurowski, Alexis Burdette, Megan Burrell, Tiffany Gooch, Maura Snyder, Misty Turner, Darlene Trice, Beth Cogar, Candace Saye, Myra Martinez, Jessica R. Caruthers, Brittani Webb, Jessica Smith, Katherine Wayman, Courtney Chase, Eric Shirley, Martha M Loiselle, Ashley Love, Carla Laneaux, Jessica Stiwinter, Monique Figures, Brandy Herrod, Audlyne Joseph, Bianca M. Williams, Theresa Ann Bonet, Natasha L. Vang, Denise Esparza, Monica Townes, Jillian Copeland, Jennifer King, Toma Raenell Fowler, Leign Hollon, Jamie Ann Littell, Maria A. Galvan, Jennifer Sanchez, Tyson Thompson, Amanda M. Ritzert, Jeri Cook, Tami Carlaw, Cherie Allen, Joseph Estes, Tina Nunes, Noemi Banda, Hector Villegas, Nada Marwan Muwaquet, Anita Goddard, Rikkita McLean, Heather Rubesch, Brandon Strickland, Maria Lourdes Cabrera Tinajero, Charlotte Henderson, Desoree Madkins, Jacqueline Widdis, Stacey Feliciano, Lilia Godinez, Laura Canseco, Terri Armstrong, Janice Moss, Kimberly Fay, Marlena Mudd, Amber Sprowl, Denise Hargreaves, Beverly Amanda Moncrief, Dawn Ervin, Pamela Rodriguez-Polanco, Anh Dinh, Angelica Tafoya, Denice Zelms, Melissa N. Carter, Laquasha Burks, Ashley Heger, Cortina Thomas, Tracy Hill, Hailee Paxton, Lashaunta Candys, Rahshene Davis, Amanda Walton, Kymberlee Bateni, Shannon Esposito, Kira Weed, Brandie Burns, Amy Lancaster, Krystle Bennett, Tomekia Lenoir, Marcia Boynton, Stevi Wood, Cynthia Martin, Taylor Thomas, Lekisha Morgan, Tykena Grigg, Stephanie Bruggeman, Tracy A Clark, Jessica Whitstone, Laurie Nordman, Jessica Kolenda, Tamara Rankin, April Cochran, Cassie L. Hill, Danielle Eni, Amy Johnson, Amy L Wilmet, Alicia Byington, Shantell Steadman, Felicia White, Gwendolyn Essary, Andrea Veres, Ghiselle Watson, Corina Weimann, Carey Byrne, Marisela Oller-Reyes, Demi Sienna, Sylvia Montes, Amy Grogan, Kimberly Twitty, Angela Winfield, Glorimar Rivera, Myesha Yvette Calhoun, Kelli Adams, Keyunta Karmon Wallace, Ashley Schluessler, Samantha Strickland, Lacy Batangan, Dawn Artis, Jacqueline Zoltak, Kristin Harms, Robert Davis, Christina Marie McNally, Joanna Tyler, Stephanie Martini, Cassidy Reinstedler, Collene Henson, Heidi Heaton, Erica Annan, Brittany Medinger, Sarah Schreyer, Brooklyn Powers, RuthAnne Lichtenwaldt, Lindsay Luna, Zella N Cray, Marla Ornelas, Teresa Dees, Courtnee Yates, Miles Abbott, Amanda Benjamin, Amy Fedor, Chelsea Neerings, James Burks, Tamara Rogers, Cassie Halton, Marieliz Singh, Andrea Dawes, Jacqueline Farzatian, Brenda Jones, Deirdre Jackson, Amanda Richert, K C Von Gesjen, Maria Davis, Ayauna Modlin, Matthew Troha, Latasha Arnold, Allen Goughanour, Jeffrey Lenzner, Rebecca Wojtowicz, Lynda J. Miller, Stephanie Klopack, Lyndsey Woods, Yolanda Daniels, Cheryl Annarelli, Nicole Fitzgerald, Shannon Fewell, Suzanne Summers, Monica Thammavong, Tammy Villani, Lannie T McAfee, Tanya Luke, Susana Gegner, Amber Synder, Ashley Davis, Crystal Rutherford, Jaime Armijo, Leona M Thomas, Leah Shay Middleton, Emily Teague, Alexandria Chelone, Lakisha Kidd, Tabitha McDowell, Kiesha Allen, Norma Tibbs, Donna McCurry, Ya'Sheka Robinson, Megan Gilbert, Erin Ryan, Megean Bauer, Suzanne Smith-Freda, Celeste Howser, Brandon Couvillion, Mitchell Cole, Richard Hubicki, Kristin Fanning, Andrea Hervey, Frederick Mullins, Agata Graham, Elizabeth Morris, Kerry Walden, Brett A Pike, Kristy Mowell, Kylie K. Cook, Ms. Xonda Lahoe, Heather Young, Eva White, Sarah B Miller, Thy N. Truong, Amanda M. Elkins, Serena Pearson, Carmen Dominguez, Leslie Perez, Rachel Elsey, Jessica L. Thornton, Stacy Morehouse, Lisa Martinez, Lien Huynh, Daitra Wersal, Summer Ary, Shawna Borrowman, Donna Tingen, Mikaela Berry, Samantha Osuch, Tiffany Wagner, Shannon Crockett, Alisha Barclay, Matt Downs, Abby Smith, Yen Phi-Thai Ngo, Rebecca Fife, Katina Kirk, Samantha Badger, Stacy Nunez, Robin Jones, Rita Coyner, Jenny De Los Santos, Megan Gaddis, Brooke Shepherd, Nakia Lewis, Sarina Cervantes, Gladis Davis, Crystal Abraro, Ruth Hospodarsky, Bailey Johnson, Natasha Bryant, Patricia Villarreal, Melissa Cabral, Christina Ramirez, Milana Murphey, Venessa McGeough, Jennifer Danley, Tangela Morton, Ashley Rockwell, Kimberly Gupton, Sheena Jones, Audriana Hush, Andrea Scholfield, Terre L Pendergrass, Belinda Sunny, Lettie Lee, Jessica Lewis, Zoila Recinos, Kamaria Regan, Meredith Smith, April Mays, Stacey Meacham, Rebecca Kuhl, Danielle Borek, Brandie Peets, Bradley Davis, Candice Back, Veronica Delrio, John-Paul Long, Amberlee Price, Jessica Davis, Brandy N. Scott, Barbara Myers, Jacqueline Zemba, Sandra Naurek, Carmen Sepulveda, Patrick Kelly, Monica Silerio, Dorena Borders, Nicole Hartford, Corina Norman, Andrea J Wand, Ashley Cochran, Sarah W Beck, Lynnette Lynn-Horton, Corrina Pollock, Kayla Harris, Ebone Porter, Jessica Hubicki, Cassandra Hancock, Brittany Dowsett, Maria Lopez, Donavon Arvie, Julie Parrish, Karla Rivera, Shawna Griffie, Kori L. Mcwilliams, Evelyn Ramirez, Amanda Madril, Amber Goss, Melissa Fadel, Lexi K. Rutherford, Starla Garza, Shemek Ague, Amy Chee, Shelby Ketelboeter, Summer Creekmore, Ana Camacho, Jennifer R. Widmer, Cody Roan, Andrea Rodriguez, Kayla Hord, Kathleen Kendrick, Miriam Cruz, Corey Brown, Sonia Buenrostro, Paola Choute, Brandy Wolford, Vilma Shandera, Eric Talbert, Shelonda D. Joy, Carmen Garcia, Amber Abeare, Anita Eleby, Mariam Smith, Jason Naurek, Jeneay Jackson, Natasha Bjugan, Rebecca Turner, Tierra Hampton, Kayla Cubie, Desiree Woody, Monique L Garth, Jakitta Cooper Joseph, Sandra Garcia, Briana Elliott, Tatika Avery, Samantha Lasseter-Perez, Carissa Mason, Kay Nuzzo, Jennifer Montminy, Penny Morico, Priscilla H Freeze, Terionne Anderson, Jessie Orton, Samantha Bourget, Natalys E Lopez, Lashanda Henry, Richole Madison-Ogburn, Cassandra Worsham, Zahra Hosseinpour, Ashley Block, Jaime Slaven, Justin Briskey, Gina Lafata, Shermaine Asby, Kami Armstrong, Ashley Hamblen, Alyshia Battiest, Ysabel Torres, Nicole Bacque-Alexander, Ms. Whitney Cross, Stasia Boyles, Erika Martin, Lanika R. Saunders, Amber Osborn, Eryne Otterson, Sharon Lynn Hoskison, Susan M. Burtis, Chelsea Dawn Mcclune, Karol Macquarrie, Kymbra M. McLaughlin, Amanda Truitt, Kaila Allen, Kelli Baugh, Laura Galbreath, Theresa Rokovich, Allison Greene, Shandra Grooms, Heather Keller, Laura Plunkett, Nanci Fils-Aime, Amber Molinar, Genesia E Lozano, Stephanie L. Meyers, Amy Howarth, Rakia Esver, Lauren Monsey, Tina Glaspie, Sharmila Jackson, Viktoriya Tymoshchuk, Regina Bearyman, LEEANNE ACCETTURO, Brandy McNamee, Shonita Boyce, Ashley Lowder, Laporsche M. Anderson, Jodie Blackburn, Jessica Hardy, Elizabeth Ide, Katherine A. Rodriguez-Vargas, Shelby Comtois, Pamela Franklin Redd, Spring Weller, Kristen Nicole Cox, Melissa Beauprez, Levette Griffin, Nicholas Clark, Maria Oropeza, Andrew Urban, Tania Paz Acosta, Taylor Salas, Patty J Hardman, Brian Welke, Varita Williams, Heather Roby, Melissa Harding, Sasha Diehl, Felicia Okoro, Lori Louvier-Durand, Angela Randle, Susan Allen, Michelle Reisner, Rosy E Gomez, Fiona Tucker, Heather Mason, Dearra Scott, Emily Gaines, Alice M. Dishong, Christina Delgado, Amber Fowler, Cortney Jameson, Amanda Howell, Ashley Smith, Stephanie Sollis, Lorrie Frakes, Jennifer Jury, Jonathan Gross, Melissa Cherry, Jamie Lynn Wells, Shelisha Crawford, Tammy Calamari, Janelle Menge, Mallari Moffatt, Lydia Slaughter, Richard McCormack, Tarhir Ismail, Malika Thompson, Erin Weed, Angel Alvarez, Crystal Cox, Tiffany Sue Weishuhn, Barbara Bivens, Aneesah Anani, Latara Lucero, LaToya Campbell, Laura Sherrill Howell, Adria Perez, Shannon Letters, Karla Cassady, Candiz Veliz, Laurice Goodhue, Michele D. Holt, Gerlin Munoz Chavarria, Robin Corbello, Rita Stylianou, Kerri Carmen, Adam Ejnik, Lisa Abrams, Mickele Mason-Anthony, Kimberly Petry, Almalnda Moctezuma, Estell Reams, Ashley Brewer, Brittany Williams, Cynthia L. Wilson, Jessica Piscionere, Sheryl Woods, Candace Williams, Terrena Sellers, Alisha Wyatt, Krystal N Bentley, Wendy S. Shirah, Jennifer Black, Diana Olatunbosun, Christina Sell, Yvette Ezell, Diana Barron, Lauren T Pittman, Abbie Taylor, Ashley Rios, Emily Marolda, Amber L. Mills, Kari R Davis, Michele Eland, Shaunessey Singleton, Tamara Brown, Yolanda Blue, Heather Kyle, Kashena Hubbard, Sasha Anderson, Lisseth Heredia, Melisa Johnson, Briana Hankerson, Tasha L. Raine, Wade Gale, Esmerelda Garcia, Brandi Smith, Kitanea McKenzie, Emily Birse, Kourtney Castillo, Amanda Armas, Joseph Capaldo, Shelley Bunting, Crystal Richards, Chassity R. Kimbrough, Kelly Guy, Tiffany Collins, Heather Lulo, Jill Kopish, Destiny Dawn Newton, Marissa Jones, Cassandra Sutton, Shelby Ameling, Melinda Colon, Dominique Rayford, Dorothy J Schumacher, Rachel A. Sigure, Carolyn K. Jewell, Amanda Bradway, Sherry Broadwater, Ebony Carey, Deeana Palello, Tiffany Gregg, Morgan VanZile, Sherry Lopez De Ricci, Meghan Flores, Julie Biffle, Amy Renee Porter, Jennifer Mennen, William Laska, Christina Miske, Megan Irwin, Regina Zwart, Stephanie Rogers, Paris Hooks, Priscilla Baldwin, Summer Sadira, Jessica Stebbins, Elizabeth Vargas, Caitlyn Dixon, Janviere Harris, Valentina Mendez, Tonetta S. Davis, Tonya Schuldt, Kim Druyvesteyn, Sara Sturgil, Kristine Schow, Christina Bell, Jami A. Barber, Tiffany Crowther, Carolyn Crusha, Lakeesha Whitehead, Charisma Serrano, Megan Barker, Rebecca Arafa, Rebecca Fisher, Melody Williams, Angela Martinez, Geneva Scott, Monica Thompson, Wendy Parikh, Dimeshia Craig, Kaysey Davis, Tad VanZile, Melissa Lopez, Benjamin Atwell, Linda Rogers, Amanda J. Steinborn, Linda A. Thurman, Christine Montano, Pamela Barlow, Tavonda Ford, Pamela J Richardson, Ahou Gladys Adou, Amber Welton, Tanya Lewis, Teresa Macias, Beatrice L. Griner, Dawnjai Grady, Johari Guy, Mandy Robinson, Alle Lopez-Davis, Lisa Dawn Harris, Amber Heetland, Michael Davis, Brittany Agerton, Marina Schoeberl, Jessicca Tanner, McKenna Ripple, Nicole Mattox, Amber Aston, April Rogers, Cassie Painter, Alisha Thompson, Amanda Solis, Ada Stucky and Erica Mitchell
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Berlex Laboratories, Inc., DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer OY, Lisa Hernandez, Danielle Thate, Alexandro E. Mendoza, John Doe Distributors, Bayer Pharm AG, Bayer Healthcare AG and John Doe Manufacturers
Applicant: Gregory N McEwen
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Attorney Chantell Boutte, Nina Marie Towle and Plaintiffs' Steering Committee
Case Number: 7:2013md02434
Filed: April 8, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: White Plains Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Cathy Seibel
Referring Judge: Lisa Margaret Smith
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3353 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #3352 Letter filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close No. 13-MC-2434 and No. 13-MD-2434. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/26/2019) (rro)
November 26, 2019 Filing 3352 JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook and Michael K. Johnson dated November 26, 2019 re: Status Update. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
November 26, 2019 Transmission to Office of the Clerk of Court. Transmitted re: #3353 Memo Endorsement to the Office of the Clerk of Court for processing. (rro)
November 20, 2019 Filing 3351 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Andrew L. Goldman on behalf of Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. New Address: Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum, 200 S. Wacker Dr., 22nd Floor, Chicago, IL, United States 60606, 3126816000. (Goldman, Andrew)
November 20, 2019 Filing 3350 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Tarek Ismail on behalf of Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. New Address: Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum, 200 S. Wacker Dr., 22nd Floor, Chicago, IL, United States 60606, 3126816000. (Ismail, Tarek)
November 20, 2019 Filing 3349 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Brian P. O'Donoghue on behalf of Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. New Address: Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum, 200 S. Wacker Dr., 22nd Floor, Chicago, IL, United States 60606, 3126816000. (O'Donoghue, Brian)
November 20, 2019 Filing 3348 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Shayna Susanne Cook on behalf of Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. New Address: Goldman Ismail Tomaselli Brennan & Baum, 200 S. Wacker Dr., 22nd Floor, Chicago, IL, USA 60606, 312-681-6000. (Cook, Shayna)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3347 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (3346 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Letter filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, (248 in 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS) Letter filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ENDORSEMENT: The parties are to provide another status update by 11/29/19 if the settlement has not been finalized by then. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/30/2019) (mml)
July 29, 2019 Filing 3346 JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook and Michael K. Johnson dated 7/29/2019 re: Status Update. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3345 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (3344 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Letter filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, (246 in 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS) Letter filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ENDORSEMENT: It does not appear that the settlement has been finalized as expected. The parties are directed to provide another status update by 7/31/19. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/22/2019) (mml)
February 8, 2019 Filing 3344 JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook and Michael K. Johnson dated Feb. 7, 2019 re: Status Update. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
December 4, 2018 Filing 3343 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-181)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/4/2018) (sjo)
August 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3342 ORDER granting (3330) Motion for Badge Humphries to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:18-cv-01688-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
May 22, 2018 Filing 3341 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Rachel Abrams on behalf of Kristy M. Gabbard, Pepper Gale, Wade Gale, Stephanie Laska, William Laska, Kori L. Mcwilliams, Guida Socorro Mendoza, Sandra O Rangel, Dearra Scott. New Address: Levin Simes Abrams LLP, 1160 Battery Street East, Suite 100, San Francisco, CA, USA 94111, 415-426-3000. (Abrams, Rachel)
May 10, 2018 Filing 3340 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Diogenes P. Kekatos on behalf of Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. New Address: Seeger Weiss LLP, 77 Water Street, 8th Floor, New York, New York, 10005, 212-584-0700. (Kekatos, Diogenes)
May 10, 2018 Filing 3339 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-180) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 05/10/2018) (sjo)
April 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3338 ORDER in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; terminating (40) Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting (42) Motion to Transfer Case; terminating (45) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction in case 7:17-cv-09613-CS. It is therefore ORDERED as follows: 1. Based on Plaintiffs' filing of the April 18, 2018 Notice of Dismissal of Bayer, (Doc. 57), all claims against Bayer are now dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own attorney's fees and costs. 2. The claims against the non-Bayer Defendants shall be remanded to the Elkhart County Superior Court III in the State of Indiana (where the case was filed originally as Cause No. 20D03-1705-CT-126). 3. The Clerk of Court shall terminate Docs. 40, 42, and 45. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/26/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:17-cv-09613-CS. (mml)
April 18, 2018 Filing 3337 NOTICE of Dismissal of Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Document filed by Amber Denny, Brian S. denny. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:17-cv-09613-CS(Ohaneson, Theora)
April 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3336 ORDER GRANTING THIRD AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR NOTICE OF TAXATION OF COSTS granting #3335 Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Taxation. On this day the Court considered the Third Agreed Motion to Extend Time For Defendants to File Their Notice of Taxation of Costs (the "Third Agreed Motion"). The Court GRANTS the Third Agreed Motion and therefore, ORDERS THAT the time for Defendants to file their notice of taxation of costs is extended until May 1, 2018. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/03/2018) (ama)
April 2, 2018 Filing 3335 THIRD MOTION for Extension of Time to File Defendants' Notice of Taxation of Costs. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
March 20, 2018 Filing 3334 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Christopher Adam Seeger on behalf of Minyonna P. Watson. New Address: Seeger Weiss LLP, 55 Challenger Road, 6th FL, Ridgefield Park, New Jersey, 07660, 212-584-0700. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Seeger, Christopher)
March 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3333 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW granting (3332) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, granting (28) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Patricia Campbell of the law firm of Langdon & Emison, LLC, is permitted to withdraw from any further representation for Plaintiff Whittney Junker. The Clerk will please terminate Doc. 28. Attorney Patricia L Campbell terminated in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; Attorney Patricia L Campbell terminated in case 7:15-cv-01779-CS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/13/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01779-CS (mml)
March 13, 2018 Filing 3332 MOTION for Patricia L. Campbell to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Whittney Junker. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01779-CS(Campbell, Patricia)
March 13, 2018 Filing 3331 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Badge Humphries on behalf of Toma Raenell Fowler. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:18-cv-01688-CS(Humphries, Badge)
March 13, 2018 Filing 3330 MOTION for Badge Humphries to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-14803979. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Toma Raenell Fowler. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Badge Humphries, #2 Exhibit 1 - Certificates of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:18-cv-01688-CS(Humphries, Badge)
March 13, 2018 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (12 in 7:18-cv-01688-CS, 3330 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Badge Humphries to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-14803979. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:18-cv-01688-CS(wb)
March 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3329 ORDER GRANTING SECOND AGREED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR NOTICE OF TAXATION OF COSTS: granting #3328 Motion for Extension of Time to File. On this day the Court considered the Second Agreed Motion to Extend Time For Defendants to File Their Notice of Taxation of Costs (the "Second Agreed Motion"). The Court GRANTS the Second Agreed Motion and therefore, ORDERS THAT the time for Defendants to file their notice of taxation of costs is extended until April 1, 2018. (Docketed in 13md2434 and 13mc2434) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/1/2018) (ap)
February 28, 2018 Filing 3328 SECOND MOTION for Extension of Time to File Defendants' Notice of Taxation of Costs. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
February 15, 2018 Filing 3327 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Luke F. Callahan on behalf of Kelly Guy, Daejah Terrell, Tiffany Dawn Eaton, Lisseth Heredia, Ashley Wallace, Suzanne Summers. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Callahan, Luke)
February 15, 2018 Filing 3326 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-179) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of South Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/6/2018) (sjo)
February 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3325 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00773-CS; granting (3324) Motion for Luke F. Callahan to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (Seibel, Cathy)
February 9, 2018 Filing 3324 MOTION for Luke F. Callahan to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-14683067. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kelly Guy, Daejah Terrell, Tiffany Dawn Eaton, Lisseth Heredia, Suzanne Summers, Ashley Wallace. Return Date set for 2/9/2018 at 11:37 AM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Callahan, Luke)
February 9, 2018 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #3324 MOTION for Luke F. Callahan to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-14683067. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (ma)
January 31, 2018 Filing 3323 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Kevin M. Fitzgerald on behalf of Jennifer Laroche. New Address: Fitzgerald Law Group, LLC, 120 Exchange Street, Suite 200, Portland, Maine, United States 04101, (207) 874-7407. (Fitzgerald, Kevin)
January 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3322 ORDER NO. 34, CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: CENSUS OF CLAIMS: The Court, having communicated about this issue with Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel and Defendants' Lead Counsel and finding good cause shown, believes that in the management of this coordinated litigation, it is necessary to have a more accurate census of the cases as well as claims of putative plaintiffs, represented by Counsel, defined below, as further set forth in this Order. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/29/2018) *** Per chambers direction, this document will only be docketed in 13md2434 and 13mc2434. (mml)
January 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3321 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: CASES TRANSFERRED TO MDL DURING AND AFTER APPEAL. ORDER NO. 33. 1. This Order shall apply to cases transferred to this Court after the Court's Opinion and Order dated July 28, 2016 (Granting summary judgment to Defendants in all cases pending MDL No. 2434 ("Summary Judgment Order")). 2. On August 19, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal of the Summary Judgment Order ("the Appeal"). 3. Case Management Order 32 provides for the conditional dismissal without prejudice of those cases transferred to this MDL during and since the Appeal and provides: If the Second Circuit affirms the Court's Summary Judgment Order in its entirety, and any further petition for rehearing or certiorari is unsuccessful and the decision becomes final, Plaintiffs whose claims were conditionally dismissed shall have 60 days to show cause as to why her claim should not be dismissed with prejudice under the Summary Judgment Order. Defendants may respond within 30 days. The Court will dismiss with prejudice the claims of any Plaintiff who does not file a show-cause brief within 60 days or who is unable to show cause as to why her claim should not be dismissed. 3. On October 24, 2017, the Second Circuit affirmed this Court's Summary Judgment Order. In re Mirena IUD Prods. Liab. Litig., Mirena MDL, Plaintiffs v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20875 (2d. Cir. Oct. 24, 2017). 4. By this order, the Court clarifies that Plaintiffs should not file Motions to Reinstate or otherwise seek to show cause under CMO 32 as to why their claim should not be dismissed with prejudice until the decision of the Second Circuit becomes final (i.e., after Plaintiffs' petition for certiorari, if any, is denied or the Supreme Court issues a written opinion affirming the opinion or otherwise not remanding the cases for further proceedings). At that point, the 60-day clock referenced in CMO 32 will start to run, and Motions to Reinstate or otherwise seek to show good cause will be accepted. 5. All other provisions of CMO 32 shall remain in force as appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/26/2018). Docketed only in cases 13md2434 and 13mc2434, as per Chambers. (rjm).
January 26, 2018 ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 3320 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 32. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (ama)
January 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3318 ORDER: On January 23, 2018, a Notice of Court Conference was issued in Docket Number 7:13-MD-2434, (Doc. 3317), and all related cases, scheduling a telephone conference for Friday, January 26, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. This telephone conference was set up in response to the letter to the Court dated January 22, 2018 from Lead Counsel for Defendants and Plaintiffs Steering Committee. (No. 7:13-MD-2434, Doc. 3315; No. 7:13-MC-2434, Doc. 238.) The only counsel required to be on the call are Ms. Shayna Cook, Lead Counsel for Defendants, and Mr. Michael K. Johnson on behalf of the Plaintiffs Steering Committee. Other counsel may participate if they so choose, but they are not required to do so.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/24/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (mml)
January 23, 2018 Filing 3317 NOTICE OF COURT CONFERENCE: A telephone conference is scheduled for Friday, January 26, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. before the Hon. Cathy Seibel. Telephone Conference set for 1/26/2018 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(ap)
January 23, 2018 Filing 3316 RESPONSE to Motion re: (42 in 7:17-cv-09613-CS, 3307 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Transfer Case . RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO HAVE THIS PARTICULAR CAUSE OF ACTION TRANSFERRED TO THE INDIANA DISTRICT COURT AND/OR TRANSFERRED TO THE INDIANA TRIAL COURT. Document filed by Amber Denny, Brian S. denny. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:17-cv-09613-CS(Ohaneson, Theora)
January 22, 2018 Filing 3315 JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook and Michael K. Johnson dated Jan. 22, 2018 re: Census Order. Document filed by Bayer AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cook, Shayna)
January 19, 2018 Filing 3314 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #3307 MOTION to Transfer Case . DEFENDANT BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO HAVE THIS PARTICULAR CAUSE OF ACTION TRANSFERRED TO THE INDIANA DISTRICT COURT AND/OR TRANSFERRED TO THE INDIANA TRIAL COURT. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Shepherd, Elmore)
January 19, 2018 Filing 3313 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU (SEE #3314 Memorandum) - REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #3307 MOTION to Transfer Case . DEFENDANT BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO HAVE THIS PARTICULAR CAUSE OF ACTION TRANSFERRED TO THE INDIANA DISTRICT COURT AND/OR TRANSFERRED TO THE INDIANA TRIAL COURT. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Shepherd, Elmore) Modified on 1/19/2018 (db).
January 11, 2018 Filing 3312 MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to (20 in 7:15-cv-01783-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-02067-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-01765-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-01110-CS, 3257 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 20 in 7:15-cv-02068-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-07562-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-01116-CS) Notice of Appeal, filed by Jionnis Lewis, Marlena Mudd, Stefanie Lynn Kinnell, Kayla Cubie, Xonda Lahoe, Corina Norman, Lynnette Lynn-Horton. USCA Case Number 16-2378. The parties in the above-referenced case have filed a stipulation withdrawing this appeal pursuant to FRAP 42. The stipulation is hereby "So Ordered".. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 01/11/2018. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(nd)
January 11, 2018 Filing 3311 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Matthew J. Garver on behalf of Lauren T Pittman. New Address: Kuhn Garver, 1027 Main Street, Franklinton, Louisiana, USA 70438, 985-839-4462. (Garver, Matthew)
January 11, 2018 Filing 3310 JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook and Michael K. Johnson dated Jan. 11, 2018 re: Cases Transferred to MDL During and After Appeal. Document filed by Bayer AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cook, Shayna)
January 3, 2018 Filing 3309 MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to (3238 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 29 in 7:15-cv-05276-CS) Notice of Appeal, filed by Dena Simons. USCA Case Number 16-1961. The parties in the above-referenced case have filed a stipulation withdrawing this appeal pursuant to FRAP 42. The stipulation is hereby "So Ordered".. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 01/3/2018. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(nd)
December 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3308 ORDER denying without prejudice (3306) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS and 13-cv-7754: If the client consents to counsel's withdrawal, a stipulation to that effect should be submitted. If not, I prefer that counsel proceed via Order to Show Cause ("OSC"). Counsel should submit a proposed OSC to chambers, along with an affidavit and memorandum of law explaining why counsel should be allowed to withdraw. The Court will fill in the service, opposition and return dates, and then counsel will serve the OSC and supporting papers on the client. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07754-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
December 20, 2017 Filing 3307 MOTION to Transfer Case . Document filed by Amber Denny, Brian S. denny. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:17-cv-09613-CS(Ohaneson, Theora)
December 20, 2017 Filing 3306 MOTION for Anthony D. Irpino and Louise C. Higgins to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Tania Paz Acosta.(Irpino, Anthony)
December 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3305 ORDER granting (3304) Motion for Theora Ohaneson to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:17-cv-09613-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
December 20, 2017 Filing 3304 AMENDED MOTION for Theora Ohaneson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Amber Denny, Brian S. denny. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Certificate, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:17-cv-09613-CS(Ohaneson, Theora)
December 20, 2017 Filing 3303 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Theora Ohaneson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-14495750. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Amber Denny, Brian S. denny. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Certificate, #3 Affidavit Certificate, #4 Affidavit Certificate)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:17-cv-09613-CS(Ohaneson, Theora) Modified on 12/20/2017 (bcu).
December 20, 2017 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (40 in 7:17-cv-09613-CS, 3304 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) AMENDED MOTION for Theora Ohaneson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:17-cv-09613-CS(bcu)
December 20, 2017 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. (39 in 7:17-cv-09613-CS, 3303 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Theora Ohaneson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-14495750. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Proposed Order;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:17-cv-09613-CS(bcu)
December 13, 2017 Filing 3302 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-178)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/13/2017) (sjo)
December 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3319 ORDER NO. 32 (Cases Transferred to MDL During Appeal) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: CASES TRANSFERRED TO MDL DURING APPEAL. This Order shall apply to cases transferred to this Court after the Court's Opinion and Order dated July 28, 2016, granting summary judgment to Defendants in all cases pending in MDL No. 2434 ("Summary Judgment Order"). Plaintiffs whose claims are transferred to MDL 2434 while the Second Circuit appeal of the Summary Judgment Order is pending shall be conditionally dismissed without prejudice pending the Second Circuit's decision on the appeal. If the Second Circuit affirms the Court's Summary Judgment Order in its entirety, and any further petition for rehearing or certiorari is unsuccessful and the decision becomes final, Plaintiffs whose claims were conditionally dismissed shall have 60 days to show cause as to why her claim should not be dismissed with prejudice under the Summary Judgment Order. Defendants may respond within 30 days. The Court will dismiss with prejudice the claims of any Plaintiff who does not file a show-cause brief within 60 days or who is unable to show cause as to why her claim should not be dismissed. If the Second Circuit reverses the Summary Judgment Order in whole or in part, and any further petition for rehearing or certiorari is unsuccessful and the decision reversing the Summary Judgment Order becomes final, then the Court will enter an order reinstating the claims of the Plaintiffs whose claims were conditionally dismissed without prejudice. Defendants agree that the original filing date of those claims would govern for statute of limitations purposes if Plaintiffs' claims are reinstated in the MDL. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/10/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(ama)
December 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3301 ORDER of USCA (Certified Copy) as to (20 in 7:15-cv-01783-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-02067-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-01765-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-01110-CS, 3257 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 20 in 7:15-cv-02068-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-07562-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-01116-CS) Notice of Appeal, filed by Jionnis Lewis, Marlena Mudd, Stefanie Lynn Kinnell, Kayla Cubie, Xonda Lahoe, Corina Norman, Lynnette Lynn-Horton. USCA Case Number 16-2378. By order dated September 14, 2016, the Court granted Appellants' motion to hold this appeal in abeyance and to suspend the briefing schedule pending the Court's determination of a related appeal in 2d Cir. Docket No. 16-2890(L), In re Mirena Products Liability Litigation. The appeal in 16-2890(L) was determined on October 24, 2017. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this appeal is lifted out of abeyance. Appellants principal brief and the joint appendix are due January 17, 2018.Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Certified: 12/08/2017. (nd)
December 5, 2017 Filing 3300 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Indiana and Missouri, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/5/2017) (sjo)
December 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3299 ORDER granting #3298 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Defendants' Notice of Taxation of Costs: Defendants may have until 3/1/18 to file their notice of taxation of costs. (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
November 30, 2017 Filing 3298 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Defendants' Notice for Taxation of Costs. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
November 14, 2017 Filing 3297 MANDATE of USCA (Certified Copy) as to #3273 Notice of Appeal by Mirena MDL Plaintiffs. USCA Case Number 16-3012-cv(con). Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Issued As Mandate: 11/14/2017. (nd)
October 19, 2017 Filing 3296 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-177) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/16/2017) (sjo)
September 11, 2017 Filing 3295 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-176) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New York, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 09/08/2017) (sjo)
August 10, 2017 Filing 3294 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (3293 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Letter, filed by Matthew J. McCauley. ENDORSEMENT: Matthew J. McCauley is terminated as counsel in Nos. 13-CV-2434 and 13-MC-2434. With respect to the Notice of Entry of Appearance on behalf of Ms. Muhlstock, attached to Doc. 3293, Ms. Muhlstock must re-file her Notice of Entry of Appearance as a separate docket entry because she is appearing on behalf of all Plaintiffs. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/10/2017) (mml)
August 9, 2017 Filing 3293 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Matthew J. McCauley, Esq. dated August 9, 2017 re: Request for ECF removal. Document filed by Matthew J. McCauley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Entry of Appearance on behalf of Melanie H. Muhlstock, Esq.)(Muhlstock, Melanie)
August 7, 2017 Filing 3292 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Missouri, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 8/2/2017) (sjo)
July 14, 2017 Filing 3291 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-173)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Massachusetts, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/14/2017) (sjo)
July 11, 2017 Filing 3290 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-172) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/10/2017) (sjo)
May 31, 2017 Filing 3289 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... (Transfer Order)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Illinois, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/30/2017) (sjo)
May 12, 2017 Filing 3288 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-171) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/12/2017) (sjo)
April 10, 2017 Filing 3287 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-170) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Massachusetts, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/6/2017) (sjo)
March 20, 2017 Filing 3286 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-168) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Iowa, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/14/2017) (sjo)
February 8, 2017 Filing 3285 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-167) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Massachusetts, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 02/07/2017) (sjo)
January 24, 2017 Filing 3284 MDL TRANSFER ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO TRANSFER FROM THE MDL PANEL... the time for filing a response has passed, and no opposition to the motion has been filed. It appears that this action involves questions of fact in common with the actions previously transferred to the Southern District of New York and that the criteria for transfer of this action under 28 U.S.C. 1407 are otherwise satisfied. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/23/2017) (sjo)
December 9, 2016 Filing 3283 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL CTO-166 transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Louisiana, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/07/2016) (sjo)
November 18, 2016 Filing 3282 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-165)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/16/2016) (sjo)
November 18, 2016 Filing 3281 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-164)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New Jersey, New York and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/14/2016) (sjo)
November 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3280 ORDER. For the reasons stated on the record in open court on November 2, 2016, MDL No. 2434 should be reopened. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to docket this order in 13-MD-2434 and 13-MC-2434. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/15/16) (yv)
November 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3279 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: CASES TRANSFERRED TO MDL DURING APPEAL (ORDER No. 32) re: (225 in 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS) Memorandum & Opinion. This Order shall apply to cases transferred to this Court after the Court's Opinion and Order dated July 28, 2016, granting summary judgment to Defendants in all cases pending in MDL No. 2434 ("Summary Judgment Order"). On August 19, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal of the Summary Judgment Order. That appeal is currently pending in the Second Circuit. It is hereby ordered that: a. Plaintiffs whose claims are transferred to MDL 2434 while the Second Circuit appeal of the Summary Judgment Order is pending shall be conditionally dismissed without prejudice pending the Second Circuit's decision on the appeal. b. If the Second Circuit affirms the Court's Summary Judgment Order in its entirety, and any further petition for rehearing or certiorari is unsuccessful and the decision becomes final, Plaintiffs whose claims were conditionally dismissed shall have 60 days to show cause as to why her claim should not be dismissed with prejudice under the Summary Judgment Order. Defendants may respond within 30 days. The Court will dismiss with prejudice the claims of any Plaintiff who does not file a show-cause brief within 60 days or who is unable to show cause as to why her claim should not be dismissed. c. If the Second Circuit reverses the Summary Judgment Order in whole or in part, and any further petition for rehearing or certiorari is unsuccessful and the decision reversing the Summary Judgment Order becomes final, then the Court will enter an order reinstating the claims of the Plaintiffs whose claims were conditionally dismissed without prejudice. Defendants agree that the original filing date of those claims would govern for statute of limitations purposes if Plaintiffs' claims are reinstated in the MDL. IT IS SO ORDERED., (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/10/16) (yv) Modified on 11/15/2016 (yv).
November 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3278 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from David P. Matthews dated 10/28/16 re: malpractice claim pending in the 55th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas before Judge Jeff Shadwick. ENDORSEMENT: Phone conference to be held on December 2, 2016. Mr. Matthews and or Bayer attorney shall participate. Bayer shall state its position and reasoning, by letter of no more than 3 pages, 3 business days in advance. The Clerk shall docket this letter in 13-md-2434 and 13-mc-2434. So Ordered., (Telephone Conference set for 12/2/2016 at 02:45 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/1/16) (yv)
November 1, 2016 Filing 3277 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel dated 11/1/2016 re: #3275 LETTER MOTION to Reopen Case and/or schedule a conference addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Defendants Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, and Bayer Pharma AG dated 10/20/16. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Steering Committee. (Johnson, Michael)
October 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3276 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting in part and denying in part #3275 Letter Motion to Reopen Case. ENDORSEMENT: Phone conference to be held on 11/2/16 at 11:30 am. Plaintiffs' leadership is to state Plaintiffs' position, by letter of no more than 3 pages, by 10/31/16. Ms. Cook should confer with Plaintiff's leadership and advise the Court regarding whether we should use the call-in system or, if there will only be a few lawyers participating, whether the Court should call Ms. Cook who can then patch in Plaintiffs' counsel. Because it will be a phone conference on the record, there be no more than two, and preferably one, lawyer speaking for each side. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to docket this endorsement in 13-MD-2434 and 13-MC-2434. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/27/16) (yv)
October 27, 2016 Set/Reset Hearings: Telephone Conference set for 11/2/2016 at 11:30 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. (yv)
October 20, 2016 Filing 3275 LETTER MOTION to Reopen Case and/or schedule a conference addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Defendants Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, and Bayer Pharma AG dated 10/20/16. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Cook, Shayna)
September 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3274 ORDER of USCA (Certified Copy) as to #3238 Notice of Appeal, filed by Dena Simons, #3273 Notice of Appeal., #3257 Notice of Appeal, filed by Marlena Mudd, Corina Norman, Xonda Lahoe, Lynnette Lynn-Horton, Kayla Cubie, Stefanie Lynn Kinnell, Jionnis Lewis. USCA Case Number 16-2378. Appellants filed a motion to hold this appeal in abeyance and to suspend the briefing schedule pending the Court's resolution of a related appeal in 2d Cir. Docket No. 16-2890(L), In re Mirena Products Liability Litigation. Appellees do not oppose the motion. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Certified: 09/14/2016. (nd)
August 19, 2016 Filing 3273 NOTICE OF APPEAL from #3271 Clerk's Judgment, #3270 Memorandum & Opinion,, #3073 Memorandum & Opinion,,,,,,,,,,,,. Document filed by LEEANNE ACCETTURO, Amber Abeare, Mindy J. Abercrombie, Tiffany Abernathy, Lisa Abrams, Crystal Abraro, Berlinda Acosta, Tania Paz Acosta, Amy Adams, Kelli Adams, Violet Adams, Amber D. Adkins, Shawna Adkins, Ahou Gladys Adou, Brittany Agerton, Jeannette Akers, Heba Al-Khafaji, Ali Al-Krafaji, Dianna Aleman, Dwan Alexander, Geneva Alexander, Myra M Alexander, Shannon Alexander, Cherie Allen, Deshamonique Allen, Donniesha Allen, Mitch G. Allen, Susan Allen, Tara Allen, Shelly Allison, Nicole Almeida, Mena Altaira, Angel Alvarez, Giovanna A. Alvarez, Marlena Alvarez, Shelby Ameling, Aneesah Anani, Ashton Anderson, Byron Anderson, Katie Anderson, Kimberly Anderson, Laporsche M. Anderson, Melissa Anderson, Terionne Anderson, Samantha Anding, Claudia Andrade, Felicia Andrews, Jamie L. Andrews, Cheryl Annarelli, Baindu Ansu, Rebecca Arafa, Sulma Arandi, Natasha Archer, Amanda Armas, Jaime Armijo, Kami Armstrong, Luke Armstrong, Terri Armstrong, Tonisha Armstrong, Latasha Arnold, Sara Arterburn, Dawn Artis, Donavon Arvie, Ronshelle Arvie, James Ary, Summer Ary, Shermaine Asby, Jennifer Ashbeck, Destiny Asher, Amber Aston, Benjamin Atwell, Jenelle Atwell, Dianne Avalos, Tatika Avery, Leeann Avila, Ulises Baca Almanza, Brianna Backer, Maison Bacque-Alexander, Nicole Bacque-Alexander, Samantha Badger, Sara E. Bahat, Brent William Bailey, Marcia Bailey, Danielle Bailey, Jamia Bair, Aquilla Baker, Erica Baker, Tabitha Balderrama, Priscilla Baldwin, Staci Balice, Kira Balius, Tawanda S Ball, Jessica T Balogh, Shannon Balthazor, Denecia Banks, Jami A. Barber, Alisha Barclay, Megan Barker, Sara Barker, Kenzie Barlow, Toriana Donkaye Barnes, Stephanie Denise Barnett, Ashley Barr-Maino, Marciela Barrera, Peggy Susanne Barrett, Diana Barron, LaTanya Barron, Elisha Barrows, Stephanie Barta, Amber R. Barton, Pamela Basden, Kymberlee Bateni, Alyshia Battiest, Megean Bauer, Justin Baugh, Kelli Baugh, Allysa Baxley, Regina Bearyman, Katie Beaty, Melissa Beauprez, Breanne Beck, Sarah W Beck, Niki Becker, Christina Bell, Stacy Bell, Amalia Beltran, Melissa Benjamin, Angela Benson, Janice Benson, Krystal N Bentley, Delsa Bere, Heather Jo Bernardy, Mikaela Berry, Lisa Berumen, Natalie Best, Ashley Beverly, Julie Biffle, Kelly Biondo, Emily Birse, Natasha Bjugan, Jennifer Black, Katherine Black, Jodie Blackburn, Tomekia S. Blackmon, Amanda Blair, Yvonia Blaize, Heather R. Blocker, Ashlee D'Jan Blodgett, Nicole Bloor, Yolanda Blue, Tiffany Blundell, Pauline Bocalan, Angela Boeske, Tara Bohannon, Jami Bolton, Ashley Bonanno, Danielle Bone, Theresa Ann Bonet, Kimberly Amanda Boog, Joyce Booth, Dorena Borders, Danielle Borek, Josie Borelli, Shawna Borrowman, Carly Boudreaux, Kenna C Bounds, Tiffany Bounds, Samantha Bourget, Chantell Boutte, Shonita Boyce, Aisha Boykin, Unity Boyle, Stasia Boyles, Marcia Boynton, Scott Boynton, Sheila Bradshaw, Amanda Bradway, Silvia Brashier, Magan Brawner, Kristina Brazell, Ashley Brewer, Patricia Brewer, Kenya Briggs, Jennifer Briskey, Justin Briskey, Sherry Broadwater, Allison Michelle Broussard, Angela Brown, Ashley Brown, Corey Brown, David Brown, Jessica Brown, Kenyetta Brown, Larissa Brown, Morran Brown, Stefanie Brown, Tamara Brown, Toddella Brown, Zabrinah Brown, Stephanie Bruggeman, Lisa P. Bryant, Natasha Bryant, Seneatria Bryant, Antonique Buchanan, Sonia Buenrostro, Nelly Bulkin, Shelley Bunting, Wade Bunting, Alexis Burdette, Natalia Burga, James Burks, Laquasha Burks, Brandie Burns, Lori Burns, Megan Burrell, Emily Burrus, Susan M. Burtis, Jalyssa Burton, Rebecca Burton, Lisa Bustin, Candace Butler, Heather Buys-Weiler, Alicia Byington, Janine Byrd, Carey Byrne, Melissa Cabral, Angela Cahoy, Tammy Calamari, Myesha Yvette Calhoun, Ana Camacho, LaToya Campbell, Nicole Campbell, Stephanie Campbell, Lashaunta Candys, Yessica Cano, Laura Canseco, Bernice Cantrell, Joseph Capaldo, Samantha Capaldo, Ebony Carey, Tami Carlaw, Kerri Carmen, Ola Cheyenne Carney, Kasinda Carpenter, Trinity Carrico, Hope Carson, Kara Carter, Malia Carter, Melissa N. Carter, Tabitha K. Carter, Jessica R. Caruthers, Brittany Casey, Karla Cassady, Cristina Castillo, Mayra Castillo, Ninfa Castillo, Karah Aliene Caudle, Sarina Cervantes, Jodie Chaney, Shelly Chapman, Tanee Chappell, Courtney Chase, Gerlin Munoz Chavarria, Amy Chee, Alexandria Chelone, Melissa Cherry, Cynthia Childers, Paola Choute, Kevin Chow, Shelley Chow, Susan Chruszcyzyk, Maegan Rene Clark, Nicholas Clark, Rody Clark, Tracy A Clark, Tracy Clark, Kalaki Clarke, Kenneth Clarke, Dayanara Claxton, Hayley Cleckler, Ashley Clement, Christina Cleveland, Brianna Cobb, Angie S. Cochran, April Cochran, Armendia Cochran, Ashley Cochran, Jordan Cochran, Bridget Cole, Eva Cole, Mitchell Cole, Channelle Coleman, Delina Coleman, Talvata Collier, Tiffany Collins, Melinda Colon, Shelby Comtois, Travis Comtois, Aileen Concepcion, Athena Condich, Kati-An Cook, Kelly J. Cook, Kylie K. Cook, Stephanie Cook, Jennifer Cook-Hoots, Kimberly Cooke, Brittany Cool, Renee Cooley, Emily Cooper, Faun R. Cope, Jillian Copeland, Robin Corbello, Kathryn Cordell, Ray Cordero, Stephanie Corley, Jillian M Corrao, July Cortez, Kathleen Cosmas, Katelyn Costanza, Martha E Cota, Brandon Couvillion, Leanndra Couvillion, Dawn Marie Covert, Heather Coville, Crystal Cox, Jessica Cox, Kristen Nicole Cox, Rita Coyner, Dimeshia Craig, Melissa Nicole Craig, Lindsay Crain, Kevin Crawford, Shelisha Crawford, Zella N Cray, Summer Creekmore, Kristina Marie Crisel, Lauren Ann Crocker, Shannon Crockett, Whitney Cross, Meia Crow, Ashley Crowley, Melanie Crumpton, Carolyn Crusha, Kiara Cruz, Miriam Cruz, Kayla Cubie, Doris Cummins, Gina M. Cunningham, Rebecca Curran, Tiffany Currie, Tara Custer, Carolyn Cutler, Jeff Dangar, Natalie Dangar, Kelly L. Daniel, Lewis B. Daniel, Chasity Daniels, Yolanda Daniels, Jennifer Danley, Bonnie Lynne Danner, Katey Daughtery, Denielle Davenport, Tatum Davignon, Anzata Davis, Ashley Davis, Bradley Davis, Ebony C. Davis, Gladis Davis, Jessica Davis, June Davis, Karen L. Davis, Kari R Davis, Lashawn Marie Davis, Mandy Davis, Maria Davis, Marvetta T. Davis, Melissa Louise Davis, Michael Davis, Robert Davis, Shaunte Davis, Rachael Davis-Shouse, Chelsey Day, Carlos De Los Santos, Jenny De Los Santos, Annesley DeGaris, Julie Deal, Teresa Dees, Chelsea DelPape, Tammy Delaughter, Daphne Delee, Ashley Delespin, Laura Delgadillo, Christina Delgado, Roberta Delloyd, Veronica Delrio, Raquel Demorest, Lisa Dempsey, Amy Demrovsky, Michelle M. Denison, Karlie Denton, Jillian Depaola, Elizabeth Derouen, Amanda L. Devaux, Stephanie Devocht, Nell Dewey, Sara Ann Dewolf, Ishani Dias, Sasha Diehl, Keren Dimas, Anh Dinh, Vivian Dinis, Candice Ditalia, Caitlyn Dixon, Nicole Dobbs, Rachel Dollins, Carmen Dominguez, Danielle Dominie, Kristie B. Donovan, Jennifer G Donoway, Nicole Dorsey, Sylvie Dosseh, Christin H. Downs, Matt Downs, Brittany Dowsett, Krista Doxey, Jonathan Doyle, Jr, Michelle Dragon, Tracey Dragon, Christina Drake, Deena D. Driscoll, Devon Druckenmiller, George Druckenmiller, Jerilyn Dudley, Kacie Dugas, Marcella Dukes, Felicia Duncan, Carrie Dunlap, Brandon Dunn, Tanya Dunn, Staci Durbala, Brandie Duryea, Claudette Eaton, Tiffany Dawn Eaton, Kimberly Edmondson, Candace Edwards, Constance Edwards, George Edwards, Letitia Edwards, Amy Edwards, Janell Egloff, Rachel Lynn Eilenstine, Adam Ejnik, Erin Ejnik, Michele Eland, Anita Eleby, Amanda M. Elkins, Angela Ellingsworth, Briana Elliott, Alicia Ellis, Jasmin Ellis, Britney Ellison, Nicole Ellison, Ashley Elms, Rachel Elsey, Julie Elson, Philip Elson, Tamara Embler, Ronda Emmrich, Danielle Eni, Taylor Erickson, Dawn Ervin, Carol Erwin, Denise Esparza, Candace Espinoza, Marylyn Espinoza, Michael Esposito, Shannon Esposito, Gwendolyn Essary, Joseph Estes, Lisa Estes, Stacie Estey, Sheila Estrada, Rakia Esver, Kendra Evans, Yvette Ezell, Melissa Fadel, Dennis Falcon, Sara Falcon, Brandi Falls, Noelle Fanjoy, Kristin Fanning, Emily Fauntleroy, Kimberly Fay, Shanitriss Feaster, Yasmen Featherstone, Amy Fedor, Stacey Feliciano, Amy Fennell, Melissa Fenwick, Amanda Ferguson, Amy Ferguson, Evanna Ferguson, Virchus Ferguson, April Ferrao, Carolyn Ferrara, Angelica Ferretiz, Robin Fetterolf, Shannon Fewell, Rebecca Fife, Kristen Filicko, Nanci Fils-Aime, Rebecca Fisher, Nicole Fitzgerald, Rachel Fitzgerald, Vanessa Flathers, Ashley Fleming, Carey Flint, Meghan Flores, Jencenta Fomeche, Tavonda Ford, Rebecca Foret, Amber Foster, Cody Foster(an individual, personally), Cody Foster(as next friend of RF, a minor child), Deborah Wooten Foster, Jessica Fountaine, Amber Fowler, Stacy Fowler, Alexis Foyt, Alexis Foyt(an individual), Lorrie Frakes, Debbie Francis, Michelle Francis, Brianna Franklin-Spey, Lucero Freedom, Anthony Freeze, Priscilla H Freeze, Ashleigh French, Jessica M. Freret, Lynne Frey, Karina Frias-Esparza, Ruchell Fucile, Candace Fuller, Hannah Fulmer, Gary Furner, Jessie Ann Furner, Kristy M. Gabbard, Robert M. Gabbard, Megan Gaddis, Lori Gahr, Antoinette Gaines, Emily Gaines, Kandace R. Galatas, Laura Galbreath, Pepper Gale, Wade Gale, Katherine Gallaher, Maria A. Galvan, Cecilia Gamez, Samara Gantt, Carmen Garcia(Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Ryan Cordero, Deceased Minor), Carmen Garcia, Esmerelda Garcia, Maitai Garcia, Maribel Garcia, Mary Katherine Garcia, Rebecca Garcia, Sandra Garcia, Sharai Patricia Garcia, Theresa M. Garcia, Stacey Gardiner, Jaclyn Gargulinski, Melissa May Garman, Samantha Berry Garner, Cinthia Garnica, Brandi Garrity, Monique L Garth, Kathleen Gary, Starla Garza, Dionicia Gerolaga, Jessica Giddens, Sandra Gideon, Megan Gilbert, Kendra Gilcrease-Broome, Leslie Gillis, Angela Gilman, Christina Giovanni, Megan Gisi, Tina Glaspie, Katrina Glass, Katie L Gobeli, Anita Goddard, David Goddard, Lilia Godinez, Jacquelyn Goetz-Moffitt, Kassandra Gomez, Rosy E Gomez, Selena Gomez-Munoz, Hayley Goncalves, Lourdes Gonzalez, Melanie Gonzalez, Natalie Gonzalez, Tiffany Gooch, Laurice Goodhue, Amber Goss, Robert Goss, Courtney Goulart, Dawnjai Grady, Agata Graham, Marie Grande, Shawn Grande, Timprince Graves, J
August 19, 2016 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: #3273 Notice of Appeal by Mirena Plaintiffs. (nd)
August 19, 2016 Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for #3273 Notice of Appeal filed by Mirena plaintiffs were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (nd)
August 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3272 ORDER of USCA (Certified Copy) as to (3238 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 29 in 7:15-cv-05276-CS) Notice of Appeal, filed by Dena Simons USCA Case Number 16-1961. Appellant filed an unopposed motion to stay the briefing schedule pending the final resolution of Appellee Bayer's Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment in the district court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Pending the final resolution of the summary judgment motion in the district court, Appellant must provide a written status update to the Court every 30 days. Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, Clerk USCA for the Second Circuit. Certified: 08/10/2016. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(nd)
July 29, 2016 Terminate Transcript Deadlines (tro)
July 29, 2016 Filing 3271 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated July 28, 2016, Defendants' Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; 13-MD-2434, 13-MC-2434 and remaining member cases in this MDL are closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 7/29/2016) (tro) Modified on 8/2/2016 (tro). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/2/2016: #1 Right to Appeal part 1, #2 Right to Appeal part 2) (tro).
July 28, 2016 ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 3269 OPINION & ORDER as duplicative of #3270 . The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (tro)
July 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3270 OPINION & ORDER re: (3172 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. Defendants' Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions, (13-MD-2434 Doc. 3172; 13-MC-2434 Doc. 215), and enter judgment in and close all remaining member cases in this MDL. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/28/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(tro)
July 26, 2016 Filing 3268 NOTICE OF CANCELLATION OF CONFERENCE: The conference scheduled before this Court for August 2, 2016 is cancelled.The Next Status Conference set for 9/6/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel. (yv)
July 26, 2016 Filing 3267 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Steve Faries dated July 26, 2016 re: Resignation from the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
July 18, 2016 Filing 3266 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (3250 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 29- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Samantha Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Affidavit of Service PFS and Certified Mailing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01375-CS(Johnson, Michael)
July 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3265 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (4 in 16-cv-721) Motion to Vacate. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. For the reasons stated above, the Order dismissing Plaintiff Dawn Badger's case without prejudice, (13-md-2434 Doc. 3255; 16-cv-721 Doc. 3), is hereby VACATED as to Plaintiff Badger. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion at 16-cv-721 Doc. 4. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/15/16) (yv) Modified on 8/17/2016 (yv).
July 15, 2016 USCA Appeal Fees received $ 505.00 receipt number 465407013276 on 7/15/16 re: #3257 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jionnis Lewis, Marlena Mudd, Stefanie Lynn Kinnell, Kayla Cubie, Xonda Lahoe, Corina Norman, Lynnette Lynn-Horton. (yv)
July 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3264 ORDER granting #3263 Motion for Michael Patrick Kella to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 7, 2016 Filing 3263 MOTION for Michael Patrick Kella to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12509112. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brianna Backer. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kella, Michael)
July 7, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #3263 MOTION for Michael Patrick Kella to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12509112. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
July 6, 2016 Filing 3262 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Plaintiffs Sur-Reply in Opposition to Defendant Bayers Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Kekatos, Diogenes)
July 6, 2016 Filing 3261 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated July 6, 2016 re: submission of plaintiff's sur-reply papers in further opposition to defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
July 6, 2016 Filing 3260 DECLARATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Opposition re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 36, #2 Exhibit 37)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
July 6, 2016 Filing 3259 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Plaintiffs Local Rule 56.1(B) Sur-Response to Defendants Statement of Additional Facts Submitted in Support of Defendants Reply. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Kekatos, Diogenes)
July 6, 2016 Filing 3258 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY (See #3262 Reply) - REPLY AFFIRMATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Opposition re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Kekatos, Diogenes) Modified on 7/7/2016 (db).
July 6, 2016 Appeal Fee Due: for (20 in 7:15-cv-01783-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-02067-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-01765-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-01110-CS, 3257 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 20 in 7:15-cv-02068-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-07562-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-01116-CS) Notice of Appeal. Appeal fee due by 7/20/2016. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (tp)
July 6, 2016 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: (20 in 7:15-cv-01783-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-02067-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-01765-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-01110-CS, 3257 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 20 in 7:15-cv-02068-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-07562-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-01116-CS) Notice of Appeal. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (tp)
July 6, 2016 Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for (20 in 7:15-cv-01783-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-02067-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-01765-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-01110-CS, 3257 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 20 in 7:15-cv-02068-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-07562-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-01116-CS) Notice of Appeal, filed by Jionnis Lewis, Marlena Mudd, Stefanie Lynn Kinnell, Kayla Cubie, Xonda Lahoe, Corina Norman, Lynnette Lynn-Horton were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (tp)
July 5, 2016 Filing 3257 NOTICE OF APPEAL from (3225 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order,,,. Document filed by Kayla Cubie, Xonda Lahoe, Lynnette Lynn-Horton, Stefanie Lynn Kinnell, Jionnis Lewis, Marlena Mudd, Corina Norman. Form C and Form D are due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Griffin, Keith)
July 5, 2016 Filing 3256 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-163) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/24/2016) (sjo)
June 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3255 Vacated as per Judges Order dated 07/15/2016 as to Plaintiff Dawn Badger, Doc. # 5 ORDER granting (3217) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("CMO") 7 and 7A, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") Containing All Core Criteria, (Doc. 3217), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet i.e. a Plaintiff Fact Sheet containing all core criteria or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order will be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and as further set forth in this Order and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 3217): So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/30/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03800-CS, 7:16-cv-00721-CS, 7:16-cv-00876-CS (yv) Modified on 7/15/2016 (yv).
June 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3254 ORDER granting (3216) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 3216), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and as further set forth in this Order and terminate Defendants' Motion, (Doc. 3216): So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/30/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-10059-CS, 7:15-cv-10060-CS, 7:15-cv-10061-CS (yv)
June 30, 2016 Filing 3253 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated June 30, 2016 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 3216, 3217). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
June 30, 2016 Filing 3252 EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
June 30, 2016 Filing 3251 MOTION to Dismiss No. 20, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
June 30, 2016 Filing 3250 MOTION to Dismiss No. 29- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
June 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3249 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #3248 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. Although the Court doesn't see the need for a sur-reply because no new issues were raised in Defendants' reply papers, in light of the importance of this motion, Plaintiffs may submit a sur-reply, not more than 5 pages, by July 6, 2016. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/29/16) (yv)
June 23, 2016 Filing 3248 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File sur-reply to summary judgment motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated 6/23/2016. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
June 22, 2016 Filing 3247 DECLARATION of Shayna S. Cook in Support re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 30, #2 Exhibit 31, #3 Exhibit 32, #4 Exhibit 33, #5 Exhibit 34, #6 Exhibit 35, #7 Exhibit 36, #8 Exhibit 37)(Harrington, William)
June 22, 2016 Filing 3246 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment . DEFENDANTS REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AND OPPOSING STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL MATERIAL FACTS. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
June 22, 2016 Filing 3245 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment . . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
June 22, 2016 Filing 3241 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lawrence L. Jones, II on behalf of Sheila Estrada. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-04701-CS(Jones, Lawrence)
June 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3244 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (DE#9 in Case No. 7:16-CV-3458(CS)) FIRST LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Letter Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Sarah J. Showard dated June 21, 2016. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk shall effectuate this request. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/21/2016) (lnl)
June 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3243 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (DE#15 in Case No. 7:15-CV-5441(CS)) FIRST LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Letter Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Sarah J. Showard dated June 21, 2016. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk shall effectuate this request. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/21/2016) (lnl)
June 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3242 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (DE#23 in case No. 7:14-cv-9330(CS)) FIRST LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Letter Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Sarah J. Showard dated June 21, 2016. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk shall effectuate this request. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/21/2016) (lnl)
June 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3240 ORDER APPOINTING NEW CO-LEAD COUNSEL AND NEW MEMBER OF PLAINTIFFS' STEERING COMMITTEE, PENDING BEFORE THIS COURT are three matters. The first is the requested resignation of Matthew J. McCauley as Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel in light of his forthcoming departure from the law firm of Parker Waichman LLP ("Parker Waichman"). The second and third are the nominations, by Plaintiffs' remaining Co-Lead Counsel (James R. Ronca and Fred R. Thompson) and Liaison Counsel (Diogenes P. Kekatos), with the unanimous support of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee ("PSC"), of Michael K. Johnson of the law firm of Johnson Becker PLLC, who is currently a member of the PSC, for appointment as Mr. McCauley's replacement as Co-Lead Counsel, and of Melanie H. Muhlstock of Parker Waichman to be appointed to assume Mr. Johnson's seat on the PSC. Having considered the applications, the Court hereby accepts Mr. McCauley's resignation, appoints Mr. Johnson to replace him as Co-Lead Counsel, and appoints Ms. Muhlstock to replace Mr. Johnson on the PSC. SO ORDERED. (Attorney Michael K. Johnson for Brittany Agerton,Michael K. Johnson for Nicole Almeida,Michael K. Johnson for James Ary,Michael K. Johnson for Summer Ary,Michael K. Johnson for Kelli Baugh,Michael K. Johnson for Angela Benson,Michael K. Johnson for Shelley Chow,Michael K. Johnson for Kalaki Clarke,Michael K. Johnson for Kelly L. Daniel,Michael K. Johnson for Lewis B. Daniel,Michael K. Johnson for Danielle Dominie,Michael K. Johnson for Kristie B. Donovan,Michael K. Johnson for Jonathan Doyle, Jr,Michael K. Johnson for Janell Egloff,Michael K. Johnson for Brianna Franklin-Spey,Michael K. Johnson for Amber Goss,Michael K. Johnson for Robert Goss,Michael K. Johnson for Peggy Green,Michael K. Johnson for Tiffany Gregg,Michael K. Johnson for Cassie Halton,Michael K. Johnson for Brooklyn G. Jones,Michael K. Johnson for Melissa Jones,Michael K. Johnson for Melissa Jones,Michael K. Johnson for Margarita S. Krncevic,Michael K. Johnson for Raymond Krncevic,Michael K. Johnson for Gina Lafata,Michael K. Johnson for Leah Laskan,Michael K. Johnson for Adam McLaughlin,Michael K. Johnson for Kymbra M. McLaughlin,Michael K. Johnson for Jonathan Miller,Michael K. Johnson for Sheena Montano-Padilla,Michael K. Johnson for Sylvia Montes,Michael K. Johnson for Shaniqua E. Murphy,Michael K. Johnson for Brandie Peets,Michael K. Johnson for Kevin Peets,Michael K. Johnson for Tricia Prendergast,Michael K. Johnson for Melissa Price,Michael K. Johnson for Evelyn Ramirez,Michael K. Johnson for Michaela Ramsey,Michael K. Johnson for Shaquayla Reynolds,Michael K. Johnson for McKenna Ripple,Michael K. Johnson for Toyana Robinson,Michael K. Johnson for Marina Schoeberl,Michael K. Johnson for Benjamin Shipp,Michael K. Johnson for Brandy Shipp,Michael K. Johnson for Nathan Smith,Michael K. Johnson for Olivia Smith,Michael K. Johnson for Brandon Sweet,Michael K. Johnson for Kara Sweet,Michael K. Johnson for Amanda Thompson,Michael K. Johnson for Jennifer Vezina,Michael K. Johnson for Ghiselle Watson,Michael K. Johnson for Minyonna P. Watson,Michael K. Johnson for Corina Weimann,Michael K. Johnson for Jamie Lynn Wells,Michael K. Johnson for Melody Williams,Michael K. Johnson for Ronail Williams,Michael K. Johnson for Jennifer S. Wilson,Michael K. Johnson for Tiffany M Yarborough added. Attorney Matthew J. McCauley and Matthew Joseph McCauley terminated.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/20/16) (yv)
June 17, 2016 Filing 3239 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Donna M. Di Donato to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Natalys E Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Massachusetts, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - RI, #3 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-02881-CS(Chabot, Douglas) Modified on 6/17/2016 (sdi).
June 17, 2016 Appeal Record Sent to USCA (Electronic File). Certified Indexed record on Appeal Electronic Files for (3238 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 29 in 7:15-cv-05276-CS) Notice of Appeal, filed by Dena Simons were transmitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS. (tp)
June 17, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #3239 MOTION for Donna M. Di Donato to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): expired Certificate of Good Standing from Commonwealth of Massachusetts;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (sdi)
June 17, 2016 Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Certified Copy of Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re: (29 in 7:15-cv-05276-CS, 3238 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Notice of Appeal. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS. (tp)
June 16, 2016 Filing 3238 NOTICE OF APPEAL from (3210 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 3210 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Vacate, Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,,,,. Document filed by Dena Simons. Filing fee $ 505.00, receipt number 0208-12431160. Form C and Form D are due within 14 days to the Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(Luke, Robert)
June 16, 2016 Filing 3237 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-162) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/16/2016) (sjo)
June 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3236 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Amber McDaniel, hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/10/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05009-CS(yv)
June 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3235 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Misty Martin, hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/10/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05000-CS(yv)
June 10, 2016 Filing 3234 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (3216 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 28- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Jessica Stiwinter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service PFS and Certified Mailing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-00598-CS(Johnson, Michael)
June 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3233 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Amanda Madril, hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/10/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04983-CS(yv)
June 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3232 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a), Plaintiff, Erica Johnson, hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/10/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04964-CS(yv)
June 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3231 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Shannon Alvord-Fewell, hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/10/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04943-CS(yv)
June 9, 2016 **** Per chambers instructions Document #3226 was deleted.****. (sjo)
June 8, 2016 Filing 3230 DECLARATION of Dion Kekatos in Opposition re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-2, #2 Exhibit Exhibits 3-9, #3 Exhibit Exhibits 10-12, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 13-15, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 16-18, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 19-20, #7 Exhibit Exhibits 21-35)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
June 8, 2016 Filing 3229 RESPONSE to Motion re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Letter to Judge Seibel. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Kekatos, Diogenes)
June 8, 2016 Filing 3228 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Pursuant to Rule 56.1. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Kekatos, Diogenes)
June 8, 2016 Filing 3227 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment . . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Kekatos, Diogenes)
June 7, 2016 Filing 3224 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Donna M. Di Donato to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12386540. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Natalys E Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Massachusetts, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Rhode Island)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-02881-CS(Chabot, Douglas) Modified on 6/7/2016 (bcu).
June 7, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. (3224 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 10 in 7:16-cv-02881-CS) MOTION for Donna M. Di Donato to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12386540. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): expired Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Rhode Island;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-02881-CS(bcu)
June 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3225 ORDER re: (3161 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria, filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("CMO") 7 and 7A, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") Containing All Core Criteria, (Doc. 3161), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 3161), and close the cases as further set forth in this Order. An entry of judgment is not required. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/6/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(yv)
June 2, 2016 Set/Reset Hearings: Status Conference set for 8/2/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 9/6/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 10/4/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 11/15/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel. (yv)
June 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3223 Order No. 30 (SCHEDULING ORDER): The status conference scheduled for June 7, 2016 is adjourned. Status conferences will be held on the following dates: (1) August 2, 2016; (2) September 6, 2016; (3) October 4, 2016; (4) November 15, 2016; (5) December 13, 2016. All conferences will be held at 3:00 P.M. Eastern Standard Time. SO ORDERED. (Status Conference set for 12/13/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/2/16) (yv)
June 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3222 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #3221 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment . (Responses due by 6/8/2016. Replies due by 6/22/2016.) ENDORSEMENT: Application GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Opposition is due by June 8, 2016 and Defendants' Reply is due by June 22, 2016. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/1/16) (yv)
June 1, 2016 Filing 3221 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated June 1, 2016. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
June 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3220 ORDER granting (3160) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice, (Doc. 3160), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 3160), and close the cases as further set forth in this Order. An entry of judgment is not required. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/1/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05588-CS, 7:15-cv-06674-CS (yv)
June 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3219 ORDER granting (3159) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice, (Doc. 3159), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table as further set forth in this Order. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table as further set forth in this Order have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table as further set forth in this Order and terminate Defendants' Motion, (Doc. 3159). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/1/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (yv)
May 31, 2016 Filing 3218 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated May 31, 2016 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 3159, 3160, 3161). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
May 31, 2016 Filing 3217 MOTION to Dismiss No. 11- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
May 31, 2016 Filing 3216 MOTION to Dismiss No. 28- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
May 27, 2016 Filing 3215 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lane C. Siesky on behalf of Kyle A. Taylor, Melissa K. Taylor. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01992-CS(Siesky, Lane)
May 27, 2016 Filing 3214 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Karolina Viehe on behalf of Kyle A. Taylor, Melissa K. Taylor. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01992-CS(Viehe, Karolina)
May 26, 2016 Filing 3213 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #3161 SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I, #2 Exhibit II, #3 Exhibit III, #4 Exhibit IV, #5 Exhibit V, #6 Exhibit VI, #7 Exhibit VII, #8 Exhibit VIII, #9 Exhibit IX, #10 Exhibit X, #11 Exhibit XI, #12 Exhibit XII, #13 Exhibit XIII, #14 Exhibit XIV, #15 Exhibit XV, #16 Exhibit XVI, #17 Exhibit XVII, #18 Exhibit XVIII, #19 Exhibit XIX, #20 Exhibit XX, #21 Exhibit XXI, #22 Exhibit XXII)(Harrington, William)
May 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3212 ORDER granting (3211) Motion for Douglas E. Chabot to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-02881-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
May 19, 2016 Filing 3211 MOTION for Douglas E. Chabot to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12321840. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Natalys E Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit RI Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit MA - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-02881-CS(Chabot, Douglas)
May 19, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (7 in 7:16-cv-02881-CS, 3211 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Douglas E. Chabot to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12321840. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-02881-CS(bcu)
May 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3210 ORDER denying (3139) Motion to Vacate; granting (3161) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; denying (18) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-05276-CS. Accordingly, because Plaintiff did not serve a substantially completed PFS within 90 days from the Court's Order dismissing her case without prejudice, Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate, (13-MD-2434, Doc. 3139; 15-CV-5276, Doc. 18), is hereby DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's case with prejudice, (Doc. 3161), is hereby GRANTED as to the above-captioned Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the case in the caption, to terminate the pending motions at 15-CV-5276, Doc. 18 and 13-MD-2434, Doc. 3139, and to close No. 15-CV-5276. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/18/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS. (mml)
May 17, 2016 Filing 3209 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Patrick Doyle on behalf of Amanda Thompson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03560-CS(Doyle, Michael)
May 16, 2016 Filing 3208 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a conference proceeding held on 02/09/2016 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(Staten, Mary)
May 16, 2016 Filing 3207 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: conference held on 2/9/2016 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Mary Staten, (914) 390-4027. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 6/9/2016. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/20/2016. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/18/2016.(Staten, Mary)
May 16, 2016 Filing 3206 REPLY to Response to Motion re: (2795 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Dena Simons. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(Luke, Robert)
May 12, 2016 Filing 3204 FILING ERROR - DUPLICATE DOCUMENT - DECLARATION of Keith D. Griffin in Opposition re: (3161 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria.. Document filed by Kayla Cubie, Xonda Lahoe, Lynnette Lynn-Horton, Stefanie Lynn Kinnell, Jionnis Lewis, Marlena Mudd, Corina Norman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff Lahoe's deficiency submission (part 1), #2 Exhibit Plaintiff Lahoe's deficiency submission (part 2), #3 Exhibit Plaintiff Lewis' PFS submission (part 1), #4 Exhibit Plaintiff Lewis' PFS submission (part 2), #5 Exhibit Plaintiff Lynn-Horton's PFS submission (part 1), #6 Exhibit Plaintiff Lynn-Horton's PFS submission (part 2), #7 Exhibit Plaintiff Lynn-Horton's PFS submission (part 3), #8 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 4 (Plaintiff Cubie's authorizations), #10 Exhibit Exhibit 4 (Plaintiff Kinnell's authorizations), #11 Exhibit Exhibit 4 (Plaintiff Lahoe's authorizations), #12 Exhibit Exhibit 4 (Plaintiff Lynn-Horton's authorizations), #13 Exhibit Exhibit 4 (Plaintiff Mudd's authorizations), #14 Exhibit Exhibit 4 (Plaintiff Norman's authorizations- part 1), #15 Exhibit Exhibit 4 (Plaintiff Norman's authorizations- part 2))Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Griffin, Keith) Modified on 5/12/2016 (db).
May 12, 2016 Filing 3203 DECLARATION of Keith D. Griffin in Opposition re: (3161 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria.. Document filed by Kayla Cubie, Xonda Lahoe, Lynnette Lynn-Horton, Stefanie Lynn Kinnell, Jionnis Lewis, Marlena Mudd, Corina Norman. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Plaintiff Cubie's deficiency cure), #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Plaintiff Kinell's deficiency cure), #4 Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Plaintiff Mudd's deficiency cure), #5 Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Plaintiff Norman's deficiency cure))Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Griffin, Keith)
May 12, 2016 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY THAT THE ATTEMPTED FILING OF Document No. (3204, 17, 20, 20, 18, 18, 20, 18) HAS BEEN REJECTED. THIS IS A DUPLICATED DOCUMENT. Note to Attorney Keith David Griffin : This is a Duplicate Document. Do Not Re-File. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(db)
May 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3205 ORDER granting (2885) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order ("CMO") 22A, and for the reasons stated on the record in court on May 3, 2016, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Vanhook v. Bayer (14-CV-980), (13-MD-2434 Doc. 2885; 14-CV-980 Doc. 39), is hereby GRANTED with respect to all claims. The Court previously dismissed Plaintiff's products liability claims, (see 13-MD-2434 Docs. 3169, 3192), and gave Plaintiff an opportunity to oppose Defendants' motion to dismiss her breach of warranty, fraud and punitive damages claims by letter on or before May 10, 2016. Plaintiff has not submitted any opposition. Accordingly, all claims in the above-captioned case are hereby dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to Vanhook v. Bayer (14-CV-980), terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434 Doc. 2885 and 14-CV-980 Doc. 39, and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/11/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00980-CS (yv)
May 11, 2016 Filing 3202 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (3161 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Kayla Cubie, Xonda Lahoe, Lynnette Lynn-Horton, Stefanie Lynn Kinnell, Jionnis Lewis, Marlena Mudd, Corina Norman. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Griffin, Keith)
May 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3201 ORDER granting #3198 Motion for Lane C. Siesky to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3200 ORDER granting #3197 Motion for Karolina Viehe to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3199 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting (3179) Motion to Vacate (16 in 7:15-cv-07546-CS, 3110 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (17) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-07546-CS. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. For the reasons stated above, the Order dismissing Plaintiff Sandra Naurek's case without prejudice, (13-md-2434 Doc. 3110; 15-cv-7546 Doc. 16), is hereby VACATED as to Plaintiff Naurek. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434 Doc. 3179 and 15-cv-7546 Doc. 17. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/11/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-07546-CS (yv)
May 11, 2016 Filing 3198 MOTION for Lane C. Siesky to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12288272. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kyle A. Taylor, Melissa K. Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - IN, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - IL, #3 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01992-CS(Siesky, Lane)
May 11, 2016 Filing 3197 MOTION for Karolina Viehe to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12288083. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kyle A. Taylor, Melissa K. Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - IN, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01992-CS(Viehe, Karolina)
May 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3196 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (3194 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 25 in 7:15-cv-05276-CS) Letter filed by Dena Simons, (Replies due by 5/16/2016.) ENDORSEMENT: Application denied. The Court instructed Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Reply because Plaintiff raised many new issues in the Reply that were not discussed in the original Motion to Vacate. Plaintiff may respond by 5/16/16 if she so desires. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/11/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(yv)
May 11, 2016 Filing 3195 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-161) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arkansas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/11/2016) (sjo)
May 11, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (3197 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 9 in 7:16-cv-01992-CS) MOTION for Karolina Viehe to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12288083. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., (3198 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 10 in 7:16-cv-01992-CS) MOTION for Lane C. Siesky to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12288272. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01992-CS(wb)
May 10, 2016 Filing 3194 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Robert Luke dated 05/10/16 re: Request to Strike Defendants Sur-Reply (Doc 3177). Document filed by Dena Simons.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(Luke, Robert)
May 10, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3193 SUGGESTION OF REMAND: Pursuant to CMO 22A, and for the reasons stated on the record in court on May 3, 2016, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Valdez v. Bayer (14-CV-1479) was granted with respect to claims alleging design defect and strict liability, (13-MD-2434 Doc. 3192; 14-CV-1479 Doc. 64). These claims were dismissed with prejudice. The only remaining potential claims in the above-captioned case are not properly part of this multi-district litigation, as they do not relate to perforation, migration or embedment of the Mirena device. Accordingly, the Court suggests that this action be remanded to the Northern District of Texas so that Plaintiff may pursue any other claim if she so chooses. This suggestion of remand applies only to the above-captioned case, Valdez v. Bayer (14-CV-1479). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to serve a copy of this Suggestion of Remand upon the Clerk of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/10/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01479-CS(yv)
May 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3192 AMENDED ORDER re: (63 in 7:14-cv-01479-CS, 63 in 7:14-cv-01479-CS, 63 in 7:14-cv-01479-CS, 63 in 7:14-cv-01479-CS, 63 in 7:14-cv-01479-CS, 63 in 7:14-cv-01479-CS, 63 in 7:14-cv-01479-CS, 43 in 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 43 in 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 43 in 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 43 in 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 43 in 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 43 in 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 43 in 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-03833-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-03833-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-03833-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-03833-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-03833-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-03833-CS, 20 in 7:15-cv-03833-CS, 15 in 7:15-cv-03830-CS, 15 in 7:15-cv-03830-CS, 15 in 7:15-cv-03830-CS, 15 in 7:15-cv-03830-CS, 15 in 7:15-cv-03830-CS, 15 in 7:15-cv-03830-CS, 15 in 7:15-cv-03830-CS, 3169 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 3169 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 3169 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 3169 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 3169 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 3169 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 3169 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,. This Order hereby amends the Court's May 3, 2016 Order relating to the above-captioned cases, (13-MD-2434 Doc. 3169; 15-CV-3830 Doc. 15; 15-CV-3833 Doc. 20; 14-CV-1479 Doc. 63; 14-CV-980 Doc. 43). Pursuant to Case Management Order ("CMO") 22A, and for the reasons stated on the record in court on May 3, 2016, Defendants Motions to Dismiss Pena v. Bayer (15-CV-3830), (13-MD-2434 Doc. 2875; 15-CV-3830 Doc. 9), and Twitty v. Bayer (15-CV-3833), (13-MD-2434 Doc. 2883; 15-CV-3833 Doc. 14), are hereby GRANTED. Pursuant to CMO 22A, and for the reasons stated on the record in court on May 3, 2016, Defendants Motion to Dismiss Valdez v. Bayer (14-CV-1479), (13-MD-2434 Doc. 2884; 14-CV-1479 Doc. 59), is hereby GRANTED with respect to claims alleging design defect and strict liability. These claims are dismissed with prejudice. Pursuant to CMO 22A, and for the reasons stated on the record in court on May 3, 2016, Defendants Motion to Dismiss Vanhook v. Bayer (14-CV-980), (13-MD-2434 Doc. 2885; 14-CV-980 Doc. 39), is hereby GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's products liability claims. If Plaintiff wishes to oppose Defendants' motion to dismiss her breach of warranty, fraud and punitive damages claims, Plaintiff may submit a letter, not more than 3 pages, by May 10, 2016 explaining why those causes of action should not be dismissed. Defendants can reply by May 17, 2016.The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close Pena v. Bayer (15-CV-3830) and Twitty v. Bayer (15-CV-3833). The Clerk of Court is also respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434 Docs. 2875, 2883, 15-CV-3830 Doc. 9 and 15-CV-3833 Doc. 14. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to Valdez v. Bayer (14-CV-1479) and terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434 Doc. 2884 and 14-CV-1479 Doc. 59. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to Vanhook v. Bayer (14-CV-980). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/9/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 7:14-cv-01479-CS, 7:15-cv-03830-CS, 7:15-cv-03833-CS(yv) Modified on 5/10/2016 (yv).
May 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3191 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #3141 Response to Motion filed by Ashley Heger. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. For the reasons stated above, the Order dismissing Plaintiff Ashley Heger's case without prejudice, (13-md-2434 Doc. 3110; 15-cv-6467 Doc. 13), is hereby VACATED as to Plaintiff Heger. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion at 15-cv-6447 Doc, 14. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/9/16) (yv)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3190 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09513-CS(Harrington, William)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3189 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Oy.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08811-CS(Harrington, William)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3188 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Oy, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06456-CS(Harrington, William)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3187 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Oy, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09472-CS(Harrington, William)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3186 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Incorporated, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00104-CS(Harrington, William)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3185 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08628-CS(Harrington, William)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3184 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05207-CS(Harrington, William)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3183 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00509-CS(Harrington, William)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3182 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Oy, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06094-CS(Harrington, William)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3181 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00542-CS(Harrington, William)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3180 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05767-CS(Harrington, William)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3179 MOTION to Vacate (3110 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, . Document filed by Sandra Naurek. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Certificate of Service)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-07546-CS(Regan, Michael)
May 9, 2016 Filing 3178 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-160) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Arizona and Arkansas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/9/2016) (sjo)
May 6, 2016 Filing 3177 REPLY to Response to Motion re: (18 in 7:15-cv-05276-CS, 3139 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Vacate (2925 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, 2795. BAYERS SUR-REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO VACATE COURT ORDER NUMBER 2795 [sic] DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND REQUEST FOR ORAL HEARING. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(Harrington, William)
May 5, 2016 Filing 3176 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Mark Anthony Cox on behalf of Destiny Asher. New Address: Law Office of Mark A. Cox, PLLC, 15401 N. May Ave, Suite 400, Edmond, Oklahoma, USA 73013, 4052855444. (Cox, Mark)
May 4, 2016 Filing 3175 DECLARATION of Shayna S. Cook in Support re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29)(Harrington, William)
May 4, 2016 Filing 3174 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment . . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
May 4, 2016 Filing 3173 RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
May 4, 2016 Filing 3172 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William) Modified on 8/1/2016 (tro).
May 4, 2016 Filing 3171 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Robert Luke dated May 4, 2016 re: SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. (Doc 3161). Document filed by Dena Simons.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(Luke, Robert)
May 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3170 MEMO ENDORSEMENT denying as moot (3168) Motion to Vacate (2809 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. ENDORSEMENT: Application DENIED as moot. On April 26, 2016, the Court denied this Motion to Vacate. (Doc. 3154.) Because Plaintiff has filed this motion on May 2, 2016, the Court questions whether counsel has read the Court's April 26 Order. In that order, the Court directed counsel to send copies of the Order to the plaintiffs whose cases were dismissed. (See Doc. 3154, at 4.) Counsel is now further directed to certify by letter to the Court by May 6, 2016 that counsel has reviewed the Court's April 26 Order and provide evidence of service of the April 26 Order to the four plaintiffs whose cases were dismissed. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/3/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-09767-CS (yv)
May 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3169 ORDER granting (2875) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2883) Motion to Dismiss; terminating (2884) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (39) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:14-cv-00980-CS; terminating (59) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:14-cv-01479-CS; granting (9) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:15-cv-03830-CS; granting (14) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:15-cv-03833-CS. Pursuant to Case Management Order ("CMO") 22A, and for the reasons stated on therecord in court on May 3, 2016, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Pena v. Bayer (15-CV-3830),(13-MD-2434 Doc. 2875; 15-CV-3830 Doc. 9), and Twitty v. Bayer (15-CV-3833), (13-MD-2434 Doc. 2883; 15-CV-3833 Doc. 14), are hereby GRANTED. Pursuant to CMO 22A, and for the reasons stated on the record in court on May 3, 2016, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Valdez v. Bayer (14-CV-1479) is hereby GRANTED with respect to claims alleging design defect and strict liability. These claims are dismissed with prejudice. Further, this case is hereby remanded to the Northern District of Texas if Plaintiff wishes to pursue a claim that is not barred by the statute of limitations. Pursuant to CMO 22A, and for the reasons stated on the record in court on May 3, 2016, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Vanhook v. Bayer (14-CV-980) is hereby GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's products liability claims. If Plaintiff wishes to oppose Defendants' motion to dismiss her breach of warranty, fraud and punitive damages claims, Plaintiff may submit a letter, not more than 3 pages, by May 10, 2016 explaining why those causes of action should not be dismissed. Defendants can reply by May 17, 2016. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close Pena v. Bayer (15-CV-3830) and Twitty v. Bayer (15-CV-3833). The Clerk of Court is also respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434 Docs. 2875, 2883, 15-CV-3830 Doc. 9 and 15-CV-3833 Doc. 14. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to Valdez v. Bayer (14-CV-1479), terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434 Doc. 2884 and 14-CV-1479 Doc. 59, and remand the case to the Northern District of Texas. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to Vanhook v. Bayer (14-CV-980). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/3/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 7:14-cv-01479-CS, 7:15-cv-03830-CS, 7:15-cv-03833-CS (yv)
May 2, 2016 Filing 3168 MOTION to Vacate Court Order [Doc.No. 2809 in 13-MD-2434] Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Elizabeth Stouder.(Melidonian, Lina)
May 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3167 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #3164 Letter Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted, although the Court is not sure why Defendants will need 55 pages for their multi-state survey because the Court imagines the law is the same in many jurisdictions. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434, Doc. 3164 and 13-mc-2434, Doc. 213. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/2/16) (yv)
May 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3166 ORDER granting (3103) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("CMO") 7 and 7A, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") Containing All Core Criteria, (Doc. 3103), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiff as further set forth in this Order. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiff as further set forth in this Order has 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet i.e. a Plaintiff Fact Sheet containing all core criteria or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiff has not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order will be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to spread this Order to the case in the caption and as further set forth in this Order and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 3103): So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/2/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05446-CS (yv)
May 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3165 ORDER re: (3102 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 18, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 3102), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 3102), and close the cases as further set forth in this Order. An entry of judgment is not required. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/2/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(yv)
May 2, 2016 Filing 3164 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated 5-2-2016. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
May 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3163 ORDER granting (3101) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 (CMO 7), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 3101), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and as further set forth in this Order and terminate Defendants' Motion, (Doc. 3101): So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/2/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-08479-CS, 7:15-cv-08793-CS (yv)
April 29, 2016 Filing 3162 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated April 29, 2016 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 3101, 3102, 3103). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
April 29, 2016 Filing 3161 SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
April 29, 2016 Filing 3160 MOTION to Dismiss No. 19, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Harrington, William)
April 29, 2016 Filing 3159 MOTION to Dismiss No. 27- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
April 29, 2016 Filing 3158 RESPONSE in Support of Motion re: (18 in 7:15-cv-05276-CS, 3139 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Vacate (2925 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, 2795. and Reply to Defendants Motion in Opposition. Document filed by Dena Simons. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(Luke, Robert)
April 29, 2016 Filing 3157 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-159) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/29/2016) (sjo)
April 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3156 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (20 in 7:15-cv-05276-CS, 3155 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Vacate. ENDORSEMENT: This Order (13-md-2434, Doc. 3155; 15-cv-5276, Doc. 20), which was issued before Plaintiff had time to reply, is hereby VACATED and Plaintiff's motion to vacate, (13-md-2434, Doc. 3139; 15-cv-5276, Doc. 18), is reinstated. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/27/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(yv)
April 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3155 Vacated as per Judges Order dated 04/27/2016, Doc. #3156 ORDER denying (3139) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; denying (18) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-05276-CS. Accordingly, because Plaintiff did not serve a substantially completed PFS within 90 days from the Court's Order dismissing her case without prejudice, Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate, (13-MD-2434, Doc. 3139; 15-CV-5276, Doc. 18), is hereby DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the case in the caption and to terminate the pending motions at 15-CV-5276, Doc. 18 and 13-MD-2434, Doc. 3139. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/27/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS (yv) Modified on 4/28/2016 (yv).
April 27, 2016 Filing 3153 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-158) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida, Maryland and North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/27/2016) (sjo)
April 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3154 ORDER granting (3102) Motion to Dismiss; denying (3130) Motion to Vacate ; denying (3131) Motion to Vacate ; denying (3132) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; denying (3) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-09654-CS; denying (3) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-09767-CS; denying (3) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-09778-CS; denying (3) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-09786-CS. In accordance with CMO 7, because Plaintiffs did not serve completed PFS's within 90 days from the Court's Order dismissing their cases without prejudice, Plaintiffs Motions to Vacate, (15-CV-9654, Doc. 3; 15-CV-9767, Doc. 3; 15-CV-9778, Doc. 3; 15-CV-9786, Doc. 3; 13-MD-2434, Docs. 3130, 3131 and 3132), are hereby DENIED, and Defendants Motion to convert Plaintiffs' dismissals without prejudice into dismissals with prejudice, (Doc. 3102), is hereby GRANTED as to the above-captioned Plaintiffs. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, close these cases, and to terminate the pending motions at 15-CV-9654, Doc. 3; 15-CV-9767, Doc. 3; 15-CV-9778, Doc. 3; 15-CV-9786, Doc. 3; 13-MD-2434, Docs. 3130, 3131 and 3132. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/26/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-09654-CS, 7:15-cv-09767-CS, 7:15-cv-09778-CS, 7:15-cv-09786-CS (yv)
April 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3152 ORDER denying as moot (2762) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3151 ORDER denying as moot (2756) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 26, 2016 Filing 3150 NOTICE of COURT CONFERENCE: An oral ruling will be issued by the Hon. Cathy Seibel, U.S.D.J. on May 3, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. at the Charles L. Brieant United States Courthouse, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601, Courtroom 621. The parties may appear telephonically. (Oral ruling set for 5/3/2016 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel.)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 7:14-cv-01479-CS, 7:15-cv-03830-CS, 7:15-cv-03833-CS(yv)
April 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3149 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice and without costs or attorney's fees to any party, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/25/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(yv)
April 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3148 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice and without costs or attorney's fees to any party, pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/25/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(yv)
April 22, 2016 Filing 3147 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (18 in 7:15-cv-05276-CS, 3139 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Vacate (2925 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, 2795. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(Harrington, William)
April 22, 2016 Filing 3146 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG and without costs to either party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Christie L. Hayes.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Bess, Nathan)
April 22, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3145 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #3128 Letter requesting Stay of proceedings in the Second Disposition Pool cases, filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. ENDORSEMENT: Application GRANTED. For the reasons stated above, and in light of the fact that Defendants do not oppose, (see 13-md-2434, Doc. 3129), all proceedings for cases in the Second Disposition Pool ("SDP") are hereby stayed pending the resolution of Defendants' forthcoming omnibus summary judgment motion. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/21/16) (yv)
April 21, 2016 Filing 3144 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, With prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants and Without costs to either party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Jennifer Danley.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Childers, Charles)
April 20, 2016 Filing 3143 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-157) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida and Missouri, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/20/2016) (sjo)
April 20, 2016 Filing 3142 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG and without costs to either party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Christie L. Hayes.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
April 19, 2016 Filing 3141 RESPONSE to Motion re: #3047 NINTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Ashley Heger. (Yackulic, Corrie)
April 18, 2016 Filing 3140 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-156) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Jersey, Rhode Island and South Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/18/2016) (sjo)
April 15, 2016 Filing 3139 FIRST MOTION to Vacate (2925 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, 2795. Document filed by Dena Simons. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05276-CS(Luke, Robert) Modified on 4/28/2016 (yv).
April 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3138 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER terminating #2341 BAYER'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF ITS FIFTH MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT A PLAINTIFF FACT SHEET CONTAINING ALL CORE CRITERIA. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion at Doc. 2341. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/14/2016) (mml)
April 14, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3137 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO AND MOTION TO VACATE COURT ORDER NUMBER 2793 DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT A PLAINTIFF FACT SHEET. ENDORSEMENT: Application GRANTED. For the reasons stated above, the Order dismissing Plaintiff Janisse Sandidge's case without prejudice, (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2923; 15-CV-5653, Doc. 13), is hereby VACATED as to Plaintiff Sandidge. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/14/2016) (mml)
April 14, 2016 Filing 3136 NOTICE of Withdrawal re: #2341 FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
April 14, 2016 Filing 3135 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #3132 MOTION to Vacate Court Order [Doc.No. 2809 in 13-MD-2434] Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Harrington, William)
April 14, 2016 Filing 3134 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #3131 MOTION to Vacate Court Order [Doc.No. 2809 in 13-MD-2434] Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Harrington, William)
April 14, 2016 Filing 3133 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #3130 MOTION to Vacate Court Order [Doc.No. 2809 in 13-MD-2434] Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Harrington, William)
April 14, 2016 Pro Hac Vice Fee Not Required for #69 MOTION for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8493202. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. DUPLICATE PAYMENT. (dig)
April 13, 2016 Filing 3132 MOTION to Vacate Court Order [Doc.No. 2809 in 13-MD-2434] Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Jennifer Whittington.(Melidonian, Lina)
April 13, 2016 Filing 3131 MOTION to Vacate Court Order [Doc.No. 2809 in 13-MD-2434] Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Kimberly Stuckey.(Melidonian, Lina)
April 13, 2016 Filing 3130 MOTION to Vacate Court Order [Doc.No. 2809 in 13-MD-2434] Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Carenia Williams.(Melidonian, Lina)
April 12, 2016 Filing 3129 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated April 12, 2016 re: SDP Deadlines. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
April 12, 2016 Filing 3128 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated April 12, 2016 re: Stay of proceedings in the Second Disposition Pool cases. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
April 12, 2016 Filing 3127 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FILER ERROR -(SEE DOCUMENT #3130) MOTION to Vacate Court Order [Doc.No. 2809 in 13-MD-2434] Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Candace Williams.(Melidonian, Lina) Modified on 4/22/2016 (lb).
April 11, 2016 Filing 3126 RESPONSE to Motion re: #2793 MOTION to Dismiss No. 23- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Janisse Sandidge. (Strick, Lawrence)
April 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3125 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (3123) Motion to Vacate (2809 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 45 in 7:15-cv-05455-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated above, the Order dismissing Plaintiff Jessica Brown's case without prejudice, (13-md-2434, Doc. 2809; 15-cv-5455, Doc. 45), is hereby VACATED as to Plaintiff Brown. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion at 13-md-2434 Doc. 3123. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/8/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05455-CS (yv)
April 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3124 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (3122) Motion to Vacate (2809 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated above, the Order dismissing Plaintiff Jessica Johnson's case without prejudice, (13-md-2434, Doc. 2809), is hereby VACATED as to Plaintiff Johnson. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion at 13-md-2434 Doc. 3122. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/8/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-09780-CS (yv)
April 7, 2016 Filing 3123 MOTION to Vacate #2809 Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, . Document filed by Jessica Brown.(Melidonian, Lina)
April 7, 2016 Filing 3122 MOTION to Vacate #2809 Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, . Document filed by Jessica Johnson.(Melidonian, Lina)
April 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3121 ORDER granting #2102 Motion for Kevin M. Zielke to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
April 7, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2102 MOTION for Kevin M. Zielke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
April 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3120 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (1346) Motion to Dismiss Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Berlex Laboratories, Inc. and Berlex, Inc. ONLY. in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion at 13-md-2434 Doc. 1346. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/4/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04907-CS (yv)
April 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3119 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting (1102) Motion to Substitute Attorney. (Added attorney Dawn M. Chmielewski for Laura Galbreath,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Laura Galbreath,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Tamisin Hammond,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Gwendolyn Price,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Tamisin Hammond,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Gwendolyn Price. Attorney Charles Michael Bollinger terminated in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (29) Motion to Substitute Attorney. Added attorney Dawn M. Chmielewski for Laura Galbreath,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Laura Galbreath,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Tamisin Hammond,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Gwendolyn Price,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Tamisin Hammond,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Gwendolyn Price. Attorney Charles Michael Bollinger terminated in case 7:14-cv-00573-CS; granting (24) Motion to Substitute Attorney. Added attorney Dawn M. Chmielewski for Laura Galbreath,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Laura Galbreath,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Tamisin Hammond,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Gwendolyn Price,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Tamisin Hammond,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Gwendolyn Price. Attorney Charles Michael Bollinger terminated in case 7:14-cv-01853-CS; granting (22) Motion to Substitute Attorney. Added attorney Dawn M. Chmielewski for Laura Galbreath,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Laura Galbreath,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Tamisin Hammond,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Gwendolyn Price,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Tamisin Hammond,Dawn M. Chmielewski for Gwendolyn Price. Attorney Charles Michael Bollinger terminated in case 7:14-cv-03262-CS) ORDERED that Dawn M. Chmielewski be substituted as co-counsel of record for plaintiffs in the captioned matter in place of C. Michael Bollinger. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions: 13-md-2434 Doc. 1102, 14-cv-1853 Doc. 24, 14-cv-573, Doc. 29, 14-cv-3262 Doc. 22. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/4/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00573-CS, 7:14-cv-01853-CS, 7:14-cv-03262-CS (yv)
April 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3118 ORDER granting #3100 Motion for Randall Seth Crompton to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
April 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3117 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (2977 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 6 in 7:15-cv-06793-CS) Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Deshaaron Holmes. ENDORSEMENT: The Court's order dismissing Plaintiff Deshaaron Holmes' case without prejudice (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2809; 15-CV-6793, Doc. 5), is hereby VACATED as to Plaintif Holmes only because Plaintiff has produced a substantially completed PFS within the required 90-day period. Plaintiff's counsel is again reminded that once a case is dismissed without prejudice, counsel should file a motion to vacate and not a response to a motion that has already been decided. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/4/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06793-CS(yv)
April 4, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #3100 MOTION for Randall Seth Crompton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12119572. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
April 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3116 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (3056) Motion to Vacate (2809 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 5 in 7:15-cv-06767-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (8) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-06767-CS in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/1/16). ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated above, the Order dismissing Plaintiff Kymberlee Bateni's case without prejudice, (13-md-2434, Doc. 2809; 15-cv-6767, Doc. 5), is hereby VACATED as to Plaintiff Bateni only. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434 Doc. 3056 and 15-cv-6767 Doc. 8. So Ordered. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06767-CS (yv)
April 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3115 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (3058) Motion to Vacate (2809 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 5 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (9) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-06860-CS in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated above, the Order dismissing Plaintiff Sherry Lopez de Ricci's case without prejudice, (13-md-2434, Doc. 2809; 15-cv-6860, Doc. 5), is hereby VACATED, only as to Plaintiff de Ricci. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434 Doc. 3058 and 15-cv-6860 Doc. 9. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/1/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06860-CS (yv)
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3114 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (3094) Motion to Vacate (2923 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 8 in 7:15-cv-05655-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (9) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-05655-CS in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated below, the Order dismissing Plaintiff Autumn Hardy's case without prejudice, (13-md-2434, Doc. 2923; 15-cv-5655, Doc. 8), is hereby VACATED, only as to Plaintiff Hardy (15-cv-5655). The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434 Doc. 3094 and 15-cv-5655 Doc. 9. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/31/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05655-CS (yv) Modified on 4/1/2016 (yv).
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3113 PLAINTIFF AMANDA FERGUSON'S MOTION TO VACATE ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND TO REINSTATE CASE granting (3059) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (6) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-06790-CS. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated above, the Order dismissing Plaintiff Amanda Ferguson's case without prejudice, (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2809; 15-CV-6790, Doc. 5), is hereby VACATED, only as to Plaintiff Ferguson's case (15-CV-6790). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434 Doc. 2059 and 15-CV-6790 Doc. 6. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/31/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06790-CS (mml)
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3112 ORDER granting (3045) MOTION to Dismiss No. 25- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 3045), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion, (Doc. 3045). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/31/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-08176-CS, 7:15-cv-08179-CS (lnl)
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3111 ORDER granting (3046) MOTION to Dismiss No. 17, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 3046), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 3046), and close the cases in the table below. An entry of judgment is not required. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/31/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3110 Vacated as to Ashley Heger and Sandra Naurek as per Judges Orders dated 05/09/2016 and 05/11/2016, Doc. #15 and Doc. #18 ORDER granting (3047) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("CMO") 7 and 7A, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") Containing All Core Criteria, (Doc. 3047), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet - i.e. a Plaintiff Fact Sheet containing all core criteria - or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order will be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 3047). (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/31/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (mml) Modified on 5/10/2016 (yv). Modified on 5/11/2016 (yv).
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3109 ORDER granting (3107) Motion for Bradley M. Lakin to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-09619-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
March 31, 2016 Filing 3108 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated March 31, 2016 re: Revised Proposed Order on Bayer's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 3045). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
March 31, 2016 Filing 3107 MOTION for Bradley M. Lakin to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12128157. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jennifer Miller. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate Missouri, #3 Exhibit Certificate Illinois, #4 Exhibit Certificate Arizona)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-09619-CS(Lakin, Bradley)
March 31, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (122 in 7:15-cv-09619-CS, 3107 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Bradley M. Lakin to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12128157. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-09619-CS(wb)
March 30, 2016 Filing 3106 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated March 30, 2016 re: Response to Bayer's March 22, 2016 Letter. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
March 30, 2016 Filing 3105 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated March 30, 2016 re: Response to Plaintiffs' March 22, 2016 Letter. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Under Seal), #2 Exhibit B (Under Seal))Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05801-CS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Cook, Shayna)
March 30, 2016 Filing 3104 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated March 30, 2016 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 3045, 3046, 3047). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
March 30, 2016 Filing 3103 TENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
March 30, 2016 Filing 3102 MOTION to Dismiss No. 18, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Affidavit Affidavit of Service on pro se Plaintiff)(Harrington, William)
March 30, 2016 Filing 3101 MOTION to Dismiss No. 26- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
March 29, 2016 Filing 3100 MOTION for Randall Seth Crompton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12119572. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Nicholas Clark, Rody Clark. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - MO, #3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - IL)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01801-CS(Crompton, Randall)
March 28, 2016 Filing 3099 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-155) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/28/2016) (sjo)
March 25, 2016 Filing 3097 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (3045 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 25- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Tara Custer. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service PFS and Certified Mailing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-08029-CS(Johnson, Michael)
March 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3096 JOINT ORDER, On March 22, 2016, Plaintiffs and Defendants in the above-captioned litigations filed letters in the federal multi-district litigation (MDL), (13-MD-2434 Docs. 3087, 3088). These letters discussed the effect of the Federal Courts March 8, 2016 Daubert Opinion & Order, (13-MD-2434 Doc. 3073), on the pending motions for summary judgment in the Danley (13-CV-6586) and Hayes (14-CV-288) cases in the MDL and on the future of the MDL. The parties are hereby directed to respond to these letters, addressing the arguments set forth by the opposing party in no more than 3 pages, on or before March 30, 2016. The parties are currently scheduled to appear for a conference before Judge Seibel on April 5, 2016 at 3:00 p.m. The parties are directed to appear instead at 1:30 p.m. at the same location (Room 621 at 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, New York 10601) on April 5, 2016 for a joint settlement conference with Judge Seibel and Judge Martinotti. The attending parties must have full authority to discuss settlement. The parties should be available and prepared to continue the conference on April 6, 2016 if the discussion on April 5 is productive. Counsel shall submit an ex parte settlement statement of not more than 5 pages, on or before April 1, 2016. This statement shall address both liability and damages and shall (without prejudice) set forth the parameters for what they feel is a reasonable range for settlement, as well as their estimate of potential jury verdicts. These amounts will not, without express permission, be conveyed to the other party. So Ordered., (Settlement Conference set for 4/5/2016 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel and Judge Martinotti, J.S.C.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel and Judge Martinotti, J.S.C. on 3/24/16) (yv)
March 24, 2016 Filing 3095 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eric D. Holland on behalf of Nicholas Clark, Rody Clark. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01801-CS(Holland, Eric)
March 24, 2016 Filing 3094 MOTION to Vacate (2923 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, without Prejudice for Failure to Submit Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Autumn Hardy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Affidavit of Service PFS)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05655-CS(Johnson, Michael)
March 24, 2016 Filing 3093 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Casey Thurman, Linda A. Thurman. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - MO, #3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - IL, #4 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - MI)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01800-CS(Holland, Eric) Modified on 3/24/2016 (sdi).
March 24, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. (3093 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 8 in 7:16-cv-01800-CS) MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Duplicate filing. File the Motion for Pro Hac Vice only into the civil case.;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01800-CS(sdi)
March 24, 2016 **** Per chambers instructions Documents #2850, #2852 Exhibit 21, #2853 and #2855 Exhibit 21 were deleted.**** (sjo)
March 23, 2016 Filing 3092 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-154) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Connecticut, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/23/2016) (sjo)
March 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3091 ORDER granting (3090) Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01801-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
March 23, 2016 Filing 3090 MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice CORRECTED. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Nicholas Clark, Rody Clark. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - MO, #3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - IL, #4 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - MI)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01801-CS(Holland, Eric)
March 23, 2016 Filing 3089 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Nicholas Clark, Rody Clark. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - MO, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - IL, #3 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - MI)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01801-CS(Holland, Eric) Modified on 3/23/2016 (sdi).
March 23, 2016 Filing 3088 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated March 22, 2016 re: Daubert Ruling. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
March 23, 2016 Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment: for (8 in 7:16-cv-01801-CS) MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice CORRECTED. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12099537.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01801-CS(Holland, Eric)
March 23, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (3090 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 8 in 7:16-cv-01801-CS) MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice CORRECTED. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01801-CS(sdi)
March 23, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE re: Document No. #3089 MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Proposed Order; the filing fee was not paid;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order. Pay the filing fee using the event Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment found under the event list Other Documents. (sdi)
March 23, 2016 **** Per chambers instructions Document #3088 was deleted.**** (sjo)
March 22, 2016 Filing 3087 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated March 22, 2016 re: Daubert Impact. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Cook, Shayna)
March 21, 2016 Filing 3086 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-153)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New York and North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/21/2016) (sjo)
March 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3085 ORDER granting #3082 Motion for Annesley H. DeGaris to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3084 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT FROM RECORD....that Document No. [2978, 6] are stricken from the record., Motions terminated: (3061 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 11 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS) MOTION to Withdraw (2978 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 6 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS) Response in Opposition to Motion, . filed by Sherry Lopez De Ricci, (8 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS) MOTION to Withdraw (2978 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 6 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS) Response in Opposition to Motion, . filed by Sherry Lopez De Ricci. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. 13-md-2434 Doc. 2978 and 15-cv-6860 Doc. 6 are hereby stricken. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434 Doc. 3061 and 15-cv-6860 Docs. 8 and 11. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/15/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06860-CS(yv)
March 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3083 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT FROM RECORD....that Document No. (3040) is stricken from the record., Motions terminated: (7 in 7:15-cv-06767-CS, 3055 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Withdraw (3040 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Response in Opposition to Motion . filed by Kymberlee Bateni. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. 13-md-2434 Doc. 3040 and 15-cv-6767 are hereby stricken. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434 Doc. 3055 and 15-cv-6767 Doc. 7. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/15/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06767-CS(yv)
March 16, 2016 Filing 3082 MOTION for Annesley H. DeGaris to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Annesley DeGaris. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-00582-CS(DeGaris, Annesley)
March 16, 2016 Filing 3081 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for John Howard Robinson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12073953. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Ashton Anderson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Robinson, John) Modified on 3/16/2016 (bcu).
March 16, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #3081 MOTION for John Howard Robinson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-12073953. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Wyoming;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (bcu)
March 16, 2016 ***STRICKEN DOCUMENT. Deleted document number [2978, 6] from the case record. The document was stricken from this case pursuant to (3084 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 3084 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 12 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS, 12 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS) Order Striking Document from Record, Terminate Motions,. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06860-CS(yv)
March 16, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (10 in 7:16-cv-00582-CS, 3082 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Annesley H. DeGaris to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-00582-CS(bcu)
March 16, 2016 ***STRICKEN DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 3040 from the case record. The document was stricken from this case pursuant to #3083 Order Striking Document from Record, Terminate Motions,. (yv)
March 15, 2016 Filing 3080 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-152) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Connecticut and Indiana, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/15/2016) (sjo)
March 14, 2016 Filing 3079 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-151) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, Missouri and South Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/11/2016) (sjo)
March 10, 2016 Filing 3078 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Thomas Joseph Preuss on behalf of Ashley Wallace. (Preuss, Thomas)
March 9, 2016 Filing 3077 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Patricia N. Syverson on behalf of Andrea Penaflor. New Address: Bonnett Fairbourn Friedman & Balint, 600 West Broadway, Suite 900, San Diego, CA, USA 92101, 619-798-4593. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08715-CS(Syverson, Patricia)
March 9, 2016 Filing 3074 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-150) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Massachusetts and South Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/9/2016) (sjo)
March 8, 2016 Filing 3098 INTERNET CITATION NOTE: Material from decision with Internet citation re: #3073 Memorandum & Opinion. (Attachments: #1 Internet Citation, #2 Internet Citation) (vf)
March 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3073 OPINION & ORDER re: (49 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 2688 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF RICHARD STRASSBERG, M.D. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, (2694 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 48 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF ROGER C. YOUNG, M.D., PH.D. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, (57 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 2724 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dr. David Feigal. filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, (52 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 53 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 2705 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dena R. Hixon, M.D. filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, (2697 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF APRIL ZAMBELLI-WEINER, PH.D. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, (2685 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUZANNE PARISIAN, M.D. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, (2679 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF JOHN JARRELL, PH.D., P.E. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, (2702 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Preclude certain opinions of Michelle Collins, Ph.D., and Drs. Vanessa K. Dalton, Jay Goldberg, Steven Goldstein, Geri Hewitt, Marcia C. Javitt, and Michael Policar. filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, (2691 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUSAN WRAY, PH.D. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. Defendants' and Plaintiffs' motions are granted to the extent set forth above and otherwise denied. Specifically: Plaintiffs' Omnibus Motion to Exclude Defendants' Experts is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Young is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Jarrell is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Wray is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Strassberg is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Feigal is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Hixon is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Parisian is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Defendants' Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Dr. Zambelli-Weiner is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions (13-MD-2434 Docs. 2679, 2685, 2688, 2691, 2694, 2697, 2702, 2705 and 2724 and 13-MC-2434 Docs. 134, 140, 143, 146, 149 and 152). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/8/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(yv) . Modified on 3/8/2016 (yv).
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3076 STIPULATION EXTENDING BAYER DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER OR MOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT: It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the undersigned counsel for the respective parties that the Bayer defendants' time to answer or move with respect to the amended complaint is extended up and to March 15, 2016. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/7/16) (yv)
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3075 STIPULATION EXTENDING BAYER DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER OR MOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT: It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the undersigned counsel for the respective parties that the Bayer defendants' time to answer or move with respect to the amended complaint is extended up and to March 15, 2016. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/7/16) (yv)
March 7, 2016 Filing 3072 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated March 7, 2016 re: Response to Defendants' Letter re Plaintiff Danley's Deposition Designations. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3071 MEMO ENDORSEMENT in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (9) Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Amend in case 7:16-cv-00050-CS. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. Plaintiff may amend her complaint as described. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/7/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-00050-CS (yv)
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3070 STIPULATION EXTENDING BAYER DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER OR MOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT: It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the undersigned counsel for the respective parties that the Bayer defendants' time to answer or move with respect to the amended complaint is extended up and to March 15, 2016. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/7/16) (yv)
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3069 STIPULATION EXTENDING BAYER DEFENDANTS' TIME TO ANSWER OR MOVE WITH RESPECT TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT: It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the undersigned counsel for the respective parties that the Bayer defendants' time to answer or move with respect to the amended complaint is extended up and to March 15, 2016. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/7/16) (yv)
March 7, 2016 Filing 3068 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated March 7, 2016 re: Danley Deposition Designations. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Cook, Shayna)
March 4, 2016 Filing 3067 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated March 4, 2016 re: Defendants' SDP Trial Selections. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
March 4, 2016 Filing 3066 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated March 4, 2016 re: SDP Trial Selections. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3065 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Jack Landskroner dated 3/1/16 re: withdrawing as counsel of record for Plaintiff and to request removal from the service list. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk will please terminate Mr. Landskroner as counsel for Plaintiff in 16-cv-1334 and 13-md-2434. So Ordered., (Attorney Jack Landskroner terminated.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/2/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01334-CS(yv)
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3064 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2997) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to vacate the order dismissing the above-captioned case without prejudice (13-md-2434 Doc. 2925; 15-cv-5901 Doc. 12) with respect to Plaintiff Viktoriya Tymoshchuk and to reopen Plaintiff's case. The Clerk of Court is also respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion at 13-md-2434 Doc. 2997. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/3/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05901-CS (yv)
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3063 MEMO ENDORSEMENT in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (11) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-06676-CS. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to vacate the order dismissing the above-captioned case without prejudice (13-md-2434 Doc. 2923; 15-cv-6676 Doc. 10) with respect to Plaintiff Dianne Avalos and to reinstate Plaintiff's case. The Clerk of Court is also respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion at 15-cv-6676 Doc. 11. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/3/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06676-CS (yv)
March 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3062 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (3002) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (10) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-06679-CS. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to Vacate the Order dismissing the above-captioned case without prejudice (13-md-2434 Doc. 2923; 15-cv-6679 Doc. 10) with respect to Plaintiff Monique Lucero and to reinstate Plaintiff's case. The Clerk of Court is also respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434 Doc. 3002; 15-cv-6679 Doc. 10. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/3/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06679-CS (yv) Modified on 3/16/2016 (yv).
March 2, 2016 Filing 3061 MOTION to Withdraw (2978 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 6 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS) Response in Opposition to Motion, . Document filed by Sherry Lopez De Ricci. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06860-CS(Saba, Ryan)
March 2, 2016 Filing 3060 NOTICE of Errata re: (3057 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 8 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS) MOTION to Withdraw (2978 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 6 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS) Response in Opposition to Motion, .. Document filed by Sherry Lopez De Ricci. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06860-CS(Saba, Ryan)
March 2, 2016 Filing 3059 MOTION to Vacate (5 in 7:15-cv-06790-CS, 2809 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, . Document filed by Amanda Ferguson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06790-CS(Saba, Ryan)
March 2, 2016 Filing 3058 MOTION to Vacate (5 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS, 2809 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, . Document filed by Sherry Lopez De Ricci. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06860-CS(Saba, Ryan)
March 2, 2016 Filing 3057 MOTION to Withdraw (2978 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 6 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS) Response in Opposition to Motion, . Document filed by Sherry Lopez De Ricci. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06860-CS(Saba, Ryan) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
March 2, 2016 Filing 3056 MOTION to Vacate (2809 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 5 in 7:15-cv-06767-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, . Document filed by Kymberlee Bateni. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06767-CS(Saba, Ryan)
March 2, 2016 Filing 3055 MOTION to Withdraw (3040 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Response in Opposition to Motion . Document filed by Kymberlee Bateni. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06767-CS(Saba, Ryan)
March 2, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3054 ORDER granting #3032 Motion for Michael X. Imbroscio to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3053 ORDER granting (2972) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 (CMO 7), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2972), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 2972), and close the cases as further set forth in this Order. An entry of judgment is not required. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/1/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (yv)
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3052 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiffs, Marie Grande and Shawn Grande, hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/1/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09824-CS(yv)
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3051 ORDER granting (2973) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 (CMO 7), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2973), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiff as further set forth in this Order. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiff as further set forth in this Order has 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiff has not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the case in the caption and as further set forth in this Order and terminate Defendants' Motion, (Doc. 2973). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/1/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-07246-CS (yv)
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3050 ORDER re: (2974 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. Pursuant to Case Management Orders (CMO) 7 and 7A, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria, (Doc. 2974), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiff as further set forth in this Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to spread this Order to the case in the caption, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 2974), and close the case as further set forth in this Order. An entry of judgment is not required. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/1/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05702-CS(yv)
March 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3049 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on PLAINTIFFS MISTY LONG AND JOHN-PAUL LONG'S RESPONSE TO BAYER'S SIXTH MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT A PLAINTIFF FACT SHEET CONTAINING ALL CORE CRITERIA denying (2974) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. Based on the above, Defendants' motion to dismiss (13-md-2434 Doc. 2974) is denied with respect to the above-captioned plaintiffs. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to vacate the Order (13-md-2434 Doc. 2612; 14-cv-9034 Doc. 16) with respect to the above-captioned Plaintiffs. So Ordered (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/1/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09034-CS (yv)
March 1, 2016 Filing 3048 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated March 1, 2016 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2972, 2973, 2974). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
March 1, 2016 Filing 3047 NINTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
March 1, 2016 Filing 3046 MOTION to Dismiss No. 17, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
March 1, 2016 Filing 3045 MOTION to Dismiss No. 25- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
March 1, 2016 Filing 3044 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Appear ., MOTION for Annesley H. DeGaris to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Annesley DeGaris. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order for Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing Supreme Court of Alabama)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-00582-CS(DeGaris, Annesley) Modified on 3/1/2016 (wb).
March 1, 2016 Filing 3043 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated March 1, 2016 re: Second Disposition Pool. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
March 1, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #3032 AMENDED MOTION for Michael X. Imbroscio to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
March 1, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. (9 in 7:16-cv-00582-CS, 9 in 7:16-cv-00582-CS, 3044 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 3044 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Appear . MOTION for Annesley H. DeGaris to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the wrong event type was used to file the motion;. Re-file the motion using the event type Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice found under the event list Motions - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-00582-CS(wb)
February 29, 2016 Filing 3042 REPLY to Response to Motion re: (2713 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 22- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. re: Bateni v. Bayer, 15-cv-06767. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06767-CS(Harrington, William)
February 29, 2016 Filing 3041 REPLY to Response to Motion re: (2713 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 22- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. re: Lopez De Ricci v. Bayer, 15-cv-06860. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06860-CS(Harrington, William)
February 26, 2016 Filing 3040 ***STRICKEN DOCUMENT. Deleted document number 3040 from the case record. The document was stricken from this case pursuant to #3083 Order Striking Document from Record, Terminate Motions,. RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #2713 MOTION to Dismiss No. 22- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Kymberlee Bateni. (Saba, Ryan) Modified on 3/16/2016 (yv).
February 26, 2016 Filing 3039 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-149) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida and Missouri, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/25/2016) (sjo)
February 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3038 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a), Plaintiffs, Julie Cantor Miller and Jonathan Miller, hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/26/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-01168-CS(yv) Modified on 3/7/2016 (yv).
February 26, 2016 Filing 3037 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2973 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 24- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Amanda Richert. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service PFS and Certified Mailing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-07578-CS(Johnson, Michael)
February 25, 2016 Filing 3035 JOINT PRELIMINARY TRIAL REPORT. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
February 25, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3034 ORDER granting #3031 Motion for Paul. W. Schmidt to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
February 25, 2016 Filing 3032 AMENDED MOTION for Michael X. Imbroscio to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Imbroscio, Michael) Modified on 2/25/2016 (sdi). Modified on 2/26/2016 (sdi).
February 25, 2016 Filing 3031 AMENDED MOTION for Paul. W. Schmidt to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Schmidt, Paul)
February 25, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #3031 AMENDED MOTION for Paul. W. Schmidt to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
February 25, 2016 Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment: for #3032 AMENDED MOTION for Michael X. Imbroscio to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11998256.(Imbroscio, Michael)
February 24, 2016 Filing 3036 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from C. Andrew Childers dated 2/23/16 re: review of the CMOs entered in MDL 2434 and compliance with said Orders. Document filed by Jennifer Danley.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(yv) Modified on 2/26/2016 (yv).
February 24, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3033 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Renee Cooley, hereby dismisses the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/24/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04893-CS(yv)
February 24, 2016 Filing 3030 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Julie Cantor Miller, Jonathan Miller. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-01168-CS(McCauley, Matthew)
February 23, 2016 Filing 3029 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Renee Cooley. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04893-CS(McCauley, Matthew)
February 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3028 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (3025 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Letter filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. ENDORSEMENT: Based on the parties' submissions, it seems that Mr. McCauley (inadvertently or not) violated CMO 21 in his ex parte conversation with Dr. Archibald. It is hard to imagine what other conclusion can be drawn from Dr. Archibald's testimony that her understanding, based on conversation with Mr. McCauley, is that the "premise" of Plaintiff Miller's case is that the Mirena migrated after insertion and that the Mirena literature does not include that possibility as a risk. While it is fair game for Plaintiff's counsel to discuss the doctor's treatment of the Plaintiff, the doctor's views (if any) regarding when her patient's perforation or migration occurred, and her understanding of the Mirena warnings, it is not fair game to let the doctor know in advance that Plaintiff's counsel is taking the position in court that the patient suffered a post- insertion injury about which Defendant failed to warn. I do not believe, however, that there is a pattern of "woodshedding" violations that would justify requiring the requested certification from all counsel in the SDP, Hayes and Danley cases. I did not find that Mr. Childers violated CMO 21's "woodshedding" provision, and so widespread relief seems premature. I will, however, require that all Plaintiffs' counsel in the Miller case provide the requested certification as to Miller and, if they are counsel in Hayes, Danley or any SDP case, as to those cases as well. The certification shall be provided to Defendants' counsel by February 28, 2016. The Plaintiffs' leadership is directed to alert all Plaintiffs' counsel to the possibility that discovery of additional violations may result in the striking of cases from the IDP or SDP and/or modification of CMO 21. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to docket this endorsement in 13-CV-1168, 13-MD-2434, and 13-MC-2434. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/23/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-01168-CS(yv)
February 22, 2016 Filing 3027 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Matthew J. McCauley dated February 22, 2016 re: Response to Bayer's Letter regarding Order No. 21. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2. Confidential)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-01168-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
February 22, 2016 Filing 3026 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Annesley H. DeGaris to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11980632. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Annesley DeGaris. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-00582-CS(DeGaris, Annesley) Modified on 2/22/2016 (bcu).
February 22, 2016 Filing 3025 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 22, 2016 re: Violation of CMO 21. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Cook, Shayna)
February 22, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. (8 in 7:16-cv-00582-CS, 3026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Annesley H. DeGaris to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11980632. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Alabama;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-00582-CS(bcu)
February 19, 2016 Filing 3024 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-148) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Louisiana, Minnesota and Utah, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/19/2016) (sjo)
February 19, 2016 Filing 3023 MOTION for Rachel A. Sternlieb to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brett A Pike, Sheri Michelle Pike. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01144-CS(Sternlieb, Rachel) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
February 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3022 ORDER granting (3020) Motion for Irving J. Warshauer to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01144-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
February 19, 2016 Filing 3021 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Rachel A. Sternlieb to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11974476. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brett A Pike, Sheri Michelle Pike. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Louisiana Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01144-CS(Sternlieb, Rachel) Modified on 2/19/2016 (sdi).
February 19, 2016 Filing 3020 MOTION for Irving J. Warshauer to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11974179. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brett A Pike, Sheri Michelle Pike. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Louisiana Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01144-CS(Warshauer, Irving)
February 19, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (8 in 7:16-cv-01144-CS, 3020 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Irving J. Warshauer to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11974179. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:16-cv-01144-CS(wb)
February 19, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice Document No. 3021 belonging to case 14cv1144 that was incorrectly filed on 2/19/2016 in case 16cv1144 and assigned payment receipt number 0208-11974476. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the motion was filed in the wrong case... (sdi)
February 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3019 ORDER granting #2965 Motion for Sonila Themeli to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
February 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3018 ORDER granting #2961 Motion for Kenneth F. Baum to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
February 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3017 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) and the attached Authorization to Dismiss (Exh. "A"), Plaintiffs, Melissa Vinson and Robert Vinson, hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate all pending motions in the above-captioned case as well as the pending motion at Doc. 2886, 13-MD-2434. So Ordered. Motions terminated: (43 in 7:13-cv-09253-CS) MOTION for Carmen S. Scott to Withdraw as Attorney and Motley Rice LLC; Climaco, Wilcox, Peca, Tarantino & Garofoli, Co., L.P.A.; Neblett Beard & Arsenault; and Parker Waichman LLP. filed by Melissa Vinson, Robert Vinson, (42 in 7:13-cv-09253-CS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Vinson Per CMO 22A. filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, (2886 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Vinson Per CMO 22A. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, (45 in 7:13-cv-09253-CS) MOTION for Order to Show Cause . filed by Melissa Vinson, Robert Vinson. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/17/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-09253-CS(yv)
February 17, 2016 Filing 3016 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-147) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, colorado, minnesota, misissippi and New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/17/2016) (sjo)
February 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3015 ORDER granting #3013 Motion for Lyn P. Pruitt to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
February 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3014 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Jeffrey Goodman dated 2/16/16 re: Change of Email for MDL Notifications. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to effectuate the above request. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/16/16) (yv)
February 16, 2016 Filing 3013 MOTION for Lyn P. Pruitt to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11956114. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing for Caryl Lyn Pruitt, #2 Exhibit Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Pruitt, Caryl)
February 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3012 ORDER granting #3007 Motion for Brian J. Holmes to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
February 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3011 ORDER: Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close the member cases in the caption. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate all pending motions in the member cases in the caption, and to terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434, Docs. 2859, 2861, 2862, 2863, 2865, 2866, 2867, 2869, 2870, 2872, 2874, 2876, 2879, 2880, 2881, 2882. Entries of judgment are not required. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/16/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(yv)
February 16, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #3013 MOTION for Lyn P. Pruitt to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11956114. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
February 16, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #3007 MOTION for Brian J. Holmes to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11948490. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
February 12, 2016 Filing 3010 AMENDED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 12, 2016 re: Status of Letter Motions filed under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Cook, Shayna)
February 12, 2016 Filing 3009 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Melissa Vinson, Robert Vinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Auth to Dismiss)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-09253-CS(Scott, Carmen)
February 12, 2016 Filing 3008 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Filing re: (2979 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Order to Show Cause .. Document filed by Melissa Vinson, Robert Vinson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-09253-CS(Scott, Carmen)
February 11, 2016 Filing 3007 MOTION for Brian J. Holmes to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11948490. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Nicole Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Holmes, Brian)
February 11, 2016 Filing 3006 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 11, 2016 re: Status of defendants' letter motions filed under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Harrington, William)
February 11, 2016 Filing 3005 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 11, 2016 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-09253-CS(Harrington, William)
February 11, 2016 Filing 3004 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 11, 2016 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00980-CS(Harrington, William)
February 11, 2016 Filing 3003 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-146) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida, Kansas, Missouri, New Jersey and Ohio, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/11/2016) (sjo)
February 10, 2016 Filing 3002 MOTION to Vacate (2923 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, without Prejudice for Failure to Submit Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Monique Lucero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - PFS Affidavit of Service)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06679-CS(Johnson, Michael)
February 10, 2016 Filing 3000 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/3/2016) (sjo)
February 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 3001 ORDER granting (2953) Motion to Withdraw in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (9) Motion to Withdraw in case 7:15-cv-04114-CS. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that James D. Barger, Neil D. Overholtz, Nathan C. Bess and Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz, PLLC, are withdrawn as Plaintiff's attorneys of record. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/9/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04114-CS (yv) Modified on 2/24/2016 (yv).
February 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2999 ORDER granting #2998 Motion for Benjamin Walther to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
February 9, 2016 Filing 2998 MOTION for Benjamin Walther to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11935998. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Walther, Benjamin)
February 9, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2998 MOTION for Benjamin Walther to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11935998. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
February 8, 2016 Filing 2997 MOTION to Vacate #2925 Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, . Document filed by Viktoriya Tymoshchuk. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion to Vacate)(Bruera, Sofia)
February 8, 2016 Filing 2996 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 8, 2016 re: Second Disposition Pool. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
February 8, 2016 Filing 2995 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated February 8, 2016 re: Foreign Bayer Defendants. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
February 8, 2016 Filing 2994 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from C. Andrew Childers dated February 8, 2016 re: Response to Bayer's February 4, 2016 Letter. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
February 8, 2016 Filing 2993 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-145) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California and New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/5/2016) (sjo)
February 5, 2016 Filing 2992 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: (61 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) MOTION for Summary Judgment ., (2756 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 55, #2 Exhibit 56, #3 Exhibit 57, #4 Exhibit 58, #5 Exhibit 59, #6 Exhibit 60)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Harrington, William)
February 5, 2016 Filing 2991 AMENDED REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (61 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) MOTION for Summary Judgment ., (2756 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Summary Judgment . re: Danley v. Bayer, 13-cv-06586. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Harrington, William)
February 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2990 ORDER granting #2988 Motion for Timothy R. Holton to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
February 5, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2988 MOTION for Timothy R. Holton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11920761. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
February 4, 2016 Filing 2989 MOTION to Vacate #2923 Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, without Prejudice for Failure to Submit Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Dianne Avalos. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - PFS Affidavit of Service)(Johnson, Michael) Modified on 3/15/2016 (sjo).
February 4, 2016 Filing 2988 MOTION for Timothy R. Holton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11920761. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Morgan VanZile. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Holton, Timothy)
February 4, 2016 Filing 2987 REPLY to Response to Motion re: (2713 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 22- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. re: Holmes v. Bayer, 15-cv-06793. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06793-CS(Harrington, William)
February 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2986 ORDER granting (2984) Motion for Jeffrey L. Goodman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-08070-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
February 4, 2016 Filing 2985 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 4, 2016 re: Lee Deposition. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Filed Under Seal, #2 Exhibit Filed Under Seal, #3 Exhibit Jan. 25, 2016 RFPs to Danley, #4 Exhibit Filed Under Seal)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Cook, Shayna)
February 4, 2016 Filing 2984 FIRST MOTION for Jeffrey L. Goodman to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11917960. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Shelly Allison. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Illinois, #3 Exhibit Iowa, #4 Exhibit Kansas, #5 Exhibit Minnesota, #6 Exhibit Missouri, #7 Exhibit Nebraska, #8 Exhibit Wisconsin)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-08070-CS(Goodman, Jeffrey)
February 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2983 ORDER granting (2921) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 (CMO 7), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2921), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 2921), and close the cases as further set forth in this Order. An entry of judgment is not required. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/4/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00901-CS, 7:15-cv-01164-CS, 7:15-cv-01711-CS, 7:15-cv-01723-CS (yv)
February 4, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (2984 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 10 in 7:15-cv-08070-CS) FIRST MOTION for Jeffrey L. Goodman to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11917960. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-08070-CS(sdi)
February 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2982 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Counsels' Firms serve Plaintiffs Melissa Vinson and Robert Vinson with a copy of this Order and its attachment on or before 2/10/16. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Melissa Vinson and Robert Vinson SHOW CAUSE on March 8, 2016 at 3:oo p.m., via telephone or in person at Room 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601, why Plaintiffs' Counsels' Motion to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiffs on or before March 1, 216. (Show Cause Response due by 3/1/2016.) So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/3/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-09253-CS(yv)
February 3, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2981 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REINSTATE HER COMPLAINT 18 Motion to Reopen re: #1 Complaint. The Motion to Reinstate Plaintiff Megean Bauer's Complaint is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/3/16) (yv)
February 3, 2016 Filing 2980 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated February 3, 2016 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 2921). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
February 2, 2016 Filing 2979 MOTION for Order to Show Cause . Document filed by Melissa Vinson, Robert Vinson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-09253-CS(Scott, Carmen) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
February 1, 2016 Filing 2978 ***STRICKEN DOCUMENT. Deleted document number [2978, 6] from the case record. The document was stricken from this case pursuant to (3084 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 3084 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 12 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS, 12 in 7:15-cv-06860-CS) Order Striking Document from Record, Terminate Motions,. RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2713 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 22- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Sherry Lopez De Ricci. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06860-CS(Saba, Ryan) Modified on 3/16/2016 (yv).
February 1, 2016 Filing 2977 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2713 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 22- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Deshaaron Holmes. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06793-CS(Saba, Ryan)
February 1, 2016 Filing 2976 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2974 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by John-Paul Long, Misty Long. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09034-CS(Oliver, Alyson)
February 1, 2016 Pro Hac Vice Fee Refunded: for #2826 MOTION for Larry D. Helvey to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11729653. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #2950 MOTION for Larry D. Helvey to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee refunded for Receipt number 0208-11729653, for the following reason(s): DUPLICATE PAYMENT. (dig)
January 29, 2016 Filing 2975 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Gerard Ryan dated 1/29/2016 re: Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to CMO 22A. Document filed by Melissa Vinson.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-09253-CS(Ryan, Gerard)
January 29, 2016 Filing 2974 SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
January 29, 2016 Filing 2973 MOTION to Dismiss No. 24- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
January 29, 2016 Filing 2972 MOTION to Dismiss No. 16, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
January 29, 2016 Filing 2971 MOTION for Carmen S. Scott to Withdraw as Attorney and Motley Rice LLC; Climaco, Wilcox, Peca, Tarantino & Garofoli, Co., L.P.A.; Neblett Beard & Arsenault; and Parker Waichman LLP. Document filed by Melissa Vinson, Robert Vinson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-09253-CS(Scott, Carmen) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
January 29, 2016 Filing 2970 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated January 29, 2016 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03833-CS(Harrington, William)
January 29, 2016 Filing 2969 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-144) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Louisiana and Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/27/2016) (sjo)
January 29, 2016 Filing 2968 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated January 29, 2016 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03830-CS(Harrington, William)
January 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2967 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff JENNIFER KING ("Plaintiff') and her counsel hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against Defendants BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., BAYER OY, and BAYER PHARMA AG ("Defendants"). Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to dismiss the case against all defendants. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/28/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07310-CS(yv)
January 28, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2961 AMENDED MOTION for Kenneth F. Baum to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
January 27, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2966 ORDER granting #2964 Motion for Robert R Luke to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 27, 2016 Filing 2965 MOTION for Sonila Themeli to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11883591. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Themeli, Sonila)
January 27, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2965 MOTION for Sonila Themeli to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11883591. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
January 27, 2016 Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment: for #2964 AMENDED MOTION for Robert R Luke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11883031.(Luke, Robert)
January 27, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2964 AMENDED MOTION for Robert R Luke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
January 26, 2016 Filing 2964 AMENDED MOTION for Robert R Luke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Dena Simons. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Supreme Court of Texas letter of Good Standings, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Luke, Robert) Modified on 1/27/2016 (sdi). Modified on 1/27/2016 (bcu).
January 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2963 NOTICE OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL: Comes now Plaintiff, Carlotta Campbell, by her undersigned counsel, and hereby moves to voluntarily dismiss her cause of action and only her cause of action, without prejudice against Defendants, pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1) with each party to bear their own costs and leaving Jennifer Miller's claim and those of the other plaintiffs originally filed in the same case pending with the Court. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/26/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-09619-CS(yv)
January 26, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2962 NOTICE OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL: Comes now Plaintiff, Valerie Anderson, by her undersigned counsel, and hereby moves to voluntarily dismiss her cause of action and only her cause of action, without prejudice against Defendant's, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) with each party to bear their own costs and leaving Jennifer Miller's claim and those of the other plaintiffs originally filed in the same case pending with the Court. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/26/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-09619-CS(yv)
January 25, 2016 Filing 2961 AMENDED MOTION for Kenneth F. Baum to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Baum, Kenneth)
January 25, 2016 Filing 2960 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-143) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey and South Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/20/2016) (sjo)
January 21, 2016 Filing 2959 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated January 21, 2016 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01479-CS(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2958 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Counsel's Firm serve Plaintiff Savannah M. Woodruff with a copy of this Order and its attachment on or before January 26, 2016. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Savannah M. Woodruff SHOW CAUSE on February 9, 2016 at 3:00 p.m., via telephone or in person at Room 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601, why Plaintiff Counsel's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiff on or before February 2, 2016. So Ordered. (Show Cause Hearing set for 2/9/2016 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Show Cause Response due by 2/2/2016.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/21/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04114-CS(yv)
January 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2957 ORDER granting #2952 Motion for Allyson D. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2956 ORDER granting #2950 Motion for Larry D. Helvey to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 21, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2950 MOTION for Larry D. Helvey to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
January 21, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2952 MOTION for Allyson D. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11859579. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
January 21, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #2954 MOTION for Kenneth F. Baum to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11859698. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of California;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (sdi)
January 20, 2016 Filing 2955 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and WITHOUT costs to either party pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Kimberly J Maness.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04020-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
January 20, 2016 Filing 2954 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Kenneth F. Baum to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11859698. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Baum, Kenneth) Modified on 1/21/2016 (sdi).
January 20, 2016 Filing 2953 MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel. Document filed by Savannah M. Woodruff. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04114-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
January 20, 2016 Filing 2952 MOTION for Allyson D. Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11859579. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Miller, Allyson)
January 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2951 ORDER NO. 29 (Pretrial Scheduling Order): 1. This Order shall apply to the first case selected for trial in 13-MD-2434. 2. The Courts individual practices regarding Joint Pretrial Orders shall apply unless expressly altered by this Order. The Joint Pretrial Order shall be filed on February 25, 2016. 3. With respect to deposition designations: a. On February 25, 2016, the parties shall exchange deposition designations to be offered in the party's case in chief. The designations shall be made in a word document titled with the case caption, the name of the witness, and the date of the deposition. The chart shall consist of four columns for the beginning page:line of the designation, the end page:line of the designation, objections, and response (page:line chart). Parties may not designate objections or colloquy between counsel. b. On March 17, 2016, the parties shall exchange counter designations to the other party's designations on a new page:line chart. Objections to the other party's designations shall also be noted on the initial designation chart. c. On March 24, 2106, the parties shall exchange counter-counter designations on a new page:line chart. Objections to counter designations and responses to objections to the original designations shall also be exchanged. d. On March 30, 2016, the parties shall exchange objections to counter-counter designations on a new page:line chart. The parties shall also exchange responses to objections to counter designations. e. On April 4, 2016, the parties shall submit to the Court page:line charts for each deposition reflecting both parties' designations, counter-designations, counter-counter designations, objections, and responses. The parties shall also jointly submit complete transcripts of the depositions reflecting each party's respective designations, objections, and responses. 4. With respect to exhibit lists: a. On February 25, 2016, the parties shall exchange exhibits lists. Plaintiffs' exhibits shall be identified with a "P" and then consecutive numbering. Defendants' exhibits shall be identified with a "D" and then consecutive numbering. Exhibits lists shall be in Microsoft Excel format and shall include the following columns in the following order: Exhibit number, beginning bates number, end bates number, date, and description of the exhibit. The Excel spreadsheet shall also include a column where the opposing party can enter objections to exhibits. Parties shall also exchange at this time on a CD or other media true and accurate electronic copies (in color, where applicable) of all exhibits identified on their list in PDF format with the file name being the exhibit number. An identical copy of this CD shall be submitted to the Court. b. On March 17, 2016, the parties shall exchange objections to exhibits. The objections should be noted in a column on the Excel spreadsheet. The party shall place one star in the objection column indicating exhibits to which there is no authenticity objection and two stars indicating exhibits to which there is no objection on any ground. c. On March 24, 2016, both parties' exhibit lists (noting objections) shall be filed with the Court. An identical CD to that exchanged by the parties pursuant to paragraph 4(c) shall also be filed with the Court. 5. With respect to motions in limine: a. On March 15, 2016, the parties shall file motions in limine. b. Oppositions to motions in limine are due by March 29, 2016. 6. The parties may file a joint jury questionnaire on April 1, 2016. The Court has not decided to use a jury questionnaire. 7. The Court's individual practices regarding filing proposed voir dire questions, proposed jury instructions, and verdict form shall apply. These documents shall be filed on March 18, 2016. Before April 1, 2016, any party may file objections to the other party's proposed voir dire questions, jury instructions or verdict form. 8. The Joint Pretrial Order should include any special considerations governing the conduct of trial, including trial disclosures of exhibits, witnesses, and demonstratives as well as presentation of video testimony. So Ordered. (Motions due by 3/15/2016. Responses due by 3/29/2016. Pretrial Order due by 2/25/2016.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/20/16) (yv)
January 20, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice re: Document No. #2950 MOTION for Larry D. Helvey to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the filing fee was not paid;.. Pay the filing fee using the event Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment found under the event list Other Documents. (sdi)
January 20, 2016 Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment: for #2950 MOTION for Larry D. Helvey to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11860956.(Helvey, Larry)
January 19, 2016 Filing 2950 MOTION for Larry D. Helvey to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Abigail Urban. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Helvey, Larry) Modified on 1/20/2016 (sdi). Modified on 1/21/2016 (sdi).
January 19, 2016 Filing 2949 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, With prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Melissa Beauprez. (Watson, Leila)
January 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2948 ORDER granting (2947) Motion for Phyllis A. Jones to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04053-CS, 7:15-cv-03040-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
January 19, 2016 Filing 2947 MOTION for Phyllis A. Jones to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11851351. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04053-CS, 7:15-cv-03040-CS(Jones, Phyllis)
January 19, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (32 in 7:14-cv-04053-CS, 2947 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 17 in 7:15-cv-03040-CS) MOTION for Phyllis A. Jones to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11851351. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04053-CS, 7:15-cv-03040-CS(wb)
January 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2946 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) Plaintiffs Shaunte Davis and Robert Davis, hereby dismisses the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all Defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorney fees. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/15/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01943-CS(yv)
January 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2945 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Shaterica Yates, hereby dismisses the above captions case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/15/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04365-CS(yv)
January 15, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2944 ORDER granting #2943 Motion for Sarah E. Lynch to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 15, 2016 Filing 2943 MOTION for Sarah E. Lynch to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11842406. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Lynch, Sarah)
January 15, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2943 MOTION for Sarah E. Lynch to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11842406. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
January 14, 2016 Filing 2942 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-142) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Iowa, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/12/2016) (sjo)
January 14, 2016 Filing 2941 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Shaunte Davis, Robert Davis. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01943-CS(Tate, Mark)
January 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2940 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Shawna Adkins, hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/6/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04860-CS (yv)
January 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2939 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order Nos. 7 and 7A, and for the reasons stated on the record in court on January 12, 2016, the Court's January 4, 2016 Order vacating the dismissal of Plaintiff Nancy Whitehorse's case without prejudice, (15-CV-3508, Doc. 34 and 13-MD-2434,Doc. 2918), is hereby VACATED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close the case in the caption. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/13/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03508-CS(yv)
January 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2938 ORDER re: (2896 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 103 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) Letter, filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, (Deposition due by 2/2/2016., Replies due by 2/19/2016.) For the reasons stated on the record in court on January 12, 2016, Defendants' request to strike the affidavit of Jane Lee, which is Exhibit 23 to Plaintiff Jennifer Danley's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2896 and 13-CV-6586, Doc.103), is hereby DENIED, but Defendants may take Jane Lee's deposition on or before February 2, 2016, and Defendants may file amended Reply papers in connection with their Motion for Summary Judgment on or before February 19, 2016. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/13/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(yv)
January 12, 2016 Filing 2937 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Jane E. Joseph dated January 12, 2016 re: Opposition to Letter Motion of Shayna S. Cook dated December 16, 2015.. Document filed by Amanda Vanhook.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00980-CS(Joseph, Jane)
January 12, 2016 Filing 2935 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Brian J. Holmes to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11826413. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Nicole Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Holmes, Brian) Modified on 1/12/2016 (sdi).
January 12, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #2935 MOTION for Brian J. Holmes to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11826413. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Illinois;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (sdi)
January 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2936 ORDER: This Order applies to the Second Disposition Pool and any additional disposition pools (collectively, later disposition pool cases) and governs the production of sales representative's custodial and personnel files (as defined by Case Management Orders (CMOs) 18C and 19) that were produced in a previous disposition pool case. 1. Production of Custodial Files: If BHCP did not produce a sales representative's custodial file in a previous disposition pool case and a Plaintiff, pursuant to CMOs entered by this Court, requests the production of that sales representative's custodial file in a later disposition pool case, BHCP shall produce that sales representative's custodial file. The contents of the file shall be governed by paragraph 3 of CMO 18C and include documents and tangible things in the file up to the date of the Plaintiff's request. If BHCP has already produced a sales representative's custodial file in a previous disposition pool case and a Plaintiff, pursuant to CMOs entered by this Court, requests the production of that sales representative's custodial file in a later disposition pool case, BHCP shall only supplement that sales representative's custodial file if the removal date of the Plaintiff's Mirena in the later disposition pool case occurred after the date that Plaintiff requested the sales representative's custodial file in the previous disposition pool case. In that case, in addition to providing a copy of the previously produced custodial file, BHCP will produce a supplement to that file containing the contents as defined by paragraph 3 of CMO 18C from the last collection date to the date of Plaintiff's later request. 2. Production of Sales Representative Personnel Files: If a Plaintiff requests a sales representative's deposition in a later disposition pool case and that sales representative's personnel file was not previously produced in a previous disposition pool case, BHCP shall produce that sales representative's personnel file pursuant to CMO 19. If BHCP produced a sales representative's personnel file in a previous disposition pool case and a Plaintiff requests that sales representative's deposition in a later disposition pool case, BHCP shall only supplement that sales representative's personnel file if the removal date of the Plaintiff's Mirena in the later disposition pool case occurred after the date that Plaintiff requested the sales representative's personnel file in the previous disposition pool case. In that case, in addition to providing a copy of the previously produced personnel file, BHCP will produce a supplement to that file containing the information required by CMO 19 from the last collection date to the date of Plaintiff's later request. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/11/16) (yv) Modified on 1/21/2016 (yv).
January 7, 2016 Filing 2934 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated January 7, 2016 re: Proposed Order regarding Sales Representative Discovery in later Disposition Pool Cases. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
January 7, 2016 Filing 2933 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated January 7, 2016 re: Summary Judgment Reply Briefs. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Cook, Shayna)
January 7, 2016 Filing 2932 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: (2762 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Summary Judgment re: Hayes v. Bayer, 14-cv-0288., (62 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS) MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 51)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
January 7, 2016 Filing 2931 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (2762 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Summary Judgment re: Hayes v. Bayer, 14-cv-0288., (62 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS) MOTION for Summary Judgment . . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
January 7, 2016 Filing 2930 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: (61 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) MOTION for Summary Judgment ., (2756 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 55, #2 Exhibit 56, #3 Exhibit 57, #4 Exhibit 58, #5 Exhibit 59)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Harrington, William)
January 7, 2016 Filing 2929 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (61 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) MOTION for Summary Judgment ., (2756 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Summary Judgment . . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Harrington, William)
January 7, 2016 Filing 2928 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Larry D. Helvey to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Abigail Urban. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order for Admission for Pro Hac Vice)(Helvey, Larry) Modified on 1/7/2016 (bcu).
January 7, 2016 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #2928 MOTION for Larry D. Helvey to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Iowa;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (bcu)
January 5, 2016 Filing 2927 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Shawna Adkins. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04860-CS(McCauley, Matthew)
January 5, 2016 Filing 2926 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from C. Andrew Childers dated January 5, 2016 re: Plaintiff Jennifer Danley's response to Defendants request for a pre-motion conference. Document filed by Jennifer Danley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Confidential, #2 Exhibit 2. Confidential, #3 Exhibit 3. Confidential, #4 Exhibit 4. Confidential, #5 Exhibit 5. Confidential, #6 Exhibit 6. Confidential, #7 Exhibit 7., #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9. Confidential)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
January 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2925 Vacated as per Judges Order dated 03/03/2016, Doc. # 3064 ORDER granting (2795) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Orders (CMO) 7 and 7A, Defendants Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet (PFS) Containing All Core Criteria, (Doc. 2795), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs as further set forth in this Order have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet i.e. a Plaintiff Fact Sheet containing all core criteria or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order will be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants motion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants Motion (Doc. 2795). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/4/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (yv) Modified on 3/3/2016 (yv).
January 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2924 ORDER granting (2794) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 (CMO 7), Defendants Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2794), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 2794), and close the cases in the table below. An entry of judgment is not required. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/4/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00996-CS, 7:15-cv-01194-CS, 7:15-cv-01208-CS, 7:15-cv-01274-CS (yv)
January 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2923 Vacated with respect to Plaintiff Monique Lucero, Autumn Hardy and Janisse Sandidge as per Judge Orders dated 03/03/2016, Doc. # 3062, Order dated 03/31/2016, Doc. # 3114 and Order dated 04/14/2016, Doc. # 3137 ORDER granting (2793) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 (CMO 7), Defendants Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2793), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants Motion, (Doc. 2793). So Ordered.(Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/4/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (yv) Modified on 1/5/2016 (yv). Modified on 3/3/2016 (yv). Modified on 4/1/2016 (yv). Modified on 4/14/2016 (mml).
January 4, 2016 Filing 2922 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated January 4, 2016 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2793, 2794, 2795). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
January 4, 2016 Filing 2921 MOTION to Dismiss No. 15, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
January 4, 2016 Filing 2920 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated January 4, 2016 re: Venue Waiver of Plaintiff April Rogers. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
January 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2919 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2916) Letter Motion for Leave to File Document in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (106) Letter Motion for Leave to File Document in case 7:13-cv-06586-CS. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. Plaintiffs may file the above referenced letter and related exhibits in redacted form on ECF pursuant to the protocol set forth in 13-md-2434, Docs. 2700, 2751. All pre-motion conference letters and responses thereto that contain confidential information may be filed in redacted form in accordance with the protocol set forth in 13-md-2434, Docs. 2700, 2751, with unredacted copies to be provided to Chambers. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/4/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS (yv)
January 4, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2918 Vacated as per Judges Order dated 1/13/16, Doc. # 2939 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2917) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (33) Motion to Vacate in case 7:15-cv-03508-CS. ENDORSEMENT: [Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court vacate its dismissal and reinstate Plaintiffs claims.] Application Granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to vacate the Order granting Defendants' motion to dismiss with respect to Nancy Whitehorse, Doc. 28, 15-cv-3508 and Doc. 2651, 13-md-2434, and reopen the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/4/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03508-CS (yv) Modified on 1/8/2016 (yv). Modified on 1/13/2016 (yv).
January 4, 2016 Filing 2917 MOTION to Vacate Dismissal W/O Prejudice. Document filed by Nancy Whitehorse.(Van Parys, Nicholas)
January 4, 2016 Filing 2916 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Redacted version of Plaintiff Jennifer Danley's response to Defendants' pre-motion conference letter addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated January 4, 2016. Document filed by Jennifer Danley.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
January 4, 2016 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - EVENT TYPE ERROR. Notice to Attorney Larry D. Helvey to RE-FILE Document #2912 MOTION to Amend/Correct Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Use the event type Appear Pro Hac Vice found under the event list Motions. ***NOTE*** Before re-filing, check the case number on the document, it may be incorrect. (ldi)
December 30, 2015 Filing 2915 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-141) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/30/2015) (sjo)
December 30, 2015 Filing 2914 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-140)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Kentucky and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/29/2015) (sjo)
December 30, 2015 Filing 2913 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 30, 2015 re: Rogers Venue Waiver. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04325-CS(Cook, Shayna)
December 23, 2015 Filing 2912 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - MOTION to Amend/Correct Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Document filed by Abigail Urban. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Helvey, Larry) Modified on 1/4/2016 (ldi).
December 23, 2015 Filing 2911 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated December 23, 2015 re: Courtesy Copy of Daubert Reply Brief. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 23, 2015 Filing 2910 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (57 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 2724 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dr. David Feigal. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2909 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (2908 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Letter filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. Plaintiffs shall submit an executed venue waiver from Ms. Rogers on or before January 6, 2016. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/23/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04325-CS(yv)
December 22, 2015 Filing 2908 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated December 22, 2015 re: SDP Venue. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 22, 2015 Filing 2907 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #2795 EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. as to Plaintiff Carissa Mason. Document filed by Carissa Mason. (Pang Parra, Amber)
December 22, 2015 Filing 2906 FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Denis E. McGuinness, co-counsel for Plaintiffs, STACY VALDEZ and ANDREW VALDEZ dated December 22, 2015 re: Opposition to the letter motion of Shayna S. Cook dated December 16, 2015. Document filed by Andrew Valdez, Stacy Valdez.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01479-CS(Haldenstein, Kenneth)
December 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2905 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (2896 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 103 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) Letter, filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, (Pre-Motion Conference set for 1/12/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel.) ENDORSEMENT: Pre-motion conference to be held on 1/12/16 at 3pm. Plaintiff is to state her position by letter (not to exceed 3 pages) by 1/5/16. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/22/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(yv)
December 21, 2015 Filing 2904 NOTICE of of Withdrawal of Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice re: (2902 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 17 in 7:14-cv-08415-CS) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,,,. Document filed by Sabriyah R. Williams. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08415-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
December 21, 2015 Filing 2903 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Filing re: (16 in 7:14-cv-08415-CS, 2901 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,,,. Document filed by Sabriyah R. Williams. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08415-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
December 21, 2015 Filing 2902 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare AG, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlex Laboratories, Inc., Berlex, Inc., DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,, Does, Amber Foster, John Doe Distributors, John Doe Manufacturers, Andrea E. Lukacs, McKesson Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Miranda Pena, Brittney Rixner. Document filed by Sabriyah R. Williams. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08415-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
December 21, 2015 Filing 2901 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare AG, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlex Laboratories, Inc., Berlex, Inc., DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,, Does, Amber Foster, John Doe Distributors, John Doe Manufacturers, Andrea E. Lukacs, McKesson Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Miranda Pena, Brittney Rixner. Document filed by Sabriyah R. Williams. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08415-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
December 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2900 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiffs hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT McKesson Corporation. Each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/21/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03445-CS(yv)
December 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2899 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Edward S. Cook dated 12/18/15 re: request that the Cook, Hall & Lampros listing be removed from this case and any related cases. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to effectuate the request. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/21/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-08367-CS(yv)
December 21, 2015 Filing 2898 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-139) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, California, District of Columbia, Minnesota, New York and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/16/2015) (sjo)
December 21, 2015 Filing 2897 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-138) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/10/2015) (sjo)
December 21, 2015 Filing 2896 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 18, 2015 re: Request for Leave to File a Motion to Strike. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D Filed Under Seal)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Cook, Shayna)
December 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2895 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (2892 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Letter filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. Defendants may file the below referenced letter and related exhibits in redacted form on ECF pursuant to the protocol set forth in 13-md-2434, Docs. 2700, 2751. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/18/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(yv)
December 21, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. (28 in 7:14-cv-04893-CS, 2893 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Jesse E. Weisshaar to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11756595. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Virginia;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04893-CS(wb)
December 18, 2015 Filing 2894 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) McKesson Corporation. Document filed by McKesson Corporation, McKesson Corporation. (Rosati, Pavan)
December 18, 2015 Filing 2893 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Jesse E. Weisshaar to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11756595. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc. Return Date set for 12/23/2015 at 05:00 PM.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04893-CS(Weisshaar, Jesse) Modified on 12/21/2015 (wb).
December 18, 2015 Filing 2892 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 18, 2015 re: Sealing Motion to Strike. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
December 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2891 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Amanda Ritzert, by and through the undersigned counsel, voluntarily dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434, Doc. 2877, and 13-cv-6585, Doc. 46, and close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/17/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06585-CS(yv)
December 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2890 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Maria A.Galvan, by and through the undersigned counsel, voluntarily dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434, Doc. 2868, and 13-cv-4666, Doc. 59, and close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/17/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04666-CS(yv)
December 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2889 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A)(i), Suzanne Roskos, by and through the undersigned counsel, voluntarily dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434, Doc. 2878, and 13-cv-7035, Doc. 46, and close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/17/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07035-CS(yv)
December 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2888 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Cassie Hill, by and through the undersigned counsel, voluntarily dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-md-2434, Doc. 2871, and 13-cv-4665, Doc. 59, and close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/17/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04665-CS(yv) Modified on 12/17/2015 (yv).
December 16, 2015 Filing 2887 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Yates Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
December 16, 2015 Filing 2886 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Vinson Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2885 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Vanhook Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2884 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Valdez Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2883 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Twitty Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2882 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Turner Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2881 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Sunny Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2880 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Slone Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2879 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Sepulveda Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2878 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Roskos Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2877 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Ritzert Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2876 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Peterson Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2875 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Pena Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2874 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Miller Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2873 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Maness Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William) Modified on 2/19/2016 (sjo).
December 16, 2015 Filing 2872 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Maldon Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2871 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Hill Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2870 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Green Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2869 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Garnica Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2868 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Galvan Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2867 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Esver Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2866 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Embler Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2865 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Dragon Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2864 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Davis Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William) Modified on 2/19/2016 (sjo).
December 16, 2015 Filing 2863 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Costanza Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2862 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Carrico Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2861 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Carey Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2860 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Beauprez Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William) Modified on 2/19/2016 (sjo).
December 16, 2015 Filing 2859 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Alexander Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
December 16, 2015 Filing 2858 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Adkins Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William) Modified on 2/19/2016 (sjo).
December 16, 2015 Filing 2857 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #2795 EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. First response to defficiency. Document filed by Robin Fetterolf. (Pfender, Thomas)
December 15, 2015 Filing 2856 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated December 15, 2015 re: Unredacted version of filings. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 15, 2015 Filing 2855 DECLARATION of Nathan C. Bess in Opposition re: (2762 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Summary Judgment re: Hayes v. Bayer, 14-cv-0288.. Document filed by Christie L. Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2. Confidential, #3 Exhibit 3. Confidential, #4 Exhibit 4. Confidential, #5 Exhibit 5. Confidential, #6 Exhibit 6. Confidential, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12. Confidential, #13 Exhibit 13. Confidential, #14 Exhibit 14. Confidential, #15 Exhibit 15. Confidential, #16 Exhibit 16. Confidential, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19. Confidential, #20 Exhibit 20., # 21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22. Confidential, #23 Exhibit 23. Confidential, #24 Exhibit 24. Confidential, #25 Exhibit 25. Confidential, #26 Exhibit 26. Confidential, #27 Exhibit 27. Confidential, #28 Exhibit 28. Confidential, #29 Exhibit 29. Confidential, #30 Exhibit 30. Confidential, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32. Confidential, #33 Exhibit 33. Confidential, #34 Exhibit 34. Confidential, #35 Exhibit 35. Confidential, #36 Exhibit 36)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 15, 2015 Filing 2854 COUNTER STATEMENT TO (2763 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Rule 56.1 Statement. Document filed by Christie L. Hayes. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 15, 2015 Filing 2852 DECLARATION of C. Andrew Childers in Opposition re: (2756 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Jennifer Danley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2. Confidential, #3 Exhibit 3. Confidential, #4 Exhibit 4. Confidential, #5 Exhibit 5. Confidential, #6 Exhibit 6. Confidential, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12. Confidential, #13 Exhibit 13. Confidential, #14 Exhibit 14. Confidential, #15 Exhibit 15. Confidential, #16 Exhibit 16. Confidential, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19. Confidential, #20 Exhibit 20. Confidential, # 21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22. Confidential, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24. Confidential, #25 Exhibit 25. Confidential, #26 Exhibit 26. Confidential, #27 Exhibit 27. Confidential, #28 Exhibit 28. Confidential, #29 Exhibit 29. Confidential, #30 Exhibit 30. Confidential, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32. Confidential, #33 Exhibit 33. Confidential, #34 Exhibit 34. Confidential, #35 Exhibit 35. Confidential, #36 Exhibit 36. Confidential, #37 Exhibit 37. Confidential, #38 Exhibit 38. Confidential, #39 Exhibit 39. Omitted, #40 Exhibit 40, #41 Exhibit 41, #42 Exhibit 42)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 15, 2015 Filing 2851 COUNTER STATEMENT TO (2757 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Rule 56.1 Statement. Document filed by Jennifer Danley. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 15, 2015 Filing 2849 DECLARATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Support re: (52 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 53 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 2705 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dena R. Hixon, M.D... Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Confidential)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 15, 2015 Filing 2848 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (52 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 53 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 2705 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dena R. Hixon, M.D.. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2847 ORDER No. 24C (Second Disposition Pool Selection Process): The following order partially modifying certain language set forth in Order 24A, (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2401; 13-MC-2434, Doc. 114), is hereby adopted: 1. Order 24A currently states in several scenarios (4-13) that the parties shall identify candidate replacement or removal cases for the Second Disposition Pool ("SDP:) "within fourteen days of the dismissal order." (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2401; 13-MC-2434, Doc. 114.) 2. Effective from the date of this Order, if a SDP case is voluntarily dismissed by Plaintiffs pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), which does not require approval by this Court, the relevant party shall identify a replacement or removal case or cases within fourteen days of when the voluntary dismissal was filed via ECF. All other instructions and deadlines set forth in Order 24A, (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2401; 13-MC-2434, Doc. 114), remain in effect. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/15/15) (yv) Modified on 12/15/2015 (yv).
December 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2846 ORDER: The Court will issue a new CMO amending CMO 24A to more accurately reflect the spirit of CMO 24A, which is to give Defendants fourteen days to replace or strike if a Plaintiff voluntarily dismisses a SDP case more than 30 days after selection. Defendants' December 11, 2015 strike of Ms. Mehrer from the SDP, however, will stand, and Plaintiffs request to overrule that strike is hereby DENIED. The current list of 12 remaining Plaintiffs pending in the SDP is listed at Doc. 2822. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/15/15) (yv)
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2845 MEMO ENDORSEMENT re: #2785 Letter; denying as moot #2682 Motion for to exclude testimony; terminating #2767 Motion for Summary Judgment. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion to exclude the testimony of Dr. Richard Luciani, 13-md-2434, Doc. 2682, is denied as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion at 13-md-2434, Doc. 2682. In addition, for the reasons stated above, the Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate Plaintiffs' pending summary judgment motion at 13-md-2434, Doc. 2767. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/14/15) (yv)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2844 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kelly K. McNabb on behalf of Alicia Groning, Thomas Groning. (McNabb, Kelly)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2843 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (2702 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Preclude certain opinions of Michelle Collins, Ph.D., and Drs. Vanessa K. Dalton, Jay Goldberg, Steven Goldstein, Geri Hewitt, Marcia C. Javitt, and Michael Policar. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2842 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (34 in 7:14-cv-03473-CS, 2823 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Notice (Other) filed by Charlene Torrence, Motions terminated: (23 in 7:14-cv-03473-CS, 23 in 7:14-cv-03473-CS) MOTION to Compel Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharma to Produce Defense Fact Sheet . MOTION for Discovery . filed by Charlene Torrence. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion at 14-cv-3473, Doc. 23, So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/14/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03473-CS(yv)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2841 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: (2697 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF APRIL ZAMBELLI-WEINER, PH.D... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit I, #2 Exhibit J, #3 Exhibit K)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2840 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (2697 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF APRIL ZAMBELLI-WEINER, PH.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2839 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: (48 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 2694 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF ROGER C. YOUNG, M.D., PH.D... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Q, #2 Exhibit R, #3 Exhibit S, #4 Exhibit T)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2838 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (2694 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 48 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF ROGER C. YOUNG, M.D., PH.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2837 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (2691 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUSAN WRAY, PH.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2836 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Motion re: (2823 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Notice (Other). Document filed by Charlene Torrence. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Supplemental Declaration of Gary Martin Meyers, Esq.)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03473-CS(Meyers, Gary)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2835 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: (49 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 2688 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF RICHARD STRASSBERG, M.D... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit J, #2 Exhibit K)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2834 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (49 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 2688 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF RICHARD STRASSBERG, M.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2833 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: (2685 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUZANNE PARISIAN, M.D... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit G, #2 Exhibit H, #3 Exhibit I, #4 Exhibit J)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2832 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (2685 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUZANNE PARISIAN, M.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2831 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: (2679 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF JOHN JARRELL, PH.D., P.E... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit E, #2 Exhibit F, #3 Exhibit G, #4 Exhibit H, #5 Exhibit I)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2830 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (2679 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF JOHN JARRELL, PH.D., P.E.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2829 ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiffs, Desiree Iniguez, et al., hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT McKesson Corporation. Each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. It Is So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/14/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04330-CS(yv)
December 14, 2015 Filing 2828 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated December 14, 2015 re: Response to Bayer's Dec. 11, 2015 Letter re SDP Strike. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2827 ORDER GRANTING VOLUNTARY PARTIAL DISMISSALWITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Jerilynn Dudley, hereby dismisses the above-captioned case with prejudice ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT McKesson Corporation. Each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. It Is So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/14/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03800-CS(yv)
December 14, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #2826 MOTION for Larry D. Helvey to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11729653. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Iowa;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (sdi)
December 12, 2015 Filing 2826 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Larry D. Helvey to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11729653. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Abigail Urban. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Helvey, Larry) Modified on 12/14/2015 (sdi).
December 11, 2015 Filing 2825 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 11, 2015 re: Reply re Second Disposition Pool. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 September 18, 2014 Order)(Cook, Shayna)
December 11, 2015 Filing 2824 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated December 11, 2015 re: Response to Bayer's SDP Strike. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 11, 2015 Filing 2823 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Motion. Document filed by Charlene Torrence. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Gary Martin Meyers, Esq.)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03473-CS(Meyers, Gary)
December 11, 2015 Filing 2822 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 11, 2015 re: Second Disposition Pool. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
December 11, 2015 Filing 2821 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a Conference proceeding held on 12/2/15 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(Siwik, Christine)
December 11, 2015 Filing 2820 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: Conference held on 12/2/2015 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Albert Gorn, 914-390-4222. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 1/4/2016. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/14/2016. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/13/2016.(Siwik, Christine)
December 10, 2015 Filing 2819 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated December 10, 2015 re: COMPENDIUM OF JOURNAL ARTICLES. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11 Part 1, #12 Exhibit 11 Part 2, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 10, 2015 Filing 2818 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Falisha Robinson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06807-CS(Seeger, Christopher)
December 10, 2015 Filing 2817 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) McKesson Corporation. Document filed by McKesson Corporation. (Rosati, Pavan)
December 10, 2015 Filing 2816 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) McKesson Corporation. Document filed by McKesson Corporation. (Rosati, Pavan)
December 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2815 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #2814 Letter filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/9/15) (yv)
December 9, 2015 Filing 2814 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated December 9, 2015 re: Additional Pages Request. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 9, 2015 Filing 2813 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Missouri, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/08/2015) (sjo)
December 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2812 ORDER granting (2808) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (49) Motion to Vacate in case 7:14-cv-00885-CS. I would like to take this opportunity to remind counsel of the significant amount of time and resources it takes Defendants to engage in unnecessary motion practice and for the Court to administer these Orders and vacate dismissals, all of which would be unnecessary if Plaintiffs merely adhered to the already generous time allotments granted to them to submit required documents. The Court reminds counsel that it may alter CMOs with respect to specific lawyers and firms if the behavior of waiting until the last minute to submit necessary documents continues. Nevertheless, pursuant to CMO 7, because both Plaintiffs submitted a PFS within 90 days from when their cases were dismissed without prejudice, the Order dismissing Plaintiffs cases (Doc. 2612) is VACATED with respect to the above-captioned cases. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and terminate the pendingmotion at 13-MD-2434, Doc. 2808. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/8/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00885-CS, 7:14-cv-05694-CS (yv)
December 7, 2015 Filing 2811 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-137) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/3/2015) (sjo)
December 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2810 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Jay R. Vaughn dated 12/3/15 re: withdrawing as counsel of record and requesting removal from the service list. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Mr. Vaughn as counsel in 15-cv-7911 and 13-md-2434. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/4/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-07911-CS(yv)
December 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2809 Vacated as per Judges Orders dated 04/01/2016, 04/04/2016 & 4/8/2016 Doc. # 10, #13, #8, #3 and #46 as to Sherry Lopez de Ricci, Kymberlee Bateni, Deshaaron Holmes, Jessica Johnson and Jessica Brown only ORDER granting (2713) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 (CMO 7), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2713), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants Motion, (Doc. 2713): (As further set forth in this Order.) So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/3/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (yv) Modified on 12/3/2015 (yv). Modified on 4/1/2016 (yv). Modified on 4/1/2016 (yv). Modified on 4/4/2016 (yv). Modified on 4/8/2016 (yv). Modified on 4/8/2016 (yv).
December 3, 2015 Filing 2808 MOTION to Vacate (46 in 7:14-cv-00885-CS, 2612 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, . Document filed by SHERRY BROADWATER. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00885-CS(Rabner, Monte)
December 2, 2015 Filing 2807 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James Shepherd dated 11/30/2015 re: request for a 45 day responsive pleading extension for the SDP cases. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/2/15) (yv)
December 2, 2015 Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: #2807 Endorsed Letter, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. (yv)
December 2, 2015 Filing 2806 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2713 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 22- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Stephanie Martini. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06862-CS(Saba, Ryan)
December 2, 2015 Filing 2805 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2713 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 22- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Denise Esparza. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06789-CS(Saba, Ryan)
December 2, 2015 Filing 2804 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2713 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 22- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Amber Synder. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06865-CS(Saba, Ryan)
December 2, 2015 Filing 2803 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2713 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 22- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Tyson Thompson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-06867-CS(Saba, Ryan)
December 2, 2015 Filing 2802 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2510 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Christi Howard-Williams. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05694-CS(Saba, Ryan)
December 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2801 ORDER granting (2714) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2714), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 2714), and close the cases in the table below. An entry of judgment is not required. As further set forth in this Order. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/2/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (yv)
December 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2800 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (16) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Kelly K McNabb terminated. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request and terminate the pending motion at 14-cv-9821, (Doc.16). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/2/15) (yv)
December 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2799 ORDER granting (2541) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2556) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2559) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 22A (CMO 22A), and for the reasons stated on the record in court today, Defendants' Motions to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Docs. 2541, 2556, 2559), are GRANTED as to the above-captioned Plaintiffs. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close the cases in the caption. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434, Docs. 2541, 2556, 2559. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/2/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03559-CS, 7:13-cv-03808-CS, 7:14-cv-04888-CS (yv)
December 2, 2015 Filing 2798 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Opposition re: (57 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 2724 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dr. David Feigal.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 2, 2015 Filing 2797 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: (57 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 2724 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dr. David Feigal. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
December 2, 2015 Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: (21 in 7:14-cv-04888-CS, 21 in 7:14-cv-04888-CS, 21 in 7:14-cv-04888-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03559-CS, 7:13-cv-03808-CS, 7:14-cv-04888-CS(yv)
December 2, 2015 Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk. Transmitted re: (32 in 7:15-cv-00901-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, to the Docket Assistant Clerk for case processing. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(yv)
November 30, 2015 Filing 2796 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated November 30, 2015 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2713, 2714). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
November 30, 2015 Filing 2795 EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
November 30, 2015 Filing 2794 MOTION to Dismiss No. 14, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
November 30, 2015 Filing 2793 MOTION to Dismiss No. 23- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
November 30, 2015 Filing 2792 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated November 30, 2015 re: SDP Replacement Selection. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
November 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2791 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Matthew J. McCauley dated 11/30/2015 re: request to be excused from attendance at the December 2, 2015 cases management conference. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. Plaintiffs' leadership should be sure there is someone present who can address the issues on the agenda. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/30/2015) (yv)
November 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2790 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-136) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/30/2015) (sjo)
November 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2789 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #2788 Letter filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. Mr. Ronca may appear by phone. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/30/2015) (yv)
November 25, 2015 Filing 2788 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James Ronca, Esquire dated 11/25/2015 re: In re: Mirena IUD Product Liability Litigation, 13-MD-2434. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Spizer, Gregory)
November 25, 2015 Filing 2787 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Opposition re: #2705 MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dena R. Hixon, M.D... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17)(Harrington, William)
November 25, 2015 Filing 2786 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #2705 MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dena R. Hixon, M.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2785 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated November 24, 2015 re: Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Daubert Motions. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2784 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2697 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF APRIL ZAMBELLI-WEINER, PH.D.. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2783 DECLARATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Opposition re: (48 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 2694 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF ROGER C. YOUNG, M.D., PH.D... Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Confidential, #2 Exhibit 2., #3 Exhibit 3., #4 Exhibit 5, #5 Exhibit 6. Confidential, #6 Exhibit 7. Confidential)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2782 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2694 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 48 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF ROGER C. YOUNG, M.D., PH.D.. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2781 DECLARATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Opposition re: (2691 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUSAN WRAY, PH.D... Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Confidential, #2 Exhibit B. Confidential, #3 Exhibit C. Confidential, #4 Exhibit D. Confidential)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2780 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2691 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUSAN WRAY, PH.D.. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2779 DECLARATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Opposition re: (49 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 2688 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF RICHARD STRASSBERG, M.D... Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Confidential, #2 Exhibit B. Confidential, #3 Exhibit C. Confidential, #4 Exhibit D. Confidential, #5 Exhibit E. Confidential)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2778 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (49 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 2688 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF RICHARD STRASSBERG, M.D.. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2777 DECLARATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Opposition re: (2685 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUZANNE PARISIAN, M.D... Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Confidential, #2 Exhibit 2., #3 Exhibit 3. Confidential, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2776 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2685 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUZANNE PARISIAN, M.D.. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2775 DECLARATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Opposition re: (2679 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF JOHN JARRELL, PH.D., P.E... Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Confidential, #2 Exhibit B. Confidential, #3 Exhibit C. Confidential, #4 Exhibit D., #5 Exhibit E., #6 Exhibit F., #7 Exhibit G. Confidential, #8 Exhibit H. Confidential, #9 Exhibit J., #10 Exhibit K., #11 Exhibit L., #12 Exhibit M. Confidential)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2774 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2679 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF JOHN JARRELL, PH.D., P.E.. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2773 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Opposition re: #2702 MOTION to Preclude certain opinions of Michelle Collins, Ph.D., and Drs. Vanessa K. Dalton, Jay Goldberg, Steven Goldstein, Geri Hewitt, Marcia C. Javitt, and Michael Policar.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Exhibit 39, #40 Exhibit 40, #41 Exhibit 41, #42 Exhibit 42, #43 Exhibit 43, #44 Exhibit 44)(Harrington, William)
November 24, 2015 Filing 2772 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #2702 MOTION to Preclude certain opinions of Michelle Collins, Ph.D., and Drs. Vanessa K. Dalton, Jay Goldberg, Steven Goldstein, Geri Hewitt, Marcia C. Javitt, and Michael Policar. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
November 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2771 ORDER: Counsel's handling of this matter thus far, which has been careless at best, is inexcusable. Nevertheless, in the interest of deciding cases on the merits, and because the facts suggest Plaintiff's complaint is timely, Plaintiff's application for leave to file an AC (Doc. 24) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff may file an AC advancing only those causes of action that were not previously dismissed by the Court in other words, Plaintiff's AC may not contain causes of action sounding in fraud or breach of warranty. (See Transcript of Proceedings on October 14, 2015 at 27.) Counsel should review the transcript from the October 14, 2015 conference carefully for the details of the Court's prior ruling. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 19) in No. 15-CV-1475. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/19/2015) (rj)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2770 DECLARATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Support re: #2767 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Defendant's affirmative defense of preemption.. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5. Confidential, #6 Exhibit 6. Confidential, #7 Exhibit 7. Confidential, #8 Exhibit 8. Confidential, #9 Exhibit 9. Confidential, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15. Confidential, #16 Exhibit 16. Confidential, #17 Exhibit 17. Confidential, #18 Exhibit 18. Confidential, #19 Exhibit 19. Confidential, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24. Confidential, #25 Exhibit 25. Confidential, #26 Exhibit 26. Confidential, #27 Exhibit 27. Confidential)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2769 RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2768 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2767 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Defendant's affirmative defense of preemption. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2767 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Defendant's affirmative defense of preemption. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2766 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated November 17, 2015 re: Motions for Summary Judgment. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Cook, Shayna)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2765 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: #2762 MOTION for Summary Judgment re: Hayes v. Bayer, 14-cv-0288.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Exhibit 39, #40 Exhibit 40, #41 Exhibit 41, #42 Exhibit 42, #43 Exhibit 43, #44 Exhibit 44, #45 Exhibit 45, #46 Exhibit 46, #47 Exhibit 47, #48 Exhibit 48, #49 Exhibit 49, #50 Exhibit 50)(Harrington, William)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2764 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2762 MOTION for Summary Judgment re: Hayes v. Bayer, 14-cv-0288. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2763 RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2762 MOTION for Summary Judgment re: Hayes v. Bayer, 14-cv-0288. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2761 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - (SEE DOCUMENT #2763) RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William) Modified on 11/17/2015 (lb).
November 17, 2015 Filing 2760 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - (SEE DOCUMENT #2762) MOTION for Summary Judgment re: Hayes v. Bayer, 13-cv-0288. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William) Modified on 11/17/2015 (lb).
November 17, 2015 Filing 2759 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: #2756 MOTION for Summary Judgment .. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Exhibit 39, #40 Exhibit 40, #41 Exhibit 41, #42 Exhibit 42, #43 Exhibit 43, #44 Exhibit 44, #45 Exhibit 45, #46 Exhibit 46, #47 Exhibit 47, #48 Exhibit 48, #49 Exhibit 49, #50 Exhibit 50, #51 Exhibit 51, #52 Exhibit 52, #53 Exhibit 53, #54 Exhibit 54)(Harrington, William)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2758 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2756 MOTION for Summary Judgment . . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2757 RULE 56.1 STATEMENT. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2756 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2755 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a conference proceeding held on 02/26/2014 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(Staten, Mary)
November 17, 2015 Filing 2754 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: conference held on 2/26/2014 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Mary Staten, (914) 390-4027. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/11/2015. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/21/2015. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/18/2016.(Staten, Mary)
November 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2753 ORDER: Defendants are correct that Plaintiff's counsel has flouted this Court's orders yet again. First, counsel has not, as ordered, explained the contradictions in Plaintiff's various statements (as outlined yet again in Defendants' November 11, 2015 letter, Doc. 2746). It appears counsel is studiously avoiding mention of (or provision of records regarding) the December 2012 x-ray which, according to Plaintiff's PFS, diagnosed the perforation. Second, the explanation counsel provides for his prior derelictions is at least partly unavailing and at least partly false. If counsel was unable to stay on the line when he knew his client's case was to be addressed, it is inexcusable that he did not promptly make efforts to educate himself as to that ruling. He should have ordered the transcript to find out what the ruling was, or at least gotten the particulars from a lawyer (from the PSC or otherwise) who had them. And it does not seem that the claim that "counsel misunderstood the Court's instructions based on the Minute Entry" can be true, as the minute entry contains no instructions. Likewise, it does not seem that the claim that "counsel mistakenly calendared the due date as October 29, 2015 [rather than October 28, 2015], based on the October 16, 2015" minute entry can be true, as the minute entry made no reference to October 28, October 29 or any other due date. For these reasons, the application for leave to amend is DENIED. Even though the Court would be justified in dismissing Plaintiff's case with prejudice, it will give Plaintiff a final chance to explain why she should be allowed to amend, on the following conditions. First, any such application must: 1) be filed by 5 p.m. on November 17, 2015; 2) comply in full with my October 14, 2015 Order (including that it provide all pertinent medical records and explain the seeming contradictions among Plaintiff's various statements); 3) comply in full with my October 30, 2015 Order (including that it provide a full and accurate explanation as to why counsel filed the Amended Complaint without complying with my October 14, 2015 ruling and why counsel did not act within the prescribed period); and 4) explain why counsel's November 11, 2015 letter did not comply with my October 14, 2015 ruling and my October 30, 2015 Order (including that it explain why it contained what appears to be an inaccurate explanation for counsel's derelictions). Second, Plaintiff's counsel will be required to personally pay Defendants' expenses incurred as a result of his failure to comply with my October 14, 2015 ruling and my October 30, 2015 Order. Defendants should supply Plaintiff's counsel with a listing of those expenses, and Plaintiff's counsel should reimburse Defendants within one week thereafter or, if Plaintiff's counsel disputes the expenses, he may make application to the Court within one week thereafter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/13/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01475-CS (lnl)
November 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2752 ORDER granting #2749 Motion for Ina D. Chang to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
November 13, 2015 Filing 2750 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Amber Griffin Shaw to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11622016. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brandy Wiggins. (Attachments: #1 Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Shaw, Amber) Modified on 11/13/2015 (sdi).
November 13, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #2750 MOTION for Amber Griffin Shaw to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11622016. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of Tennessee;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (sdi)
November 13, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2749 MOTION for Ina D. Chang to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11621062. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
November 13, 2015 Set/Reset Deadlines: Applications due by 11/17/2015. (lnl)
November 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2751 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (59 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 60 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS) Letter, filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, (2434 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Letter, filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. ENDORSEMENT: APPLICATION GRANTED. Pending and future motions, and any response thereto, shall adhere to the protocol set forth in 13-MD-2434, Doc. 2700, and may be filed in redacted form to the extend they include or discuss material designated as confidential (with unredacted hard copies provided to chambers). If such material so dominates the filing that redaction is impractical, the papers may be filed under seal and shall remain uredacted until further order of this Court. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/12/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(rj)
November 12, 2015 Filing 2749 MOTION for Ina D. Chang to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11621062. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Chang, Ina)
November 12, 2015 Filing 2748 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated November 12, 2015 re: Leave to file summary judgment motions under seal. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
November 11, 2015 Filing 2746 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated November 11, 2015 re: Gardiner Application to File an Amended Complaint. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01475-CS(Cook, Shayna)
November 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2747 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (2740 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Letter filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. ENDORSEMENT: Based on Defendants' letter (Doc. 2738), Plaintiffs' response (Doc. 2739), and the above request, the parties shall adhere to the following page limits and deadlines. For Plaintiff Jennifer Danley, Defendants may submit a brief in connection with a motion for Summary Judgment not exceeding 35 pages. For Plaintiff Christine Hayes, Defendants may submit a brief in connection with a motion for Summary Judgment not exceeding 38 pages. Defendants' opposition to Plaintiffs' Daubert motion (Doc. 2702) may not exceed 35 pages. Daubert Reply briefs, except for those involving the motions set forth in Case Management Order 9D, Doc. 2666, are due by December 14, 2015. Opposition briefs for Summary Judgment Motions are due by December 15, 2015. Reply briefs are due by January 7, 2016. No further extensions will be granted. SO ORDERED. (Responses due by 12/15/2015, Replies due by 1/7/2016.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/10/2015) (mml)
November 10, 2015 Filing 2745 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Mandissa Fayola Logan on behalf of Zabrinah Brown. (Logan, Mandissa)
November 10, 2015 Filing 2744 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by June Patricia Bashant on behalf of Zabrinah Brown. (Bashant, June)
November 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2743 ORDER denying as moot #2731 Motion for Alicia J. Donahue to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
November 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2742 ORDER granting (2741) Motion for Alicia J. Donahue to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07310-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
November 10, 2015 Filing 2741 MOTION for Alicia J. Donahue to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07310-CS(Donahue, Alicia)
November 10, 2015 Filing 2740 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated November 10, 2015 re: Reply re Page Limit Extension. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
November 10, 2015 Filing 2739 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated 11/10/2015 re: Defendants' Page Limit Request. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 10, 2015 Filing 2738 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated November 10, 2015 re: Page Limit Extension. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
November 10, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2741 MOTION for Alicia J. Donahue to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
November 9, 2015 Filing 2737 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated November 9, 2015 re: Grande Venue Waiver. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09824-CS(Cook, Shayna)
November 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2736 ORDER granting #2734 Motion for Mandissa Fayola Logan to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
November 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2735 ORDER granting #2733 Motion for Patricia Bashant to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
November 6, 2015 Filing 2734 FIRST MOTION for Mandissa Fayola Logan to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11599915. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Zabrinah Brown. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of the Clerk of The Supreme Court of the State of California, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order For Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Logan, Mandissa)
November 6, 2015 Filing 2733 MOTION for June Patricia Bashant to Appear Pro Hac Vice CORRECTED. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Zabrinah Brown. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order For Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Bashant, June)
November 6, 2015 Filing 2732 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-135)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of michigan, Minnesota and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/6/2015) (sjo)
November 6, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2733 MOTION for June Patricia Bashant to Appear Pro Hac Vice CORRECTED. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
November 6, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2734 FIRST MOTION for Mandissa Fayola Logan to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11599915. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
November 5, 2015 Filing 2731 MOTION for Alicia J. Donahue to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11593344. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07310-CS(Donahue, Alicia)
November 5, 2015 Filing 2730 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Kaylin Richard. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08368-CS(Geiger, Andrew)
November 4, 2015 Filing 2729 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-134) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/04/2015) (sjo)
November 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2728 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (2727 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 11 in 7:15-cv-04110-CS) RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2645 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 21- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. ENDORSEMENT: For the reasons stated below, the Order dismissing Plaintiff's case without prejudice (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2722; 15-CV-4110, Doc. 10) is hereby VACATED, only as to Plaintiff Emma Elizabeth Reel (15-CV-4110). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/4/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04110-CS(lnl)
November 3, 2015 Filing 2727 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2645 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 21- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Emma Ellizabeth Reel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04110-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
November 3, 2015 Filing 2726 DECLARATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Support re: (57 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 2724 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dr. David Feigal.. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1., #2 Exhibit 2., #3 Exhibit 3. part 1, #4 Exhibit 3. part 2, #5 Exhibit 4. Confidential, #6 Exhibit 5. Confidential, #7 Exhibit 6. Confidential, #8 Exhibit 7., #9 Exhibit 8., #10 Exhibit 9., #11 Exhibit 10.)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 3, 2015 Filing 2725 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (57 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 2724 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dr. David Feigal. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 3, 2015 Filing 2724 MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dr. David Feigal. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
November 3, 2015 Filing 2723 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Document filed by Amanda G Sledge. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS(Bell, Bobby)
November 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2722 Vacated only as to Plaintiff Emma Elizabeth Reel (15-CV-4110) as per Judge's Order dated 11/4/2015, Doc. #2728. ORDER granting (2645) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2645), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion, (Doc. 2645). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/2/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (mml) Modified on 11/4/2015 (lnl).
November 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2721 ORDER granting (2646) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("CMO") 7 and 7A, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") Containing all Core Criteria, (Doc. 2646), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet - i.e. a Plaintiff Fact Sheet containing all core criteria - or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order will be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants. Motion, (Doc. 2646). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/2/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07509-CS, 7:15-cv-00857-CS, 7:15-cv-02549-CS (mml)
November 2, 2015 Filing 2720 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated November 2, 2015 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2645, 2646). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2719 ORDER: On October 14, 2015, the Court issued a bench ruling in Plaintiff's case, No. 15-CV-1475, in response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Case Management Order ("CMO") 22A. (No. 15-CV-1475 Doc. 8.) Counsel was on notice that the decision would be rendered at that time. (Transcript of Proceedings on October 14, 2015 ("Tr.") at 42-43.) I dismissed all claims as time-barred, and also found that the breach of warranty and fraud claims had been abandoned and failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. (Tr. 24-27.) Even though Plaintiff had failed to follow CMO 22A in that she did not address amendment in her opposition to the motion, I allowed Plaintiff to brief via a three-page letter why she should be allowed to amend. I directed that her application had to include supporting documentation, and I specified that the records attached as Exhibit A to her April 10, 2015 letter did not suffice because they did not cover the relevant 2013 events or explain the seeming contradictions among Plaintiff's various statements. (Tr. 26-27.) That letter was due within 14 days of the ruling. Plaintiff seems to have entirely flouted my order. The 14-day period expired on October 28 without the Court receiving anything from Plaintiff. On October 29, she filed an Amended Complaint ("AC") on the Court's Electronic Case Filing system. She did so without leave; she did so without having submitted the required letter; she did so without having provided the required supporting documentation; she did so outside the prescribed time period; and in the AC she reintroduced claims as to which she was not given permission to even seek to amend, and which suffer from the same defects as in the original Complaint. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, (No. 15-CV-1475 Doc. 19), is hereby STRICKEN. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to review my October 14, 2015 ruling. If Plaintiff wishes to submit an application as to why she should now be allowed to file an amended complaint, any such application must: 1) comply in full with the requirements of my October 14, 2015 ruling; 2) explain why Plaintiff filed the AC without complying with that ruling; and 3) explain why Plaintiff did not act within the prescribed period. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to strike Doc. 19 from the docket in No. 15-CV-1475. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/30/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01475-CS(lnl)
October 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2718 ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANTS' RESPONSIVE PLEADING DEADLINE: Upon consideration of the parties' joint letter dated October 29, 2015 requesting an extension of Defendants' responsive pleading deadline, it is hereby: ORDERED that the Defendants' responsive pleading deadline in the above-mentioned cases is extended to December 1, 2015. (Responses due by 12/1/2015) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/30/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
October 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2717 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Renee Cooley, hereby dismisses the above-captioned case with prejudice ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT Bayer Healthcare AG. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/30/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04893-CS (lnl)
October 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2716 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a), Plaintiffs, Julie Cantor Miller and Jonathan Miller, hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice ONLY AS TO DEFENDANT Bayer Healthcare AG. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/30/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-01168-CS (lnl)
October 30, 2015 Filing 2715 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for June Patricia Bashant to Appear Pro Hac Vice CORRECTED. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Zabrinah Brown.(Bashant, June) Modified on 10/30/2015 (sdi).
October 30, 2015 Filing 2714 MOTION to Dismiss No. 13, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2015 Filing 2713 MOTION to Dismiss No. 22- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2015 Filing 2712 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for June Patricia Bashant to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Zabrinah Brown. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bashant, June) Modified on 10/30/2015 (sdi).
October 30, 2015 Filing 2711 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for June Patricia Bashant to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11571703. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Zabrinah Brown.(Bashant, June) Modified on 10/30/2015 (sdi). Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
October 30, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #2711 MOTION for June Patricia Bashant to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11571703. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of California;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (sdi)
October 30, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #2715 MOTION for June Patricia Bashant to Appear Pro Hac Vice CORRECTED. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of California;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (sdi)
October 30, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice to RE-FILE Document No. #2712 MOTION for June Patricia Bashant to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff... The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): missing Certificate of Good Standing from Supreme Court of California;. Re-file the motion as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice - attach the correct signed PDF - select the correct named filer/filers - attach valid Certificates of Good Standing issued within the past 30 days - attach Proposed Order.. (sdi)
October 29, 2015 Filing 2710 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-133) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota and West Virginia, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/29/2015) (sjo)
October 28, 2015 Filing 2709 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2645 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 21- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Angelica Tafoya. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proof of Service of PFS)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03803-CS(Johnson, Michael)
October 27, 2015 Filing 2708 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-132) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California and Illinois, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/27/2015) (sjo)
October 26, 2015 Filing 2707 DECLARATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Support re: (53 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 2705 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 52 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dena R. Hixon, M.D... Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1., #2 Exhibit 2., #3 Exhibit 3., #4 Exhibit 4., #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
October 26, 2015 Filing 2706 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (53 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS) MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dena R. Hixon, M.D.. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
October 26, 2015 Filing 2705 MOTION to Preclude the Testimony of Dena R. Hixon, M.D.. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2704 DECLARATION of Diogenes P. Kekatos in Support re: #2702 MOTION to Preclude certain opinions of Michelle Collins, Ph.D., and Drs. Vanessa K. Dalton, Jay Goldberg, Steven Goldstein, Geri Hewitt, Marcia C. Javitt, and Michael Policar.. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-G, #2 Exhibit H, #3 Exhibit I, #4 Exhibit J-M, #5 Exhibit N, #6 Exhibit O, #7 Exhibit P, #8 Exhibit Q, #9 Exhibit R-X)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2703 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2702 MOTION to Preclude certain opinions of Michelle Collins, Ph.D., and Drs. Vanessa K. Dalton, Jay Goldberg, Steven Goldstein, Geri Hewitt, Marcia C. Javitt, and Michael Policar. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Kekatos, Diogenes)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2702 MOTION to Preclude certain opinions of Michelle Collins, Ph.D., and Drs. Vanessa K. Dalton, Jay Goldberg, Steven Goldstein, Geri Hewitt, Marcia C. Javitt, and Michael Policar. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2701 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 22, 2015 re: Daubert Motions. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2700 AMENDED ORDER OF SEALING granting (2673) Motion to Seal Document in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Upon the application of Diogenes P. Kekatos, Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, by letter filed on October 21, 2015, (Doc. 2673), requesting permission to file under seal, it is hereby ORDERED, that declarations and memoranda of law in support of Plaintiffs' forthcoming motions, under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), to exclude the opinions of Drs. Michelle Collins, Vanessa Dalton, David W. Feigal, Jay Goldberg, Steven Goldstein, Geri D. Hewitt, Dena R. Hixon, Marcia C. Javitt, Michael Policar, and Maureen T.F. Reitman, may be filed in redacted form to the extent they include or discuss material designated as confidential (with unredacted hard copies provided to chambers). If such material so dominates the filing that redaction is impractical, the papers may be filed under seal and shall remain under seal until further order of this Court. Defendants will also follow the protocol described above with respect to any Rule 702 F.R.E. and Daubert motions they may file to exclude the opinions of various Plaintiffs' designated experts. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion at 13-MD-2434, Doc. 2673. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/22/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2699 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: #2697 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF APRIL ZAMBELLI-WEINER, PH.D... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2698 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2697 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF APRIL ZAMBELLI-WEINER, PH.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2697 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF APRIL ZAMBELLI-WEINER, PH.D.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2696 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: (48 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF ROGER C. YOUNG, M.D., PH.D... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2695 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (48 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF ROGER C. YOUNG, M.D., PH.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2694 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF ROGER C. YOUNG, M.D., PH.D.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06586-CS(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2693 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: #2691 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUSAN WRAY, PH.D... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P)(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2692 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2691 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUSAN WRAY, PH.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2691 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUSAN WRAY, PH.D.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2690 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: (49 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF RICHARD STRASSBERG, M.D... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2689 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (49 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS) MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF RICHARD STRASSBERG, M.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2688 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF RICHARD STRASSBERG, M.D.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2687 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: #2685 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUZANNE PARISIAN, M.D... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2686 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2685 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUZANNE PARISIAN, M.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2685 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF SUZANNE PARISIAN, M.D.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2684 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: #2682 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF RICHARD LUCIANI, M.D... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J)(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2683 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2682 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF RICHARD LUCIANI, M.D.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2682 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF RICHARD LUCIANI, M.D.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2681 DECLARATION of Christopher J. Cook in Support re: #2679 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF JOHN JARRELL, PH.D., P.E... Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2680 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2679 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF JOHN JARRELL, PH.D., P.E.. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2679 MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF JOHN JARRELL, PH.D., P.E.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
October 22, 2015 Filing 2678 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-131) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Georgia, Minnesota, New Jersey and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/22/2015) (sjo)
October 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2677 ORDER granting (2542) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2544) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2550) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2552) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2553) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2554) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2557) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2560) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2562) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2565) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (67) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-cv-03111-CS; granting (50) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-cv-06816-CS; granting (44) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-cv-07338-CS; granting (66) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:14-cv-00513-CS; granting (43) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:14-cv-00650-CS; granting (36) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:14-cv-00984-CS; granting (27) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:14-cv-03270-CS; granting (16) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:14-cv-04494-CS; granting (9) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:15-cv-05310-CS; granting (8) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:15-cv-05367-CS. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close the member cases in the caption. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate all pending motions in the member cases in the caption, and to terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434, Docs. 2542, 2544, 2550, 2552, 2553, 2554, 2557, 2560, 2562, 2565. Entries of judgment are not required. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/21/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (rj)
October 21, 2015 Filing 2676 COMPLAINT against Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-11536050)Document filed by Nelda Monico.(Lapeze, Keith)
October 21, 2015 Filing 2675 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Does 1 through 100. Document filed by Deirdre Jackson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01710-CS(Griffin, Keith)
October 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2674 ORDER granting 13 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request and terminate the pending motion at 15-cv-4956. Attorney William Harvell Burris terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/21/2015) (rj)
October 21, 2015 Filing 2673 LETTER MOTION to Seal Document (Plaintiffs' Fed. R. Evid. 702/Daubert Motions) addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated 10/21/2015. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
October 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2672 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #2671 Letter filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED ( Motions due by 10/22/2015.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/20/2015) (rj)
October 20, 2015 Filing 2671 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated October 20, 2015 re: Order of Sealing protocol. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
October 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2670 ORDER OF SEALING terminating #2669 Motion to Seal Document. Upon the application of Diogenes P. Kekatos, Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, by letter filed on October 19, 2015, (Doc. 2669), requesting permission to file under seal, it is hereby ORDERED, that declarations and memoranda of law in support of Plaintiffs' forthcoming motions, under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), to exclude the opinions of Drs. Vanessa Dalton, David W. Feigal, Jay Goldberg, Steven Goldstein, Geri D. Hewitt, Dena R. Hixon, Marcia C. Javitt, and Michael Policar, may be filed in redacted form to the extent they include or discuss material designated as confidential (with unredacted hard copies provided to chambers). If such material so dominates the filing that redaction is impractical, the papers may be filed under seal and shall remain under seal until further order of this Court. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion at 13-MD-2434, Doc. 2669. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/19/2015) (rj)
October 19, 2015 Filing 2669 LETTER MOTION to Seal Document (Plaintiffs' Fed. R. Evid 702 Motions) addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated October 19, 2015. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
October 15, 2015 Filing 2667 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-130)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/15/2015) (sjo)
October 14, 2015 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Cathy Seibel: Status Conference held on 10/14/2015. The Court issues oral rulings. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to term the following motions: 15 Civ. 1475 (CS) Gardiner, Term motion Doc. No. 2192 in MDL docket. Terminate all pending motions in individual case 15-cv-01475-cs. 14 Civ. 860 (CS) Miller, Term Motion Doc. No. 2200 in MDL docket. Terminate all pending motions in individual case 14 Civ. 860 (CS) 15 Civ. 1310 (CS) Slaght, Term Motion Doc. No. 2206 in MDL docket. 15 Civ. 1454 Harris-Kemp, Term Doc. 2193 in MDL Docket. Term all pending motions in individual case 15 Civ. 1454 (CS). This case is now dismissed. Please close this case (15 Civ. 1454 (CS)). 13 Civ. 7351 (CS) Ponce, Termination motion Doc. No. 51. Motion(s) terminated: (2192 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Gardiner Per CMO 22A. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, (8 in 7:15-cv-01475-CS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Gardiner Per CMO 22A filed by Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, (2200 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Miller Per CMO 22A filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, (7 in 7:15-cv-01454-CS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Harris-Kemp Per CMO 22A filed by Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., (2193 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Harris-Kemp Per CMO 22A. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, (51 in 7:13-cv-07351-CS) MOTION to Withdraw filed by Margaret J. Ponce, (2206 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Slaght Per CMO 22A filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, (33 in 7:14-cv-00860-CS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Miller Per CMO 22A. filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc. (Court Reporter Angela O'Donnell) (mml)
October 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2668 ORDER GRANTING MOTION OF LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P. and ZIMMERMAN REED P.L.L.P. TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF CONSTANCE NELSON granting Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff shall proceed pro se if she wishes to continue litigating her case, until such time as new counsel enters an appearance. Attorney Charles S Zimmerman; Yvonne M. Flaherty and Hart Lawrence Robinovitch terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/14/2015) (rj)
October 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2666 ORDER No. 9D (AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER): The following amended scheduling order partially modifying certain deadlines set forth in Order No. 9A (13-MD-2434, Doc. 1391; 13-MC-2434, Doc. 79) and Order No. 9C (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2503; 13-MC-2434, Doc. 121), is hereby adopted: 1. The deadlines for generic expert depositions are extended to October 20, 2015 for defense experts Maureen Reitman and Dr. David Feigal only. 2. Plaintiffs' Daubert/Fed. R. Evid. 702 motion for defense expert Dr. Dena Hixon will be due October 26, 2015; Defendants' opposition will be due November 25, 2015; Plaintiffs reply will be due December 15, 2015. 3. Plaintiffs' Daubert/Fed. R. Evid. 702 motions for defense experts Maureen Reitman and Dr. David Feigal will be due November 3, 2015; Defendants' oppositions will be due December 2, 2015; Plaintiffs replies will be due December 23, 2015. All other deadlines set forth in Order No. 9A and Order No. 9C remain in effect Motions due by 11/3/2015. Responses due by 12/2/2015 Replies due by 12/23/2015. Deposition due by 10/20/2015. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/14/2015) (rj)
October 13, 2015 Filing 2665 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 13, 2015 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03808-CS(Harrington, William)
October 13, 2015 Filing 2664 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 13, 2015 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03559-CS(Harrington, William)
October 13, 2015 Filing 2663 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 13, 2015 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04888-CS(Harrington, William)
October 13, 2015 Filing 2662 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 13, 2015 re: Status of defendants' letter motions filed under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Harrington, William)
October 9, 2015 Filing 2661 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 9, 2015 re: SDP Replacement Selections. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2660 ORDER No. 24B (Pleadings in Disposition Pool Cases): The Court hereby issues the following Order concerning the filing of pleadings in cases selected for the disposition pools: A. In the two Initial Disposition Pool actions that have been selected for trial Jennifer Danley, 13-cv-6586, and Christie Hayes, 14-cv-288 Defendants shall file responsive pleadings to the plaintiffs' complaints by no later than November 2, 2015. B. For cases selected for the Second Disposition Pool ("SDP"), pursuant to Order 24A (Amended Case Management Order Re: Second Disposition Pool Selection Process) (Docs. 2401 in 13-MD-2434 and 114 in 13-MC-2434) and the Court's Order of July 1, 2015 (making random SDP selections) (Docs. 2479 in 13-MD-2434 and 119 in 13-MC-2434), the plaintiffs are hereby granted leave to file amended complaints. C. For the initial batch of cases selected for the SDP by the Court and the parties on July 1 and 2, 2015, respectively, the deadline to do so was September 3, 2015. D. In any current case that was selected for the SDP as a replacement case after July 2, 2015, the plaintiff shall have (or has had) 30 days from the date of selection to the SDP or until September 3, 2015 (whichever deadline is later) to file an amended complaint. In any case subsequently selected for the SDP on or after the date of entry of this Order, the plaintiff similarly will have 30 days from the date of selection to the SDP to file an amended complaint. E. SDP complaints filed and served upon Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., prior to February 26, 2014, may be amended pursuant to Order No. 14 (Docs. 707 in 13-MD-2434 and 51 in 13-MC-2434) for the purpose of adding Defendants Bayer OY and Bayer Pharma AG. Any such amendment must have been completed by September 3, 2015 or, for any case selected for the SDP as a replacement case after July 2, 2015, must be completed 30 days from the date of selection to the SDP. Service of amended complaints on Bayer OY and Bayer Pharma AG shall be effected in accordance with Order No. 13 (Docs. 706 in 13-MD-2434 and 50 in 13-MC-2434) and Order No. 14. F. In any current case that was selected for the SDP prior to entry of this order, Defendants shall have 60 days from the date of selection to the SDP or until November 2, 2015 (whichever deadline is later) to respond to the SDP Plaintiffs' amended complaints (or complaints, in the case of any SDP plaintiff who has not filed or does not file an amended complaint). G. In the case of any plaintiff whose action is selected for the SDP as a replacement case on or after the date of entry of this Order, Defendants shall have 60 days to file a responsive pleading. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/8/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl)
October 8, 2015 Filing 2659 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-129) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota and South Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/08/2015) (sjo)
October 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2658 ORDER granting (2604) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("CMO") 7 and 7A, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") Containing All Core Criteria, (Doc. 2604), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 2604), and close the member cases in the table below. An entry of judgment is not required. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/6/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (mml)
October 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2657 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated 10/6/2015 re: Bayer would like to withdraw its CMO 22A letter motion in this matter. ENDORSEMENT: Defendants' request is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions, 13-md-2434, Doc. 2540 and 14-cv-1941, Doc. 35. SO ORDERED. Motions terminated: (2540 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Cochran Per CMO 22A filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, (35 in 7:14-cv-01941-CS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Cochran Per CMO 22A filed by Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healtcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/6/2015) (mml)
October 6, 2015 Filing 2656 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-128) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Iowa, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Washington and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/6/2015) (sjo)
October 5, 2015 Filing 2655 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated October 2, 2015, pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 (CMO 7"), Defendants Motion to Dismiss with prejudice is granted as to the Plaintiffs Rachel Havermale, 14-cv-6143, and Brooklyn Powers, 14-cv-9822; accordingly, these cases are closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 10/5/2015) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Right to Appeal, #2 Notice of Right to Appeal)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06143-CS, 7:14-cv-09822-CS(dt)
October 5, 2015 Filing 2654 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 5, 2015 re: Bayer's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Cochran per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2650 SECOND REVISED CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/1/2015) (mml)
October 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2653 ORDER granting (2603) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2603), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 2603), and close the cases in the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/2/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06143-CS, 7:14-cv-09822-CS (mml)
October 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2652 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James Shepherd dated 10/1/2015 re: Counsel requests that the the Court vacate the Revised Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order entered on December 20, 2013 and enter the corrected Second Revised Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. For the reasons stated below, 13-md-2434, Doc. 537, and 13-mc-2434, Doc 43, are hereby GRANTED. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/1/2015) (mml)
October 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2651 Vacated as per Judges Order dated 01/04/2016, Doc. # 2918 ORDER granting (2602) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2602), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion, (Doc. 2602). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/2/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (mml) Modified on 1/4/2016 (yv).
October 2, 2015 Filing 2649 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated October 2, 2015 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2602, 2603, 2604). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
October 2, 2015 Filing 2648 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 2, 2015 re: SDP Plaintiff Richard and Trial Venue Waiver. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 1, 2015 Filing 2647 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-127) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida, Indiana, Missouri and New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/30/2015) (sjo)
September 30, 2015 Filing 2646 SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
September 30, 2015 Filing 2645 MOTION to Dismiss No. 21- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
September 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2644 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (65 & 66 in Case No. 13-cv-5203) MOTIONS for Jeffrey A. Bowersox to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's counsel is permitted to withdraw as attorney of record, and Plaintiff Spain will proceed pro se. All deadlines as to Plaintiff Spain are stayed thirty (30) days to allow Plaintiff to find new counsel. Mr. Bowersox is directed to serve a copy of this order on Plaintiff by October 6, 2015. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions at Doc. 65 and 66. So Ordered. (Attorney Jeffrey A. Bowersox terminated) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/29/2015) (lnl)
September 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2643 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (66 & 67 in Case No. 13-cv-5204) MOTIONS for Jeffrey A. Bowersox to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's counsel is permitted to withdraw as attorney of record, and Plaintiff Cook-Hoots will proceed pro se. All deadlines as to Plaintiff Cook-Hoots are stayed thirty (30) days to allow Plaintiff to find new counsel. Mr. Bowersox is directed to serve a copy of this order on Plaintiff by October 6, 2015. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions at Doc. 66 and 67. So Ordered. (Attorney Jeffrey A. Bowersox terminated) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/29/2015) (lnl)
September 29, 2015 Filing 2642 LETTER RESPONSE to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from GERARD RYAN dated SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 re: (2541 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Comtois Per CMO 22A., (16 in 7:14-cv-04888-CS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Comtois Per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Shelby Comtois, Travis Comtois. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04888-CS(McCauley, Matthew)
September 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2641 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Brent William Bailey, dated 9/15/2015, re: Counsel writes to request that his name be removed from the service list and e-mail notifications regarding the above-reference litigation. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/24/2015) (As set forth in this Order) (lnl)
September 24, 2015 Filing 2640 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-126)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/24/2015) (sjo)
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2639 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD ORDER WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF MARGARET PONCE: ORDERED that Plaintiff's Counsel Firm serve Plaintiff Margaret Ponce with a copy of this Order on or before 9/30/2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED in Courtroom 621, U.S. Courthouse, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 that Plaintiff Margaret Ponce SHOW CAUSE on 10/14/2015 at 10:00 a.m., why Plaintiff Counsel's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiff on or before 10/7/2015. SO ORDERED. (Show Cause Hearing set for 10/14/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Show Cause Response due by 10/7/2015.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/22/2015) (mml)
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2638 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting (2637) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request. SO ORDERED. Attorney Pamela A. Borgess terminated in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (19) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Pamela A. Borgess terminated in case 7:15-cv-03173-CS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/22/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03173-CS. (mml)
September 21, 2015 Filing 2637 MOTION for Pamela A. Borgess to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Ray Cordero, Carmen Garcia(Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Ryan Cordero, Deceased Minor), Carmen Garcia.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03173-CS(O'Brien, James)
September 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2636 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN P.L.L.P. AND ZIMMERMAN REED P.L.L.P. AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF CONSTANCE NELSON: ORDERED that Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P. serve Plaintiff Constance Nelson with a copy of this Order on or before 9/24/15. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Constance Nelson SHOW CAUSE on 10/14/15 in Room 621 300 Quarropas St., white Plains, NY 10601 at 10:00 am, why Lockridge Grindal Nauen P.L.L.P. and Zimmerman Reed, P.L.L.P.'s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiff on or before 10/7/15. It is SO ORDERED. (Show Cause Hearing set for 10/14/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Show Cause Response due by 10/7/2015.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/17/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03890-CS (lnl)
September 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2635 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting (2633) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to effectuate the request as to Plaintiffs Kinell, 15-cv-2068, and Cubie, 15-cv-2067. SO ORDERED. Attorney David C. DeGreeff terminated in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (13) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney David C. DeGreeff terminated in case 7:15-cv-02067-CS; granting (11) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney David C. DeGreeff terminated in case 7:15-cv-02068-CS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/16/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02067-CS, 7:15-cv-02068-CS (mml)
September 16, 2015 Filing 2634 REPLY to Response to Motion re: (2604 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. BAYERS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION IN OPPOSITION (2623) and BAYERS OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REINSTATE HER COMPLAINT. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02886-CS(Harrington, William)
September 15, 2015 Filing 2633 MOTION for David C. DeGreeff to Withdraw as Attorney for Plainitffs Kayla Cubie and Stefanie Kinnell. Document filed by Kayla Cubie, Stefanie Lynn Kinnell. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02067-CS, 7:15-cv-02068-CS(DeGreeff, David)
September 15, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Eric Johnson to E-MAIL Document No. #2629 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to judgments@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
September 14, 2015 Filing 2632 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by James Griffin O'Brien on behalf of Ray Cordero, Carmen Garcia(Individually and as Representatives of the Estate of Ryan Cordero, Deceased Minor), Carmen Garcia. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03173-CS(O'Brien, James)
September 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2631 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting (2624) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Lisa Anne Schlitzkus terminated in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (54) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Lisa Anne Schlitzkus terminated in case 7:13-cv-08617-CS. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request and terminate the pending motions at 13-cv-8617, (doc.54), 13-md-2434,(doc. 2624). (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/10/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08617-CS (rj)
September 14, 2015 Filing 2630 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-125) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota and New York, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/14/2015) (sjo)
September 14, 2015 Filing 2629 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. Document filed by Rachel A. Sigure. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05767-CS(Johnson, Eric) Modified on 9/15/2015 (km).
September 14, 2015 Filing 2628 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-124) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New York and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/10/2015) (sjo)
September 14, 2015 Filing 2627 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-123) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Oregon, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/9/2015) (sjo)
September 10, 2015 Filing 2626 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Michael P. Doyle dated September 10, 2015 re: (2559 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Schaeffer Per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Heather Schaeffer. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03808-CS(Doyle, Michael)
September 10, 2015 Filing 2625 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Michael P. Doyle dated September 10, 2015 re: (2556 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Reed Per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Jessica Reed. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03559-CS(Doyle, Michael)
September 10, 2015 Filing 2624 MOTION for Lisa Anne Schlitzkus to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Melissa Anderson.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08617-CS(Chu, Welson)
September 10, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Shezad Malik to E-MAIL Document No. #2622 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
September 10, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney James O' Brien to E-MAIL Document No. #2621 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
September 9, 2015 Filing 2623 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2604 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. AND PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REINSTATE HER COMPLAINT. Document filed by SHANNON WADE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #6 Certificate of Service)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02886-CS(Heacox, Catherine)
September 9, 2015 Filing 2622 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Christina Cleveland. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03167-CS(Malik, Shezad) Modified on 9/10/2015 (km).
September 9, 2015 Filing 2621 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Stevi Wood, Michael Wood. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00598-CS(O'Brien, James) Modified on 9/10/2015 (km).
September 9, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Shezad Malik to E-MAIL Document No. #2614 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
September 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2620 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE Plaintiff; ELIZABETH SELLERS, hereby voluntarily dismisses this action, without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) & (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/8/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01087-CS (lnl)
September 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2619 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiff Natasha L. Vang voluntarily dismisses the abovecaptioned action with prejudice, against all Defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/8/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02390-CS (lnl)
September 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2618 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiff Dori Amber Jordan voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action with prejudice, against all Defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/8/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02387-CS (lnl)
September 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2617 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiffs voluntarily dismiss the above-captioned action with prejudice, against all Defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/8/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00107-CS (lnl)
September 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2616 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(i), Plaintiff, SHANNON ALEXANDER, by and through the undersigned counsel, voluntarily dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/8/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02956-CS (lnl)
September 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2615 AGREED MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: Comes now Plaintiff, Tina Glaspie, by her undersigned counsel, and hereby moves to voluntarily dismiss this cause of action without prejudice against Defendants, pursuant to Rule 41(2) with each party to bear their own costs. Plaintiff's counsel has consulted with Defendants' counsel regarding this Motion, and this action is agreeable to the Defendants. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/8/2015) (lnl)
September 8, 2015 Filing 2614 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Document filed by Denise Mrgudich. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07803-CS(Malik, Shezad) Modified on 9/9/2015 (km).
September 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2613 ORDER granting (2509) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2509), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion, (Doc. 2509): PLAINTIFF, MEMBER CASE NUMBER (S.D.N.Y.) July Cortez 15-cv-1711, Christina Giovanni 15-cv-1164, Erica Mitchell 15-cv-1723, Kamiria Morris 15-cv-901. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/4/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00901-CS, 7:15-cv-01164-CS, 7:15-cv-01711-CS, 7:15-cv-01723-CS (rj)
September 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2612 Vacated as per Judges Order dated 12/08/2015, Doc. # 2812 ORDER granting (2510) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("CMO") 7 and 7A, I hereby grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") Containing all Core Criteria, (Doc. 2510), as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet i.e. a Plaintiff Fact Sheet containing all core criteria or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order will be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants Motion, (Doc. 2510):PLAINTIFF, MEMBER CASE NUMBER (S.D.N.Y.) Sherry Broadwater 14-cv-885, Christi Howard-Williams 14-cv-5694, Misty Long 14-cv-9034, Jelina Petzinger 14-cv-5702, Sheryl Woods 14-cv-7320. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/4/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (rj) Modified on 12/8/2015 (yv).
September 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2611 ORDER No.27 (Scheduling Order): In addition to previously scheduled conferences, status conferences will be held on the following dates: (1) January 12, 2016; (2) February 9, 2016; (3) March 8, 2016; (4) April 5, 2016; (5) May 3, 2016; (6) June 7, 2016. All conferences will be held at 3:00 PM Eastern Standard Time. Status Conference set for 1/12/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 2/9/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 3/8/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 4/5/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 5/3/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 6/7/2016 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/4/2015) (rj)
September 3, 2015 Filing 2610 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #265 Amended Complaint against Bayer Healthcare AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Cantor Julie Miller. Related document: #265 Amended Complaint filed by Jonathan Miller, Cantor Julie Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(McCauley, Matthew)
September 3, 2015 Filing 2609 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 3, 2015 re: SDP Replacement Selections. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 3, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Matthew McCauley to E-MAIL Document No. #2608 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
September 2, 2015 Filing 2608 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. Document filed by Natasha Bjugan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04873-CS(McCauley, Matthew) Modified on 9/3/2015 (km).
September 2, 2015 Filing 2607 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carmen Sessions Scott on behalf of Rebecca L Mehrer. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03557-CS(Scott, Carmen)
September 2, 2015 Filing 2606 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-122)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, New Mexico and South Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/2/2015) (sjo)
September 1, 2015 Filing 2605 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated September 1, 2015 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2509, 2510). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
September 1, 2015 Filing 2604 FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
September 1, 2015 Filing 2603 MOTION to Dismiss No. 12, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
September 1, 2015 Filing 2602 MOTION to Dismiss No. 20- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
September 1, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Rachel Abrams to E-MAIL Document No. #2601 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
August 31, 2015 Filing 2601 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, PREJUDICE prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Does. Document filed by Shannon Alexander. (Abrams, Rachel) Modified on 9/1/2015 (km).
August 28, 2015 Filing 2600 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated August 28, 2015 re: SDP Trial Venue Waiver. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
August 27, 2015 Filing 2599 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #2510 SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Terre L Pendergrass. (Blackwell, Jeffrey)
August 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2598 OPINION AND ORDER re: (19 in 7:14-cv-04876-CS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc, (2231 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY. For the reasons above, the Defendants' motion to dismiss the Missouri Action on res judicata grounds is denied. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion, (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2231), and spread this opinion to, and terminate the pending motions in, the case in the caption. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/26/2015) (mml)
August 26, 2015 Filing 2597 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2510 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Kendra Lange. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08369-CS(Johnson, Michael)
August 26, 2015 Filing 2595 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-121) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California and Illinois, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 8/26/2015) (sjo)
August 25, 2015 Filing 2596 NOTICE OF ADJOURNMENT OF CONFERENCE: The conference previously scheduled by this Court for September 2, 2015 is adjourned by this Court to October 14, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. at the Charles L. Brieant United States Courthouse, 300 Quarropas St., White Plains, NY 10601, Courtroom 621. (mml)
August 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2594 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL OF RECORD: Accordingly, we move for Mark P. Robinson, Jr., Daniel S. Robinson, Karen L Karavatos, and Shannon Lukei of the firm of Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc., to be withdrawn as counsel of record for Plaintiff Mona Justin in the above referenced case. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request. SO ORDERED. Attorney Daniel S Robinson; Mark P Robinson, Jr; Karen L Karavatos and Shannon Lukei terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/21/2015) (mml)
August 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2593 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: COMES NOW Plaintiff Celina Martin, by and through the undersigned counsel, and pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) files this Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/21/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04222-CS. (mml)
August 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2592 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: COMES NOW Plaintiff's Sandra Harmon and Lester Harmon, by and through the undersigned counsel, and pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) file this Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/21/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03558-CS. (mml)
August 20, 2015 Filing 2591 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Steve Faries on behalf of Stephanie Reyes. New Address: Matthews & Associates, 2905 Sackett Street, Houston, TX, USA 77098, 713-522-5250. (Faries, Steve)
August 20, 2015 Filing 2590 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Steve Faries on behalf of Brooke A. Quinn. New Address: Matthews & Associates, 2905 Sackett Street, Houston, TX, USA 77098, 713-522-5250. (Faries, Steve)
August 20, 2015 Filing 2589 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Steve Faries on behalf of Sara E. Bahat. New Address: Matthews & Associates, 2905 Sackett Street, Houston, TX, USA 77098, 713-522-5250. (Faries, Steve)
August 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2588 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(a)(l)(A)(i), Priscilla Sammons, by and through the undersigned counsel, voluntarily dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/19/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03192-CS (lnl)
August 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2587 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(a)(l)(A)(i), Amanda Steinborn, by and through the undersigned counsel, voluntarily dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/19/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07036-CS (lnl)
August 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2586 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(i), Mellissa I. Naylor, by and through the undersigned counsel, voluntarily dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/19/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02569-CS (lnl)
August 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2585 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Kimberly L. Gross, by and through the undersigned counsel, voluntarily dismisses with prejudice the above-entitled action. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/19/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02947-CS. (mml)
August 20, 2015 Filing 2584 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-120)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arkansas, California, Georgia and Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 8/20/2015) (sjo)
August 19, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Shezad Malik to E-MAIL Document No. #2582 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
August 18, 2015 Filing 2582 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Document filed by Mary Katherine Garcia. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07800-CS(Malik, Shezad) Modified on 8/19/2015 (km).
August 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2583 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to CMO 22A and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Amber Barton, by and through the undersigned counsel, voluntarily dismisses with prejudice the action. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. SO ORDERED. Amber R. Barton terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/14/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00591-CS. (mml)
August 14, 2015 Filing 2578 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2509 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 19- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Taylor Erickson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01727-CS(Johnson, Michael)
August 14, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Jonathan Mencel to E-MAIL Document No. #2570 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to judgments@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
August 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2581 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (9) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request. SO ORDERED. Attorney Turner W. Branch terminated in case 7:15-cv-04814-CS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/13/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04814-CS. (mml)
August 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2580 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (58) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request. SO ORDERED. Attorney Sofia Bruera terminated in case 7:13-cv-05205-CS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/13/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05205-CS. (mml)
August 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2579 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate this request. SO ORDERED. Attorney Jane E. Joseph terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/13/2015) (mml)
August 13, 2015 Filing 2577 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2510 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Hayley Goncalves. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01280-CS(Johnson, Michael)
August 13, 2015 Filing 2576 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2510 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Wendy Parikh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00845-CS(Johnson, Michael)
August 13, 2015 Filing 2575 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Paul Matthews on behalf of Sara E. Bahat. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03040-CS(Matthews, David)
August 13, 2015 Filing 2574 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Rachal G. Rojas on behalf of Sara E. Bahat. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03040-CS(Rojas, Rachal)
August 13, 2015 Filing 2573 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Steve Faries on behalf of Sara E. Bahat. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03040-CS(Faries, Steve)
August 13, 2015 Filing 2572 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-119) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Georgia, Kansas, Minnesota, New Jersey and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 8/13/2015) (sjo)
August 13, 2015 Filing 2571 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2510 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Allysa Baxley. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09106-CS(Scott, Carmen)
August 13, 2015 Filing 2570 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Amber R. Barton. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00591-CS(Mencel, Jonathan) Modified on 8/14/2015 (km).
August 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2569 ORDER granting #2568 Motion for Nina Marie Towle to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
August 12, 2015 Filing 2568 MOTION for Nina Marie Towle to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11267920. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Nina Marie Towle. Return Date set for 8/12/2015 at 02:30 PM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Towle, Nina)
August 12, 2015 Filing 2567 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated August 12, 2015 re: SDP Pool. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
August 12, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Michael Johnson to E-MAIL Document No. [2533, 2534 & 2535] Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
August 12, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2568 MOTION for Nina Marie Towle to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-11267920. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2566 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Wood Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2565 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Williams Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2564 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Vang Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2563 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Steinborn Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2562 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Somma Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2561 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Sigure Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2560 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Shea Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2559 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Schaeffer Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2558 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Sammons Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2557 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Rowland Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2556 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Reed Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2555 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Ponse Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
August 11, 2015 Filing 2554 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Pierson Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2553 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Paxton Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2552 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff O'Neill Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2551 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Naylor Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2550 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff McGrane Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2549 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Martin Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2548 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Marquez Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2547 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Jordan Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2546 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Harmon Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2545 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Gross Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2544 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Gilman Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2543 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Garcia Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2542 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Concepcion Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2541 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Comtois Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2540 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Cochran Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2539 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Bjugan Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2538 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Barton Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2537 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Alexander Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
August 11, 2015 Filing 2536 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Bayer Oy; Bayer Pharma AG, re: (2507 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Amended Complaint. Document filed by Dwan Alexander. (Attachments: #1 Request for Summons)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07755-CS(Abramson, David)
August 10, 2015 Filing 2535 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Lori Louvier-Durand. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09813-CS(Johnson, Michael) Modified on 8/12/2015 (km).
August 10, 2015 Filing 2534 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Document filed by NGOC TRAN. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07808-CS(Malik, Shezad) Modified on 8/12/2015 (km).
August 10, 2015 Filing 2533 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Maria Zenaida Galvan Zabalza. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03175-CS(Malik, Shezad) Modified on 8/12/2015 (km).
August 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2532 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting (2531) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Henry N. Didier, Jr and Henry Nicholas Didier, Jr terminated in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (12) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Henry N. Didier, Jr and Henry Nicholas Didier, Jr terminated in case 7:15-cv-04761-CS; granting (15) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Henry N. Didier, Jr and Henry Nicholas Didier, Jr terminated in case 7:15-cv-04766-CS; granting (12) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Henry N. Didier, Jr and Henry Nicholas Didier, Jr terminated in case 7:15-cv-04769-CS; granting (17) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to effectuate the request, and spread this order to the cases in the caption. SO ORDERED. Attorney Henry N. Didier, Jr and Henry Nicholas Didier, Jr terminated in case 7:15-cv-04780-CS; granting (12) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Henry N. Didier, Jr and Henry Nicholas Didier, Jr terminated in case 7:15-cv-04783-CS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/7/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (mml)
August 7, 2015 Filing 2531 MOTION for Henry Didier to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Amber Willis, Tiffany Wagner, April Harrier, Nina White, Pauline Bocalan. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Griffin, Keith)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2530 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Thomas Joseph Preuss on behalf of Lisseth Heredia. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-05447-CS(Preuss, Thomas)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2529 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Marlena Mudd. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01765-CS(Griffin, Keith)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2528 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Angelica Ferretiz. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01716-CS(Griffin, Keith)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2527 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Melisa Johnson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00690-CS(Griffin, Keith)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2526 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Stefanie Lynn Kinnell. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02068-CS(Griffin, Keith)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2525 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Kayla Cubie. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02067-CS(Griffin, Keith)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2524 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Jionnis Lewis. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01783-CS(Griffin, Keith)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2523 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Amber Willis. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04769-CS(Griffin, Keith)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2522 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Nina White. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04780-CS(Griffin, Keith)
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2521 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (10) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate this request. SO ORDERED. Attorney Bruce L. Braley terminated in case 7:15-cv-04759-CS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/6/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04759-CS. (mml)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2520 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Tiffany Wagner. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04761-CS(Griffin, Keith)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2519 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of April Harrier. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04783-CS(Griffin, Keith)
August 6, 2015 Filing 2518 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Pauline Bocalan. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04766-CS(Griffin, Keith)
August 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2517 ORDER granting (2478) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2478), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 2478), and close the cases in the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/3/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06475-CS, 7:14-cv-07508-CS, 7:14-cv-07654-CS. (mml)
August 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2516 ORDER granting (2477) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2477), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order will be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion, (Doc. 2477). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/3/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (mml)
August 2, 2015 Filing 2514 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by John Lee Hoffoss, Jr on behalf of Lettie Lee. New Address: Hoffoss Devall, LLC, 517 W. College St., Lake Charles, LA, USA 70605, 337-433-2053. (Hoffoss, John)
July 31, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2515 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("CMO") 7 and 7A, and for the reasons stated in the Court's July 10, 2015 Order, (Doc. 2493), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria, (Doc. 2305), is GRANTED as to Ms. Boykin. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close Ms. Boykin's case. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/31/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08525-CS(rj)
July 31, 2015 Filing 2513 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Sarah J Showard on behalf of All Parties. New Address: Showard Law Firm, P.C., 4703 E. Camp Lowell Dr., Ste. 253, Tucson, AZ, USA 85712, (520) 622-3344. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Change of Address)(Showard, Sarah)
July 31, 2015 Filing 2512 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated July 31, 2015 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2477, 2478). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
July 31, 2015 Filing 2511 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-118) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New York, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/31/2015) (sjo)
July 30, 2015 Filing 2510 SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
July 30, 2015 Filing 2509 MOTION to Dismiss No. 19- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
July 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2508 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF TRISHA ANN TIDWELL: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Trisha Ann Tidwell, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Costs of Court are hereby taxed against the party incurring same. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/29/2015) (mml)
July 29, 2015 Filing 2507 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Dwan Alexander.(Abramson, David)
July 29, 2015 Filing 2506 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-117) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida, Michigan and Pennsylvania, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/27/2015) (sjo)
July 27, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Shayna Cook to E-MAIL Document No. #2505 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
July 24, 2015 Filing 2505 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s). Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00096-CS(Cook, Shayna) Modified on 7/27/2015 (km).
July 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2503 ORDER No. 9(AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER):The following amended scheduling order partially modifying certain deadlines set forth in Order 9A, (13-MD-2434, Doc. 1391; 13-MC-2434, Doc. 79), is hereby adopted: 1. The parties shall conduct depositions of case-specific experts for the cases selected for trial and of generic experts between July 27, 2015 and October 9, 2015. Plaintiffs shall not depose any generic defense expert on a topic as to which Defendants have not already deposed Plaintiffs' generic expert(s). Plaintiffs shall not depose any defense expert on a case as to which Defendants have not already deposed Plaintiffs' case-specific expert(s). 2. Daubert/Fed. R. Evid. 702 motions are due by October 22, 2015. Opposition briefs are due by November 24, 2015. Reply briefs are due by December 14, 2015. All other deadlines set forth in Order 9A and Order 9B, (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2356; 13- MC-2434, Doc. 112), remain in effect. Motions due by 10/22/2015. Responses due by 11/24/2015 Replies due by 12/14/2015. Deposition due by 10/9/2015. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/22/2015) (rj)
July 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2504 ORDER No. 26 (Expert Deposition Protocol) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: EXPERT DEPOSITION PROTOCOL: This Order governs expert depositions in the above- captioned multidistrict litigation("MDL No. 2434"): 1. Order No. 12, (13-MD-2434, Doc. 510), (Deposition Protocol), shall govern depositions to the extent its provisions are not inconsistent with the provisions of this Order. 2. Each party shall bear the costs of witness fees and travel expenses of its own experts relating to depositions. 3. If free office space is unavailable to accommodate an expert deposition, it is the producing party's obligation to pay to rent reasonably accommodating space for the deposition. 4. If an expert is designated as a generic expert only, then the deposition of that expert is limited to 7 hours on the record. 5. If an expert is designated as a case-specific expert only, then the deposition of that expert is limited to 7 hours on the record. 6. If an expert is designated as both a generic and a case-specific expert, then the deposition of that expert is limited to 10 hours on the record. 7. If an expert is designated as a case-specific expert on more than one case, then for each case beyond the first, that expert may be deposed for an additional 3 hours beyond the limits in Paragraphs 5 and 6. 8. Parties may seek additional deposition time for an expert beyond the limitations of this Order through agreement of the parties or through a motion to this Court for good cause shown. 9. Defendants will identify no more than ten experts as "priority experts" for plaintiffs to depose. These "priority experts" are the witnesses whom Defendants may call during trials for the Initial Disposition Pool cases. Plaintiffs shall have the right to depose andfile Daubert/Fed. R. Evid. 702 challenges to Defendants' "priority experts." 10. Defendants may designate any of the remaining "non-priority experts" for any trial as soon as reasonably possible but not less than sixty days before trial without agreement of the parties, or through a motion to this Court and good cause shown. Upon such designation, Plaintiffs shall have the right to depose the "non-priority expert" and file Daubert/Fed. R. Evid. 702 challenges. 11. In the event that any "non-priority experts" are not identified by Defendants as trial experts for trial cases from the Initial Disposition Pool, Plaintiffs' right to depose and file Daubert/Fed. R. Evid. 702 challenges to any "non-priority expert" that is identified in any trial setting is specifically preserved. 12. Nothing in this Order shall serve as a basis to reopen generic expert discovery beyond generic experts whose reports already have been disclosed. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/22/2015) (rj)
July 20, 2015 Filing 2502 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Carmen S. Scott dated July 14, 2015 re: Defense Expert Conflict. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
July 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2501 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #2497 Letter filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiffs are directed to send the Court, by Monday, copies of the privileged documents it shared with Dr. Goldstein for the Court's in camera review, as suggested on page 2 of Ms. Scott's letter (a copy of which should be filed on the docket in this case). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/17/2015) (mml)
July 17, 2015 Filing 2500 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated July 17, 2015 re: Opposition to Goldstein DQ. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Goldstein Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Report)(Cook, Shayna)
July 17, 2015 Filing 2499 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-116) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida, Minnesota, Ohio and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/17/2015) (sjo)
July 15, 2015 Filing 2498 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #2497 Letter filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff's request is granted. The July 22 status conference will also be a pre motion conference with respect to plaintiff's anticipated motion to disqualify. Defendants' response (in a letter, no more than three pages) is due Monday, July 20, 2015 at 10:00 am EST. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/15/2015) (rj)
July 15, 2015 Filing 2497 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated July 15 2015 re: Requesting a concurrent pre-motion conference at next Status Conference. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
July 10, 2015 Filing 2496 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Michael Ray Clinton on behalf of Niki Becker, Yessica Cano, Kathryn Cordell, Kristen Nicole Cox, Anita Eleby, Yvette Ezell, Hannah Fulmer, Katherine Gallaher, Jaclyn Gargulinski, Jennifer Hunsucker, Mona Justin, Elina Lloyd, Sally McAdam, Diana Olatunbosun, Tamara Rankin, Vanessa Valdez, Gerlin Munoz Chavarria, Tyler Scott Johnson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Clinton, Michael)
July 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2495 ORDER granting (2433) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("CMO") 7 and 7A, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria, (Doc. 2433), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 2433), and close the member cases in the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/10/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04299-CS, 7:14-cv-06882-CS (lnl)
July 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2494 ORDER granting (2431) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2431), is hereby GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 2431). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/10/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
July 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2493 ORDER granting (2305) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Defendants' motion to dismiss with prejudice is GRANTED as to the plaintiffs in the table below, and Ms. Boykin's voluntary dismissal, (13-CV-8525, Doc. 82), is VACATED. The Plaintiffs Steering Committee is directed to provide a copy of this order to all plaintiffs. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (13-MD-2434, Doc. 2305), vacate the order granting Ms. Boykin's voluntary dismissal, (13-CV-8525, Doc. 82), and close the member cases in the table. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/10/2015) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
July 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2492 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk is respectfully directed to close Ms. Hermenegildo's case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/9/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03832-CS(lnl)
July 8, 2015 Filing 2491 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-115) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota, New York and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/8/2015) (sjo)
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2490 ORDER granting (2432) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2432), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiff in the table below The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the case in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 2432), and close the case in the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/8/2015) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06093-CS (lnl)
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2489 ORDER granting (2339) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2339), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 2339). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/8/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00066-CS, 7:15-cv-00068-CS, 7:15-cv-00542-CS (lnl)
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2488 ORDER granting (2340) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2340), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 2340), and close the cases in the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/8/2015) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
July 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2487 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2484) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request, and to docket this order in Ms. Jackson's member case docket, 15-cv-1710. So Ordered. Attorney James A Harris and Charles T Paglialunga terminated in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/6/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01710-CS (lnl)
July 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2486 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2485) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request, and to docket this order in Ms. Norman and Ms. Lahoe's member cases, dockets 15-cv-1116 and 15-cv-1110; respectively. So Ordered. (Attorney Corrie Johnson Yackulic terminated in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/6/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01110-CS, 7:15-cv-01116-CS (lnl)
July 1, 2015 Filing 2485 MOTION for Corrie J. Yackulic to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Xonda Lahoe, Corina Norman. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Griffin, Keith)
July 1, 2015 Filing 2484 MOTION for Charles T. Paglialunga and James A. Harris to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Deirdre Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Griffin, Keith)
July 1, 2015 Filing 2483 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Deirdre Jackson. (Griffin, Keith)
July 1, 2015 Filing 2482 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated July 1, 2015 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2431, 2432, 2433). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
July 1, 2015 Filing 2481 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Xonda Lahoe. (Griffin, Keith)
July 1, 2015 Filing 2480 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Keith David Griffin on behalf of Corina Norman. (Griffin, Keith)
July 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2479 ORDER SECOND DISPOSITION POOL SELECTIONS: Pursuant to Case Management Order ("CMO") 24A, paragraph 3, the Parties informed the Court that a total of 759 plaintiffs served a Plaintiff Fact Sheet with Core Criteria completed by May 1, 2015. (Doc. 2465.) Defense counsel has assigned each of those plaintiffs a unique number, ranging from 1 through 759. In accordance with CMO 24A, the Court randomly selects the following five numbers, which correspond to five of those individual cases (the corresponding cases being unknown to the Court), for inclusion in the Second Disposition Pool: 121, 686, 561, 34, 7. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/1/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl)
June 30, 2015 Filing 2478 MOTION to Dismiss No. 11, With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
June 30, 2015 Filing 2477 MOTION to Dismiss No. 18- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
June 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2476 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Michelle R. Mangrum, dated 6/29/2015, re: Counsel writes: Please be advised that Wendy L. Williams and Michael G. Elliott are no longer with Shook, Hardy & Bacon LLP effective June 27, 2015. Please accept this correspondence as the Notice of Withdrawal for each and kindly remove Wendy Williams and Michael Elliott from the service list and e-mail notification with regard-to the above-referenced matter. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/29/2015) (lnl)
June 29, 2015 Filing 2475 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a conference proceeding held on 6/17/2015 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(McGuirk, Kelly)
June 29, 2015 Filing 2474 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: conference held on 6/17/2015 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Albert Gorn, 914-390-4222. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/23/2015. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/3/2015. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/1/2015.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(McGuirk, Kelly)
June 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2473 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting (2472) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Sanders-Brooks' case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 2472. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/26/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08409-CS. (mml)
June 26, 2015 Filing 2472 MOTION to Vacate . Document filed by Whitney Sanders-Brooks.(Hutton, Mark)
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2471 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF JOHN T. KIRTLEY, III, OF FERRER POIROT & WANSBROUGH, AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORDS FOR PLAINTIFF: John T. Kirtley, III ("JTK"), of the firm of Ferrer, Poirot & Wansbrough ("FPW"), represents Plaintiff, SARAH B. MILLER, in this pharmaceutical products liability action presently pending before this Court. The action, which was filed on January 23, 2014, alleges that Plaintiff suffered personal injuries as a result of her alleged use of Mirena intrauterine system ("IUS"). Before the undersigned is JTK/FPW's application for leave to withdraw as Plaintiff's counsel. Based on the accompanying Declaration of John T. Kirtley, III, dated June 24, 2015, John T. Kirtley, III, on May 20, 2015, advised Plaintiff that he and the firm would seek to withdraw from representing her because the firm has determined that her case is not economically feasible to continue to pursue. Plaintiff gave her verbal consent. However, in an effort to obtain written permission to withdraw, JTK/FPW has made numerous unsuccessful attempts to contact Plaintiff. Specifically, JTK/FPW has attempted to reach Plaintiff by telephone, and electronic mail to obtain her written consent to withdraw, but Plaintiff has not responded. IT APPEARS TO THE COURT, based on the evidence presented by JTK/FPW, that there is good cause to grant JTK/FPW's motion to be relived as counsel under Local Civil Rule 1.4 of the Southern District of New York and ABA-AMPRC Rule l.16(b)(6). Specifically, (1) good cause for withdrawal exists because FPW has determined that the case is no longer economically feasible to continue to prosecute making it unreasonably difficult for JTK/FPW to continue to represent client; and (2) only a Fact Sheet has been completed in the case - no trial date has been set, and thus Plaintiff will not be prejudiced by the proposed withdrawal. ACCORDINGLY, it is on this 24th day of June, 2015, ORDERED that JTK/FPW serve Plaintiff Sarah Miller with a copy of this Order on or before July 1, 2015, by US mail confirmed receipt delivery and/or overnight delivery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on July 22, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 621, U.S. Courthouse, 300 Quarropas St., White Plains, NY 10601, Plaintiff Sarah B. Miller SHOW CAUSE why John T. Kirtley, III/FPW's Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiff on or before July 15, 2015. Opposing papers shall be filed with the Court, and Plaintiff shall provide Mr. Kirtley with a copy of such papers at the same time. (Show Cause Hearing set for 7/22/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Show Cause Response due by 7/15/2015.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00860-CS (lnl)
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2470 ORDER in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (35) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that W. Mark Lanier and Alex Brown, of The Lanier Law Firm, PLLC, are removed as counsel of record for Plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Matthew Joseph McCauley, of Parker Waichman LLP, and Dawn M. Chmielewski, of Neblett, Beard and Arsenault, are enrolled as Plaintiffs attorneys of record herein. (Attorney W Mark Lanier terminated in case 7:14-cv-00639-CS) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00639-CS (lnl)
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2469 ORDER in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (50) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that W. Mark Lanier and Alex Brown, of The Lanier Law Firm, PLLC, are removed as counsel of record for Plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Matthew Joseph McCauley, of Parker Waichman LLP, and Dawn M. Chmielewski, of Neblett, Beard and Arsenault, will remain as Plaintiffs attorneys of record herein. So Ordered. (Attorney Alex J Brown terminated in case 7:13-cv-06906-CS) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06906-CS (lnl)
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2468 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2462) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (14) Motion to Vacate in case 7:14-cv-08418-CS. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Barrett's case without prejudice is vacated. As Defendants have informed the Court that they have no objection, Plaintiff's request to grant her voluntary dismissal, (Doc. 13), is granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion at 13-md-2434, Doc. 2462, and close Plaintiff's case; 14-cv-8418. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08418-CS (lnl)
June 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2467 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2463) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (20) Motion to Vacate in case 7:14-cv-07233-CS. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. McLoud's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 20, and 13-md-2434, doc. 2463. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07233-CS (lnl) (Main Document 2467 replaced on 6/24/2015) (lnl).
June 24, 2015 Filing 2466 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-114) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Illinois and Mississippi, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/24/2015) (sjo)
June 24, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Yvonne Flaherty to E-MAIL Document No. #2464 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
June 23, 2015 Filing 2465 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated June 23, 2015 re: SDP eligible cases. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
June 23, 2015 Filing 2464 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, Without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Crystal Abraro. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02066-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne) Modified on 6/24/2015 (km).
June 23, 2015 Filing 2463 MOTION to Vacate Court Order Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Karen McLoud.(Mehrmann, Michael)
June 22, 2015 Filing 2462 MOTION to Vacate (13 in 7:14-cv-08418-CS) Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, (9 in 7:14-cv-08418-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, . Document filed by Peggy Susanne Barrett.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08418-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
June 22, 2015 Filing 2461 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lawrence L. Jones, II on behalf of Laura Rains. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04818-CS(Jones, Lawrence)
June 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2460 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (20 in 7:15-cv-00518-CS) LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Brian J. Perkins dated June 19, 2015 re: In re Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, 13-MD-2434, Archer et al. v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., No. 7:15-cv-00518-CS, Plaintiffs Nata sha Archer, Unity Boyle and Shelisha Crawford. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk is respectfully directed to terminate Doc. 19. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/22/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00518-CS (lnl)
June 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2459 ORDER denying (2446) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: In accordance with CMO 7, Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate, (Doc. 2446), is DENIED, and Defendants' Motion to convert Plaintiff's dismissal without prejudice into a dismissal with prejudice, (Doc. 2448), is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the case in the caption, close Plaintiff's case, and to terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434, Docs. 2446 and 2448. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/22/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07602-CS (lnl)
June 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2458 ORDER in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (17) Motion to Vacate in case 7:14-cv-05659-CS: As Plaintiff's motion is unopposed, and because the Court finds that Plaintiff's voluntary dismissal was filed as a result of excusable neglect, see Pioneer, 507 U.S. at 388 (interpretation of "excusable neglect" includes "both simple, faultless omissions to act and, more commonly, omissions caused by carelessness"); see also U.S. v. Hooper, 9 F.3d 257, 259 (2d Cir. 1993) (interpreting "excusable neglect" in context of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b), and finding excusable neglect where legal assistant erred in filing late notice of appeal), Plaintiff's motion to vacate the order dismissing her case and reinstate her complaint is GRANTED pursuant to FRCP 60(b)(1), and the order dismissing Plaintiff's case, (Doc. 13), is hereby VACATED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to reopen Plaintiff's case, and terminate the pending motion, (Doc. 17). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/19/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05659-CS (lnl)
June 18, 2015 Filing 2457 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2431 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 17- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Jessica Hardy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Documentation of Defendants' Receipt of Plaintiff's PFS)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00993-CS(Johnson, Michael)
June 18, 2015 Filing 2456 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-113) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Louisiana, New Mexico, Pennsylvania and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/18/2015) (sjo)
June 18, 2015 Filing 2454 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-112)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/17/2015) (sjo)
June 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2455 STIPULATION AND ORDER CONCERNING TRIAL POOL: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, as follows 1. Plaintiff Mejia's motion for voluntary dismissal is GRANTED, with each side bearing its own costs. 2. In light of the dismissal of Plaintiff Mejia's action, Defendants may strike one of Plaintiffs' remaining Trial Pool selections. 3. Defendants must notify the Court and counsel for Plaintiffs of their decision to remove either Ms. Danley or Ms. Keller from the Trial Pool no later than entry of this order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/17/2015) (lnl)
June 17, 2015 Filing 2453 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2431 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 17- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Amber Spear. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Documentation of Defendants' Receipt of Plaintiff's PFS)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00735-CS(Johnson, Michael)
June 16, 2015 Filing 2452 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2341 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Robert Davis, Shaunte Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01943-CS(Tate, Mark)
June 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2451 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #2324 MOTION to Vacate (1911 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, & Plaintiff's Response to Order. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Jones' case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 39. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/16/2015) (lnl)
June 15, 2015 Filing 2450 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lawrence L. Jones, II on behalf of Ashley S. Smith. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-04402-CS(Jones, Lawrence)
June 12, 2015 Filing 2449 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated June 12, 2015 re: Proposed Stipulation and Order. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04322-CS(Cook, Shayna)
June 12, 2015 Filing 2448 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2446 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2175 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07602-CS(Harrington, William)
June 12, 2015 Filing 2447 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-111)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/10/2015) (sjo)
June 10, 2015 Filing 2446 MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2175 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Jennifer Haywood.(Melidonian, Lina)
June 10, 2015 Filing 2445 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2237 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Kerry Walden. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05370-CS(Lukei, Shannon)
June 10, 2015 Filing 2444 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2237 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Mezel Tyler, Nickie Tyler. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05369-CS(Lukei, Shannon)
June 10, 2015 Filing 2443 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2237 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Brittany Ivy. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04051-CS(Lukei, Shannon)
June 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2442 NON-PARTY SUBPOENAS AT ISSUE: These rulings leave nine subpoenaed entities. Of these nine, six have submitted objections (Axiom, Blue Diesel, Grey Healthcare, Mom Central, Oglivy CommonHealth, and Young & Rubicam), and three have not (Daniel Ferrante, Juice Box Design, and Red Nucleus). Of the subpoenaed persons or entities who have not objected, two have produced documents (Juice Box Design and Red Nucleus), and one has not (Daniel Ferrante). The objections of the subpoenaed entities are sustained, and the following subpoenas are quashed: Axiom, Blue Diesel, Grey Healthcare, Mom Central, Oglivy CommonHealth, and Young & Rubi cam. Despite the Court's efforts to limit the breadth of the subpoenas, they remain vastly overbroad in both time and scope. I am satisfied that the need to expend significant expense and time in order to gather these documents is a real concern in this case, and I therefore quash these six subpoenas. I note, however, that issues of trade secrets and confidential information are already dealt with in this case, and that does not present any concern to the undersigned in reaching this decision. Furthermore, concerns about privilege (especially unsupported concerns which may, after all, be mere conjecture), may be dealt with through a standard privilege log. Despite these protections for subpoenaed persons and entities, the broad scope of the subpoenas as they were issued leads to the inescapable conclusion that they are, in fact, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Those six subpoenas to which objections were filed are quashed. Juice Box Design and Red Nucleus did not object to the subpoenas, and they have already produced their documents, therefore those subpoenas will be allowed to stand. Daniel Ferrante has also not objected, and is granted to June 30, 2015, to produce documents responsive to the subpoena. In light of Bayer's general objection and assertion of burdensomeness, I will permit Daniel Ferrante to submit information supportive of a specific claim of burdensomeness in order for him to seek to quash the subpoena, but any such submission must be made no later than June 19, 2015. Plaintiffs' Steering Committee are directed to serve a copy of this Order on each of the subpoenaed parties, or, where attorneys have appeared on the party's behalf, on counsel, no later than Monday, June 15, 2015. This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 6/9/2015) (mml)
June 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2441 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2440) MOTION to Vacate 2351 Order. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Miller's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 2440, and docket this Order in ms. Miller's member case, 14-cv-7305. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/9/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07305-CS (lnl)
June 8, 2015 Filing 2440 MOTION to Vacate #2351 Order,,,, . Document filed by Casey Miller.(Melidonian, Lina)
June 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2439 ORDER granting (2187) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2188) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2190) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2191) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2196) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2201) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2202) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2204) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2205) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2207) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2208) Motion to Dismiss; granting (2209) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: On March 13, 2015, pursuant to Case Management Order No. 22A ("CMO 22A," Doc. 1510), Defendants submitted motions to dismiss all of the claims asserted in the member cases listed in the caption. CMO 22A allows Defendants to move to dismiss cases they believe are subject to dismissal under this Court's decision in Truitt v. Bayer, 29 F. Supp. 3d 345 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). CMO 22A provides that each plaintiff against whom Defendants so move has 30 days to respond by either submitting a letter in opposition or voluntarily dismissing her case with prejudice. If a plaintiff takes no such action within 30 days of receiving a CMO 22A motion to dismiss, Defendants may submit a proposed order of dismissal with prejudice. No plaintiff to whom this Order applies submitted any response whatsoever to Defendants' motions within the allotted 30 days. Indeed, none of these plaintiffs have submitted a response since the 30-day period expired on April 13, 2015. By failing to oppose Defendants' motions to dismiss within the allotted 30 days, Plaintiffs have abandoned their claims. See Hanig v. Yorktown Cent. Sch. Dist., 384 F. Supp. 2d 710, 723 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) ("[B]ecause plaintiff did not address defendants motion to dismiss with regard to this claim, it is deemed to be abandoned and hereby dismissed."); see also In re World Trade Ctr. Litig., 722 F.3d 483, 487 (2d Cir. 2013) ("in complex cases" district courts are accorded "particular deference [when making] discretionary determination[s] undertaken to manage the litigation before the court"). Moreover, Defendants' arguments that Plaintiffs' claims are time-barred and otherwise subject to dismissal appear to be correct under both applicable state law and the Truitt opinion. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close the member cases in the caption. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate all pending motions in the member cases in the caption, and to terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434, Docs. 2187, 2188, 2190, 2191, 2196, 2201, 2202, 2204, 2205, 2207, 2208, 2209. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/4/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
June 3, 2015 Filing 2438 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2437 MOTION to Dismiss ., #2436 MOTION to Dismiss . . Document filed by Dilsia Mejia. (Plymale, Douglas)
June 3, 2015 Filing 2437 MOTION to Dismiss . Document filed by Dilsia Mejia. Responses due by 6/16/2015(Plymale, Douglas) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
June 3, 2015 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Douglas Robert Plymale to RE-FILE Document #2436 MOTION to Dismiss . ERROR(S): Supporting Documents are filed separately, each receiving their own document #. (db)
June 2, 2015 Filing 2436 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION to Dismiss . Document filed by Dilsia Mejia. Responses due by 6/16/2015 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum In Support)(Plymale, Douglas) Modified on 6/3/2015 (db).
June 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2435 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2430) MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2351 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Campbell's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 2430. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/1/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06608-CS (lnl)
June 1, 2015 Filing 2434 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated June 1, 2015 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2339, 2340). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
June 1, 2015 Filing 2433 FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
June 1, 2015 Filing 2432 TENTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
June 1, 2015 Filing 2431 MOTION to Dismiss No. 17- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
May 29, 2015 Filing 2430 MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2351 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria. Document filed by Stephanie Campbell.(Melidonian, Lina)
May 28, 2015 Filing 2429 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-110) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/28/2015) (sjo)
May 28, 2015 Filing 2428 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-109) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts and Utah, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/27/2015) (sjo)
May 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2427 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2420) MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2351 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Berry's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 2420. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/27/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06753-CS (lnl)
May 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2426 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2422) MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2351 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Robinett's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 2422. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/27/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06481-CS (lnl)
May 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2425 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2423) MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2351 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Waters' case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 2423. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/27/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07321-CS (lnl)
May 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2424 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2421) MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2351 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Mattox's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 2421. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/27/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06615-CS (lnl)
May 26, 2015 Filing 2423 MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2351 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria. Document filed by Sonja Waters.(Melidonian, Lina)
May 26, 2015 Filing 2422 MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2351 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria. Document filed by Stevie Robinett.(Melidonian, Lina)
May 26, 2015 Filing 2421 MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2351 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria. Document filed by Nicole Mattox.(Melidonian, Lina)
May 26, 2015 Filing 2420 MOTION to Vacate Court Order Number 2351 Dismissing Plaintiff's Claims for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria. Document filed by Mikaela Berry.(Melidonian, Lina)
May 21, 2015 Filing 2419 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated May 21, 2015 re: Bayer Defendants' veto of PSC selection from trial pool. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
May 21, 2015 Filing 2418 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2341 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Heather R. Blocker. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08417-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
May 21, 2015 Filing 2417 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, Esq. dated May 21, 2015 re: Veto Plaintiff Steering Committee's selection of Laurie Nordman. Document filed by SHERRY BROADWATER, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
May 20, 2015 Filing 2416 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Charles Wade Miller on behalf of Kenna C Bounds. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03702-CS(Miller, Charles)
May 20, 2015 Filing 2415 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-108) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona and Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/20/2015) (sjo)
May 19, 2015 Filing 2414 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Panagiotis V Albanis on behalf of Tomekia S. Blackmon. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00315-CS(Albanis, Panagiotis)
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2413 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Reynolds E. Pitts, Jr., dated 5/13/2015, re: Counsel writes to request that his name be removed from the e-mail distribution list for the above-referenced cases and related cases. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate this request. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/19/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03412-CS (lnl)
May 19, 2015 Filing 2412 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Panagiotis V Albanis on behalf of Nada Marwan Muwaquet. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01449-CS(Albanis, Panagiotis)
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2411 ORDER granting (2408) Motion for Daniel E. Phillips to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03795-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
May 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2410 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 5/18/2015, re: Counsel writes: Defendants have requested, and plaintiffs have agreed to, a brief extension on the veto deadline in the Court's April 23, 2015 Order modifying Case Management Order 9A. Paragraph 2 of that Order sets the veto deadline for Wednesday, May 20, 2015 at 4 p.m. Eastern. The parties jointly request that the veto deadline be moved to the following day Thursday, May 21, 2015, at noon. The parties request this accommodation to allow for a review of a deposition set for May 20, 2015. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The veto deadline is extended from May 20, 2015 at 4:00 pm to May 21, 2015 at noon eastern. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/19/2015) (lnl)
May 18, 2015 Filing 2409 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated May 18, 2015 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Third Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice for failure to provide Core Criteria information. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
May 18, 2015 Filing 2408 MOTION for Daniel E. Phillips to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10932972. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Tara Waldal. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03795-CS(Phillips, Daniel)
May 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2407 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2345 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 24 in 7:14-cv-04876-CS) Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, Request for Permission to File Sur-Reply and for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Christopher Oxx dated May 4, 2015. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff may submit a sur-reply, limited to five pages, within seven days of the filing of this order. The Parties should be prepared to discuss these issues at the June 17, 2015 conference. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/18/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04876-CS (lnl)
May 18, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (10 in 7:15-cv-03795-CS, 2408 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Daniel E. Phillips to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10932972. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03795-CS(sdi)
May 15, 2015 Filing 2406 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2341 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Eryne Otterson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05788-CS(Saba, Ryan)
May 15, 2015 Filing 2405 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2341 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Christina Miske. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05695-CS(Saba, Ryan)
May 15, 2015 Filing 2404 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2341 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Rebecca Fisher. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05705-CS(Saba, Ryan)
May 15, 2015 Filing 2403 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated May 15, 2015 re: Status of defendants' letter motions filed under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Harrington, William)
May 15, 2015 Filing 2402 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-107) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/15/2015) (sjo)
May 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2401 ORDER No. 24A - AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: SECOND DISPOSITION POOL SELECTION PROCESS: This Order governs the selection of cases pending in MDL No. 2434 to be included in the Second Disposition Pool. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/14/2015) (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
May 14, 2015 Filing 2400 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-106) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Missouri, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/13/2015) (sjo)
May 13, 2015 Filing 2399 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated May 13, 2015 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01475-CS(Harrington, William)
May 13, 2015 Filing 2398 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated May 13, 2015 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01454-CS(Harrington, William)
May 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2397 ORDER NO.25 (Non-Party Discovery) CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR DISCOVERY PRODUCED BY NON-PARTIES: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs and Defendants BAYER HEALTH CARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC., BAYER PHARMA AG ("BP AG") and BAYER OY ("BOY") through their respective counsel and subject to the approval of this Court, that the following Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order for Discovery Produced by Non-Parties shall be entered in this action. This Order shall govern the production and use of documents produced by non-parties to this litigation. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/12/2015) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
May 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2396 ORDER granting (2392) Motion for Mike Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03412-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
May 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2395 ORDER granting (2387) Motion for Kathryn Snapka to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09132-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
May 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2394 ORDER granting #2391 Motion for Amber Marie Seu Yin Pang Parra to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2393 ORDER granting (2390) Motion for Todd Michael Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03412-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
May 12, 2015 Filing 2392 MOTION for Mike Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10913678. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Alexis Rinas. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03412-CS(Miller, Mike)
May 12, 2015 Filing 2391 MOTION for Amber Marie Seu Yin Pang Parra to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10913679. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Melissa Fenwick. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Hawaii, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Texas, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Pang Parra, Amber)
May 12, 2015 Filing 2390 AMENDED MOTION for Todd Michael Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Alexis Rinas. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03412-CS(Miller, Todd)
May 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2389 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (2368) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2369) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2370) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2371) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2372) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2373) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2374) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2375) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2376) Motion to Withdraw Reference; granting (2376) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2377) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2378) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2379) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated; granting (2380) Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Tony Wayne Edwards terminated in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request and terminate the motion docs. 2368, 2369, 2370, 2371, 2372, 2373, 2374, 2375, 2376, 2377, 2378, 2379, and 2380. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/12/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
May 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2388 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #2363 MOTION for Jackqualyn R. Quinton to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request as to the Plaintiff in the caption. So Ordered. (Attorney Jackqualyn R. Quinton terminated) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/12/2015) (lnl)
May 12, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (16 in 7:14-cv-09132-CS, 2387 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Kathryn Snapka to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected Motion. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09132-CS(wb)
May 12, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (2390 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7 in 7:15-cv-03412-CS) AMENDED MOTION for Todd Michael Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03412-CS(wb)
May 12, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2391 MOTION for Amber Marie Seu Yin Pang Parra to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10913679. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #2392 MOTION for Mike Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10913678. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 11, 2015 Filing 2387 MOTION for Kathryn Snapka to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected Motion. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Beverly Amanda Moncrief. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09132-CS(Snapka, Kathryn)
May 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2386 ORDER granting (2382) Motion for William T. Dowd to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
May 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2385 ORDER granting (2381) Motion for Carasusana B. Wall to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03173-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
May 11, 2015 Filing 2384 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Todd Michael Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10907247. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Alexis Rinas. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03412-CS(Miller, Todd) Modified on 5/11/2015 (sdi).
May 11, 2015 Filing 2383 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James Shepherd dated May 11, 2015 re: Proposed Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order for Non-Party Discovery. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
May 11, 2015 Filing 2382 MOTION for William T. Dowd to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10906415. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Keisha Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(Dowd, William)
May 11, 2015 Filing 2381 MOTION for Carasusana B. Wall to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10906395. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Ray Cordero, Carmen Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03173-CS(Wall, Carasusana)
May 11, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (2384 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 6 in 7:15-cv-03412-CS) MOTION for Todd Michael Miller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10907247. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Missing Certificate of Good Standing from the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03412-CS(sdi)
May 11, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (9 in 7:15-cv-03173-CS, 2381 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Carasusana B. Wall to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10906395. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-03173-CS(wb)
May 11, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (2382 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 43 in 7:14-cv-04247-CS) MOTION for William T. Dowd to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10906415. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(wb)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2380 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Lyndsey Woods.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2379 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Nandee Walker.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2378 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Leah Wade.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2377 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Lindsey D. Stepp.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2376 FIRST MOTION to Withdraw Reference ., MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Pamela J Richardson.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2375 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Carina Perez.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2374 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Jessica M. Matlock.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2373 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Humaira Mahmood.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2372 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Genesia E Lozano.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2371 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Darci Hughes.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2370 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Melanie Gonzalez.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2369 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Lisa P. Bryant.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2368 FIRST MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Danielle Eni.(Edwards, Tony)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2367 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated May 8, 2015 re: CMO 24A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Cook, Shayna)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2366 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2341 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Staci Durbala. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09885-CS(Lumaghi, Laura)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2365 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2341 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Anzata Davis. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05782-CS(Saba, Ryan)
May 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2364 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #2361 MOTION to Vacate (2351 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 9 in 7:14-cv-05821-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, Dismissal without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Bulkin's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion Doc. 11. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/8/2051) (lnl)
May 8, 2015 Filing 2363 MOTION for Jackqualyn R. Quinton to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Alisha Wyatt. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02961-CS(Quinton, Jackqualyn)
May 7, 2015 Filing 2362 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2341 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Stefanie Brown. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05825-CS(Saba, Ryan)
May 7, 2015 Filing 2361 MOTION to Vacate (2351 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 9 in 7:14-cv-05821-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, Dismissal without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Nelly Bulkin.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05821-CS(Saba, Ryan)
May 7, 2015 Filing 2360 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2341 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Amy Edwards. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08555-CS(Lukei, Shannon)
May 7, 2015 Filing 2359 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated May 7, 2015 re: Reply to Plaintiff Slaght's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01310-CS(Harrington, William)
May 6, 2015 Filing 2358 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #2341 FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Laureen Green. (Melidonian, Lina)
May 6, 2015 Filing 2357 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Kathryn Snapka to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10892792. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Beverly Amanda Moncrief. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exh A-Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Snapka, Kathryn) Modified on 5/6/2015 (sdi).
May 6, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #2357 MOTION for Kathryn Snapka to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10892792. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Missing Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Court of Texas with the Clerk of Courts Signature. Not from the State Bar Association. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (sdi)
May 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2356 ORDER NO. 9B (AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER): 1. Plaintiffs' generic expert reports are due by May 22, 2015. An expert who is offering generic as well as case-specific opinions must submit a generic expert report on this date. 2. Defendants' generic expert reports are due by June 29, 2015. An expert who is offering generic as well as case-specific opinions must submit a generic expert report on this date. 3. Plaintiffs' case-specific expert reports for the cases selected for trial are due by June 22, 2015. 4. Defendants' case-specific expert reports for the cases selected for trial are due by July 22, 2015. All other deadlines set forth in Order 9A, as partially modified with respect to the Keisha Johnson v. Bayer action, No. 14-CV-4247, (Doc. 2325), remain in effect. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/5/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
May 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2355 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on #2354 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated May 5, 2015 re: Cancellation of Status Conference. ENDORSEMENT: The parties' request to cancel the May 12, 2015 status conference is granted. The Court need not hear oral argument on the Brown matter, 14-cv-4876, at this time, but appreciates counsel's availability. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/5/2015) (lnl)
May 5, 2015 Filing 2354 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated May 5, 2015 re: Cancellation of Status Conference. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
May 5, 2015 Filing 2353 CONSENT LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Submit Expert Reports addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated May 5, 2015. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kekatos, Diogenes) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
May 5, 2015 Filing 2352 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated May 5, 2015 re: Rule 45 Non-Party Subpoena. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
May 5, 2015 Filing 2350 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-105) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/5/2015) (sjo)
May 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2351 Vacated as per Judges Orders dated 5/27/2015, Docs. #2424, 2425, 2426, 2427; dated 6/1/2015, Doc. #2435; dated 6/24/2015, Doc. #2467 ORDER granting (2237) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("CMO") 7 and 7A, I hereby grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria (Doc. 2237), as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet i.e. a Plaintiff Fact Sheet containing all core criteria or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order will be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendant' Motion (Doc. 2237). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/4/2015) (lnl) Modified on 5/27/2015 (lnl). Modified on 6/2/2015 (lnl). Modified on 6/24/2015 (lnl).
May 4, 2015 Filing 2349 LETTER MOTION for Conference re: (2345 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 24 in 7:14-cv-04876-CS) Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion, Request for Permission to File Sur-Reply and for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Christopher Oxx dated May 4, 2015. Document filed by Ashley Brown. Return Date set for 6/17/2015 at 10:00 AM.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04876-CS(Oxx, Christopher)
May 4, 2015 Filing 2348 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a conference proceeding held on 4/22/2015 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(McGuirk, Kelly)
May 4, 2015 Filing 2347 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: conference held on 4/22/2015 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Albert Gorn, 914-390-4222. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 5/29/2015. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/8/2015. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/6/2015.(McGuirk, Kelly)
May 1, 2015 Filing 2346 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2237 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Nelly Bulkin. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05821-CS(Saba, Ryan)
May 1, 2015 Filing 2345 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (19 in 7:14-cv-04876-CS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint., (2231 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04876-CS(Cook, Shayna)
May 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2344 ORDER granting (2247) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2247), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants motion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate the Defendants' Motion (Doc. 2247). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/1/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08418-CS, 7:14-cv-09586-CS, 7:14-cv-09822-CS (lnl)
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2343 ORDER granting (2248) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2248), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 2248), and close the cases in the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/30/2015) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
April 30, 2015 Filing 2342 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated April 30, 2015 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2247, 2248, 2237). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
April 30, 2015 Filing 2341 FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
April 30, 2015 Filing 2340 NINTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
April 30, 2015 Filing 2339 MOTION to Dismiss No. 16- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2338 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (36 in 7:14-cv-00860-CS) LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from John T. Kirtley, III dated 04/20/2015 re: 33 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Miller Per CMO 22A. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiff may either submit a response letter, no more than three pages, or amend her complaint as to injuries related to the IUD implanted March 18, 2010 only, within thirty days of the filing of this memo endorsement. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/30/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00860-CS (lnl)
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2337 ORDER granting (2323) Motion for Kevin M. Fitzgerald to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02256-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 30, 2015 Filing 2336 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-104) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New York, North Carolina and North Dakota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/30/2015) (sjo)
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2335 ORDER granting (2332) Motion for Jeffrey Thomas Gwynn to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02266-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 30, 2015 Filing 2334 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated April 30, 2015 re: Rule 45 Non-Party Subpoena. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
April 30, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (9 in 7:15-cv-02256-CS, 2323 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Kevin M. Fitzgerald to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10854199. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02256-CS(bcu)
April 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2333 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (17 in 7:14-cv-04213-CS, 2321 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) RESPONSE to Motion re: (14 in 7:14-cv-04213-CS, 2285 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Stay Further Briefing And Decision On Defendants Motion To Dismiss Pending Appeal Of January 9, 2015 Order. ENDORSEMENT Further briefing on the pending motion in 14-cv-4213 is stayed. Defendants' reply will be due 30 days after the second circuit's decision on the appeal from my 1/9/15 Order. Plaintiff may sur-reply within two weeks of the filing of Defendants' reply. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/29/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04213-CS(lnl)
April 29, 2015 Filing 2332 MOTION for Jeffrey Thomas Gwynn to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10868218. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Mercedes Jimenez.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02266-CS(Gwynn, Jeffrey)
April 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2331 ORDER granting (2330) Motion for Nathan D. Sturycz to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07647-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 29, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2330 AMENDED MOTION for Nathan D. Sturycz to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
April 29, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (2332 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 14 in 7:15-cv-02266-CS) MOTION for Jeffrey Thomas Gwynn to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10868218. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02266-CS(wb)
April 28, 2015 Filing 2330 AMENDED MOTION for Nathan D. Sturycz to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kelly Biondo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificates of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Pro Hac Fee Receipt, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07647-CS(Sturycz, Nathan) Modified on 4/29/2015 (sdi). Modified on 4/29/2015 (wb).
April 28, 2015 Filing 2329 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated April 28, 2015 re: opposition to Defendant's March 13, 2015 motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claim as time-barred pursuant to Case Management Order ("CMO") 22A. Document filed by Kamaria Regan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Melidonian, Lina)
April 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2328 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF JEFFREY L. RAIZNER. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. (Attorney Jeffrey Lewis Raizner terminated) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/27/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03559-CS, 7:13-cv-03560-CS, 7:13-cv-03808-CS (lnl)
April 28, 2015 Filing 2327 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-103) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota and New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/28/2015) (sjo)
April 27, 2015 Filing 2326 NOTICE ADJOURNMENT OF CONFERENCE: The conference previously scheduled by this Court for Wednesday, May 13, 2015 is adjourned by this Court to Tuesday, May 12, 2015 at 10:00 am at the Charles L. Brieant United States Courthouse, 300 Quarropas St., White Plains, NY 10601, Courtroom 621. (Status Conference set for 5/12/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel) (lnl)
April 24, 2015 Filing 2324 MOTION to Vacate (1911 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, & Plaintiff's Response to Order. Document filed by Robin Jones.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00522-CS(Miller, Howard)
April 24, 2015 Filing 2323 MOTION for Kevin M. Fitzgerald to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10854199. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by JENNIFER LAROCHE. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Admission Pro Hac Vice)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02256-CS(Fitzgerald, Kevin) Modified on 4/24/2015 (wb). Modified on 4/30/2015 (bcu).
April 24, 2015 Filing 2322 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated April 24, 2015 re: Rule 45 Non-Party Subpoenas. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Part 1 of 6, #2 Exhibit B. Part 2 of 6, #3 Exhibit C. Part 3 of 6, #4 Exhibit D. Part 4 of 6, #5 Exhibit E. Part 5 of 6, #6 Exhibit F Part 6 of 6)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
April 24, 2015 Filing 2321 RESPONSE to Motion re: (14 in 7:14-cv-04213-CS) MOTION to Stay Further Briefing and Decision on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Pending Appeal of January 9, 2015 Order., (2285 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Stay Further Briefing And Decision On Defendants Motion To Dismiss Pending Appeal Of January 9, 2015 Order. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04213-CS(Cook, Shayna)
April 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2325 ORDER: This Order memorializes certain modifications to deadlines in Case Management Order ("CMO") 9A, made for the reasons stated on the record in open court on April 22, 2015: 1. The May 6, 2015, 4 p.m. Eastern, deadline for each side to select and identify to the Court and opposing counsel three Initial Disposition Pool ("IDP") cases for trial, established in CMO 9A paragraph 8, is changed to May 13, 2015, 4. pm. Eastern. 2. The May 13, 2015, 4 p.m. Eastern, deadline for each side to exercise one veto from the other side's case selections for trial and inform the Court of such, established in CMO 9A paragraph 8, is changed to May 20, 2015, 4 p.m. Eastern. 3. The April 30, 2015 deadline for case-specific discovery in IDP cases, established in CMO 9A paragraph 7, is changed to May 29, 2015 as to Plaintiff Keisha Johnson only. This extension is granted to accommodate only Plaintiff Johnson's depositions of the two sales representatives identified in her letter to the Court, (Doc. 2301). One of those two depositions must occur prior to May 20, 2015. The remainder of CMO 9A is unchanged. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to spread this order to the case in the caption. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/23/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS (lnl)
April 22, 2015 Filing 2320 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-102)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Kansas, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah and Virginia, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/22/2015) (sjo)
April 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2319 ORDER granting #2318 Motion for Christopher Cantrell to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
April 22, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (11 in 7:15-cv-00463-CS, 2318 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Christopher Cantrell to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10840422. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00463-CS(bcu)
April 21, 2015 Filing 2318 MOTION for Christopher Cantrell to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10840422. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jessica Cox, Christina Drake. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00463-CS(Cantrell, Christopher)
April 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2317 ORDER granting #2314 Motion for Gregory N. McEwen to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
April 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2316 ORDER: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Kamaria Regan's letter, (Doc. 2284), in opposition to Defendant's March 13, 2015 motion to dismiss Plaintiff's claim as time-barred pursuant to Case Management Order ("CMO") 22A, (Doc. 2203). Section 2.b. of CMO 22A requires that such letters be "no more than three pages" in length. This page limit, and similar limits for Defendants' submissions, provide the parties an opportunity to set forth relevant facts and make adequate, effective arguments. Because the substantive issues have been litigated and the Court has issued rulings, (Docs. 1203, 2035), three pages should be enough for a plaintiff to distinguish her case, if possible. The page limit also ensures the Court's ability to efficiently manage its docket something particularly important in a large, complex multi-district litigation ("MDL") such as this, see In re World Trade Ctr. Disaster Site Litig., 722 F.3d 483, 487 (2d Cir. 2013) while making informed decisions on the issues presented. These objectives are frustrated when a party, like Plaintiff, adjusts the size of the font and margins to fit into three pages what should normally be presented in a longer document. I take this opportunity to clarify, for all parties in this MDL, that submissions to the Court should be in 12-point font with one-inch margins. If absolutely necessary, a party may draft a submission in 11-point font, but the document must be double-spaced. Plaintiff's letter is hereby stricken, with leave to refile in compliance with the guidelines described herein within seven days. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the case in the caption. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/21/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04213-CS (lnl)
April 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2315 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James R. Ronca, dated 4/21/2015, re: Counsel writes: I have intended to be present at the status conference scheduled for tomorrow at 10:00 a.m. I learned yesterday afternoon while participating in a hearing in Chicago, that I am required to participate in a court-ordered deposition in Philadelphia on Wednesday at noon. I returned to my office this morning. This deposition is for a trial which begins Monday. Because I cannot be in two places at once. I respectfully ask the Court to excuse me from attendance on Wednesday. I will try to participate by phone. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. Mr. Ronca's absence is excused. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/21/2015) (lnl)
April 21, 2015 Filing 2314 MOTION for Gregory N. McEwen to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10839300. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Gregory N McEwen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(McEwen, Gregory)
April 21, 2015 ***STRICKEN DOCUMENT. Deleted document number (2284) from the case record. The document was stricken from this case pursuant to (2316 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04213-CS) Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04213-CS(lnl)
April 21, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2314 MOTION for Gregory N. McEwen to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10839300. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
April 20, 2015 Filing 2313 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (19 in 7:14-cv-04876-CS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint., (2231 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Ashley Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04876-CS(Oxx, Christopher)
April 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2312 ORDER granting (2302) Motion for Sin-Ting Mary Liu to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2311 ORDER No. 24 (Second Disposition Pool) CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: SECOND DISPOSITION POOL SELECTION PROCESS: I. Selection of Cases for the Second Disposition Pool 1. Each side shall select five cases for potential inclusion in the Second Disposition Pool. Only cases with a Plaintiff Fact Sheet in which the Core Criteria has been completed by May 1, 2015 are eligible for selection to the Second Disposition Pool. Each side may select up to two cases previously struck from the Initial Disposition Pool. By 4 p.m. Eastern on July 2, 2015, Lead Counsel for the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee ("PSC") and Lead Counsel for the Defendants shall identify to the Court by email each party's selections for the Second Disposition Pool. 2. The Court expects the parties to exercise good faith in selecting cases for potential inclusion in the Second Disposition Pool, and to not select cases presenting unique or idiosyncratic facts that would render the results of these cases unenlightening. The Court cannot police this request and will not entertain applications regarding whether one side or another has abided by it. The Court merely sets forth its expectations. 3. An additional five cases shall be chosen at random from all cases which have been filed and a Plaintiff Fact Sheet with Core Criteria completed served as of May 1, 2015. To accomplish this, by June 16, 2015, Defense counsel will provide a complete list of cases to Lead Counsel for the PSC with each case consecutively assigned a number beginning with the number 1 (e.g., 1 through 500). On June 23, 2015, the parties shall inform the Court of the total number of cases on the list. On June 29, 2015, the Court shall identify a random five numbers in the range between 1 and the highest numbered case. The five cases corresponding to those numbers shall be the included in the Second Disposition Pool. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/20/2015) (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) (lnl)
April 20, 2015 Filing 2310 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from James Shepherd dated April 20, 2015 re: Bayer's Reply to Plaintiffs' Response re: Late Third-party Subpoenas. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
April 20, 2015 Filing 2309 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-101) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Oklahoma and Utah, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/17/2015) (sjo)
April 20, 2015 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Notice to Attorney Christopher Carl Oxx to RE-FILE Document #2308 Response in Opposition to Motion. ERROR(S): Document linked to filing error. (ldi)
April 17, 2015 Filing 2308 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2228 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Ashley Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04876-CS(Oxx, Christopher) Modified on 4/20/2015 (ldi).
April 17, 2015 Filing 2307 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher Carl Oxx on behalf of Ashley Brown. (Oxx, Christopher)
April 17, 2015 Filing 2306 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated April 17, 2015 re: (39 in 7:14-cv-04247-CS, 2301 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Case-Specific Discovery) addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Gregory J. Pals, for Attorneys for Plaintiff dated 04/16/2015. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(Cook, Shayna)
April 17, 2015 Filing 2305 THIRD MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
April 17, 2015 Filing 2304 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2247 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 15- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Sokha Thon. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09109-CS(Watson, Leila)
April 17, 2015 Filing 2302 MOTION for Sin-Ting Mary Liu to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Christie L. Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Liu, Sin-Ting)
April 17, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (41 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 2302 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Sin-Ting Mary Liu to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(bcu)
April 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2303 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on #2297 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from James Shepherd dated April 16, 2015 re: Bayer Defendants' Request for Leave to File a Reply re: Late Third-party Subpoenas. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. Any reply must be filed no later than 12noon Monday, April 20, 2015. SO ORDERED. (Replies due by 4/20/2015) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 4/16/2015) (lnl)
April 16, 2015 Filing 2301 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery (Case-Specific Discovery) addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Gregory J. Pals, for Attorneys for Plaintiff dated 04/16/2015. Document filed by Keisha Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(Pals, Gregory) Modified on 4/11/2016 (sjo).
April 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2300 ORDER granting #2299 Motion for John Amato, IV to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
April 16, 2015 Filing 2299 AMENDED MOTION for John Amato, IV to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Morran Brown. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Amato, John)
April 16, 2015 Filing 2298 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for John Amato, IV to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Morran Brown.(Amato, John) Modified on 4/16/2015 (sdi).
April 16, 2015 Filing 2297 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from James Shepherd dated April 16, 2015 re: Bayer Defendants' Request for Leave to File a Reply re: Late Third-party Subpoenas. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
April 16, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #2298 MOTION for John Amato, IV to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Proposed Order. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a Proposed Order. (sdi)
April 16, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2299 AMENDED MOTION for John Amato, IV to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
April 15, 2015 Filing 2296 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated April 15, 2015 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00860-CS(Harrington, William)
April 15, 2015 Filing 2295 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from W. Roger Smith, III dated April 15, 2015 re: Response to Bayer's Pre-Motion Conference Request. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
April 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2294 ORDER granting (2293) Motion for Andrew D. Kinghorn to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 15, 2015 Filing 2293 AMENDED MOTION for Andrew D. Kinghorn to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Keisha Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(Kinghorn, Andrew)
April 15, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (37 in 7:14-cv-04247-CS, 2293 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) AMENDED MOTION for Andrew D. Kinghorn to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(sdi)
April 14, 2015 Filing 2292 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Andrew D. Kinghorn to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10815140. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Keisha Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(Kinghorn, Andrew) Modified on 4/15/2015 (bcu).
April 14, 2015 Filing 2291 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-100) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Arizona, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, North Carolina and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/14/2015) (sjo)
April 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2290 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #2288 Motion for Jackqualyn R. Quinton to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request as to the plaintiffs in the caption. So Ordered. Attorney Jackqualyn R. Quinton terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/14/2015) (lnl)
April 14, 2015 Filing 2289 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice re: (11 in 7:14-cv-04983-CS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Madril Per CMO 22A.. Document filed by Amanda Madril. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04983-CS(McCauley, Matthew)
April 14, 2015 Filing 2288 MOTION for Jackqualyn R. Quinton to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Pamela J Richardson, Lisa P. Bryant, Leah Wade, Nandee Walker, Susan M. Burtis, Genesia E Lozano, Sharon Love, Rachel Hermosillo, Lyndsey Woods, Darci Hughes, Humaira Mahmood, Lindsey D. Stepp, Summer Creekmore, Jessica M. Matlock, Carina Perez, Danielle Eni, Melanie Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Quinton, Jackqualyn)
April 14, 2015 Filing 2287 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tony Wayne Edwards on behalf of Lisa P. Bryant, Summer Creekmore, Leah Wade, Nandee Walker, Susan M. Burtis, Carina Perez, Genesia E Lozano, Sharon Love, Rachel Hermosillo, Lyndsey Woods, Melanie Gonzalez, Darci Hughes. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Edwards, Tony)
April 13, 2015 Filing 2286 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Mark Anthony Cox on behalf of Destiny Asher. New Address: Maples, Nix & Diesselhorst, 2908 Via Esperanza, Edmond, Oklahoma, United States 73013, 4054783737. (Cox, Mark)
April 10, 2015 Filing 2285 MOTION to Stay Further Briefing And Decision On Defendants Motion To Dismiss Pending Appeal Of January 9, 2015 Order. Document filed by Kamaria Regan.(Melidonian, Lina) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
April 10, 2015 Filing 2284 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated April 10, 2015 re: #2203 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Regan Per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Kamaria Regan. (Melidonian, Lina)
April 10, 2015 Filing 2283 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Sin-Ting Mary Liu to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Christie L. Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Liu, Sin-Ting) Modified on 4/10/2015 (wb).
April 10, 2015 Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment: for (40 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS) MOTION for Sin-Ting Mary Liu to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10800816.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Liu, Sin-Ting)
April 10, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (40 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 2283 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Sin-Ting Mary Liu to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Proposed Order. Certificate of Good Standing Must be issued from Supreme Court of California with a Clerk of Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a Proposed Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(wb)
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2282 ORDER granting (2275) Motion for Tony W. Edwards to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05207-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2281 ORDER granting (2276) Motion for Thomas J. Rzepka to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07715-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2280 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 41(a)(A)(i): STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P 41(a)(A)(i) On March 13, 2015 Defendant's filed a letter brief moving to dismiss this case pursuant to CMO 22A and the Court's Order in Truitt v. Bayer (13-CV-7811, ECF No. 50, and 13-MD-2434 ECF No. 1203). Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff ERIN WEED and her counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned case is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice, against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/9/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00861-CS (lnl)
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2279 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to ORDER No. 22A (Statute of Limitations) and Rule 4l(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff hereby dismisses her claims with prejudice, each side to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/9/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01168-CS (lnl)
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2278 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to ORDER No. 22A (Statute of Limitations) and Rule 41 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff hereby dismisses her claims with prejudice, each side to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/9/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01169-CS (lnl)
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2277 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: Pursuant to ORDER No. 22A (Statute of Limitations) and Rule 41 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff hereby dismisses her claims with prejudice, each side to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/9/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-01166-CS (lnl)
April 9, 2015 Filing 2276 MOTION for Thomas J. Rzepka to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10798011. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Felicia S Keene. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of GHood standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07715-CS(Rzepka, Thomas)
April 9, 2015 Filing 2275 MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10797411. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jessica M. Matlock. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05207-CS(Edwards, Tony)
April 9, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (2275 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 50 in 7:13-cv-05207-CS) MOTION for Tony W. Edwards to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10797411. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05207-CS(wb)
April 9, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (11 in 7:14-cv-07715-CS, 2276 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Thomas J. Rzepka to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10798011. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07715-CS(wb)
April 8, 2015 MEMORANDUM TO THE DOCKET CLERK: The second caption in the Order dated April 7, 2015, docketed as ECF No. 2268 in 13md2434, is revised to state 13cv5765 (CS)(LMS). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to docket the April 7, 2015, Order (ECF No. 2268 in 13md2434) in 13cv5765, and to remove the Order from 13cv5767. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05765-CS. (mml)
April 8, 2015 Filing 2274 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #2237 FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Tania Paz Acosta. (Irpino, Anthony)
April 8, 2015 Filing 2273 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05765-CS(Clark, Walter)Log # 13010
April 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2272 ORDER granting (2160) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2160), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 2160), and close the cases in the table below. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/8/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
April 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2271 MEMO ENDORSEMENT terminating #2235 LETTER MOTION to Reopen Case addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Douglas Eaton dated 3/24/2015. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Capaldo's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 2235 in the MDL docket, and docs. 19 and 21 in Plaintiff's individual docket, 14-cv-5377. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/8/2015) (lnl)
April 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2270 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Kira Balius, hereby dismiss the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close No. 13-cv-7683. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/7/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07683-CS (lnl)
April 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2269 ORDER: Bayer's request submitted by letter dated April 3, 2015, (ECF No. 2259) for a pre-motion conference is granted. The above-captioned matter has been scheduled for a pre-motion conference before the undersigned on Wednesday, April 22, 2015, in Courtroom 520, immediately following the conference in this matter before Judge Seibel on that same date. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 4/7/2015) (mml)
April 7, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2268 ORDER: Defendant Bayer proposes to depose a prisoner who is currently incarcerated at a prison located in Waupin, Wisconsin, whose name is known to the parties. Defendant has offered to pay the relevant costs, including transporting Plaintiff's counsel from Green Bay to the prison. Presumably the costs would also include arranging for and paying a court reporter for the deposition. Defendant argued that the information that may be gleaned from this witness would be relevant, as the witness's contact with Plaintiff was in 2007-2008, and the relevant events in the Complaint began in 2008. There is some potential relevance to this witness's testimony. Therefore the deposition may proceed, in the manner outlined in Defendant's letter of April 3, 2015, but the deposition itself shall be limited to 90 minutes during which Defendant's counsel may make inquiry of the witness, exclusive of breaks. If Defendant's counsel intends to use any documents during the deposition, such document(s) shall be provided to Plaintiff's counsel no later than 2:00 pm Eastern time on April 8, 2015. Plaintiff's counsel may have additional time to inquire of the witness following Defendant's counsel's inquiry if Plaintiff's counsel so chooses. This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 4/7/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05765-CS. (mml)
April 7, 2015 Filing 2267 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-99) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Connecticut, Minnesota and Wyoming, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/7/2015) (sjo)
April 6, 2015 Filing 2266 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by April Ferrao. (Mathews, David)
April 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2265 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Seth Alan Katz dated 4/1/2015 re: Counsel requests to withdraw as counsel of record. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to effectuate the request and spread this order to the referenced cases. SO ORDERED. Attorney Seth Alan Katz terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/3/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02252-CS. (mml)
April 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2264 ORDER granting (2159) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS. Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2159), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiff in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiff in the table below has 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiff has not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the case in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 2159). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/3/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08409-CS (mml)
April 3, 2015 Filing 2263 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Panagiotis V Albanis on behalf of Brianna Stephanie Larson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07648-CS(Albanis, Panagiotis)
April 3, 2015 Filing 2262 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Panagiotis V Albanis on behalf of Deanna Wofford Schmidt. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02546-CS(Albanis, Panagiotis)
April 3, 2015 Filing 2261 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Panagiotis V Albanis on behalf of Isaura Manzo-Mendez. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02252-CS(Albanis, Panagiotis)
April 3, 2015 Filing 2260 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from W. Roger Smith, III dated April 3, 2015 re: Status Report on Third-Party Subpoenas. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel, Plaintiffs' Steering Committee.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
April 3, 2015 Filing 2259 LETTER MOTION for Local Rule 37.2 Conference addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James Shepherd dated April 3, 2015. Document filed by Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
April 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2258 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Wendy R. Fleishman dated 3/26/2015 re: Please be advised that Elizabeth A. Alexander is no longer with Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein effective January 9, 2015. In accordance, please accept this correspondence as the Notice of Withdrawal. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to effectuate the request, and spread this Order to the referred cases., Attorney Elizabeth Alexander and Elizabeth A Alexander terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/2/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(rj)
April 2, 2015 Filing 2257 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Panagiotis V Albanis on behalf of Isaura Manzo-Mendez. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-02252-CS(Albanis, Panagiotis)
April 2, 2015 Filing 2256 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2237 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Fiona Tucker. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05762-CS(Watson, Leila)
April 2, 2015 Filing 2255 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2237 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Diane Thomas. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07286-CS(Watson, Leila)
April 2, 2015 Filing 2254 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2237 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Candice Ditalia. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07313-CS(Watson, Leila)
April 2, 2015 Filing 2253 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2237 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Hayley Cleckler. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04234-CS(Watson, Leila)
April 2, 2015 Filing 2252 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2237 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Cherie Allen. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06850-CS(Watson, Leila)
April 2, 2015 Filing 2251 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated April 2, 2015 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2159, 2160). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
March 31, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney Matthew McCauley Document #2239 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #2243 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #2242 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #2245 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #2244 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #2241 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #2240 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. (km)
March 31, 2015 Filing 2250 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Nathan C. Bess on behalf of Christie L. Hayes. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Bess, Nathan)
March 31, 2015 Filing 2249 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-98) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/31/2015) (sjo)
March 30, 2015 Filing 2248 EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
March 30, 2015 Filing 2247 MOTION to Dismiss No. 15- Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
March 30, 2015 Filing 2246 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2237 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Carey Flint. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A1, #2 Exhibit A2, #3 Exhibit A3, #4 Exhibit A4, #5 Exhibit A5)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06057-CS(Moore, Timothy)
March 30, 2015 Filing 2245 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITHOUT prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Elizabeth Sellers. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01087-CS(Hageman, Todd) Modified on 3/31/2015 (km). Modified on 4/6/2015 (km).
March 30, 2015 Filing 2244 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Document filed by Maria Pikula. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08471-CS(McCauley, Matthew) Modified on 3/31/2015 (km). Modified on 4/6/2015 (km).
March 30, 2015 Filing 2243 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Amber McDaniel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05009-CS(McCauley, Matthew) Modified on 3/31/2015 (km). Modified on 4/6/2015 (km).
March 30, 2015 Filing 2242 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Misty Martin. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05000-CS(McCauley, Matthew) Modified on 3/31/2015 (km). Modified on 4/6/2015 (km).
March 30, 2015 Filing 2241 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Ericia Johnson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04964-CS(McCauley, Matthew) Modified on 3/31/2015 (km). Modified on 4/6/2015 (km).
March 30, 2015 Filing 2240 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Shannon Fewell. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04943-CS(McCauley, Matthew) Modified on 3/31/2015 (km). Modified on 4/6/2015 (km).
March 30, 2015 Filing 2239 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Kira Balius. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07683-CS(McCauley, Matthew) Modified on 3/31/2015 (km). Modified on 4/6/2015 (km).
March 27, 2015 Filing 2238 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2237 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Marcia Boynton, Scott Boynton. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04264-CS(Scott, Carmen)
March 27, 2015 Filing 2237 FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
March 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2236 ORDER The Court is in receipt of letters from non-parties Grey Healthcare Group; Axiom, a Huntsworth Health Company; Ogilvy CommonHealth Worldwide; and Mary Jane Minkin, M.D. upon which the Plaintiffs Steering Committee (PSC) served subpoenas between March 19, 2015 and March 25, 2015, returnable April 1, 2015 and requesting documents dating as far back as 1995. These non-parties (not surprisingly) object to the burdensome nature of the subpoenas. The return date of these subpoenas is adjourned. The Court has contacted the PSC, andunderstands that the PSC and the above-mentioned non-parties will confer and establish a more reasonable deadline. The PSC is to advise the Court of the parties resolution of this matter (or that they have failed to reach an agreement) by April 3, 2015, and is directed to immediately provide the above-mentioned non-parties with a copy of this Order. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/27/2015) (fk)
March 24, 2015 Filing 2235 LETTER MOTION to Reopen Case addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Douglas Eaton dated 3/24/2015. Document filed by Samantha Capaldo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Motion to Vacate)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05377-CS(Eaton, Douglas)
March 24, 2015 Filing 2234 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-97) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Colorado, Georgia, Maine and Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/24/2015) (sjo)
March 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2233 ORDER granting #2230 Motion for James P. Tutaj to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 23, 2015 Filing 2232 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #2231 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Witherspoon Complaint, #2 Brown Amended Complaint, #3 Battiest Complaint, #4 Brown Response Letter, #5 Bayer's Reply Letter, #6 Order to Show Cause, #7 Brown Cause Letter, #8 Bayer's Response to Cause Letter, #9 Order Dismissing Brown)(Cook, Shayna)
March 23, 2015 Filing 2231 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
March 23, 2015 Filing 2230 MOTION for James P. Tutaj to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10729638. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Janelle Menge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Tutaj, James)
March 23, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2230 MOTION for James P. Tutaj to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10729638. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
March 23, 2015 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - EVENT TYPE ERROR. Notice to Attorney Shayna Susanne Cook to RE-FILE Document #2227 Notice (Other). Use the event type Dismiss found under the event list Motions. (ldi)
March 23, 2015 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - EVENT TYPE ERROR. Notice to Attorney Shayna Susanne Cook to RE-FILE Document #2228 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint. Use the event type Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion found under the event list Replies, Opposition and Supporting Documents. (ldi)
March 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2229 ORDER granting (2226) Motion for Devona L. Wells to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02322-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
March 20, 2015 Filing 2228 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Witherspoon Complaint, #2 Brown Amended Complaint, #3 Battiest Complaint, #4 Brown Response Letter, #5 Bayer's Reply Letter, #6 Order to Show Cause, #7 Brown Cause Letter, #8 Bayer's Response to Cause Letter, #9 Order Dismissing Brown)(Cook, Shayna) Modified on 3/23/2015 (ldi).
March 20, 2015 Filing 2227 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - NOTICE of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown's Amended Complaint. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Cook, Shayna) Modified on 3/23/2015 (ldi).
March 20, 2015 Filing 2226 MOTION for Devona L. Wells to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Maya Wofford. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02322-CS(Wells, Devona)
March 20, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Matthew McCauley to E-MAIL Document No. #2225 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to judgments@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
March 20, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (27 in 7:14-cv-02322-CS, 2226 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Devona L. Wells to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02322-CS(bcu)
March 19, 2015 Filing 2225 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. Document filed by Katrina Witherspoon. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08471-CS(McCauley, Matthew) Modified on 3/20/2015 (km).
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2224 ORDER terminating (2068) Motion to Dismiss; terminating (2069) Motion to Dismiss; terminating (2071) Motion to Dismiss; terminating (2072) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close the member cases in the caption. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate all pending motions in the member cases in the caption, and to terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434, Docs. 2068, 2069, 2071, 2072 and 2087. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/18/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2223 ORDER: Plaintiffs' request to file a motion to compel a foreign witness over whom defendants allege they do not have control is DENIED. Plaintiffs may seek the witness's deposition through the process made available under the Hague Convention. Such deposition may be taken after the April 1, 2015 generic discovery deadline (see if6 of Scheduling Order No. 9A), but the taking of the deposition will not serve as a basis to alter any other existing deadlines. Any supplementation of discovery responses, including expert discovery, shall be accomplished in accordance with existing Scheduling Orders filed in this case, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 3/18/2015) (lnl)
March 18, 2015 Filing 2222 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-96) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Illinois, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, North Dakota, Pennsylvania and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/18/2015) (sjo)
March 18, 2015 ***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number #2224 ORDER. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (lnl)
March 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2221 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.41(a)(l)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff JENNIFER KINDART and or counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Bayer Oy. Each side shall bear its' own costs and attorney's fees. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/17/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07802-CS(lnl)
March 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2220 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.4l(a)(l)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff TAMMY VILLANI and or counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Bayer Oy. Each side shall bear its' own costs and attorney's fees. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/17/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07821-CS(lnl)
March 17, 2015 Filing 2219 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from John T. Kirtley, III dated March 16, 2015 re: #2200 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Miller Per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Sarah B Miller. (Kirtley, John)
March 17, 2015 Filing 2218 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-95) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Colorado and Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/11/2015) (sjo)
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2217 ORDER granting #2183 Motion for Deborah Ann Moeller to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2216 ORDER granting #2182 Motion for Lori Connors McGroder to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2215 ORDER granting #2181 Motion for David Scott Hartnett to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2214 ORDER granting #2180 Motion for Jennifer Michelle Stevenson to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2213 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Young Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2212 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Weed Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2211 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Villani Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2210 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Veres Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2209 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Todd Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2208 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Tingen Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2207 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Smith Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2206 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Slaght Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2205 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Sigmon Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2204 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Ridley Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2203 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Regan Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2202 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Pikula Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2201 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Minor Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2200 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Miller Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2199 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff McDaniel Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2198 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Martin Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2197 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Madril Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2196 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Langston Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2195 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Kindhart Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2194 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Johnson Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2193 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Harris-Kemp Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2192 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Gardiner Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2191 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Garcia Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2190 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Gaines Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2189 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Fewell Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2188 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Edwards Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2187 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Collins Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2186 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Carmen Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2185 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Butler Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2184 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Balius Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2183 MOTION for Deborah Ann Moeller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10698199. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Moeller, Deborah)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2182 MOTION for Lori Connors McGroder to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10696813. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(McGroder, Lori)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2181 MOTION for David Scott Hartnett to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10696700. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hartnett, David)
March 13, 2015 Filing 2180 MOTION for Jennifer Michelle Stevenson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10696318. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Stevenson, Jennifer)
March 13, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2180 MOTION for Jennifer Michelle Stevenson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10696318. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
March 13, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2181 MOTION for David Scott Hartnett to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10696700. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #2182 MOTION for Lori Connors McGroder to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10696813. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
March 13, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2183 MOTION for Deborah Ann Moeller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10698199. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
March 13, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENTS - NON-ECF DOCUMENTS ERROR. Note to Attorney William Harrington to E-MAIL Document Nos. [2177, 2178 and 2179] Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
March 12, 2015 Filing 2179 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00361-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 3/13/2015 (km).
March 12, 2015 Filing 2178 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07518-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 3/13/2015 (km).
March 12, 2015 Filing 2177 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09515-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 3/13/2015 (km).
March 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2176 ORDER granting (2110) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2110), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 2110), and close the cases in the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/11/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
March 11, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2175 ORDER granting (2109) MOTION to Dismiss No. 13- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("CMO 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2109), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in CMO 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 2109). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/11/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
March 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2174 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (15 in 7:14-cv-04876-CS, 2173 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated March 9, 2015 re: Briefing Schedule in Brown Matter. ENDORSEMENT: The parties' schedule is approved. So Ordered. (Motions due by 3/20/2015. Responses due by 4/17/2015. Replies due by 5/1/2015.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/9/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04876-CS(lnl)
March 9, 2015 Filing 2173 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated March 9, 2015 re: Briefing Schedule in Brown Matter. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04876-CS(Cook, Shayna)
March 6, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Melanie Muhlstock to E-MAIL Document No. #2171 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
March 5, 2015 Filing 2171 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Stephanie Corley. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04895-CS(Muhlstock, Melanie) Modified on 3/6/2015 (km).
March 5, 2015 Filing 2170 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated March 5, 2015 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 2109, 2110, 2111). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
March 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2169 ORDER granting (2111) Motion to Dismiss; denying (2132) Motion to Vacate; denying (2133) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; denying (32) Motion to Vacate in case 7:14-cv-00891-CS; denying (33) Motion to Vacate in case 7:14-cv-00986-CS: In accordance with CMO 7 and CMO 7A, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 2111), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the caption. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close the cases in the caption, and terminate the pending Motions, (Docs. 2111, 2132, 2133). Further, lead counsel for plaintiffs are directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel for all plaintiffs. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/5/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00891-CS, 7:14-cv-00986-CS (tn)
March 4, 2015 Filing 2172 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Plaintiff MOLLY RAUSCHUBER and or counsel, hereby give notice that the action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/4/2015) (mml)
March 4, 2015 Filing 2168 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-94) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Kentucky, Minnesota, North Carolina and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/4/2015) (sjo)
March 4, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2167 ORDER granting #2165 Motion for Brett A Emison to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 4, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2165 MOTION for Brett A Emison to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10657936. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
March 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2166 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (13 in 7:14-cv-04876-CS, 2164 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated March 3, 2015 re: Brown Res Judicata Motion. ENDORSEMENT: Pre-motion Conference is waived. The parties should attempt to agree on a motion schedule and advise the Court of same. The Clerk shall docket this order in 13-MD-2434 and 14-CV-4876. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/3/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04876-CS (lnl)
March 3, 2015 Filing 2165 MOTION for Brett A Emison to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10657936. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Megan Gilbert, Andrea J Wand. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Certificate of Good Standing, #5 Certificate of Good Standing, #6 Text of Proposed Order)(Emison, Brett)
March 3, 2015 Filing 2164 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated March 3, 2015 re: Brown Res Judicata Motion. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04876-CS(Cook, Shayna)
March 3, 2015 Filing 2163 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-93) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, Texas and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/27/2015) (sjo)
March 3, 2015 Filing 2162 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-92)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Mississippi and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/20/2015) (sjo)
March 2, 2015 Filing 2161 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated March 2, 2015 re: Lexecon in Johnson Matter. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(Cook, Shayna)
March 2, 2015 Filing 2160 SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
March 2, 2015 Filing 2159 MOTION to Dismiss No. 14- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
March 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2158 ORDER granting #2156 Motion for Joseph M. Lyon to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 2, 2015 Filing 2157 MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONSES . Document filed by Joseph Pfeifer, Rachel Pfeifer.(White, Terry)
March 2, 2015 Filing 2156 MOTION for Joseph M. Lyon to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10648398. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Denielle Davenport. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Lyon, Joseph)
March 2, 2015 Filing 2155 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Molly Rauschuber. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Malik, Shezad) Modified on 3/3/2015 (dt). Modified on 3/3/2015 (dt).
March 2, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney William Harrington to E-MAIL Document No. #2153 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
March 2, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2156 MOTION for Joseph M. Lyon to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10648398. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
February 27, 2015 Filing 2154 FIRST MOTION to Vacate Order on Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice. Document filed by JESSICCA TANNER.(Malik, Shezad) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
February 27, 2015 Filing 2153 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00361-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 3/2/2015 (km).
February 27, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #2139 MOTION for John Amato, IV to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10616735. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Expired Certificate of Good Standing. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bcu)
February 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2152 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF HEYGOOD ORR & PEARSON AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF DESOREE MADKINS: ORDERED that Heygood, Orr & Pearson serve Plaintiff Desoree Madkins with a copy of this Order on or before March 4, 2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Desoree Madkins SHOW CAUSE on April 3, 2015 10:00 am why Heygood, Orr & Pearson's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiff on or before March 27, 2015. So Ordered. Show Cause Hearing set for 4/3/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Show Cause Response due by 3/27/2015. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/25/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03742-CS(lnl)
February 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2151 PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLAINTIFF NOTIFIES THE COURT that it dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Case Management Order No. 22A, each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/25/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06171-CS (lnl)
February 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2150 ORDER granting (1836) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 22A (CMO 22A), and for the reasons stated on the record in court today, Defendants Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 1836), is GRANTED as to the above-captioned Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close the case in the caption. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate the pending motion at 13-MD-2434, Doc. 1836. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/25/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06190-CS (lnl)
February 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2149 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Miranda Roberson, hereby dismisses the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05413-CS (lnl)
February 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2148 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P41(a), Plaintiff, Sara Platt, hereby dismisses the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05408-CS (lnl)
February 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2147 NOTICE AND ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), Plaintiff, Eva White, hereby dismissed the above-captioned case with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08471-CS(lnl)
February 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2146 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE: COMES NOW the Plaintiff, Patricia Brewer, by and through her attorneys, ROBINSON CALCAGNIE ROBINSON SHAPIRO DA VIS, INC., and hereby voluntarily dismisses her Complaint with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 4l(a)(l)(A)(i). Each party will bear its own costs and fees. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/24/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09896-CS(lnl)
February 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2145 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT PLAINTIFF, Jessi Sargent, hereby dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 4l(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Case Management Order No. 22A, with each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. ENDORSEMENT: SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/23/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05245-CS (lnl)
February 23, 2015 Filing 2144 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 23, 2015 re: Status of the Third Wave of SOL Letter Motions. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Cook, Shayna)
February 23, 2015 Filing 2143 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated February 23, 2015 re: Venue Designation of IDP Plaintiff Keisha Johnson. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
February 20, 2015 Filing 2142 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a conference proceeding held on 04/02/2014 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(O'Donnell, Angela)
February 20, 2015 Filing 2141 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: conference held on 4/2/2014 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Angela O*Donnell, (914) 390-4025. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 3/16/2015. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/26/2015. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/26/2015.(O'Donnell, Angela)
February 20, 2015 Filing 2140 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James Shepherd dated February 20, 2015 re: European Document Issue in Thurmond case. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Amended Motion)(Harrington, William)
February 20, 2015 Filing 2139 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - The Certificate of Good Standing Expired MOTION for John Amato, IV to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10616735. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Morran Brown. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Amato, John) Modified on 2/27/2015 (bcu). Modified on 2/27/2015 (ad).
February 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2138 PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: PLAINTIFF NOTIFIES THE COURT that it dismisses this action with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Case Management Order No. 22A, each party to bear its own costs and attorney's fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/18/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06477-CS(lnl)
February 19, 2015 Filing 2137 REPLY to Response to Motion re: (2133 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 33 in 7:14-cv-00986-CS) MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. . Document filed by Christina Taylor-riendeau. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00986-CS(Kassan, Randi)
February 19, 2015 Filing 2136 REPLY to Response to Motion re: (32 in 7:14-cv-00891-CS, 2132 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. . Document filed by Jennifer Pinkney. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00891-CS(Kassan, Randi)
February 19, 2015 Filing 2135 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2133 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 33 in 7:14-cv-00986-CS) MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00986-CS(Harrington, William)
February 19, 2015 Filing 2134 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (32 in 7:14-cv-00891-CS, 2132 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00891-CS(Harrington, William)
February 19, 2015 Filing 2133 MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. Document filed by Christina Taylor-riendeau.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00986-CS(Kassan, Randi)
February 19, 2015 Filing 2132 MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, , Notice of Compliance, and Request to Reinstate. Document filed by Jennifer Pinkney.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00891-CS(Kassan, Randi)
February 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2131 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00773-CS; granting (2129) Motion for Kelly Kristine McNabb to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (Seibel, Cathy)
February 19, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney William Harrington to E-MAIL Document No. #2130 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
February 18, 2015 Filing 2130 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07518-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 2/19/2015 (km).
February 18, 2015 Filing 2129 MOTION for Kelly Kristine McNabb to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Corrected). Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Evelyn Ramirez, Kalaki Clarke, Kenneth Clarke, Cherie Sperato, Frank Sperato, Rita Sanchez-Sandler, Geoffrey Sandler, Toyana Robinson, Michaela Ramsey, Shaquayla Reynolds, Gina Lafata, Tiffany Gregg, LaTanya Barron, Cynthia Solano, Sylvia Montes, Kevin Chow, Shelley Chow, Stacy Nunez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Fleishman, Wendy)
February 18, 2015 Filing 2128 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-91) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Indiana, Minnesota and New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/18/2015) (sjo)
February 18, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (7 in 7:14-cv-06158-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-05685-CS, 14 in 7:15-cv-00121-CS, 101 in 7:13-cv-02911-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-05686-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-06159-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-06144-CS, 83 in 7:13-cv-02816-CS, 2129 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 79 in 7:13-cv-02910-CS, 23 in 7:15-cv-00328-CS, 72 in 7:13-cv-03591-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-08611-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-06157-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-09339-CS) MOTION for Kelly Kristine McNabb to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Corrected). Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(sdi)
February 18, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO EMAIL DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney William Harrington to E-MAIL Document No. #2126 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
February 17, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2127 ORDER: pursuant to CMO 7, the Orders dismissing Plaintiffs' cases are VACATED with respect to the above-captioned cases. Specifically, Doc. 1771 is vacated as to Plaintiffs Brashier, Davis, Santoro, Scherrer, Wash and Wittler only, and Doc. 1947 is vacated as to Plaintiff Waters only. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/17/2015) (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl)
February 17, 2015 Filing 2126 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09515-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 2/18/2015 (km).
February 13, 2015 Filing 2125 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 13, 2015 re: IDP Replacement Selection. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
February 11, 2015 Filing 2124 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 11, 2015 re: Ashley Brown. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06190-CS(Cook, Shayna)
February 11, 2015 Filing 2123 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-90) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Illinois, Minnesota, Mississippi, Texas and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/10/2015) (sjo)
February 10, 2015 Filing 2122 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated February 10, 2015 re: Waiver of Venue Objections (Rauschuber). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
February 10, 2015 Filing 2121 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Kelly K. McNabb to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10583050. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Evelyn Ramirez, Kalaki Clarke, Kenneth Clarke, Cherie Sperato, Frank Sperato, Rita Sanchez-Sandler, Geoffrey Sandler, Toyana Robinson, Michaela Ramsey, Shaquayla Reynolds, Gina Lafata, Tiffany Gregg, LaTanya Barron, Cynthia Solano, Sylvia Montes, Kevin Chow, Shelley Chow, Stacy Nunez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Fleishman, Wendy) Modified on 2/10/2015 (bcu).
February 10, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (13 in 7:15-cv-00121-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-05686-CS, 2121 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 6 in 7:14-cv-06157-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-06144-CS, 22 in 7:15-cv-00328-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-06158-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-06159-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-09339-CS) MOTION for Kelly K. McNabb to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10583050. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the Supreme Court of Minnesota and not from the District Court. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(bcu)
February 10, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (71 in 7:13-cv-03591-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-08611-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-05685-CS, 2121 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 100 in 7:13-cv-02911-CS, 82 in 7:13-cv-02816-CS, 78 in 7:13-cv-02910-CS) MOTION for Kelly K. McNabb to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10583050. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the Supreme Court of Minnesota and not from the District Court. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(bcu)
February 10, 2015 Pro Hac Vice Fee Refunded: for Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment,. Filing fee refunded for Receipt number 0208-10544045, for the following reason(s): DUPLICATE PAYMENT. (dig)
February 9, 2015 Filing 2120 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated February 9, 2015 re: Plaintiff's Response to Case Managment Order 22. Document filed by Ashley Brown.(Melidonian, Lina)
February 6, 2015 Filing 2119 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lawrence L. Jones, II on behalf of Alishia Warrick. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00846-CS(Jones, Lawrence)
February 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2118 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Kevin M. Zielke, dated 2/5/2015 re: Counsel writes: Please be advised that Susan Artinian is no longer with Dykema Gossett PLLC effective February 1, 2015. In accordance, please accept this correspondence as the Notice of Withdrawal. Further she should be removed from the service list and email notifications with regard to the above-referenced matter. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact my office. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall effectuate this request. So Ordered. Attorney Susan Artinian terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/6/2015) (lnl)
February 6, 2015 Filing 2117 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-89)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/4/2015) (sjo)
February 5, 2015 Filing 2116 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2109 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 13- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Susan Chruszcyzyk. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07551-CS(Watson, Leila)
February 5, 2015 Filing 2115 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (2109 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss No. 13- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Carliss Wooten-Griffin. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07439-CS(Watson, Leila)
February 5, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney Panagiotis Albanis to E-MAIL Document No. #2113 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal to wpclerk@nysd.uscourts.gov. Please resubmit with a handwritten signature. This document is not filed via ECF. (km)
February 4, 2015 Filing 2113 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Destiny Dawn Newton.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00098-CS(Albanis, Panagiotis) Modified on 2/5/2015 (km).
February 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2114 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Brent William Bailey, dated 1/29/2015, re: Counsel writes to request that his name be removed from the service list and e-mail notifications regarding the above-referenced litigation; as he is no longer active in this litigation. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court shall effectuate this request. So Ordered. Attorney Brent William Bailey terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/3/2015) (lnl)
February 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2112 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on #2105 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated January 30, 2015 re: Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause re Dismissal of Case. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/2/2015) (lnl)
February 2, 2015 Set/Reset Deadlines: Show Cause Response due by 2/10/2015. (lnl)
February 2, 2015 Filing 2111 SECOND MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
February 2, 2015 Filing 2110 SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
February 2, 2015 Filing 2109 MOTION to Dismiss No. 13- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
February 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2106 ORDER granting (2103) Motion for Matthew Steven Davis to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08833-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
January 30, 2015 Filing 2108 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Elizabeth Sellers hereby voluntarily dismisses this action, without prejudice, against all Defendants. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/30/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01070-CS(fk)
January 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2107 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 2018), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiff in the table below has outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiff in the table below has 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiff has not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the case in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 2018): Shakemeia Johnson 14-cv-6093. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/30/15) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06093-CS(fk)
January 30, 2015 Filing 2105 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated January 30, 2015 re: Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause re Dismissal of Case. Document filed by Ashley Brown.(Melidonian, Lina)
January 30, 2015 Filing 2104 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated January 30, 2015 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Twelfth Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
January 30, 2015 Filing 2103 MOTION for Matthew Steven Davis to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10548539. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stephanie Cook. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08833-CS(Davis, Matthew)
January 30, 2015 Filing 2102 MOTION for Kevin M. Zielke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Zielke, Kevin)
January 30, 2015 Filing 2101 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-88) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, California, Indiana, Missouri, Nebraska and Virginia, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/30/2015) (sjo)
January 30, 2015 Filing 2100 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-87) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota and Missouri, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/29/2015) (sjo)
January 30, 2015 Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment: for #2102 MOTION for Kevin M. Zielke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10548688.(Zielke, Kevin)
January 30, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (2103 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 9 in 7:14-cv-08833-CS) MOTION for Matthew Steven Davis to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10548539. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08833-CS(sdi)
January 30, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #2102 MOTION for Kevin M. Zielke to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Filing fee not paid. Pay the filing fee by selecting the Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment event from the Other Documents menu item. (wb)
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2099 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ALI AL-KHAFAJI: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Ali Al-Khafaji ONLY, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(ii). So Ordered. Ali Al-Krafaji terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/29/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01977-CS(lnl)
January 29, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2098 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (14 in 7:14-cv-05397-CS) PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO AND MOTION TO VACATE COURT ORDER (DOC. 1947) DISMISSING PLAINTIFF CHANELLE COLEMAN"S CLAIMS FOR FAILURE TO SUBMIT A PLAINTIFF FACT SHEET CONTAINING ALL CORE CRITERIA. ENDORSEMENT: The Order dismissing Ms. Coleman's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion doc. 16. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/29/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05397-CS (lnl)
January 29, 2015 Filing 2096 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-86) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Illinois, Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/22/2015) (sjo)
January 28, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney Todd Hageman Document #2092 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. (km)
January 26, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2094 ORDER granting (2093) Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00472-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
January 26, 2015 Filing 2093 MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jennifer Kohlbrecher, Steve Kohlbrecher. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - Missouri, #3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - Illinois, #4 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - Michigan)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00472-CS(Holland, Eric)
January 26, 2015 Filing 2092 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, Without prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Bernice Cantrell. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01070-CS(Hageman, Todd) Modified on 1/28/2015 (km).
January 26, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (8 in 7:15-cv-00472-CS, 2093 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00472-CS(bcu)
January 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2097 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (17 in 7:14-cv-03106-CS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF LAW OFFICES OF BILL BAILEY, PLLC, GRUBER & GRUBER AND LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD A. SNYDER AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF TIARA PETTIS. ENDORSEMENT: There being no opposition, the application is granted. Plaintiff is pro se until such time as new counsel appears on her behalf. Mr. Bailey is directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff. The Clerk shall docket this Order in 13-MD-2434 and 14-Cv-3106. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/23/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03106-CS(lnl)
January 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2095 ORDER withdrawing (2066) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; withdrawing (13) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:14-cv-05379-CS. ENDORSEMENT: The application is granted. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion doc. 13. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/23/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05379-CS. (mml)
January 23, 2015 Filing 2091 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated January 23, 2015 re: Request to remove CMO 22A filing. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05379-CS(Cook, Shayna)
January 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2090 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ASHLEY D. RATLIFF: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Ashley D. Ratliff, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(a)(l)(A)(ii). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/20/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09518-CS (lnl)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2089 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Yang Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2088 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Winfield Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2087 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Wilson Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2086 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Whitman Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2085 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff White Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2084 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Trujillo Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2083 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Trevino Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2082 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Starling Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2081 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Smith Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2080 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Sargent Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2079 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Sanborn Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2078 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Roberson Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2077 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Porter Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2076 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Platt Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2075 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Penaflor Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2074 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Neptune Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2073 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff McCurry Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2072 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff McCann Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2071 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Mathers Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2070 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Luna Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2069 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Korbus Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2068 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Johnson Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2067 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Graham Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2066 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Eaton Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2065 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Corley Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2064 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Byington Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2063 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Burks Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2062 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Bunting Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2061 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brewer Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2060 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Badger Per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
January 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2059 ORDER granting (2058) Motion for Lizette Miller-Radovic to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09051-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
January 21, 2015 Filing 2058 MOTION for Lizette Miller-Radovic to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10515774. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brittney Rixner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit LaSupremeCtCertificateofGoodStanding, #2 Text of Proposed Order ProposedOrder)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09051-CS(Radovic, Lizette)
January 21, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (11 in 7:14-cv-09051-CS, 2058 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Lizette Miller-Radovic to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10515774. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09051-CS(bcu)
January 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2057 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing on or before February 3, 2015, why the court should not dismiss her case, with prejudice, as time-barred. Specifically, plaintiff is ordered to comply with CMO 22A, which directs Plaintiff to file either a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 (a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, or a letter of no more than three pages distinguishing her case from the Truitt Order's holding. Plaintiff's failure to comply, once again, with CMO 22A on or before February 3, 2015 will result in dismissal of her case with prejudice. SO ORDERED. Show Cause Response due by 2/3/2015. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/20/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06190-CS (lnl)
January 20, 2015 Filing 2056 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated January 20, 2015 re: IDP Replacement Selection. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
January 20, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney William Harrington Document #2048 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. (km)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2055 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Carol Scherrer. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05892-CS(Saba, Ryan)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2054 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Silvia Brashier. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05900-CS(Saba, Ryan)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2053 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Caitlin Wittler. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05940-CS(Saba, Ryan)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2052 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Mandy Davis. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05944-CS(Saba, Ryan)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2051 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Jessica Santoro. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05896-CS(Saba, Ryan)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2050 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1905 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) TENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. And Motion to Vacate Court's Order (Doc. No. 1947). Document filed by Charlencia Waters. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05491-CS(Mencel, Jonathan)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2049 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Kristy Wash. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05897-CS(Saba, Ryan)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2048 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09518-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 1/20/2015 (km).
January 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2047 ORDER granting (2043) Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00083-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
January 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2046 ORDER granting (2042) Motion for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07449-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
January 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2045 ORDER granting (2041) Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05393-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2044 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-85) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, Missouri and Oklahoma, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/16/2015) (sjo)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2043 MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by brandi smith. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - Missouri, #3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - Illinois, #4 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - Michigan)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00083-CS(Holland, Eric)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2042 MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Yana Sloutski. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - Missouri, #3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - Illinois, #4 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - Michigan)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07449-CS(Holland, Eric)
January 16, 2015 Filing 2041 MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Rebecca Straughan. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Missouri, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Illinois, #4 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Michigan)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05393-CS(Holland, Eric)
January 16, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2042 MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #2041 MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
January 16, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (8 in 7:15-cv-00083-CS, 2043 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:15-cv-00083-CS(wb)
January 15, 2015 Filing 2040 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-84) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, North Carolina and Oklahoma, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/13/2015) (sjo)
January 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2039 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("C.M.O.") 7 and 7 A, I will grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria, (Doc. 1961), as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet- i.e. a Plaintiff fact Sheet containing all core criteria - or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The clerk is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 1961). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/13/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
January 13, 2015 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney Daniel Gallucci Document #2036 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal #2037 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. (km)
January 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2038 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 1/12/2015, re: Counsel writes to request an adjournment of the January 21 Mirena MDL status conference. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/12/2015) (lnl)
January 12, 2015 Filing 2037 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Robert Goss, Amber Goss. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02721-CS(Gallucci, Daniel) Modified on 1/13/2015 (km).
January 12, 2015 Filing 2036 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Sara Ann Dewolf. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05331-CS(Gallucci, Daniel) Modified on 1/13/2015 (km).
January 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2035 OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' claims are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Opinion and Order to, and close, the cases in the caption. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate all pending motions in the cases in the caption, and the following pending motions in 13-MD-2434: Docs. 1834, 1837, 1839, 1841, 1843-1845, 1847, 1848, 1850, 1851, 1853-1858. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/9/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl)
January 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2034 MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting #2028 Motion to Vacate #2028 MOTION to Vacate (13 in 7:14-cv-05397-CS, 1947 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss . ENDORSEMENT: The order dismissing Ms. Baker's case without prejudice is vacated. The Clerk's Office is directed to terminate the motion at doc. 47. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/8/2015) (rj)
January 8, 2015 Filing 2033 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Clarice Snow. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03334-CS(Watson, Leila)
January 8, 2015 Filing 2032 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Ronda Emmrich. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03260-CS(Watson, Leila)
January 8, 2015 Filing 2031 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Brittany Veach. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03266-CS(Watson, Leila)
January 8, 2015 Filing 2030 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Jennifer Ann Whelchel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03265-CS(Watson, Leila)
January 8, 2015 Filing 2029 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Lakisha Kidd. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02152-CS(Watson, Leila)
January 7, 2015 Filing 2028 MOTION to Vacate (13 in 7:14-cv-05397-CS, 1947 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, . Document filed by Channelle Coleman.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05397-CS(Watson, Leila)
January 7, 2015 Filing 2027 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated January 7, 2015 re: IDP Venue Objections. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
January 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2026 ORDER granting #2025 Motion for Karen L. Stern to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 5, 2015 Filing 2025 MOTION for Karen L. Stern to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10458507. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Candice Nutter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Stern, Karen)
January 5, 2015 Filing 2024 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-83)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/31/2014) (sjo)
January 5, 2015 Filing 2023 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-82)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/30/2014) (sjo)
January 5, 2015 Filing 2022 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jackqualyn R. Quinton on behalf of Lindsey D. Stepp. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09472-CS(Quinton, Jackqualyn)
January 5, 2015 Filing 2021 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-81) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Missouri and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/30/2014) (sjo)
January 5, 2015 Filing 2020 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-80)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, New Jersey and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/18/2014) (sjo)
January 5, 2015 Filing 2019 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-79) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/8/2014) (sjo)
January 5, 2015 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #2025 MOTION for Karen L. Stern to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10458507. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
December 30, 2014 Filing 2018 MOTION to Dismiss No. 12- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
December 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2017 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF LAW OFFICES OF BILL BAILEY, PLLC, GRUBER & GRUBER AND LAW OFFICES OF HOWARD A. SNYDER AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF TIARA PETTIS: The firms of Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC, Gruber & Gruber, and Law Offices of Howard A. Snyder (collectively, "Attorneys") represent Plaintiff Tiara Petti ("Plaintiff") in this pharmaceuticals products liability action presently pending before this court. The action, which was filed on February 10, 2014, alleges that Plaintiff suffered personal injuries as a result of her alleged use of the Mirena interuterine system ("IUS"). Before the undersigned is Attorneys' application for leave to withdraw as Plaintiff Tiara Pettis' counsel. Based on the accompanying Declaration of Brent William Bailey, Esq., dated December 19, 2014, Plaintiffs Attorneys have made numerous unsuccessful attempts to contact Plaintiff to obtain information required for discovery purposes. Specifically, Attorneys have attempted on several occasions to reach Plaintiff by telephone and mail to obtain "core criteria" information for her Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS"), but Plaintiff has not responded. IT APPEARS TO THE COURT, based on the evidence presented by Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC, that there is good cause to grant Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC, Gruber & Gruber, and Law Offices of Howard A. Snyder's motion to be relieved as counsel under Local Civil Rule 1.4 of the Southern District of New York and ABA-AMRPC Rule 1.16(b). Specifically, (1) good cause for withdrawal exists because Plaintiff has not assisted Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC, Gruber & Gruber, and Law Offices of Howard A. Snyder in the prosecution of the case, making it unreasonably difficult for Attorneys to continue to represent the client; and (2) minimal discovery has been completed in the case and no trial date has been set, and thus Plaintiff will not be prejudiced by the proposed withdrawal. ACCORDINGLY, it is on this 24th day of December, 2014, ORDERED that Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC serve Plaintiff Tiara Pettis with a copy of this Order on or before 1/5/2015. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Tiara Pettis SHOW CAUSE on 1/21/15 at 10 am in Courtroom 621, U.S. Courthouse, 300 Quarropas St., White Plains, NY 10601 why Law Offices of Bill Bailey, PLLC, Gruber & Gruber, and Law Offices of Howard A. Snyder's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiff on or before 1/14/15. So Ordered. (Show Cause Hearing set for 1/21/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Show Cause Response due by 1/14/2015.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/24/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03106-CS (lnl)
December 23, 2014 Filing 2016 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Nicole Sara Hemme. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01095-CS(Scott, Carmen)
December 23, 2014 Filing 2015 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jennifer Williams on behalf of Amy L Wilmet. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-09328-CS(Williams, Jennifer)
December 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2014 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("C.M.O.") 7 and 7A, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria, (Doc. 1962), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 1962), and close the member cases in the table as set forth. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/23/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) (lnl)
December 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2013 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 1945), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 1945) as set forth. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/23/2014) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
December 22, 2014 Filing 2012 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated December 22, 2014 re: Proposed Orders on Bayer's Motions to Dismiss (Docs. 1945, 1961, 1962). Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
December 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2011 ORDER No. 18D: This Order modifies Case Management Order No. 18 (13-MC-2434 Doc. 63; 13-MD-2434 Doc. 883) ("CMO 18") governing the Initial Disposition Pool. I. Voluntary Dismissal of Initial Disposition Pool Cases 1. This section replaces Section II of CMO 18. 2. After a case is selected for inclusion in the Initial Disposition Pool, the case may not be voluntarily dismissed without prejudice without a showing of good cause. 3. If a case in the Initial Disposition Pool is voluntarily dismissed by Plaintiffs, then: a. If the case is dismissed by January 16, 2015 or within thirty days after selection to the Initial Disposition Pool (whichever is later), Defendants shall identify a replacement case to the Court within fourteen days of the dismissal order. b. If the case is dismissed after January 16, 2015 or more than thirty days after selection to the Initial Disposition Pool (whichever is later), Defendants shall, within fourteen days of the dismissal order, either (i) identify up to two replacement cases, or (ii) identify a case selected by Plaintiffs to remove from the Initial Disposition Pool. In the event that Defendants choose option (ii), neither the dismissed case nor the removed case shall be replaced. If a voluntary dismissal and subsequent removal of a case from the Initial Disposition Pool pursuant to option (ii) would cause the number of cases in the Initial Disposition Pool to fall under six total cases, then Defendants must choose option (i). 4. If an Initial Disposition Pool case is dismissed due to resolution, Plaintiffs shall identify a replacement case to the Court within fourteen days of the dismissal order. II. Venue Waiver in Replacement Initial Disposition Pool Cases 5. By 5 p.m. Eastern on January 7, 2015, the parties will inform the Court and opposing counsel by email whether they agree to waive any venue objections in the following Initial Disposition Pool replacement cases and to consent to trial in the Southern District of New York: Cooke v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals et al., No. 7:13-cv-07323-CS Hayes v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals et al., No. 7:14-cv-00288-CS Hermosillo v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals et al., No. 7:13-cv-07354-CS Wofford v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals et al., No. 7:14-cv-01979-CS Plaintiffs will submit waivers signed by the client to that effect for those cases in which the client does waive venue objections. If a party declines to waive its venue objection, the party shall identify the district in which it believes that venue is proper. 6. For replacement cases selected to the Initial Disposition Pool after the date of entry of this Order, the parties will, within twenty-one days of their selection to the Initial Disposition Pool, inform the Court and opposing counsel by email whether they agree to waive any venue objections. Plaintiffs will submit waivers signed by the client to that effect for those cases in which the client does waive venue objections. If a party declines to waive its venue objection, the party shall identify the district in which it believes that venue is proper. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/19/2014) (lnl)
December 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2010 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (6 in 7:14-cv-05894-CS) RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice is vacated as to Ms. Giddens. (13-MD-2434, Doc. 1771.) This "Response in Opposition to Defendant's Eight Motion to Dismiss" suffers from the same defects as a similar document Mr. Saba filed in member case 14-CV-5891. Mr. Saba should refer to my endorsement on that document. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/19/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05894-CS(lnl)
December 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2009 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (7 in 7:14-cv-05891-CS) RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1766 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) NINTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice (14-CV-5891 Doc. 6) is vacated as to Ms. Cobb. I grant this relief even though Mr. Saba requested that the Court "deny the Defendant's Ninth Motion to Dismiss." which was previously granted. The request raises in the in the Court's mind the question whether counsel appreciates just how late in the game his client's PFS was provided or how wasteful of the Court's resources it is to have to repeatedly vacate dismissals that were granted due to failure to comply with case management orders. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/19/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05891-CS(lnl)
December 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2008 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (30 in 7:14-cv-00978-CS) MOTION to Vacate (28) Order on Motion to Dismiss. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice is vacated as to Ms. Stephens. The Clerk of Court is requested to terminate the pending moton at 14-CV-978, Doc. 30. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/19/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00978-CS (lnl)
December 16, 2014 Filing 2007 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Alyson Louise Oliver on behalf of Jessi Sargent. New Address: Oliver Law Group PC, 363 W. Big Beaver Road, Suite 200, Troy, MI, USA 48084, 248-327-6556. (Oliver, Alyson)
December 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2006 ORDER: For the reasons stated on the record on October 22, 2014, Ms. Shepherd's case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to close Ms. Shepherd's case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/16/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05817-CS (lnl)
December 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2005 ORDER: On September 19, 2014 and October 21, 2014, pursuant to Case Management Order No. ("CMO") 22A, Defendants submitted motions to dismiss all of the claims asserted in the member cases listed in the caption. CMO 22A allows Defendants to move to dismiss cases they believe are subject to dismissal under this Court's decision in Truitt v. Bayer, No. 13-CV-7811, 2014 WL 2971179 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2014). CMO 22A provides that each plaintiff against whom Defendants so move has 30 days to respond by either submitting a letter in opposition or voluntarily dismissing her case with prejudice. If a plaintiff takes no such action within 30 days of receiving a CMO 22A motion to dismiss, Defendants may submit a proposed order of dismissal with prejudice. No plaintiff to whom this Order applies submitted any response whatsoever to Defendants' motions within the allotted 30 days. Nevertheless, either before these motions were filed or while they were pending but before the 30-day response period ended, Plaintiffs' cases were dismissed without prejudice for failure to submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") as required by CMO 7. Accordingly, it is not realistic to have expected Plaintiffs to respond to the CMO 22A motions when their cases were already dismissed albeit without prejudice. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss as to the member cases in the caption are thus DENIED without prejudice to renewal should Plaintiffs' revive their claims by submitting a PFS before their cases are dismissed with prejudice under CMO 7. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the member cases in the caption and to terminate the pending motions in these member cases and at 13-MD-2434, Doc. 1825. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/15/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05847-CS, 7:14-cv-00872-CS, 7:14-cv-04311-CS, 7:14-cv-06870-CS (lnl)
December 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2004 ORDER: On September 19, 2014 and October 21, 2014, pursuant to Case Management Order No. 22A ("CMO 22A," Doc. 1510), Defendants submitted motions to dismiss all of the claims asserted in the member cases listed in the caption. CMO 22A allows Defendants to move to dismiss cases they believe are subject to dismissal under this Court's decision in Truitt v. Bayer, No. 13-CV-7811, 2014 WL 2971179 (S.D.N.Y. July 2, 2014). CMO 22A provides that each plaintiff against whom Defendants so move has 30 days to respond by either submitting a letter in opposition or voluntarily dismissing her case with prejudice. If a plaintiff takes no such action within 30 days of receiving a CMO 22A motion to dismiss, Defendants may submit a proposed order of dismissal with prejudice. No plaintiff to whom this Order applies submitted any response whatsoever to Defendants' motions within the allotted 30 days. Indeed, none of these plaintiffs have submitted a response since the 30-day period expired on October 21, 2014 (for the September 19, 2014 motions) or November 21, 2014 (for the October 21, 2014 motions). By failing to oppose Defendants' motions to dismiss within the allotted 30 days, Plaintiffs have abandoned their claims. See Hanig v. Yorktown Cent. Sch. Dist., 384 F. Supp. 2d 710, 723 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) ("[B]ecause plaintiff did not address defendant's motion to dismiss with regard to this claim, it is deemed to be abandoned and hereby dismissed."); see also In re World Trade Ctr. Litig., 722 F.3d 483, 487 (2d Cir. 2013) ("in complex cases" district courts are accorded "particular deference [when making] discretionary determination[s] undertaken to manage the litigation before the court"). Moreover, Defendants' arguments that Plaintiffs' claims are time-barred and otherwise subject to dismissal appear to be correct under both applicable state law and the Truitt opinion. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to and close the member cases in the caption. The Clerk of Court is further requested to terminate all pending motions in the member cases in the caption, and to terminate the pending motions at 13-MD-2434, Docs. 1829, 1832, 1833, 1835, 1838, 1842 and 1849. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/15/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
December 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2003 ORDER granting (1135) Motion for James A. Swartz to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01263-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
December 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2002 ORDER granting #701 Motion for Mark A. Cox to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 15, 2014 Filing 2001 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated December 15, 2014 re: Plaintiffs' opposition to Defendants' application for amendment of Order No. 18. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
December 15, 2014 Filing 2000 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Timira Campbell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00034-CS(Hingle, Michael)
December 15, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #701 MOTION for Mark A. Cox to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9388382. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #1135 FIRST MOTION for James A. Swartz to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff, Angelique Neptune. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9814485. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.>/. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1999 ORDER GRANTING WITHDRAWAL OF ELISHA N. HAWK, ESQ. (PRO HAC VICE): THIS MATTER having come before the Court on the motion of Plaintiff, Amanda Thompson, through her Counsel, pursuant to L.R.1.4, and the Court having considered the motion papers and supporting Certification of Elisha N. Hawk, Esquire in Support of Motion for Withdrawal of Elisha N. Hawk. Esq. (Pro Hac Vice), and the Court having found that good cause has been shown, IT IS, on this 12th day of December, 2014, ORDERED that Elisha N. Hawk, Esquire shall be withdrawn as Counsel Pro Hac Vice in this matter. SO ORDERED. Attorney Elisha Nicole Hawk terminated. Attorney Elisha Nicole Hawk terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/12/2014) (lnl)
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1998 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (7 in 7:14-cv-05659-CS, 1814 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated 10/17/2014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. Amended Complaint to be filed by January 5, 2015. So Ordered. (Amended Pleadings due by 1/5/2015) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/12/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05659-CS (lnl)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1997 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Brown's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06190-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1996 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Wojtowicz's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04693-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1995 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Walton's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04525-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1994 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Thate's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04509-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1993 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Spurlock's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical, Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06479-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1992 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Smith's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05232-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1991 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Schroeder's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04522-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1990 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Piscionere's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07311-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1989 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Parnell's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04507-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1988 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Medinger's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04521-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1987 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Lovett's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03895-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1986 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Horn's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06879-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1985 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Helms' response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06179-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1984 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Dollilns' response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06611-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1983 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Davis' response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06200-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1982 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Condich's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06875-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1981 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Blair's response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06178-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1980 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Abrams' response to motion to dismiss under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceutical Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05229-CS(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1979 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: Status of defendants' letter motions filed under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Harrington, William)
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1978 ORDER granting #1023 Motion for Payton Dwight Hoover to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1977 ORDER granting #1018 Motion for Keith Walton Lapeze to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1976 ORDER granting (859) Motion for Jennifer Nolte Williams to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01096-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
December 12, 2014 Filing 1975 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 12, 2014 re: IDP Dismissals. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed CMO, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Cook, Shayna)
December 11, 2014 Filing 1974 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 11, 2014 re: IDP Pool Cases. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
December 11, 2014 Filing 1973 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 11, 2014 re: Bayer's IDP Replacement Selection. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
December 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1972 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Kathleen R. Kerner, dated 12/10/2014, re: Counsel for Amanda Thompson writes to request that the pro hac vice order signed by Your Honor on 12/8/2014, DE#1963 in case 13-md-2434 be spread to the member case for Ms. Thompson (13-cv-3560). ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk's Office is directed to spread the order at Doc. 1963 to 13-cv-3560. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/10/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03560-CS (lnl)
December 10, 2014 Filing 1971 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Daphne Delee. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05697-CS(Saba, Ryan)
December 10, 2014 Filing 1970 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1961 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Trinda Morrison. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05792-CS(Saba, Ryan)
December 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1969 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #1958 MOTION for W. James Singleton to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court shall terminated Doc. 1958. (Atty W. James Singleton was added (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/8/2014) (lnl)
December 9, 2014 Filing 1965 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-78) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, Illinois, Minnesota and Montana, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/9/2014) (sjo)
December 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1968 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(l)(A)(i) Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff BROOKE LARRIMORE ("Plaintiff") and her counsel hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against Defendants BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. ("Defendants"). Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close case # 14-cv-4316. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/8/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04316-CS(lnl)
December 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1967 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Plaintiff TERESA ZUBIA and her counsel hereby give notice that the action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against Defendants BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case (14-cv-5518). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/8/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05518-CS (mml)
December 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1966 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Plaintiff TIFFANY LOPEZ and her counsel hereby give notice that the action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against Defendants BAYER HEALTH CARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. Each party shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close 14-cv-7322. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/8/2014) (mml)
December 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1964 ORDER granting #1956 Motion for Chantell M. Boutte to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1963 ORDER granting #1955 Motion for Kathleen Rose Kerner to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 8, 2014 Filing 1962 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
December 8, 2014 Filing 1961 THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
December 8, 2014 Filing 1960 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated December 8, 2014 re: Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02572-CS(Harrington, William)
December 8, 2014 Filing 1958 MOTION to Amend/Correct Notice Regarding Deficient Motion to Appear Pro Hac vice,, . Document filed by Chantell Boutte. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Singleton, W. James)
December 8, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #1957 MOTION for W. James Singleton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10380904. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Proposed Order. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a Proposed Order. (sdi)
December 8, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #1955 MOTION for Kathleen Rose Kerner to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #1956 MOTION for Chantell M. Boutte to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10380746. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
December 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1959 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (7 in 7:14-cv-05890-CS, 1918 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Response in Opposition to Motion. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice is vacated as to Ms. Hosey. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/5/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05890-CS (lnl)
December 5, 2014 Filing 1957 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for W. James Singleton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10380904. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Chantell Boutte. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Singleton, W. James) Modified on 12/8/2014 (sdi).
December 5, 2014 Filing 1956 MOTION for Chantell M. Boutte to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10380746. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Chantell Boutte. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Boutte, Chantell)
December 5, 2014 Filing 1955 MOTION for Kathleen Rose Kerner to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Amanda Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Kerner, Kathleen)
December 5, 2014 Filing 1954 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Kathleen Rose Kerner to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10379465. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Amanda Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Kerner, Kathleen) Modified on 12/5/2014 (wb).
December 5, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #1954 MOTION for Kathleen Rose Kerner to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10379465. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Proposed Order. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a Proposed Order. (wb)
December 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1953 ORDER granting #1952 Motion for Michael S. Mehrmann to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 4, 2014 Filing 1952 FIRST MOTION for Michael S. Mehrmann to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10375098. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Karen McLoud.(Mehrmann, Michael)
December 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1951 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ANEESAH ANANI: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Aneesah Anani, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/4/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02407-CS (lnl)
December 4, 2014 Filing 1950 RESPONSE to Motion re: #1450 SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. And Motion to Vacate Court Order Number 1654. Document filed by Ashley Stephens. (Seeger, Christopher)
December 4, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #1952 FIRST MOTION for Michael S. Mehrmann to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10375098. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
December 3, 2014 Filing 1949 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1766 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) NINTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Brianna Cobb. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05891-CS(Saba, Ryan)
December 3, 2014 Filing 1948 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Jessica Giddens. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05894-CS(Saba, Ryan)
December 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1947 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 1905), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants Motion (Doc. 1905). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/2/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
December 1, 2014 Filing 1946 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated December 1, 2014 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Tenth Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Harrington, William)
December 1, 2014 Filing 1945 MOTION to Dismiss No. 11- Without Prejudice for Failure to Provide a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
December 1, 2014 Filing 1944 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-77) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/01/2014) (sjo)
November 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1943 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE BY PLAINTIFF TINA TURNER: COMES NOW Plaintiff Tina Turner, and pursuant to Rule 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure hereby dismisses without prejudice all claims against Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Bayer"), with each party to bear their own costs. Defendant Bayer has not yet filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. This dismissal does not affect the claims of the other Plaintiffs in this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/24/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS(lnl)
November 24, 2014 Filing 1942 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE BY PLAINTIFF BRANDI MORRISON: COMES NOW Plaintiff Brandi Morrison, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure hereby dismisses without prejudice all claims against Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Bayer"), with each party to bear their own costs. Defendant Bayer has not yet filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. This dismissal does not affect the claims of the other Plaintiffs in this action. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/24/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS(lnl)
November 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1941 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: ASHLEY LOVE, plaintiff in the above-captioned action, by and through her undersigned attorneys, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action against Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/24/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04909-CS (lnl)
November 21, 2014 Filing 1940 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1905 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) TENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Chardey Johnson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05489-CS(Mencel, Jonathan)
November 21, 2014 Filing 1939 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-76) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Iowa and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/21/2014) (sjo)
November 21, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney Robert Shelquist Document #1920 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was referred to Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith for approval. (km)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1938 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Pamela A. Borgess dated November 20, 2014 re: Response in Opposition to Defendants' CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Eric Wojtowicz, Rebecca Wojtowicz.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04693-CS(Borgess, Pamela)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1937 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1857 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Walton per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Amanda Walton. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1936 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1856 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Thate per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Danielle Thate. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1935 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1855 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Spurlock per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Sarah Spurlock. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1934 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1854 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Smith per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Katherine Smith. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1933 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1853 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Schroeder per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Lynn Schroeder. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1932 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1851 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Piscionere per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Jessica Piscionere. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1931 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1850 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Parnell per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Ciara Parnell. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1930 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1848 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Medinger per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Brittany Medinger. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1929 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1847 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Lovett per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Leandra Lovett. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1928 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1845 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Horn per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Brooke Horn. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1927 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1843 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Helms per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Amanda Helms. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1926 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1839 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Dollins per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Rachel Dollins. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1925 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1838 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Davis per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Jessica Davis. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1924 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1837 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Condich per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Athena Condich. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1923 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1836 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Ashley Brown. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1922 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1834 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Blair per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Amanda Blair. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1921 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated November 20, 2014 re: #1844 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Abrams per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Lisa Abrams. (Melidonian, Lina)
November 20, 2014 Filing 1920 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Document filed by Ashley Love. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04909-CS(Shelquist, Robert) Modified on 11/21/2014 (km).
November 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1919 ORDER: In accordance with the Court's decision on the record at the status conference held on November 19, 2014, Defendants' document production request as identified in Defendants' October 7, 2014, letter (ECF No. 1789) is granted. If a provider has already been interviewed as of the date of entry of this Order, or if the documents at issue have already been shown or sent to a provider as of this date, then the date for the production of the documents, or for the identification of documents which have already been produced, is thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this Order, as set forth in this order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 11/19/2014) (mml)
November 19, 2014 Filing 1918 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Brandi Hosey. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05890-CS(Takahashi, Momo)
November 19, 2014 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith: Status Conference held on 11/19/2014. LaToya Burrell, Megan Carter, Daniel Gallucci, Matthew Gaughan, Tina Glandian, Caia Johnson, Diogenes Kekatos, Matthew McCauley, James Ronca, Roger Smith, and Gregory Spizer appearing by telephone for Plaintiffs. Christopher Cook, Shayna Cook, William Harrington, and James Shepherd appearing by telephone for Defendants. Discovery dispute raised in Defendants' October 7, 2014, letter (docket entry #1789) resolved. See transcript for details. Adjourned. (Court Reporter Christina Arends-Dieck) (ldr)
November 14, 2014 Filing 1917 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-75) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Georgia, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/13/2014) (sjo)
November 13, 2014 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith: Status Conference held on 11/13/2014, Matthew McCauley appearing by telephone for Plaintiffs, and Shayna Cook appearing by telephone for Defendants. Discovery dispute resolved. See transcript for details. Adjourned. (Court Reporter: carried over from deposition earlier in the day) (ldr)
November 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1916 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (1875) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (35) Motion to Vacate in case 7:14-cv-00479-CS. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice is vacated as to Ms. Davis. The Clerk's Office is directed to terminate the motion to vacate. (Docs. 35 and 1872.) So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/10/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00479-CS (lnl)
November 7, 2014 Filing 1915 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-74) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Louisiana, Minnesota and North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/6/2014) (sjo)
November 7, 2014 Filing 1914 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Bradley C. West dated 11/06/2014 re: (1841 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Fitzgerald per CMO 22A. . Document filed by Rachel Fitzgerald. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Operative Report, #2 Exhibit B-12 O.S., #3 Exhibit C-12 O.S.)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02572-CS(West, Bradley)
November 6, 2014 Filing 1913 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Erin Schossow. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08826-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
November 6, 2014 Filing 1912 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Hadley Lundback Matarazzo on behalf of Jamie L. Andrews, Joseph Estes, Lisa Estes. (Matarazzo, Hadley)
November 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1911 Vacated as per Judge's Order dated 6/16/2015, Doc. #2451 ORDER granting (1766) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 1766), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 1766). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/5/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) Modified on 6/16/2015 (lnl).
November 5, 2014 Filing 1910 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1905 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) TENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Spring Jarrell. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05486-CS(Mencel, Jonathan)
November 5, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney William Harrington Document #1909 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. (km)
November 4, 2014 Filing 1909 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02407-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 11/5/2014 (km).
November 4, 2014 Filing 1908 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from Shayna S. Cook dated November 4, 2014 re: Reply re Work Product. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
November 3, 2014 Filing 1907 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-73) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Georgia, Massachusetts, Minnesota and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/31/2014) (sjo)
November 3, 2014 Filing 1906 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-72) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Illinois, Louisiana and Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/28/2014) (sjo)
October 31, 2014 Filing 1905 TENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1904 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Status of defendants' letter motions filed under CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1903 ORDER granting (1889) Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08086-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1902 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Wilmot's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01979-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1901 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Williams' Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03485-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1900 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Olteanu's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08860-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1899 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Offlee's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01675-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1898 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Jones' Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03383-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1897 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Hartford's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01983-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1896 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Cook's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01673-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1895 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Cochran's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08883-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1894 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Childers' Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01612-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1893 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Campbell's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00034-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1892 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Calamari's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06874-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1891 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Boudreaux's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01676-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1890 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 30, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiff Anderson's Response to CMO 22A Notice. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01967-CS(Harrington, William)
October 30, 2014 Filing 1889 MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by April Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - MO, #3 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - IL, #4 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - MI)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08086-CS(Holland, Eric)
October 30, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (8 in 7:14-cv-08086-CS, 1889 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-08086-CS(wb)
October 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1888 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff in the above-captioned case, Latasha Moss, and Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("BHCP"), through their respective undersigned counsel, that this case is hereby dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Div. P. 41(a). Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 10/29/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07345-CS (lnl)
October 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1887 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (9 in 7:14-cv-05254-CS, 1797 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Response filed by Sofia Ramos-Cruz. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice is vacated as to Ms. Ramos-Cruz. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/29/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05254-CS (lnl)
October 28, 2014 Filing 1886 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated 10/28/2014 re: IDP Discovery Dispute. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
October 27, 2014 Filing 1885 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated October 27, 2014 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Ninth Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1884 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08559(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1883 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF JENNY L. KLOCEK: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Jenny L. Klocek, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(ii). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/24/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04917-CS (lnl)
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1882 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08555(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1880 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08548(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1879 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08544(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1878 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08542(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 27, 2014 Filing 1877 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-71) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1881 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on #1874 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Gene M. Williams dated October 23, 2014 re: Removal from service list and email notifications. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is directed to remove Mr. Williams from the 13-MD-2434 docket. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/24/2014) (lnl)
October 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1876 ORDER granting (1872) Motion for David Todd Mathews to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04262-CS, 7:14-cv-07005-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
October 24, 2014 Filing 1875 MOTION to Vacate (1654 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 33 in 7:14-cv-00479-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, . Document filed by Lashawn Marie Davis.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00479-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
October 23, 2014 Filing 1874 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Gene M. Williams dated October 23, 2014 re: Removal from service list and email notifications. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
October 23, 2014 Filing 1872 MOTION for David Todd Mathews to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10235478. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Ashley Brewer, Angela Ellingsworth. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing from IL, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing from MO, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing from FL, #4 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04262-CS, 7:14-cv-07005-CS(Mathews, David)
October 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1871 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08455(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 23, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (1872 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 35 in 7:14-cv-07005-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04262-CS) MOTION for David Todd Mathews to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10235478. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04262-CS, 7:14-cv-07005-CS(bcu)
October 23, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney William Harrington Document (11 in 7:14-cv-04917-CS) Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal, was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04917-CS(dt)
October 22, 2014 Filing 1870 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer OY, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04917-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 10/23/2014 (dt).
October 22, 2014 Filing 1869 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 22, 2014 re: IDP Replacement Selections. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1868 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: JODIE CHANEY, plaintiff in the above-captioned action, by and through her undersigned attorneys, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby voluntarily dismisses the above-captioned action against Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. with prejudice. Each party shall bear their own costs. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/21/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07760-CS(lnl)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1867 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08440(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1866 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08436(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1865 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08429(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1864 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08427(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1863 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08425(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1862 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08421(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1861 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08418(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1860 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08417(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1859 ORDER granting (1653) Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06958-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1858 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Wojtowicz per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1857 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Walton per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1856 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Thate per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1855 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Spurlock per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1854 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Smith per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1853 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Schroeder per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1852 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Price per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1851 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Piscionere per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1850 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Parnell per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1849 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Nelson per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1848 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Medinger per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1847 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Lovett per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1846 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Larrimore per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1845 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Horn per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1844 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Abrams per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1843 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Helms per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1842 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Frey per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1841 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Fitzgerald per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1840 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Fanning per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1839 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Dollins per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1838 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Davis per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1837 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Condich per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1836 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Brown per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1835 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Blue per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1834 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Blair per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1833 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Beverly per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1832 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Bere per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1831 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08415(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1830 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff Battiest per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) Modified on 4/6/2016 (sjo).
October 21, 2014 Filing 1829 MOTION to Dismiss per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1828 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08412(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1827 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08409(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1826 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08398(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 21, 2014 Filing 1825 MOTION to Dismiss per CMO 22A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna) Modified on 10/21/2014 (db). Modified on 10/21/2014 (db).
October 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1824 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Gerard Ryan III, dated 10/17/2014, re: Counsel for Latasha Moss writes to request a 30 day extension of time to respond to Defendant's letter of September 19, 2014, in which they seek dismissal of her case pursuant to CMO 22A on the basis of an argument that matter is time barred. Should the Court need further detail of the specifics of this application, counsel requests the opportunity to address these in an ex-parte communication with Your Honor at your convenience so as to preserve the attorney-client privilege. ENDORSEMENT: Given the system we have set up, I am not inclined to extend without a good reason. No real reason has been provided, so I think I need to take counsel up on the offer of more specifics. Please provide them no later than 10/27. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/20/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07345-CS(lnl)
October 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1823 ORDER NO. 23 (Scheduling Order): In addition to previously scheduled conferences, status conferences will be held on the following dates: (1) March 18, 2015; (2) April 22, 2015; (3) May 13, 2015; and (4) June 17, 2015. All conferences, including those previously scheduled, will be held at 10:00 AM. SO ORDERED. Status Conference set for 3/18/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 4/22/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 5/13/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 6/17/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/20/2014) (lnl)
October 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1822 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08372(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1821 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08369(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1820 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08368(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1819 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08366(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 20, 2014 Filing 1818 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated 10/20/2014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Tammy Calamari.(Melidonian, Lina)
October 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1817 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08350(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1816 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08348(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 17, 2014 Filing 1815 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 17, 2014 re: Latasha Moss. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07345-CS(Cook, Shayna)
October 17, 2014 Filing 1814 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from LINA B. MELIDONIAN dated 10/17/2014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Virchus Ferguson.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05659-CS(Melidonian, Lina)
October 17, 2014 Filing 1813 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from ANDREW GEIGER dated 10172014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendants Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Kelly J. Cook.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01673-CS(Geiger, Andrew)
October 17, 2014 Filing 1812 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from ANDREW GEIGER dated 10172014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendants Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Cynthia Childers.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01612-CS(Geiger, Andrew)
October 17, 2014 Filing 1811 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from ANDREW GEIGER dated 10172014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendants Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Janet Williams.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03485-CS(Geiger, Andrew)
October 17, 2014 Filing 1810 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from ANDREW GEIGER dated 10172014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendants Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Carly Boudreaux.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01676-CS(Geiger, Andrew)
October 17, 2014 Filing 1809 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from ANDREW GEIGER dated 10172014 re: Plaintiff's Response to Defendants Letter Requesting Plaintiffs Claim Be Dismissed As Time Barred. Document filed by Luciana Offlee.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01675-CS(Geiger, Andrew)
October 17, 2014 Filing 1808 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Bryan A. Pfleeger dated 10/17/2014 re: Defendant's Letter Requesting Plaintiff's Claims be Dismissed as Time-Barred. Document filed by Terionne Anderson, Melissa Jones, Angie S. Cochran, Ioana F Olteanu, Michelle Wilmot, Nicole Hartford, Timira Campbell.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Pfleeger, Bryan)
October 17, 2014 Filing 1807 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-70) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey and New York, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/15/2014) (sjo)
October 16, 2014 Filing 1806 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 16, 2014 re: Status Conference. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 16, 2014 Filing 1805 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Bryan A. Pfleeger dated 10/16/2014 re: Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Letter Requesting Plaintiff's Claims be Dismissed as Time-Barred. Document filed by Terionne Anderson, Melissa Jones, Angie S. Cochran, Ioana F Olteanu, Michelle Wilmot, Nicole Hartford, Timira Campbell.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Pfleeger, Bryan)
October 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1804 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.41(a)(l)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff LEEANNE ACCETTURO and or counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Bayer Oy. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/15/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03166-CS (lnl)
October 16, 2014 Filing 1803 JUDGMENT (13-cv-08631,14-cv-00495,13-cv-08646,14-cv-00286, 14-cv-00569, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS): ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order, dated October 15, 2014, Defendant's Motion to dismiss is granted as to the plaintiffs listed in the caption; accordingly, the member cases listed in this judgment are closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 10/16/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
October 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1802 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 1775), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 1775), and close the cases in the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/15/2014) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
October 15, 2014 Transmission to Judgments and Orders Clerk. Transmitted re: (35 in 7:13-cv-08631-CS, 33 in 7:14-cv-00495-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-08646-CS, 37 in 7:14-cv-00286-CS, 36 in 7:14-cv-00569-CS, 1802 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
October 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1801 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO VACATE THE ORDER DISMISSING CASE AND TO REINSTATE CIVIL ACTION - re: (45) Motion to Vacate in case 7:13-cv-08617-CS: Pursuant to Case Management Order 7 and 7 A, and upon the Motion of Plaintiff, Melissa Anderson, to Vacate Dismissal Without Prejudice and Reinstate Civil Action as filed on September 30, 2014, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice dated July 15, 2014 in the above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is hereby vacated as it pertains to Plaintiff Melissa Anderson. The Clerk of Court is instructed to reinstate the above captioned case filed by Plaintiff, Melissa Anderson, and terminate the pending motion, (Doc. 45). (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/15/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08617-CS (lnl)
October 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1800 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.41(a)(l)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff HILDA MURPHREE and or counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Bayer Oy. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/14/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07328-CS(lnl)
October 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1799 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.41(a)(l)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff DIANA BARRON and or counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Bayer Oy. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/14/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07327-CS(lnl)
October 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1798 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P.41(a)(l)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff JESSICA TYE and or counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer PharmaAG, and Bayer Oy. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/14/2014) (lnl)
October 14, 2014 Filing 1797 RESPONSE re: (1250 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 5 in 7:14-cv-05254-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,,, . Document filed by Sofia Ramos-Cruz. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05254-CS(Saba, Ryan)
October 14, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - EVENT TYPE ERROR. Note to Attorney Ryan Donald Saba to RE-FILE Document (1796 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 8 in 7:14-cv-05254-CS) MOTION to Reopen Case . Use the event type Response (non-motion) found under the event list Other Answers. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05254-CS(db)
October 13, 2014 Filing 1796 FILING ERROR - WRONG EVENT TYPE SELECTED FROM MENU - MOTION to Reopen Case . Document filed by Sofia Ramos-Cruz.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05254-CS(Saba, Ryan) Modified on 10/14/2014 (db).
October 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1873 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (1795 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 43 in 7:13-cv-07354-CS) LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Jackqualyn Quinton dated October 9, 2014 re: Leave to Amend Complaint. Document filed by Rachel Hermosillo. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. Per CMO14, Plaintiff's request to amend her complaint to add proper party Defendants is timely. The Clerk should docket this order in both 13-MD-2434 and 13-CV-7354. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/10/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07354-CS (lnl)
October 9, 2014 Filing 1795 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Jackqualyn Quinton dated October 9, 2014 re: Leave to Amend Complaint. Document filed by Rachel Hermosillo. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07354-CS(Quinton, Jackqualyn)
October 8, 2014 Filing 1793 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-69) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/7/2014) (sjo)
October 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1792 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08087(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1791 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08086(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1794 ORDER FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONSES: This Order relates to the above-captioned case. This case was originally filed in the Western District of New York on September 4, 2014. This case was transferred into MDL 2434 on September 22, 2014. Summonses were never issued by the Western District of New York. This Court directs the Southern District of New York to issue Summonses in the above-captioned case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/7/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07662-CS (lnl)
October 7, 2014 Filing 1790 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from E. James Shepherd dated October 6, 2014 re: Reply to Kayla Shepherd's Response to Bayer's Fourth Motion to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05817-CS(Harrington, William)
October 7, 2014 Filing 1789 LETTER addressed to Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith from Shayna S. Cook dated October 7, 2014 re: Work Product. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(Cook, Shayna)
October 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1788 ORDER granting #1781 Motion for Timothy B. Moore to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
October 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1787 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08062(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1786 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08054(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1785 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08056(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1784 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-08050(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 6, 2014 Filing 1783 MOTION for Neil D. Overholtz to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Mindy J. Abercrombie. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00569-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
October 6, 2014 Filing 1782 MOTION for Neil D. Overholtz to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Kimberly Amanda Boog. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00286-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
October 6, 2014 Filing 1781 FIRST MOTION for Timothy B. Moore to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10175540. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Carey Flint. Return Date set for 10/6/2014 at 10:39 AM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE, #2 Exhibit Letter of Good Standing)(Moore, Timothy)
October 6, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #1781 FIRST MOTION for Timothy B. Moore to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10175540. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
October 3, 2014 Filing 1780 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-68) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, California, Missouri and Oklahoma, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/3/2014) (sjo)
October 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1779 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL: IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel and pursuant to Local Rule 1.4, that W. Roger Smith, III, of the law firm Beasley, Allen Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C., is hereby substituted in place of attorneys David P. Matthews, Steve Faries, and Rachal G. Rojas, of David Matthews and Associates, as counsel of record for Plaintiff Tahrir Ismail in the above-captioned case. A declaration in support of this stipulation and order for substitution of counsel is attached pursuant to Local Rule 1.4. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that all pleadings, notices of hearing, and other filings in this matter should be served upon the undersigned incoming counsel. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk shall terminate Docs. 7 & 8. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/2/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06167-CS (lnl)
October 2, 2014 Filing 1778 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated October 2, 2014 re: IDP Replacement Selections. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
October 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1777 ORDER GRANTING CLERK PERMISSION TO ISSUE SUMMONS ON AMENDED COMPLAINT: The request of Jackqualyn Quinton for permission for the Clerk of Court to issue Summons on Amended Complaint as to Defendants, Bayer Oy and Bayer Phanna AG in the above captioned action is granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is granted permission to issue Summons on Amended Complaint as to Defendants, Bayer Oy and Bayer Pharma AG. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/1/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06456-CS(lnl)
October 2, 2014 Filing 1776 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-67)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/1/2014) (sjo)
October 1, 2014 Filing 1775 FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
October 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1774 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting (1767) Motion for Rochelle R. Breier to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS; granting (51) Motion for Rochelle R. Breier to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04321-CS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys.. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/30/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04321-CS (lnl)
October 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1773 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall terminate Docs. 8 and 9. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/30/2014) (lnl)
September 30, 2014 Filing 1772 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Ryan Saba dated September 30, 2014 re: Dismissal of Kayla Shepherd. Document filed by Kayla Shepherd. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05817-CS(Saba, Ryan)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1771 ORDER granting (1633) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 1633), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 1633). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/30/2014) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) Modified on 2/18/2015 (lnl).
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1770 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07877(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1769 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07873(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 30, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (1767 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 46 in 7:13-cv-05767-CS, 51 in 7:13-cv-04321-CS, 55 in 7:13-cv-03563-CS) MOTION for Rochelle Ricci Breier to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10150972. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03563-CS, 7:13-cv-04321-CS, 7:13-cv-05767-CS(bcu)
September 29, 2014 Filing 1768 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated September 29, 2014 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Eighth Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
September 29, 2014 Filing 1767 MOTION for Rochelle Ricci Breier to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10150972. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03563-CS, 7:13-cv-04321-CS, 7:13-cv-05767-CS(Breier, Rochelle) Modified on 9/29/2014 (bcu). Modified on 9/30/2014 (bcu). Modified on 10/1/2014 (lnl).
September 26, 2014 Filing 1766 NINTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
September 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1765 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07801(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1764 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07799(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 25, 2014 Filing 1763 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-66)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, New Jersey and North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/25/2014) (sjo)
September 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1762 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07719(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1761 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07715(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1760 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 1638), is GRANTED as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 1638), and close the cases in the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/23/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1759 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07686(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1758 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07685(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 23, 2014 Filing 1757 LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Ebony Carey dated 09/23/2014 re: (1411 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Ebony Carey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01951-CS(Pfleeger, Bryan)
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1756 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07684(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1755 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07682(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1754 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07671(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/1/2014: #1 Appendix) (sjo).
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1753 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07662(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1752 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07661(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1751 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07659(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1750 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07654(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1749 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07653(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1748 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07648(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1747 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07647(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) (sjo).
September 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1746 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00773-CS; granting (1702) Motion for Michael Ray Clinton to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (Seibel, Cathy)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1745 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Wilmot. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1744 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Williams. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1743 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Watson. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1742 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Vilchis. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1741 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Tye. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1740 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Soto. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1739 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Salvaleon-Cua. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1738 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Rowland. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1737 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Rokovich. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1736 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Olteanu. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1735 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Offlee. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1734 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Moss. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1733 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Middleton. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1732 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Maholmes. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1731 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Jones. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1730 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Hartford. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1729 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Ferguson. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1728 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Davis. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1727 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Cook. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1726 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Coe. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1725 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Cochran. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1724 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Childers. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1723 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Chaney. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1722 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Cervantes. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1721 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Campbell. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1720 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Calamari. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1719 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Boudreaux. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1718 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Barron. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Filing 1717 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 19, 2014 re: CMO 22A Notice to Plaintiff Anderson. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1716 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07602(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1715 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07589(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1714 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07566(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1713 ORDER: On September 5, 2014, Plaintiffs Marvetta Davis and Lourdes Gonzalez, whose cases are currently in the Initial Disposition Pool ("IDP"), (see Doc. 1524), filed notices that they were dismissing their claims against Defendants with prejudice, (Docs. 1641, 1642). Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), no court order is necessary to effectuate these dismissals because Defendants have not served an answer or a motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Case Management Order No. ("CMO") 18, however, states that a "dismissal order" triggers a 14-day period within which Defendants must select a replacement case following an IDP plaintiffs voluntary dismissal. (See Doc. 883, at Paragraph 6.) Accordingly, this Order shall constitute a "dismissal order" under CMO 18. Defendants must select plaintiffs to replace Ms. Davis and Ms. Gonzalez in the IDP within fourteen days of the entry of this Order. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/18/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05330-CS, 7:13-cv-06805-CS (lnl)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1712 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07565(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1711 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07563(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1710 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07562(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1709 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07561(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1708 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07560(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2014 Filing 1707 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-64) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, New York, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/18/2014) (sjo)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1706 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07551(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1705 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07549(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2014 Filing 1704 REPLY to Response to Motion re: #1638 FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice For Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Harrington, William)
September 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1703 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07518(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2014 Filing 1702 AMENDED MOTION for Michael Ray Clinton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Diana Olatunbosun, Yessica Cano, Kathryn Cordell, Yvette Ezell, Hannah Fulmer, Katherine Gallaher, Jaclyn Gargulinski, Cara Lawson, Elina Lloyd, Sally McAdam, Vanessa Valdez. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Clinton, Michael)
September 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1701 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07516(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1700 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07512(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1699 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07511(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1698 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07509(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1697 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07508(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1696 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07507(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (39 in 7:13-cv-06591-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-06644-CS, 20 in 7:14-cv-03474-CS, 21 in 7:14-cv-03810-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-04906-CS, 23 in 7:14-cv-02894-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-05288-CS, 11 in 7:14-cv-05399-CS, 30 in 7:14-cv-00821-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-06645-CS, 1702 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) AMENDED MOTION for Michael Ray Clinton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(sdi)
September 16, 2014 Filing 1695 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1633 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Sydney Nichole Lowe. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03402-CS(Scott, Carmen)
September 15, 2014 Filing 1694 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jackqualyn R. Quinton on behalf of Summer Creekmore. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-07437-CS(Quinton, Jackqualyn)
September 15, 2014 Filing 1693 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1638 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice For Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Kayla Shepherd. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05817-CS(Saba, Ryan)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1692 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07469(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1691 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07467(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1690 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07465(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1689 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07464(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1688 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07450(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1687 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1686 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07446(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1685 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07439(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1684 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07437(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Filing 1683 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-62)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota, New Jersey and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/11/2014) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1682 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07418(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1681 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07413(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1680 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07322(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1679 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07321(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1678 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07320(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1677 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07319(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1676 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07318(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1675 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07317(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1674 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07316(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1673 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07315(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1672 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07314(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1671 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07313(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1670 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07312(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1669 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07311(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1668 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Sylvia Davidow, dated 9/10/2014, re: Counsel for the plaintiff Samantha Badger writes to request that the Court remove my contact information from all Court notices subject to the MDL 2434. ENDORSEMENT: Ms. Davidow should be removed as an attorney to be noticed from both 13-md-2434 and 14-cv-6477. So Ordered. Attorney Sylvia Davidow terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/11/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06477-CS (lnl)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1666 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07310(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1665 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07309(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1664 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07308(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1663 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07307(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1662 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07306(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1661 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07305(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1660 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07304(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1659 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07303(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1658 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07302(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1657 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07301(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1656 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07300(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1655 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07299(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1667 CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY: Sharon Love substitutes Jackqualyn R. Clinton, as counsel of record in place of Mark C. Choate. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 9/9/2014) (mml)
September 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1654 ORDER granting (1450) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Orders ("C.M.O.") 7 and 7A, I will grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria, (Doc. 1450), as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet i.e. a Plaintiff Fact Sheet containing all core criteria or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The clerk is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below1 and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 1450). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/6/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
September 9, 2014 Filing 1653 AMENDED MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Miosity Merced. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order on Motion, #2 Exhibit A - Missouri Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit B - Illinois Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Exhibit C - Michigan Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06958-CS(Holland, Eric)
September 9, 2014 Filing 1652 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-61) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Ohio and Oklahoma, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/3/2014) (sjo)
September 9, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (1653 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 10 in 7:14-cv-06958-CS) AMENDED MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06958-CS(sdi)
September 8, 2014 Filing 1651 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Maya Wofford. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02322-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
September 8, 2014 Filing 1650 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Maria Lourdes Cabrera Tinajero. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04249-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
September 8, 2014 Filing 1649 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Leeann Avila. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05381-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
September 8, 2014 Filing 1648 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Kellie Meloche. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06096-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
September 8, 2014 Filing 1647 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Amberlee Price. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06747-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
September 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1646 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07223(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 8, 2014 Filing 1645 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos, dated 9/5/2014 re: Counsel writes: Pursuant to Order No. 9A, the following Initial Disposition Pool ("IDP") plaintiffs advise the Court and defendants that they have agreed to waive any venue objections and consent to trial of their case in the Southern District of New York. Signed waivers are attached for Plaintiffs Elms, Keller, and Murphree. The signed waiver for Plaintiff Zelms will be provided under separate cover. (See LETTER as set forth) (lnl)
September 8, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney Daniel Gallucci Document #1642 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,, #1641 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. (km)
September 5, 2014 Filing 1644 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated September 5, 2014 re: Waiver of Venue Objections for Initial Disposition Pool trials. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
September 5, 2014 Filing 1643 AFFIRMATION of Denis E. McGuinness in Opposition re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria.. Document filed by Andrew Valdez, Stacy Valdez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01479-CS(McGuinness, Denis)
September 5, 2014 Filing 1642 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Lourdes Gonzalez. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06805-CS(Gallucci, Daniel) Modified on 9/8/2014 (km).
September 5, 2014 Filing 1641 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Marvetta T. Davis, Michael Davis. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05330-CS(Gallucci, Daniel) Modified on 9/8/2014 (km).
September 3, 2014 Filing 1640 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated September 3, 2014 re: Proposed Order Granting Bayer's Second Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Produce Plaintiff Fact Sheets Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
September 3, 2014 Filing 1639 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Korto Tawse-Butha. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02375-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
September 3, 2014 Filing 1638 FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice For Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Amended Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
September 3, 2014 Filing 1637 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Miosity Merced. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A - Missouri Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit B - Illinois Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Exhibit C - Michigan Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06958-CS(Holland, Eric) Modified on 9/3/2014 (bcu).
September 3, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (1637 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 9 in 7:14-cv-06958-CS) MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Expired Certificate of Good Standing. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06958-CS(bcu)
September 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1636 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (86 in 7:13-cv-02815-CS) Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Ghiselle Watson. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice (13-cv-2815, Doc. 84) is vacated as to Ms. Watson only. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/29/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02815-CS (lnl)
September 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1635 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), I will grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 1411), as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants Motion (Doc. 1411). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/2/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
September 2, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (38 in 7:13-cv-06591-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-03474-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-05399-CS, 22 in 7:14-cv-02894-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-05205-CS, 11 in 7:14-cv-04906-CS, 20 in 7:14-cv-03810-CS, 29 in 7:14-cv-00821-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-06644-CS, 1632 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 38 in 7:13-cv-06645-CS, 55 in 7:13-cv-05288-CS) MOTION for Michael R. Clinton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10051591. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Missing Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Court of Texas with the Clerk of Court's signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(sdi)
September 1, 2014 Filing 1634 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY (SEE #1638 MOTION) - FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice For Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William) Modified on 9/11/2014 (db).
August 29, 2014 Filing 1633 EIGHTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
August 29, 2014 Filing 1632 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Michael R. Clinton to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10051591. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Diana Olatunbosun, Vanessa Valdez, Katherine Gallaher, Elina Lloyd, Yvette Ezell, Kathryn Cordell, Sally McAdam, Cara Lawson, Jaclyn Gargulinski, Yessica Cano, Hannah Fulmer. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Clinton, Michael) Modified on 9/2/2014 (sdi). Modified on 9/3/2014 (bcu).
August 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1631 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07031(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 28, 2014 Filing 1630 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated August 28, 2014 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Seventh Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
August 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1629 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-07005(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1628 ORDER granting (1077) Motion for Leave to File Document in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental and Amended Complaint is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file the Amended Complaint in 13-cv-7754. The Clerk is directed to terminate the pending motion. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/27/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07754-CS (lnl)
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1627 ORDER granting (1337) Motion for Leave to File Document in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (56) Motion for Leave to File Document in case 7:13-cv-03591-CS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Amended Complaint attached to the Motion for Leave be filed with the Court. The Clerk is directed to terminate the pending motion (13-md-2434, Doc. 1337; 13-cv-3591, Doc. 56). The Clerk is further directed to terminate the related motions at 13-md-2434, Doc. 1336 and 13-cv-3591, Doc. 55. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/27/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03591-CS (lnl)
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1626 ORDER granting (1334) Motion for Leave to File Document in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; granting (82) Motion for Leave to File Document in case 7:13-cv-02911-CS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Second Amended Complaint attached to the Motion for Leave be filed with the Court. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk is directed to terminate the pending motion (13-md-2434, Doc. 1334; 13-cv-2911, Doc. 82). The Clerk is further directed to terminate the related motion at 13-md-2434, Doc. 1335 and 13-cv-2911, Doc. 83. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/27/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02911-CS (lnl)
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1625 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06964(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1624 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06962(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1623 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06960(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1622 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06958(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1621 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06956(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1620 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06889(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1619 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06888(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1618 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06887(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 26, 2014 Filing 1617 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Ghiselle Watson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02815-CS(Geiger, Andrew)
August 26, 2014 Filing 1616 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Luciana Offlee. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01675-CS(Geiger, Andrew)
August 26, 2014 Filing 1615 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Carly Boudreaux. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01676-CS(Geiger, Andrew)
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1614 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06886(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1613 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06885(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1612 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06884(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1611 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06883(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1610 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06882(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1609 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06881(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1608 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06880(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1607 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06879(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1606 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06878(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1605 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06877(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1604 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06876(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1603 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06875(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1602 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06874(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1601 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06873(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1600 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06872(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1599 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06871(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1598 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06870(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1597 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06869(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Filing 1596 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-60) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Illinois, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 8/21/2014) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Filing 1595 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-59) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, California, Georgia, Massachusetts and Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 8/20/2014) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1594 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06850(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1593 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06848(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1592 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06847(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1591 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06829(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1590 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06826(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1589 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06822(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1588 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06811(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1587 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06802(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1586 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06799(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1585 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06794(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 22, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney Eric Holland Document #1582 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. (jno)
August 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1584 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #1583 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated August 21, 2014 re: Extension of Amended Scheduling Order No. 9A. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The deadline is extended to 9/5/14 for both Plaintiffs and Defendants. This Order will not impact other deadlines. The Clerk's office is instructed to file this Order in 13-md-2434 and 13-mc-2434. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/21/2014) (lnl)
August 21, 2014 Filing 1583 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated August 21, 2014 re: Extension of Amended Scheduling Order No. 9A. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
August 21, 2014 Filing 1582 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Pamela Basden. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06755-CS(Holland, Eric) Modified on 8/22/2014 (jno).
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1581 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06757(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1580 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06755(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1579 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06753(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1578 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06752(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1577 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06749(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1576 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06747(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1575 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on DE #45 in Case No. 14-3445 - FIRST LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Randi Kassan dated 8/19/2014 re: Melinda Nation et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk's Office is instructed to remove Lowell W. Finson as an attorney of record. So Ordered. Attorney Lowell W Finson terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/19/2014) (lnl)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1574 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06619(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1573 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06618(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1572 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06617(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1571 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06616(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1570 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06615(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1569 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06614(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1568 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06613(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1567 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06612(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1566 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06611(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1565 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06610(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1564 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06609(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1563 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06608(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1562 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting 52 in 13-cv-4322 Motion for Leave to File Document. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The operative complaint is now Doc. 53 on 13-cv-4322. The Clerk is requested to terminate the pending motion at Doc. 52. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/18/2014) (Docketed in Case No. 7:13-cv-4322-CS) (lnl)
August 18, 2014 Filing 1561 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-58) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, California, Illinois, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 8/14/2014) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1560 ORDER NO. 18C (Production of Sales Rep. Custodial Files for IDP Cases): 1. For each case in the Initial Disposition Pool (IDP), Plaintiffs may identify for further discovery certain sales representatives with Mirena responsibilities who called on a Plaintiff's inserting physician. The number of sales representative custodial files and sales representative depositions that may be requested shall be determined by the number of sales representatives identified in the Defendant Fact Sheet (DFS) as calling upon the inserting physician: a. For cases where 5 or fewer sales representatives are identified in the DFS as having called upon the inserting physician, Plaintiffs may request up to two sales representative custodial files and take up to two sales representative depositions. b. For cases where 6-7 sales representatives are identified in the DFS as having called upon the inserting physician, Plaintiffs may request up to three sales representative custodial files and take up to two sales representative depositions. c. For cases where 8 or more sales representatives are identified in the DFS as having called upon the inserting physician, Plaintiffs may request up to five sales representative custodial files and take up to three sales representative depositions. 2. Plaintiffs shall identify all sales representatives pursuant to Paragraph 1 on or before September 5, 2014 or within twenty (20) days of receipt of the DFS in that specific case, whichever comes later. 3. Defendants shall produce custodial files as defined on pages 4-7 of Exhibit B to the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (13-MC-2434, Doc. 26) for sales representatives identified pursuant to Paragraph 1. These custodial files shall be collected and reviewed for as of August 25, 2014. 4. Unless otherwise agreed, depositions of Plaintiffs or Defendants' current or former employees will take place within a reasonable distance from the city where the witness resides, at their respective counsel's office or at a mutually agreed location. Plaintiffs' counsel shall presumptively provide the location for Plaintiffs' depositions and Defendants shall provide the location for the deposition of its current employees and any former employees represented by the same counsel as Defendants 5. Plaintiffs may seek discovery of additional sales representative custodial files and/or depositions of additional sales representatives through agreement of the Parties or through a motion and good cause shown by Plaintiffs. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/15/2014) (lnl)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1559 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06541(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 Filing 1558 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Patricia N. Syverson on behalf of Andrea Penaflor. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08715-CS(Syverson, Patricia)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1557 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06539(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1556 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06538(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1555 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06537(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1554 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06536(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1553 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06535(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1552 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06534(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1551 ORDER granting (1547) Motion for Patricia N Syverson to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08715-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1550 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06532(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1549 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06530(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1548 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06528(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 Filing 1547 MOTION for Patricia N Syverson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10004362. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Andrea Penaflor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08715-CS(Syverson, Patricia)
August 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1546 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06527(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 15, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (1547 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 45 in 7:13-cv-08715-CS) MOTION for Patricia N Syverson to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-10004362. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08715-CS(sdi)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1545 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO ELIZABETH MOORE ONLY: Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff, Elizabeth Moore, and the defendants, stipulate to a dismissal of this action without prejudice. Each party shall bear its own costs and attorney fees. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/14/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03445-CS (lnl)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1544 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE BY PLAINTIFF, STACEY MEACHAM: Comes now plaintiff, Stacey Meacham, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby dismisses, without prejudice, all claims agsinst the defendants, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Bayer Oy. Under Rule 41(a)(l)(a)(i), voluntary dismissal is permissible as defendants have not filed either an Answer nor a Motion for Summary Judgment at the time of such dismissal. This dismissal does not affect the claims of the other Plaintiffs in this action. ENDORSEMENT: There are no other Plaintiffs so the case 14-CV-4263 shall be closed by the Clerk of Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/14/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04263-CS (lnl)
August 14, 2014 Filing 1543 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jackqualyn R. Quinton on behalf of Leah Wade. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06456-CS(Quinton, Jackqualyn)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1542 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06484(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1541 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06482(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1540 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06481(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1539 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06480(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1538 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06479(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 14, 2014 Filing 1537 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Meri Myers. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-06437-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1536 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06477(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1535 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06475(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 13, 2014 Filing 1534 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - AMENDED MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with CMO 20 and 20A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) Modified on 8/14/2014 (db).
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1533 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06456(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1532 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06454(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1531 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06444(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1530 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06443(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1529 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06442(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1528 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06440(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1527 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06437(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 13, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney Eric Holland Document #1526 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. (jno)
August 12, 2014 Filing 1526 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Stacey Meacham. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04263-CS(Holland, Eric) Modified on 8/13/2014 (jno).
August 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1525 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(l)(A)(i) Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff COLEEN IOVINO and or counsel, hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, and Bayer Oy. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/11/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05687-CS(lnl)
August 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1524 ORDER NO. 18B (Initial Disposition Pool Selections): The parties having submitted, in accordance with Orders 18 and !SA, their respective selections and strikes for the Initial Disposition Pool ("IDP"), the following twelve cases shall hereby comprise the IDP: Chow, Shelley - 7:13-cv-02911 (CS); Danley, Jennifer - 7:13-cv-06586 (CS); Davis, Marvetta - 7:13-cv-05330 (CS); Elms, Ashley - 7:13-cv-04326 (CS); Gonzalez, Lourdes - 7:13-cv-06805 (CS); Keller, Heather - 7:14-cv-00115 (CS); Mejia, Dilsia - 7:13-cv-04322 (CS); Murphree, Hilda - 7:13-cv-07328 (CS); Nordman, Laurie - 7:13-cv-03592 (CS); Smith, Olivia - 7:13-cv-02779 (CS); Townes, Monica - 7:13-cv-08182 (CS); Zelms, Denice - 7:13-cv-05765 (CS); This Order shall not impact the deadline for amendment of complaints set forth in paragraph 2 of Case Management Order No. 14 (13-MD-2434, Doc. 707; 13-MC-2434, Doc. 51). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/8/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1523 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06321(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1522 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06320(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1521 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06319(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1520 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06318(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1519 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06305(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1518 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06303(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1517 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06302(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1516 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06300(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 8, 2014 Filing 1515 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1450 SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Sarah B Miller, Kathryn J Stark, Trisha Ann Tidwell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Kirtley, John)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1514 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06284(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1513 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06281(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1512 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06273(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1511 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06268(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1510 ORDER No. 22A (Statute of Limitations): Order No. 22 (13-MD-2434, Doc. 1477; 13-MC-2434, Doc. 80), is hereby vacated and replaced by this Order. Having issued an opinion on July 2, 2014 in Truitt v. Bayer (13-CV-7811, Doc. 50; 13-MD-2434, Doc 1203; 13-MC-2434, Doc. 75) (the "Truitt Order"), the Court enters the following Order regarding the potential applicability of that opinion to other actions in this MDL. 1. If Defendants wish to seek dismissal of a case pursuant to the Truitt Order, Defendants shall file via ECF and serve on the relevant Plaintiff's counsel by email a letter of no more than three pages referring to this Order and briefly stating why that Plaintiff's case should be dismissed consistent with the Truitt Order. 2. Each Plaintiff whose counsel receives such a letter shall have thirty days to respond by either: a. filing a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any voluntary dismissal filed within thirty days of receiving such a letter shall note that each side will bear its own costs and attorney's fees; OR b. filing a letter with the Court of no more than three pages showing cause as to why her claim should not be dismissed by setting forth the specific facts and/or law that distinguish her case from the Truitt Order's holding. If Plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint, she shall so state in her letter and explain what additional facts she would plead to distinguish her case from the reasoning set forth in the Truitt Order. Defendants shall file a reply letter of no more than three pages within thirty days. The Court will, applying the standard of review articulated in the Truitt Order, then determine whether (1) dismissal is either appropriate or inappropriate on the basis of the letters alone or (2) a decision can be made only after additional briefing, in which case the Court will set a briefing schedule. 3. Defendants may submit a proposed Order of dismissal with prejudice for any Plaintiff(s) who does not take action under paragraph 2 within thirty days of being served with a letter under paragraph 1. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/7/2014) (lnl)
August 7, 2014 Filing 1509 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-57) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Illinois, North Carolina and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 8/5/2014) (sjo)
August 7, 2014 Filing 1508 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Dawn L. Schaeffer. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08601-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
August 7, 2014 Filing 1507 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Lashawn Marie Davis. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00479-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
August 7, 2014 Filing 1506 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Amber Lefler. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07275-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
August 7, 2014 Filing 1505 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Amanda L. Devaux. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08865-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
August 7, 2014 Filing 1504 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Christie L. Hayes. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00288-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
August 7, 2014 Filing 1503 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Keesha L. Odom. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00285-CS(Overholtz, Neil)
August 7, 2014 Filing 1502 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Dianna Aleman. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01460-CS(Oliver, Alyson)
August 7, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney William Patrick Harringto. Document No. #1500 Letter. This document is not filed via ECF. The Court permits the filing of letters including certain types of letter motions, a Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Prosecution must be formally filed. (db)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1501 ORDER granting (1430) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O.7"), I will grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 1430), as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the case in the caption and the table below, terminate the pending Motion, (Doc. 1430), and close the member cases. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/6/2014) (Motion pending only in lead MDL case) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
August 6, 2014 Filing 1500 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated August 6, 2014 re: Bayer Defendants' Letter Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with CMO 20 and 20A. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) Modified on 8/7/2014 (lnl). Modified on 8/7/2014 (db).
August 6, 2014 Filing 1499 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by DeShawn McMillian. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Pfleeger, Bryan)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1498 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06200(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Filing 1497 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated August 6, 2014 re: Order No. 22. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1496 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06199(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1495 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06198(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1494 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06197(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1493 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06193(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 8/7/2014 (sjo).
August 6, 2014 Filing 1492 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1450 SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. First. Document filed by Janice Moss. (Bell, Bobby)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1491 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06192(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 8/7/2014 (sjo).
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1490 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06191(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1489 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06190(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1488 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06180(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1487 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06179(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1486 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06178(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 8/7/2014 (sjo).
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1485 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06177(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1484 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06175(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 8/7/2014 (sjo).
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1483 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06173(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1482 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06171(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1481 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06169(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1480 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06167(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1479 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (53 in 7:13-cv-07811-CS) (1329 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated July 24, 2014 re: Final Dismissal of Plaintiff Truitt. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk shall close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/6/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS (lnl)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1478 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06159(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1477 ***VACATED*** ORDER No. 22 (Statute of Limitations): Having issued an opinion on July 2, 2014 in Truitt v. Bayer (13-CV-7811, Doc. 50; 13-MD-2434, Doc 1203; 13-MC-2434, Doc. 75) (the "Truitt Order"), the Court enters the following Order regarding the potential applicability of that opinion to other actions in this MDL. 1. If Defendants wish to seek dismissal of a case pursuant to the Truitt Order, Defendants shall file via ECF and serve on the relevant Plaintiffs counsel by email a letter of no more than three pages referring to this Order and briefly stating why that Plaintiff's case should be dismissed consistent with the Truitt Order. 2. Each Plaintiff whose counsel receives such a letter shall have thirty days to respond by either: a. filing a notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any voluntary dismissal filed within thirty days of receiving such a letter shall note that each side will bear its own costs and attorney's fees; OR b. filing a letter with the Court of no more than three pages showing cause as to why her claim should not be dismissed by setting forth the specific facts and/or law that distinguish her case from the Truitt Order's holding. If Plaintiff wishes to file an amended complaint, she shall so state in her letter and explain what additional facts she would plead to distinguish her case from the reasoning set forth in the Truitt Order. Defendants shall file a reply letter of no more than three pages within thirty days. The Court will then determine whether (1) dismissal is either appropriate or inappropriate on the basis of the letters alone or (2) a decision can be made only after additional briefing, in which case the Court will set a briefing schedule. 3. Defendants may submit a proposed Order of dismissal with prejudice for any Plaintiff(s) who does not take action under paragraph 2 within thirty days of being served with a letter under paragraph 1. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/6/2014) (lnl) Modified on 8/7/2014 to reflect that this Order has been vacated - see DE #1510 (lnl).
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1476 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06158(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1475 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06157(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Filing 1474 FILING ERROR - ELECTRONIC FILING OF NON-ECF DOCUMENT - MOTION to Dismiss Multi-Party Plaintiff Cases for Failure to Comply with Severance Order. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William) Modified on 8/6/2014 (db).
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1473 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06144(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1472 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06143(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1470 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06142(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1469 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06141(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 6, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - NON-ECF DOCUMENT ERROR. Note to Attorney William Patrick Harrington. Document No. #1474 Letter. This document is not filed via ECF. The Court permits the filing of letters including certain types of letter motions, a Motion to Dismiss must be formally filed. (db)
August 5, 2014 Filing 1468 RESPONSE to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Michaela Ramsey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (part 1) - letters and authorizations, #2 Exhibit A (part 2) - letters and authorizations)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05686-CS(Alexander, Elizabeth)
August 5, 2014 Filing 1467 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF SEEGER WEISS LLP AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF served on Ysabel Torres on July 2, 2014. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Ysabel Torres. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Proof of Service)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02932-CS(Van de Kieft, Christopher)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1466 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06121(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1465 ORDER granting (1379) Motion for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05761-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1464 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06120(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1463 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06118(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1462 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06116(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1461 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06101(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 8/5/2014 (sjo).
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1460 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06096(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1459 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06094(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1458 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06093(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1457 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06092(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Filing 1456 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1450 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Faun R. Cope. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08490-CS(Mencel, Jonathan)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1455 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06082(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1454 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06079(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1453 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06076(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1452 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06074(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1451 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06073(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 4, 2014 Filing 1450 SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1449 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06067(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1448 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06065(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1447 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06062(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1446 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06061(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1445 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06059(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1444 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06058(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1443 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-06057(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1442 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Reynolds E. Pitts, Jr., dated 7/28/2014, re: Counsel writes: I am writing to respectfully request that my name be removed from the e-mail distribution list for the above-referenced cases and any related cases. My involvement in these cases was simply to file documentation in the Northern District of Georgia on behalf of the Morgan & Morgan attorneys handling these matters while they awaited a pro hac vice appearance. I am not involved in this case in any way at this point. I have been told by the clerk that this is basically the only way for me to be removed from these cases. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall effectuate Mr. Pitts' request. So Ordered. Attorney Reynolds Eugene Pitts, Jr terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/31/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05698-CS, 7:14-cv-05699-CS, 7:14-cv-05707-CS, 7:14-cv-05709-CS (lnl)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1441 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Come now the parties, by and through their counsel of record, and hereby stipulate and agree to dismissal of their actions without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own fees and costs The parties further stipulate and agree that, should Plaintiff choose tore-file her claim(s) related to the alleged injury of Plaintiff by Mirena against any defendants, the claim(s) will be filed in a federal court of proper venue or in the pending litigation in the Southern District of New York entitled In Re Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL-2434. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/30/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00567-CS(lnl)
July 31, 2014 Filing 1440 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-56)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/31/2014) (sjo)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1439 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05947(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1438 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05946(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1437 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05945(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1436 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05944(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1435 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05943(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1434 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05942(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 31, 2014 Filing 1433 NOTICE of Substitution of Attorney. Old Attorney: Mark C. Choate, New Attorney: Jackqualyn R. Quinton, Address: Edwards Law Firm, 8282 S. Memorial Dr, Ste 100, Tulsa, OK, 74120, 800-304-9246. Document filed by Sharon Love. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05760-CS(Quinton, Jackqualyn)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1432 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05941(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1431 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05940(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Filing 1430 THIRD MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice For Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1429 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05900(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1428 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05899(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1427 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05898(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1426 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05897(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1425 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05896(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1424 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05895(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1423 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05894(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1422 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05893(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1421 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05892(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1420 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05891(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1419 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05890(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1418 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05889(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1417 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05888(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1416 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05887(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1415 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Come now the parties, by and through their counsel of record, and hereby stipulate and agree to dismissal of their actions without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(a)(l)(A)(ii), with each party to bear its own fees and costs. The parties further stipulate and agree that, should Plaintiff choose to re-file her claim(s) related to the alleged injury of Plaintiff by Mirena against any defendants, the claim(s) will be filed in a federal court of proper venue or in the pending litigation in the Southern District of New York entitled In Re Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL-2434. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/29/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00571-CS(lnl)
July 30, 2014 Filing 1414 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-55) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota and New York, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/29/2014) (sjo)
July 30, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney Neil Overholtz Document #1413 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal, #1412 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal, was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. (jno)
July 29, 2014 Filing 1413 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare AG, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Berlex Laboratories, Inc., Berlex, Inc. pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Kathleen Gary.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00567-CS(Overholtz, Neil) Modified on 7/30/2014 (jno).
July 29, 2014 Filing 1412 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Kylie K. Cook.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00571-CS(Overholtz, Neil) Modified on 7/30/2014 (jno).
July 29, 2014 Filing 1411 SEVENTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1410 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05829(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1409 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05828(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1408 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05827(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1407 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05826(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1406 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05825(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1405 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05823(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1404 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05822(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1403 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05821(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1402 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05819(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1401 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05818(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1400 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05817(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1399 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05816(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1398 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05815(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1397 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05814(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1396 ORDER granting #1061 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney: It is ORDERED that Mr. Cook's Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is instructed to terminate Mr. Cook where he appears as counsel for any party in this MDL and in member case 7:14-cv-03692-CS. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to file a copy of this order in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS and in member case 7:14-cv-03692-CS, in which Mr. Cook has appeared. Attorney James H Cook terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/28/2014) (lnl)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1395 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Glenn W. Cunningham, dated 7/23/2014, re: Counsel writes to request that his name be removed from the e-mail list regarding the above-mentioned case. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Mr. Cunningham as counsel in 13-MD-2434. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/28/2014) (lnl)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1394 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05813(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1393 ORDER granting #1174 Motion to Amend/Correct. The Motion of John J. Driscoll for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned actions is granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk of Court shall terminate Doc. 1174 in 13-MD-2434, Doc. 34 in 14-CV-4244, and Doc. 16 in 14-CV-4247. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/28/2014) (lnl)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1392 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on #1349 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated July 25, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiffs' July 22, 2014 Letter concerning Stoker, et al. ENDORSEMENT: Plaintiffs should have sought permission to re-file their remand motion promptly upon the transfer of 14-CV-4244 to this Court. But I do not regard the entry of CMO 20 as precluding them from doing so now, in light of the fact that only a few days went by between the transfer and CMO 20. So I find good cause to temporarily delay application of CMO 20 to 14-CV-4244. Should I deny the motion to remand, and re-briefed as counsel finds advisable, by 8/6/14. Defendants opposition should be filed by 8/20/14. Plaintiffs reply, if any, should be filed by 8/27/14. The Clerk is respectfully directed to docket this Order in 13-MD-2434 and 14-CV-4244. So Ordered. (Motions due by 8/6/2014. Responses due by 8/20/2014. Replies due by 8/27/2014.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/28/2014) (lnl)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1391 ORDER NO. 9A (SCHEDULING ORDER): The following amended scheduling order is adopted: 1. By 4 p.m. Eastern on August 22, 2014, the parties will inform the Court and opposing counsel by email whether they agree to waive any venue objections in the twelve Initial Disposition Pool ("IDP") cases and consent to trial in the Southern District of New York, and will submit waivers signed by the client to that effect for those cases in which the client does waive. If a party declines to waive its venue objection, the party shall identify the district in which it believes venue is proper. 2. Defendants will complete production of the previously collected custodial files (as defined on pages 4-7 of Pilot Project Exhibit B, (No. 13-MC-2434, Doc. 26)), of the custodians identified in Exhibit 1 by October 15, 2014. 3. Defendants will also make a supplemental production by October 15, 2014. The supplement will include responsive e-mails and associated attachments, as defined on pages 3-7 of Pilot Project Exhibit B, sent and/or received by the custodians identified on Exhibits 1 and 2 up to and including August 1, 2014. Productions of former employees who left the company before the previous collection and current employees who have not worked on Mirena since the previous collection will not be supplemented. Defendants will certify the date that a custodian left the company. Defendants will produce these supplemental materials on a rolling basis, to be completed by October 15, 2014. 4. Defendants will also collect supplements up to and including August 1, 2014 for the following non-custodian sources: 1) Investigational New Drug Application ("IND")/New Drug Application ("NDA") for Mirena; 2) Published and unpublished reports of Defendants' studies involving Mirena; 3) Mirena Adverse Event Data involving reports of perforation, embedment, or migration (this data will be produced in Excel format from Defendants' ARGUS database); and 4) Mirena-related FDA Contact Reports. Starting on September 1, 2014, Defendants will produce these supplemented non-custodial sources on a rolling basis, to be completed by October 15, 2014. Defendants will again collect supplements of the four non-custodial sources identified in this paragraph on February 2, 2015 and every six months thereafter. Production of these non-custodial sources will begin 30 days after collection and will be completed 60 days after collection. The generic discovery completion date in paragraph 6 shall not be applicable to this paragraph. 5. The parties agree that the supplements covered by this Order are the only supplements that Defendants will be required to make absent agreement or a motion and good cause shown by Plaintiffs. 6. Generic discovery shall be completed by April 1, 2015. Plaintiffs may seek discovery beyond this date via agreement of the Parties or through a motion and good cause shown by Plaintiffs. 7. Case-specific discovery in IDP cases shall be completed by April 30, 2015. 8. Each side shall select three of the IDP cases for trial and identify its selections by email to the Court and opposing counsel by 4 p.m. Eastern on May 6, 2015. Each side shall exercise one veto from the other side's selections and inform the Court of such by email by 4 p.m. Eastern on May 13, 2015. Nothing in this Order shall prevent dispositive motions from being filed in cases that are not selected for trial. 9. Plaintiffs' generic expert reports are due May 18, 2015. An expert who is offering generic as well as case-specific opinions must submit a generic expert report on this date. 10. Defendants' generic expert reports are due June 22, 2015. An expert who is offering generic as well as case-specific opinions must submit a generic expert report on this date. 11. Plaintiffs' case-specific expert reports for the cases selected for trial are due June 15, 2015. 12. Defendants' case-specific expert reports for the cases selected for trial are due July 15, 2015. 13. The parties shall conduct depositions of case-specific experts for the cases selected for trial and of generic experts between July 20, 2015 and October 2, 2015. Plaintiffs shall not depose any generic defense expert on a topic as to which Defendants have not already deposed Plaintiffs' generic expert(s). Plaintiffs shall not depose any defense expert on a case as to which Defendants have not already deposed Plaintiffs' case-specific expert(s). 14. Daubert motions are due by October 15, 2015. Opposition briefs are due by November 16, 2015. Reply briefs are due by December 4, 2015. 15. Dispositive motions for cases selected for trial are due by November 17, 2015. Opposition briefs are due by December 8, 2015. Reply briefs are due by December 22, 2015. 16. If the Court deems oral argument to be helpful, oral arguments on the dispositive and Daubert motions will be heard in or around January 2016. 17. The Court will select the first trial setting, which will be scheduled for March 7, 2016. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 11/17/2015. Responses due by 12/8/2015. Replies due by 12/22/2015.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/29/2014) (lnl)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1390 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05793(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1389 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05792(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1388 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05791(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1387 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05790(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1386 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05788(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1385 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05787(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1384 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05785(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1383 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05784(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1382 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05783(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1381 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05782(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1380 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05781(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 29, 2014 Filing 1379 MOTION for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Dayanara Claxton. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05761-CS(Holland, Eric)
July 29, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (11 in 7:14-cv-05761-CS, 1379 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05761-CS(wb)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1378 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), I will grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 1142), as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 1142). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/28/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00885-CS, 7:14-cv-00987-CS (lnl)
July 28, 2014 Filing 1377 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated July 28, 2014 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Sixth Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1376 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE BY PLAINTIFF PETITE SMOTHERS-TAYLOR: COMES NOW Plaintiff Petite Smothers-Taylor and pursuant to Rule 4l(a)(l) (A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure hereby dismisses without prejudice all claims against Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Bayer"), with each party to bear their own costs. Defendant Bayer has not yet filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. This dismissal does not affect the claims of the other Plaintiffs in this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/28/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(lnl)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1375 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05771(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1374 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05769(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1373 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05767(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1372 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05761(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1371 ORDER granting (1366) Motion for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04263-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1370 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05760(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1369 VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE BY PLAINTIFF DAWN RENNEGARBE: COMES NOW Plaintiff Dawn Rennegarbe and pnrsnant to Rule 41(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure hereby dismisses without prejudice all claims against Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Bayer"), with each party to bear their own costs. Defendant Bayer has not yet filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. This dismissal does not affect the claims of the other Plaintiffs in this action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/25/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS(lnl)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1368 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER PHARMACEUTICALS COPRORATION, BERLEXLABORATORIES, INC., BERLEX, INC. AND BAYER AG ONLY: Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Shelly Chow hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendants Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Berlex Laboratories, Inc., Berlex, Inc. and Bayer AG only from this action without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/25/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02911-CS (lnl)
July 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1367 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANTS BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC, BAYER PHARMACEUTICALS COPRORATION, BERLEX LABORATORIES, INC., BERLEX, INC. AND BAYER AG ONLY: Pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Cynthia Solano hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendants Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Berlex Laboratories, Inc., Berlex, Inc. and Bayer AG only from this action without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/25/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03591-CS(lnl)
July 28, 2014 Filing 1366 MOTION for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stacey Meacham. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04263-CS(Holland, Eric)
July 28, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (1366 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 12 in 7:14-cv-04263-CS) MOTION for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04263-CS(wb)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1365 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05711(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1364 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05710(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1363 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05709(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1362 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05708(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1361 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05707(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Filing 1360 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated July 25, 2014 re: Proposed Amended Scheduling Order. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Scheduling Order)(Cook, Shayna)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1359 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05705(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1358 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05704(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1357 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05703(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1356 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05702(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1355 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05701(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1354 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05700(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1353 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05699(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1352 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05698(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1351 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05697(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1350 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05696(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Filing 1349 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated July 25, 2014 re: Reply to Plaintiffs' July 22, 2014 Letter concerning Stoker, et al.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1348 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05695(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1347 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05694(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Filing 1346 MOTION to Dismiss Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Berlex Laboratories, Inc. and Berlex, Inc. ONLY. Document filed by Lauren T Pittman.(Garver, Matthew)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1345 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05691(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1344 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05690(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1343 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05689(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1342 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05687(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1341 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05686(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1340 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05685(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney Elizabeth Alexander Document #1339 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, #1338 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. (jno)
July 24, 2014 Filing 1339 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITHOUT prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer AG, Bayer Corp., Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Bayer pharmaceuticals corp., Berlex Laboratories, Inc., Berlex, Inc.. Document filed by Cynthia Solano. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03591-CS(Alexander, Elizabeth) Modified on 7/25/2014 (jno).
July 24, 2014 Filing 1338 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITHOUT prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Berlex Laboratories, Inc., Berlex, Inc.. Document filed by Shelley Chow. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02911-CS(Alexander, Elizabeth) Modified on 7/25/2014 (jno).
July 24, 2014 Filing 1337 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint . Document filed by Cynthia Solano. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - [Proposed] Amended Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03591-CS(Alexander, Elizabeth)
July 24, 2014 Filing 1336 MOTION to Withdraw (51 in 7:13-cv-03591-CS) Amended Complaint, (1088 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Brief . Document filed by Cynthia Solano. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03591-CS(Alexander, Elizabeth)
July 24, 2014 Filing 1335 MOTION to Withdraw (75 in 7:13-cv-02911-CS) Amended Complaint, (1086 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Brief . Document filed by Kevin Chow, Shelley Chow, Gina Lafata, Michaela Ramsey. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02911-CS(Alexander, Elizabeth)
July 24, 2014 Filing 1334 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint . Document filed by Shelley Chow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - [Proposed] Second Amended Complaint, #2 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02911-CS(Alexander, Elizabeth)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1333 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05661(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1332 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05659(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1331 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05658(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1330 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05657(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 24, 2014 Filing 1329 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated July 24, 2014 re: Final Dismissal of Plaintiff Truitt. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1328 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05650(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1327 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05649(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1326 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05648(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1325 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05647(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 24, 2014 Filing 1324 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Laura G. Lumaghi, dated 7/22/2014, re: Counsel writes: Plaintiffs in the above entitled case of Stoker, et al v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 7: 14-cv-04244-CS, which is currently pending in the Mirena MDL, filed a Motion to Remand to state court while the case was pending m the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The Motion to Remand was not ruled on before transfer to the Mirena MDL and is fully briefed. Plaintiffs' counsel has contacted defendants' counsel to see if the Motion to Remand can be considered by the Court or if defendants intend on filing additional documents. Defendants' counsel asked that we file our request with the Court and that they would respond separately. Therefore, Plaintiffs respectfully submit that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand is fully briefed by the parties and no further pleadings on this motion are necessary prior to the Court taking it under consideration. Document filed by Jessica Stoker. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS (lnl)
July 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1323 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Patricia Villarreal, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, as to Plaintiff Patricia Villarreal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(l )(A)(ii). ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close case# 13-CV-3632. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/23/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03632-CS(lnl)
July 23, 2014 Filing 1322 NOTICE of Villarreal, Patricia. Document filed by Patricia Villarreal. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03632-CS(Cunningham, Glenn)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1321 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05617(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1320 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05616(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1319 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05615(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1318 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05614(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1317 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05613(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1316 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05612(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1315 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05611(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1314 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05610(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1313 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05609(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1312 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05607(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1311 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05605(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1310 ORDER granting (1299) Motion for Laura G. Lumaghi to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1309 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05604(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1308 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05603(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1307 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05602(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Filing 1306 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-54) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Illinois, Minnesota and Virginia, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/17/2014) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1305 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05518(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1304 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 7/22/2014, re: Counsel writes: At the last status conference, the Court ordered the parties to submit proposals concerning the schedule by July 22. The parties have been negotiating a proposed Order addressing the schedule and supplemental discovery and believe we are close to reaching an agreement. We respectfully request an extension until July 25 to submit the proposed Order. ENDORSEMENT: So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/22/2014) (lnl)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1303 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05514(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1302 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05512(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1301 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05510(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1300 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05508(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Filing 1299 MOTION for Laura G. Lumaghi to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Keisha Johnson, Brittnie Riley, Shannon Santiago, Petite Smothers-Taylor, Amy Chee, Doris Cummins, Rachael Davis-Shouse, Jennifer G Donoway, Staci Durbala, Olivia Kelly, Lannie T McAfee, Elizabeth Morris, Brandi L Morrison, Laura M Mulhall, Lavue Pearson, Dawn Rennegarbe, Jessica Stoker, Tina N Turner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Good Standing (Missouri), #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(Lumaghi, Laura)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1298 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05491(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1297 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05489(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1296 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05488(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1295 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05486(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1294 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05484(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1293 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05482(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1292 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05480(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 22, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (1299 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 37 in 7:14-cv-04244-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-04247-CS) MOTION for Laura G. Lumaghi to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(bcu)
July 22, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (1228 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 11 in 7:14-cv-04263-CS) MOTION for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing.Missing Proposed Order. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days.Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a Proposed Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04263-CS(wb)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1291 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting (6 in 7:14-cv-05239-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-05247-CS, 1277 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 6 in 7:14-cv-05255-CS) LETTER MOTION to Reopen Case addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Ryan Saba dated July 17, 2014. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk is respectfully requested to reopen these cases and docket this Order in these three member cases. So Ordered. Motions terminated: (6 in 7:14-cv-05239-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-05255-CS, 1277 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 6 in 7:14-cv-05247-CS) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/21/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05239-CS, 7:14-cv-05247-CS, 7:14-cv-05255-CS(lnl)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1290 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05470(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1289 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05465(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1288 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05463(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1287 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05433(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 7/22/2014 (sjo).
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1286 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05432(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1285 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05431(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1284 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05429(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1283 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05428(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1282 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05426(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1281 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05425(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1280 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05424(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1279 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05416(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1278 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05414(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 18, 2014 Filing 1277 LETTER MOTION to Reopen Case addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Ryan Saba dated July 17, 2014. Document filed by Samantha Osuch, Staci Balice, Elisha Barrows.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05239-CS, 7:14-cv-05247-CS, 7:14-cv-05255-CS(Saba, Ryan)
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1276 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05413(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1275 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05412(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1274 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05411(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1273 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05410(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1272 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05409(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1271 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05408(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1270 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05407(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1269 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05406(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1268 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05400(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1267 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05399(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1266 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05397(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1265 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05393(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1264 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05390(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1263 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05387(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1262 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05381(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1261 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05379(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1260 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05377(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1259 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05376(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1258 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05375(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1255 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05372(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1254 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05370(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1253 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05369(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1252 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05368(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1257 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #1186 MOTION to Vacate (825 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 26 in 7:13-cv-07275-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss, and Reinstate Case. ENDORSEMENT: The dismissal without prejudice as to Ms. Lefler, (13-md-2434 Doc. 825) is hereby vacated. This Order shall have no impact on Plaintiff's obligation to file a PFS with all core categories completed per CMO 7 and 7A. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/16/2014) (lnl)
July 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1256 MEMO ENDORSEMENT granting #1231 MOTION to Vacate (1171 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order, Dismissing Plaintiff Brianna Franklin-Spey's Complaint Without Prejudice. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/16/2014) (lnl)
July 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1251 ORDER granting #1249 Motion for Matthew Jon Garver to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1250 ORDER granting (1026) Motion to Dismiss in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS: Pursuant to Case Management Orders No. ("C.M.O.") 7 and 7A, I will grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing all Core Criteria, (Doc. 1026), as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet i.e. a Plaintiff Fact Sheet containing all core criteria or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants' motion. The clerk is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants' Motion (Doc. 1026). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/15/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
July 15, 2014 Filing 1249 MOTION for Matthew Jon Garver to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9888163. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Lauren T Pittman. Return Date set for 7/15/2014 at 03:00 PM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit)(Garver, Matthew)
July 15, 2014 Filing 1248 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Staci Balice, Elisha Barrows, Samantha Osuch. (Saba, Ryan)
July 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1247 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05264(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1246 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05257(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1245 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05256(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1244 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05255(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1243 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05254(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 15, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #1249 MOTION for Matthew Jon Garver to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9888163. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1242 ORDER granting #1230 Motion for Kyle J. Keller to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1241 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05247(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1240 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05241(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1239 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05239(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1238 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05235(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1237 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05232(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1236 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05229(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 14, 2014 Filing 1235 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-53) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, California, Florida, Missouri, New Jersey and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/9/2014) (sjo)
July 14, 2014 Filing 1233 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-52) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alaska, Georgia, Minnesota and New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/3/2014) (sjo)
July 14, 2014 Filing 1232 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-51) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Utah and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/26/2014) (sjo)
July 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1234 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE granting #1175 MOTION for Claude P. Devall, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/9/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04255-CS (lnl)
July 11, 2014 Filing 1231 MOTION to Vacate (1171 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Order,,, Dismissing Plaintiff Brianna Franklin-Spey's Complaint Without Prejudice (with consent). Document filed by Brianna Franklin-Spey.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04946-CS(McCauley, Matthew)
July 11, 2014 Filing 1230 FIRST MOTION for Kyle J. Keller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9878199. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Tina Roberts.(Keller, Kyle)
July 11, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #1230 FIRST MOTION for Kyle J. Keller to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9878199. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
July 10, 2014 Filing 1229 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Matthew J. McCauley dated July 10, 2014 re: Plaintiff Dailyn Morrell's Response to Bayer's First Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Submit Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Dailyn Morrell.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-05017-CS(McCauley, Matthew)
July 10, 2014 Filing 1228 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stacey Meacham.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04263-CS(Holland, Eric) Modified on 7/22/2014 (wb).
July 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1227 ORDER granting #1226 Motion for John Lee Hoffoss Jr to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 10, 2014 Filing 1226 MOTION for John Lee Hoffoss Jr to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Lettie Lee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit LA Good Standing Ltr, #2 Exhibit TX Good Standing Ltr, #3 Exhibit Proof of Payment, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Hoffoss, John)
July 10, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #1226 MOTION for John Lee Hoffoss Jr to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
July 9, 2014 Filing 1225 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for John Wilson Pate to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9867446. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kenna C Bounds, Desoree Madkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Pate, John) Modified on 7/9/2014 (wb).
July 9, 2014 Filing 1224 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for James Craig Orr, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9866447. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kenna C Bounds, Desoree Madkins. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Orr, James) Modified on 7/9/2014 (wb).
July 9, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #1224 MOTION for James Craig Orr, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9866447. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Certificate of Good Standing must issued from the Supreme Court of Texas with a Clerk of Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (wb)
July 9, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #1225 MOTION for John Wilson Pate to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9867446. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Certificate of Good Standing must issued from the Supreme Court of Texas with a Clerk of Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (wb)
July 7, 2014 Filing 1223 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated July 7, 2014 re: Proposed Order granting Bayer's First Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Submit Plaintiff Fact Sheets Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
July 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1222 ORDER granting (1220) Motion for Gary Martin Meyers to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03473-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
July 7, 2014 Filing 1221 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1142 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Emily Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01465-CS(Giuffra, Thomas)
July 7, 2014 Filing 1220 MOTION for Gary Martin Meyers, Esq. to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9858881. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Charlene Torrence. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit New Jersey Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03473-CS(Meyers, Gary)
July 7, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (18 in 7:14-cv-03473-CS, 1220 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Gary Martin Meyers, Esq. to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9858881. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03473-CS(wb)
July 3, 2014 Filing 1219 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Jamie Radack, Jaimee Varsalone. (Saba, Ryan)
July 3, 2014 Filing 1218 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Heather Coville, Kristi Silva, Randi Williams, Jennifer Ashbeck. (Saba, Ryan)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1217 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05022(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1216 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05018(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1215 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05017(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1214 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05014(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1213 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05013(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1212 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05011(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1211 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05009(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1210 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05007(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1209 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05005(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1208 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-05000(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1207 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00773-CS; granting (1187) Motion for Nathan Charles Bess to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (Seibel, Cathy)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1206 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00773-CS; granting (1195) Motion for Neil D. Overholtz to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (Seibel, Cathy)
July 2, 2014 Filing 1205 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated July 2, 2014 re: Defer ruling on Dfs' motion to dismiss as it relates to Plaintiff Ysabel Torres's action. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02932-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1204 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04983(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1203 OPINION & ORDER: Defendants' Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. All of Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED as time-barred except for the fraud claims. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion. (13-CV-7811 Doc. 33; 13-MD-2434 Doc. 881.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/2/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS(lnl)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1202 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04980(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1201 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04976(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1200 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04973(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1199 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04972(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1198 ORDER NO. 20A (Dismissal for Failure to Comply with Order No. 20): By letter dated June 19, 2014 (MD Doc. No. 1105), Defendants requested permission to move to dismiss certain multi-party plaintiff complaints for failure to comply with Order No. 20. The matter having been discussed at the June 25, 2014 status conference, it is accordingly ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants may, by letter motion, move the Court for an order dismissing without prejudice the Complaint of any Plaintiff who has failed to comply with Order No. 20. The letter motion shall identify the actions in question (including the docket number), the Plaintiffs who have been joined in each action, and the grounds of non-compliance. The letter motion shall be served and filed via the Court's ECF system. 2. If the Plaintiffs who are subject of the letter motion do not comply with Order No. 20 within 30 days of ECF service of the Defendants' letter motion, the Complaints of those Plaintiffs (the "Dismissed Without Prejudice Plaintiffs") shall be dismissed without prejudice. 3. If the Dismissed Without Prejudice Plaintiffs fail to comply with Order No. 20 within 30 days following entry of an Order of dismissal without prejudice against them, Defendants may inform the Court by letter motion filed via the ECF system with a proposed Order, requesting that the Court convert the dismissal to a dismissal with prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/2/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS(lnl)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1197 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04964(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Filing 1196 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Paul Matthews on behalf of Hope Carson, Tarhir Ismail, Nichole Kreeger, Crystal Starling, Alisha Stevens. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04910-CS(Matthews, David)
July 2, 2014 Filing 1195 MOTION for Neil D. Overholtz to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9846917. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kathleen Gary, Stephanie L. Meyers, Amanda M. Elkins, Tiffany Collins, Amanda L. Devaux, Keesha L. Odom, Sarah L. Maughan, Jennifer A. Perry, Kimberly Amanda Boog, Mindy J. Abercrombie, Lashawn Marie Davis, Kylie K. Cook, Amber Nicole Sebastian, Kelly K. Simmons, Theresa Ann Bonet, Christie L. Hayes, Leona M Thomas, Jencenta Fomeche, Valerie C Gunn, Shedella V. Jessee, Marissa Bonita Lee, Amber Lefler, Lashundra Lewis, Kimberly J Maness, Sabrina Ann Mortensen, Dawn L. Schaeffer, Keyunta Karmon Wallace. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Overholtz, Neil)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1193 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04962(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1192 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04961(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1191 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04959(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1190 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04955(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1189 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04953(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1188 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04951(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 2, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (18 in 7:14-cv-04035-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04021-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04018-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-08865-CS, 27 in 7:14-cv-00479-CS, 27 in 7:14-cv-00567-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04020-CS, 1187 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 31 in 7:13-cv-08863-CS, 28 in 7:14-cv-00285-CS, 29 in 7:14-cv-00282-CS, 27 in 7:14-cv-00571-CS, 29 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 33 in 7:14-cv-00122-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04042-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04049-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04029-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04016-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-04044-CS, 29 in 7:14-cv-00281-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-07275-CS, 28 in 7:14-cv-00284-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04048-CS, 29 in 7:14-cv-00286-CS, 28 in 7:14-cv-00569-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04025-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04026-CS) MOTION for Nathan Charles Bess to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(wb)
July 2, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (30 in 7:14-cv-00282-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-04035-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-04048-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-08863-CS, 30 in 7:14-cv-00281-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-04020-CS, 29 in 7:14-cv-00285-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-04042-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-04018-CS, 34 in 7:14-cv-00122-CS, 29 in 7:14-cv-00569-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-04029-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-04049-CS, 29 in 7:14-cv-00284-CS, 1195 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 18 in 7:14-cv-04026-CS, 30 in 7:14-cv-00286-CS, 28 in 7:14-cv-00567-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-08865-CS, 28 in 7:14-cv-00479-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-04044-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-04025-CS, 28 in 7:14-cv-00571-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-04021-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-07275-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-04016-CS, 30 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS) MOTION for Neil D. Overholtz to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9846917. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(wb)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1194 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), I will grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 1143), as to the Plaintiff in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the case in the caption and the table below and terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 1143). SO ORDERED. Motions terminated: (1143 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/1/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07352-CS(lnl)
July 1, 2014 Filing 1187 MOTION for Nathan Charles Bess to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kathleen Gary, Stephanie L. Meyers, Amanda M. Elkins, Tiffany Collins, Amanda L. Devaux, Keesha L. Odom, Sarah L. Maughan, Jennifer A. Perry, Kimberly Amanda Boog, Mindy J. Abercrombie, Lashawn Marie Davis, Kylie K. Cook, Amber Nicole Sebastian, Kelly K. Simmons, Theresa Ann Bonet, Christie L. Hayes, Leona M Thomas, Jencenta Fomeche, Valerie C Gunn, Shedella V. Jessee, Marissa Bonita Lee, Amber Lefler, Lashundra Lewis, Kimberly J Maness, Sabrina Ann Mortensen, Dawn L. Schaeffer, Keyunta Karmon Wallace. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Bess, Nathan)
July 1, 2014 Filing 1186 MOTION to Vacate (825 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 26 in 7:13-cv-07275-CS) Order on Motion to Dismiss,,, and Reinstate Case. Document filed by Amber Lefler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07275-CS(Bess, Nathan)
July 1, 2014 Filing 1185 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated July 1, 2014 re: Supplemental order to Order No. 20 agreed to by the parties. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed supplemental order)(Harrington, William)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1184 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04946(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1183 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04943(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1182 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04939(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1181 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04933(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1180 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT PERMIT WITHDRAWAL OF SEEGER WEISS LLP AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF: ORDERED that Seeger Weiss serve Plaintiff Ysabel Torres with a copy of this Order on or before 7/7/2014 by email and overnight express. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Ysabel Torres SHOW CAUSE on 8/6/2014 at 10 AM in Courtroom 621, U.S. Courthouse, 300 Quarropas St., White Plains, NY 10601, why Seeger Weiss's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any Opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiff on or before 7/31/2014. So Ordered. Show Cause Hearing set for 8/6/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Show Cause Response due by 7/31/2014. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/1/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02932-CS(lnl)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1179 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04928(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1178 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04926(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Filing 1177 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Nathan Charles Bess to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kathleen Gary, Stephanie L. Meyers, Amanda M. Elkins, Tiffany Collins, Amanda L. Devaux, Keesha L. Odom, Sarah L. Maughan, Jennifer A. Perry, Kimberly Amanda Boog, Mindy J. Abercrombie, Lashawn Marie Davis, Kylie K. Cook, Amber Nicole Sebastian, Kelly K. Simmons, Anna Schaeffer, Theresa Ann Bonet, Christie L. Hayes, Leona M Thomas, Jencenta Fomeche, Valerie C Gunn, Shedella V. Jessee, Marissa Bonita Lee, Amber Lefler, Lashundra Lewis, Kimberly J Maness, Sabrina Ann Mortensen, Dawn L. Schaeffer, Keyunta Karmon Wallace. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Bess, Nathan) Modified on 7/1/2014 (wb).
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1176 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04917(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Filing 1175 MOTION for Claude P. Devall, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Lettie Lee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Hoffoss, John) Modified on 7/1/2014 (wb). Modified on 7/1/2014 (wb).
July 1, 2014 Filing 1174 MOTION to Amend/Correct Notice Regarding Deficient Motion to Appear Pro Hac vice,,, . Document filed by Keisha Johnson, Brittnie Riley, Shannon Santiago, Petite Smothers-Taylor, Amy Chee, Doris Cummins, Rachael Davis-Shouse, Jennifer G Donoway, Staci Durbala, Olivia Kelly, Lannie T McAfee, Elizabeth Morris, Brandi L Morrison, Laura M Mulhall, Lavue Pearson, Dawn Rennegarbe, Jessica Stoker, Tina N Turner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - MN, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - IL, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - MO)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(Driscoll, John)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1173 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04915(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1172 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04913(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1171 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), I will grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 987), as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendants with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants motion. The Clerk of Court is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendants Motion (Doc. 987). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/1/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1170 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04911(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1169 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04910(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1168 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04909(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Filing 1167 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Yvonia Blaize, Nelly Bulkin, Janelle Honeycutt, Heather Rubesch, Jacqueline Zemba. (Saba, Ryan)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1166 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04907(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1165 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04906(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1164 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04905(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1163 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04904(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1162 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04903(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #1175 MOTION for Claude P. Devall, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
July 1, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (6 in 7:14-cv-04289-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-04049-CS, 1177 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Nathan Charles Bess to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a Proposed Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(wb)
June 30, 2014 Filing 1161 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated June 30, 2014 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Fifth Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1160 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04898(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1159 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04896(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1158 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04895(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1157 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04893(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1156 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04888(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1155 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04887(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1154 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04886(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1153 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04881(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1152 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04877(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1151 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04876(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1150 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04873(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1149 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04871(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1148 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04867(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1147 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04864(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1146 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04860(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 27, 2014 Filing 1145 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Stefanie Brown, Anzata Davis, Alison Harrison, Tamara Hillmer, Sheryl Murphy, Eryne Otterson, Stacy Piper. (Saba, Ryan)
June 26, 2014 Filing 1144 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Christi Howard-Williams, Christina Miske. (Saba, Ryan)
June 26, 2014 Filing 1143 SECOND MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
June 26, 2014 Filing 1142 SIXTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
June 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1141 ORDER NO. 18A (IDP Deadline Extension and Plaintiff Discovery Certification): The parties having discussed with the Court an adjustment of the deadline for strikes of Initial Disposition Pool selections at the status conference held on June 25, 2014, it is accordingly ORDERED as follows: 1. By 5:00 p.m. Eastern on June 30, 2014, counsel for each Plaintiff identified in Exhibit A shall certify to Defendants that, pursuant to Order No. 7 (MD Doc. No. 263; MC Doc. No. 29), the Plaintiff has produced all documents in her possession, custody, or control responsive to the requests in Section XIV of the Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Any supplemental production by Plaintiffs must be made by this time. 2. By 4:00 p.m. Eastern on July 9, 2014, Lead Counsel for the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee and Lead Counsel for Defendants shall identify to the Court by email each sides respective strikes from the opposing party's Initial Disposition Pool selections. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/26/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS(lnl)
June 26, 2014 Filing 1140 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Dawn Artis, Kenya Briggs, Dawn Ervin, Tanya Luke, Christina Smith, Dawn Stephens, Rebecca Turner. (Saba, Ryan)
June 25, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (1137 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 54 in 7:13-cv-06501-CS) AMENDED MOTION for William D. Nefzger to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Expired Certificate of Good Standing. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06501-CS(sdi)
June 25, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (27 in 7:14-cv-00282-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-08865-CS, 25 in 7:14-cv-00569-CS, 27 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 1138 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04016-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04042-CS, 25 in 7:14-cv-00479-CS, 26 in 7:14-cv-00284-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04025-CS, 25 in 7:14-cv-00571-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-08863-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04029-CS, 31 in 7:14-cv-00122-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04026-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04048-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04020-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-07275-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04018-CS, 26 in 7:14-cv-00285-CS, 26 in 7:14-cv-00286-CS, 25 in 7:14-cv-00567-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04021-CS, 27 in 7:14-cv-00281-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04049-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-04035-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-04044-CS) MOTION for Nathan C. Bess to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9818230. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Missing Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Court of Florida with the Clerk of Court's signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(sdi)
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1139 ORDER: The undersigned has carefully reviewed the deposition transcript, but in the absence of a detailed listing from Plaintiffs' counsel as described herein, any designation by the Court of areas that were not answered but should have been answered (and, potentially, could be answered by another Rule 30(b)(6) witness), would be the result of mere guesswork. For this reason Plaintiffs' application is denied. The remaining issue not decided had been stayed; Plaintiffs' counsel is hereby granted permission to reiterate that issue (seeking additional custodial files pertaining to medical affairs matters) by a further letter submission to the undersigned no later than July 11, with any opposition from Defendants' counsel no later than July 28. This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 6/24/2014) (mml)
June 24, 2014 Filing 1138 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Nathan C. Bess to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9818230. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kathleen Gary, Stephanie L. Meyers, Amanda M. Elkins, Tiffany Collins, Amanda L. Devaux, Keesha L. Odom, Sarah L. Maughan, Jennifer A. Perry, Kimberly Amanda Boog, Mindy J. Abercrombie, Lashawn Marie Davis, Kylie K. Cook, Amber Nicole Sebastian, Kelly K. Simmons, Theresa Ann Bonet, Christie L. Hayes, Leona M Thomas, Jencenta Fomeche, Valerie C Gunn, Shedella V. Jessee, Marissa Bonita Lee, Amber Lefler, Lashundra Lewis, Kimberly J Maness, Sabrina Ann Mortensen, Dawn L. Schaeffer, Keyunta Karmon Wallace. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A -Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Bess, Nathan) Modified on 6/25/2014 (sdi).
June 24, 2014 Filing 1137 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - AMENDED MOTION for William D. Nefzger to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Charlotte Henderson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06501-CS(Nefzger, William) Modified on 6/25/2014 (sdi).
June 24, 2014 Filing 1136 SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Ryan Saba dated June 24, 2014 re: Follow up Response to Bayer Defendants' Request to Dismiss Multi-Party Plaintiff Cases for Failure to Comply with Severance Order. Document filed by Amy Adams, Terri Armstrong, Erica Baker, Danielle Lynch.(Saba, Ryan)
June 24, 2014 Filing 1135 FIRST MOTION for James A. Swartz to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff, Angelique Neptune. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9814485. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Angelique Neptune. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing in the Commmonwealth of Massachusetts)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01263-CS(Towne, Peter)
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1134 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04525(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1133 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04523(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1132 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04522(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1130 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04521(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 24, 2014 Filing 1129 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for William D. Nefzger to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9813759. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Charlotte Henderson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06501-CS(Nefzger, William) Modified on 6/24/2014 (wb).
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1128 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04520(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1127 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04517(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1126 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04515(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 24, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (53 in 7:13-cv-06501-CS, 1129 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for William D. Nefzger to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9813759. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a Proposed Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06501-CS(wb)
June 24, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (1124 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 15 in 7:14-cv-04247-CS, 33 in 7:14-cv-04244-CS) MOTION for John J Driscoll to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9812501. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Expired Certificate of Good Standing. Expired Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Courts of Missouri, Illinois and Minnesota. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(sdi)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1131 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF BRIANA COBB'S VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE PER RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Plaintiff, Brianna Cobb ("Plaintiff") by and through counsel, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) filed a voluntary dismissal without prejudice of her claims alleged in the above-styled action. Plaintiff Briana Cobb's claims alleged against Defendants in the above-styled action, Cobb, et. al. v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals (7:14-cv-04330-CS) is accordingly dismissed without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Brianna Cobb (an individual) and Brianna Cobb (an individual) terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/23/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04330-CS (lnl)
June 23, 2014 Filing 1125 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Sonia Buenrostro, Stacey Feliciano, Rebecca Fisher, Trisha Heffner, Jelina Petzinger. (Saba, Ryan)
June 23, 2014 Filing 1124 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for John J Driscoll to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9812501. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Amy Chee, Doris Cummins, Rachael Davis-Shouse, Jennifer G Donoway, Staci Durbala, Olivia Kelly, Lannie T McAfee, Elizabeth Morris, Brandi L Morrison, Laura M Mulhall, Lavue Pearson, Dawn Rennegarbe, Jessica Stoker, Tina N Turner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Missouri Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Illinois Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit Minnesota Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-04244-CS, 7:14-cv-04247-CS(Driscoll, John) Modified on 6/24/2014 (sdi).
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1123 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04509(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1122 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04507(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1121 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04506(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1120 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04503(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1119 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04500(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1118 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04496(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1117 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04494(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1116 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04493(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1115 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04491(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1114 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04489(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1113 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04488(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1112 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04487(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1111 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04484(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1110 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04483(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1109 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04481(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 23, 2014 Filing 1108 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Ryan Saba dated June 23, 2014 re: Bayer Defendants' Request to Dismiss Multi-Party Plaintiff Cases for Failure to Comply with Severance Order. Document filed by Amy Adams.(Saba, Ryan)
June 22, 2014 Filing 1107 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James Shepherd dated June 20, 2014 re: Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' June 3, 2014 Regarding the Discovery Schedule. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
June 20, 2014 Filing 1106 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-50)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Kentucky, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/19/2014) (sjo)
June 19, 2014 Filing 1105 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated June 19, 2014 re: Bayer Defendants' Request to Dismiss Multi-Party Plaintiff Cases for Failure to Comply with Severance Order. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
June 19, 2014 Filing 1104 RESPONSE to Motion re: (987 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Brianna Franklin-Spey. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08471-CS(McCauley, Matthew)
June 19, 2014 Filing 1103 RESPONSE to Motion re: (987 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Maison Bacque-Alexander, Nicole Bacque-Alexander. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00495-CS(McCauley, Matthew)
June 19, 2014 Filing 1102 MOTION to Substitute Attorney. Old Attorney: C. Michael Bollinger, New Attorney: Dawn M. Chmielewski . Document filed by Laura Galbreath, Tamisin Hammond, Gwendolyn Price. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00573-CS, 7:14-cv-01853-CS, 7:14-cv-03262-CS(Arsenault, Richard)
June 17, 2014 Filing 1101 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Virchus Ferguson. (Melidonian, Lina)
June 17, 2014 Filing 1100 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Jessica McGuin. (Melidonian, Lina)
June 17, 2014 Filing 1099 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Mayra Villegas. (Melidonian, Lina)
June 17, 2014 Filing 1098 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Kamaria Regan. (Melidonian, Lina)
June 17, 2014 Filing 1097 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Carolyn Rader. (Melidonian, Lina)
June 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1096 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04377(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1095 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04374(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1094 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04371(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1093 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04365(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 17, 2014 Filing 1092 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Justin Baugh, Kelli Baugh. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02321-CS(Scott, Carmen)
June 17, 2014 Filing 1091 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Paul Matthews on behalf of Aquilla Baker, Courtney Goulart, Marissa Jones, Mon Sweis, Maisha Weinstein. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-03267-CS(Matthews, David)
June 17, 2014 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT AMENDED COMPLAINT. Notice to Attorney Elizabeth Alexander RE: Document No. #1085 Amended Complaint. File the Exhibit to Pleading event found under the event category Other Documents and attach either opposing party's written consent or Court's leave. (sj)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1090 ORDER NO. 21 (Contact with Plaintiffs' Treating Physicians): Defendants having requested an Order from this Court for permission to informally contact Plaintiffs' treating healthcare providers ("Providers") ex parte prior to any deposition, Plaintiffs having opposed Defendants' application, the parties having argued Defendants' application at the status conference held on May 14, 2014, and the Court having made its determination orally at that conference, it is accordingly ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants are prohibited from communicating ex parte with Plaintiffs' Providers except as to deposition scheduling. 2. Plaintiffs' counsel may engage in ex parte communications with Plaintiffs' Providers to discuss the particular Plaintiff's medical conditions that are at issue in this litigation, including the physicians' records, course of treatment, product warnings and related matters. Plaintiffs' counsel are prohibited from engaging in ex parte discussions with Plaintiffs' Providers concerning liability issues or theories and Defendants' research documents or related materials. Plaintiffs must tell the Providers that any interviews are voluntary and can be declined. 3. Consistent with Section 8.c of the Revised Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order entered on December 20, 2013 (MD Doc. No. 537; MC Doc. No. 43), in any ex parte conversation with Plaintiffs' Providers, Plaintiffs' counsel are not precluded from disclosing the following documents so long as the disclosure is consistent with Paragraph 2 above: a. All documents (including call notes) referencing the Provider to whom the disclosure is being made. b. All promotional materials identified as being used for the purposes of sales call visits with the Provider to whom the disclosure is being made. c. All approved promotional materials used for the purposes of sales call visits with Providers found within the custodial file of a sales representative who called on the Provider to whom the disclosure is being made. d. All documents and materials presented during educational seminars (i.e., continuing medical education lectures and other similar lectures/meetings). e. All "Dear Doctor" and "Dear Healthcare Provider" letters sent to healthcare providers in the United States. f. All documents publicly available. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/16/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl)
June 16, 2014 Filing 1089 BRIEF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Document filed by Cherie Sperato, Frank Sperato. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Alexander, Elizabeth)
June 16, 2014 Filing 1088 BRIEF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Document filed by Cynthia Solano. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Errata B)(Alexander, Elizabeth)
June 16, 2014 Filing 1087 BRIEF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Document filed by Shaquayla Reynolds. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Alexander, Elizabeth)
June 16, 2014 Filing 1086 BRIEF FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Document filed by Shelley Chow, Gina Lafata, Michaela Ramsey, Kevin Chow. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Alexander, Elizabeth)
June 16, 2014 Filing 1085 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #374 Amended Complaint, against Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Tony Ramirez, Kenneth Clarke with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Kalaki Clarke, Evelyn Ramirez, Sylvia Montes, Tiffany Gregg, Tony Ramirez, Kenneth Clarke. Related document: #374 Amended Complaint, filed by Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Alexander, Elizabeth) Modified on 6/17/2014 (sj).
June 16, 2014 Filing 1084 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Kristie B. Donovan. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02943-CS(Scott, Carmen)
June 16, 2014 Filing 1083 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by James T Wells, Jamie Lynn Wells. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02774-CS(Scott, Carmen)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1082 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04330(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1081 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04328(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1080 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04324(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 16, 2014 Filing 1079 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Andrea E. Lukacs. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03016-CS(Scott, Carmen)
June 16, 2014 Filing 1078 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by George Edwards, Letitia Edwards. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04165-CS(Scott, Carmen)
June 16, 2014 Filing 1077 FIRST MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint . Document filed by Tania Paz Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Amended Complaint)(Irpino, Anthony)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1076 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04316(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1075 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04313(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1074 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04311(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1073 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04310(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1072 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04305(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1071 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on #1065 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated June 13, 2014 re: Modification of CMO 18 agreed to by the parties. ENDORSEMENT: Application granted. The PSC shall submit replacement cases for the IDP by close of business on 6/16/14. The dated to exercise strikes is now 6/27/14. The parties need not submit a proposed amended CMO. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/16/2014) (lnl)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1070 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04303(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1069 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04302(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1068 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04300(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1067 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04299(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 13, 2014 Filing 1066 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James R. Ronca, Esq. dated 06/13/2014 re: enlargement of time. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Ronca, James)
June 13, 2014 Filing 1065 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated June 13, 2014 re: Modification of CMO 18 agreed to by the parties. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
June 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1064 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04289(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1063 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04288(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1062 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04286(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 13, 2014 Filing 1061 MOTION for James H. Cook to Withdraw as Attorney . Document filed by Audrey L. Jackson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Cook, James)
June 13, 2014 Filing 1060 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: #1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Tania Paz Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Irpino, Anthony)
June 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1059 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04264(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1058 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04263(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1057 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04262(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1056 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04259(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1055 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04255(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1054 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04249(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1053 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04247(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1052 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04244(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1051 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), I will grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, (Doc. 988), as to the plaintiffs in the table below. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate the pending Motion (Doc. 988) as set forth. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/12/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
June 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1050 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04222(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1049 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04213(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1048 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04210(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1047 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04206(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1046 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04201(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1045 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04198(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 11, 2014 Filing 1043 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-49) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, Minnsota, Missouri, South Carolina and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/11/2014) (sjo)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1042 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04186(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 10, 2014 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Cathy Seibel: Oral Argument held on 6/10/2014 re: (33 in 7:13-cv-07811-CS, 881 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. filed by Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bayer OY, (33 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) Standing Order re Complex Civil Cases,. Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Cathy Seibel: Motion Hearing held on 6/13/2014. Oralargument heard on motions Doc. No. 33 (13 Civ. 7811-cs) and Doc. No. 881 (13-MD02434-cs) See transcript. Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS(jty)
June 10, 2014 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Cathy Seibel: Motion Hearing held on 6/10/2014. Oral argument heard on motions Doc. No. 33 (13 Civ. 7811-cs) and Doc. No. 881 (13-MD02434-cs) The Court issues oral decision. The Clerk of Court is directed to term the above motions. See transcript. (Court Reporter Sue Ghorayeb) (lnl)
June 10, 2014 Filing 1041 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carmen Sessions Scott on behalf of Nicole Sara Hemme. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01095-CS(Scott, Carmen)
June 10, 2014 Filing 1040 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carmen Sessions Scott on behalf of Andrea E. Lukacs. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03016-CS(Scott, Carmen)
June 10, 2014 Filing 1039 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carmen Sessions Scott on behalf of George Edwards, Letitia Edwards. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04165-CS(Scott, Carmen)
June 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1044 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04125(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 9, 2014 Filing 1038 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-48) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Illinois, Louisiana and Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/6/2014) (sjo)
June 9, 2014 Filing 1037 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Missouri, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/4/14) (sjo)
June 9, 2014 Filing 1036 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Channel Nekey Shelton. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06161-CS(Schlueter, Richard)
June 9, 2014 Filing 1035 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Violet Adams. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06811-CS(Schlueter, Richard)
June 9, 2014 Filing 1034 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Cecilia Gamez. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07692-CS(Schlueter, Richard)
June 9, 2014 Filing 1033 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Maria Davis. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07703-CS(Schlueter, Richard)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1032 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Diane Thomas. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07286-CS(Allen, Mitchell)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1031 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Candice Ditalia. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07313-CS(Allen, Mitchell)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1030 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Joni Powell. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07288-CS(Allen, Mitchell)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1029 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Hayley Cleckler. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04234-CS(Allen, Mitchell)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1028 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Toriana Donkaye Barnes. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04320-CS(Allen, Mitchell)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1027 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion re: (1026 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. . Document filed by Fiona Tucker. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05762-CS(Allen, Mitchell)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1026 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet Containing All Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1025 NOTICE of PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA TO YOUNG & RUBICAM BRANDS. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Subpoena, #2 Exhibit A to Proposed Subpoena)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Smith, William)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1024 NOTICE of PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA TO OGLIVY COMMONHEALTH WORLDWIDE. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Subpoena, #2 Exhibit A to Proposed Subpoena)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Smith, William)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1023 MOTION for Payton Dwight Hoover to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9753647. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jennifer Petty. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Hoover, Payton)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1022 NOTICE of PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA TO KANTER HEALTHSCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Subpoena, #2 Exhibit A to Proposed Subpoena)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Smith, William)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1021 NOTICE of PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA TO IAN HALL THORNEYCROFT, PH.D., M.D.. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Subpoena, #2 Exhibit A to Proposed Subpoena)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Smith, William)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1020 NOTICE of PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA TO DARDINE & ASSOCIATES, LLC. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Subpoena, #2 Exhibit A to Proposed Subpoena)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Smith, William)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1019 NOTICE of PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENA TO DANIEL P. FERRANTE, D.O.. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Subpoena, #2 Exhibit A to Proposed Subpoena)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Smith, William)
June 6, 2014 Filing 1018 MOTION for Keith Walton Lapeze to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9750500. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Nelda Monico. Return Date set for 7/3/2014 at 09:00 AM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Lapeze, Keith)
June 6, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #1023 MOTION for Payton Dwight Hoover to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9753647. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
June 6, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #1018 MOTION for Keith Walton Lapeze to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9750500. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
June 5, 2014 Filing 1017 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated June 5, 2014 re: Respsonse to Plaintiffs' Letters regarding the pending Motion to Dismiss Truitt's Second Amended Complaint. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1016 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04053(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1015 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04051(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1014 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04049(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1013 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04048(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1012 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04047(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1011 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04044(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1010 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04042(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1009 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04035(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1008 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04029(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1007 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04026(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1006 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04025(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1005 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04021(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1004 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04020(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1003 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04018(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 1002 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-04016(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 3, 2014 Filing 1001 NOTICE of Plaintiffs Notice of Issuance of Subpoena to Anita Lorraine Nelson, M.D.. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Subpoena, #2 Exhibit Exh A to Proposed Subpoena)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Smith, William)
June 3, 2014 Filing 1000 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated June 3, 2014 re: Correction to earlier letter about Mirena label. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
June 3, 2014 Filing 999 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated June 3, 2014 re: Mirena label change and the pending Truitt motion to dismiss. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 May 29, 2014 Mirena label)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
June 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 998 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), I will grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 933), as to the Plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the Plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendant with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If Plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendant's motion. The clerk is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendant's Motion (Doc. 933). SO ORDERED. (See ORDER as set forth) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/2/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07846-CS, 7:13-cv-08646-CS (lnl)
June 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 997 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03895(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 996 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF AMANDA M. HOWELL: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Amanda M. Howell, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/30/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01092-CS (lnl)
May 30, 2014 Filing 995 RESPONSE to Motion re: #933 FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. . Document filed by Cherie Sperato. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - email to defense)(Fleishman, Wendy)
May 30, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY - DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL. Note to Attorney William Harrington Document #993 Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal, was referred to Judge Cathy Seibel for approval. (jno)
May 29, 2014 Filing 994 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated May 29, 2014 re: Proposed Order on Bayer's Fourth Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
May 29, 2014 Filing 993 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01092-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 5/30/2014 (jno). Modified on 5/30/2014 (jno).
May 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 992 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03810(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 991 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03808(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 990 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03806(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 989 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03805(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 28, 2014 Filing 988 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss With Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Harrington, William)
May 28, 2014 Filing 987 FIFTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
May 28, 2014 Filing 986 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-47) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Minnesota, New Jersey and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/28/2014) (sjo) Modified on 5/28/2014 (sjo).
May 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 985 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03742(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 984 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03702(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 983 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03697(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 982 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03694(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 981 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03692(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 22, 2014 Filing 979 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-46) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Iowa, Nebraska and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/22/2014) (sjo)
May 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 980 ORDER NO. 13A SUPPLEMENT TO FIRST AMENDED AGREED ORDER REGARDING PROPER PARTY-DEFENDANT AND ABBREVIATED SERVICE PROCEDURES FOR SERVICE UPON DEFENDANTS BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC., BAYER OY, AND BAYER PHARMA AG: The parties having discussed the issue with the Court at the status conference held on May 14, 2014 and the Court having made its determination orally at that conference, it is accordingly ORDERED that the deadline set forth in Section IV.N of Order No. 13 (First Amended Agreed Order Regarding Proper Party-Defendant and Abbreviated Service Procedures for Service Upon Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy, and Bayer Pharma AG), entered on February 26, 2014 (MD Doc. No. 706; MC Doc. No. 50), be, and hereby is, extended from March 31, 2014 to Monday, June 16, 2014. This deadline requires that the complaint be postmarked by Monday, June 16, 2014. This deadline will not be extended for any reason. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/21/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl)
May 19, 2014 Filing 978 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Keith Walton Lapeze to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9688475. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Nelda Monico. Return Date set for 6/9/2014 at 09:00 AM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Lapeze, Keith) Modified on 5/19/2014 (sdi).
May 19, 2014 Filing 977 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #881 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Cook, Shayna)
May 19, 2014 Filing 976 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James Shepherd dated May 13, 2014 re: Response to Plaintiffs' Request for Custodial File (Redacted). Document filed by Bayer AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Harrington, William)
May 19, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #978 MOTION for Keith Walton Lapeze to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9688475. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Missing Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Court of Texas and Louisiana with Clerk of Court's Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (sdi)
May 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 975 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03485(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 974 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03476(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 973 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03474(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 972 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03473(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 971 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03472(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 14, 2014 Filing 970 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-45) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Louisiana, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina and Virginia, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/14/2014) (sjo)
May 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 969 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03462(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 968 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03445(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 12, 2014 Filing 967 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER (CTO-44) AND SIMULTANEOUS SEPARATION AND REMAND OF CERTAIN CLAIMS FROM THE MDL PANEL... It appears that the action on this conditional transfer order encompasses: (1) claims by certainplaintiffs alleging injuries from uterine perforation or post-insertion migration, which involve questions of fact that are common to the previously transferred MDL No. 2434 actions (Collene Henson, Elizabeth Moore, and Christine Montano); and (2) claims by certain other plaintiffs that donot allege such injuries and, therefore, do not involve such common questions of fact (Angela Goodwin, Micheale Carter, and Amy Edenburn). The action on the attached schedule is transferred under 28 U.S.C. 1407 to the SouthernDistrict of New York for the reasons stated in the order of April 8, 2013, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel. All claims of plaintiffs Goodwin, Carter, and Edenburn are hereby separated and simultaneously remanded to the Central District of California. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/9/2014) (sjo) Modified on 5/12/2014 (sjo).
May 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 966 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03403(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 965 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03402(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 8, 2014 Filing 964 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-43) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/2/2014) (sjo)
May 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 963 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03334(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 7, 2014 Filing 962 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated May 7, 2014 re: Bayer Defendants' proposal pursuant to CMO No. 18. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
May 7, 2014 Filing 961 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated May 7, 2014 re: Plaintiffs' position regarding issues that the Court raised in Order No. 18. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
May 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 960 ORDER APPOINTING NEW MEMBER OF PLAINTIFFS' STEERING COMMITTEE: PENDING BEFORE THIS COURT, is Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel's nomination, accompanied by supporting biographical information and a certificate of good standing from the State of New York, of Tina Glandian of the Jaw firm of Geragos & Geragos to replace Shelley Kaufman, an attorney with that firm whom this Court had appointed to the Plaintiffs' SteeringCommittee ("PSC") in its Order No. 5 entered on July 10, 2013 (Doc. No. 207). Ms. Kaufman has resigned from the PSC in light of her appointment as a judge of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County in California. Having considered the application, the Court hereby appoints Ms. Glandian to replace Ms. Kaufman on the PSC. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/7/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (lnl)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 959 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03272(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 958 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03270(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 957 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03269(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 956 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03268(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 955 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03267(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 954 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03266(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 953 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03265(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 952 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03262(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 951 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03260(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 950 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03258(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 949 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03256(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 948 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03255(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 947 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03254(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 5, 2014 Filing 946 DECLARATION of Dr. Shezad Malik in Opposition re: (33 in 7:13-cv-07811-CS, 881 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint.. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Truitt's Amended PFS)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
May 5, 2014 Filing 945 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: (33 in 7:13-cv-07811-CS, 881 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. . Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1. Aiona - Remand Order, #2 Exhibit 2. Aiona - Tr. of Proceeding)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 944 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03176(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 943 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03175(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 941 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03172(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 940 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03168(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 939 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03167(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 938 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03166(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 2, 2014 Filing 937 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated May 2, 2014 re: Defendants' Reply Letter Brief re Treater Contact. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Cook, Shayna)
May 2, 2014 Filing 936 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-42)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, California, Iowa, Louisiana, New Jersey, North Carolina and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/2/2014) (sjo)
May 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 942 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), I will grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 810), as to the plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendant with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendant's motion. The clerk is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendant's Motion as set forth. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/1/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (See ORDER as set forth) (lnl)
May 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 935 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03106(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 1, 2014 Filing 934 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, Without prejudice against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Felicia Duncan. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06819-CS(Joseph, Jane)
April 30, 2014 Filing 933 FOURTH MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
April 30, 2014 Filing 932 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated April 30, 2014 re: Proposed Order granting Bayer Defendants' Third Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A)(Harrington, William)
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 931 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-03035(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 930 ORDER NO. 20 (Severance of Multi-Plaintiff Cases): By Order dated April 8, 2013, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered centralization of certain cases in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407 specifically, cases that primarily involve injuries allegedly caused by the Mirena intrauterine contraceptive system, as a result of migration of the product away from its original position, perforation of the uterus, and/or inadequacy of the warning label. (See Doc. 1.) Other cases have been transferred for inclusion in the In re Mirena multidistrict litigation ("MDL") over time, and it is expected that additional cases will continue to be added. (See, e.g., 13-md-2434, Docs. 7, 64, 70, 75, 93, 97, 105, 129, 152, 163, 169, 195, 223, 231, 233, 267, 301, 318, 322, 329, 347, 362, 375, 391, 397, 400, 439, 470, 488, 506, 512, 536, 542, 580, 581, 623, 676, 687, 719, 745, 757, 765, 801, and 830.) Of the cases which have been transferred for inclusion in the In re Mirena MDL, at least seventeen include multiple plaintiffs. (See Exhibit A.) The Plaintiffs' Steering Committee and counsel for Defendants agree that such multi-plaintiff cases require severance, under FED. R. CIV. P. 20 and 21. Claims brought by different plaintiffs which involve common legal issues, but which allege totally different facts, may not be grouped into a single action. FED. R. CIV. P. 20(a). Pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 21, federal courts are authorized, at any time, on just terms, to sever claims. A Court's authority to order severance is not limited to cases of misjoinder; rather, the Court has broad discretion to invoke Rule 21 "to prevent prejudice or promote judicial efficiency." Lopez v. City of Irvington, No. 05-CV-5323, 2008 WL 565776, at *2 (D.N.J. 2008); see Wyndham Assocs. v. Bintliff, 398 F.2d 614, 618 (2d Cir. 1968) (not limiting Rule 21 severance to cases of misjoinder); 4 James Wm. Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice 21.02(1) (3d ed. 2007) (courts may issue severance orders under Rule 21, even in the absence of misjoinder and non-joinder of parties, "to construct a case for the efficient administration of justice"). An action severed under Rule 21 becomes a separate action. Cases in the In re Mirena MDL that involve multiple plaintiffs with common legal issues but different facts must be severed, so that the allegations of each woman who suffered direct personal injury as a result of the use of the Mirena contraceptive system (the "primary plaintiff") are presented in a separate Complaint. Therefore, as to the cases on Exhibit A, and any other multi-plaintiff cases transferred into the In re Mirena MDL, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Clerk of the Court shall file this Order in any multi-plaintiff case (as defined). 2. For those cases listed on Exhibit A, within forty-five (45) days of the ECF filing date of this Order, each primary plaintiff shall file a "Severed and Amended Complaint" in this Court. 3. For those multi-plaintiff cases which require severance and are transferred into the In re Mirena MDL after the date of this Order, each primary plaintiff shall file a "Severed and Amended Complaint" within forty-five (45) days of this Order being filed in connection with that transferred case. 4. Each Severed and Amended Complaint shall be filed on ECF under the original docket number, at which time counsel filing such Severed and Amended Complaint shall send a notice by email of such filing to Shante Jones, Deputy Clerk of the MDL Unit of the Clerk of Court, at Shante_Jones@nysd.uscourts.gov and HelpDesk@nysd.uscourts.gov. Upon such notice the Clerk of Court is directed to sever each such case and assign a separate civil case number to each case so filed, except for the first named primary plaintiff in each such case, whose Severed and Amended Complaint shall not be severed, and shall be filed under the initial SDNY docket number assigned to that multi-plaintiff case. The Clerk of Court shall incorporate all such severed cases into this MDL. 5. Unless amendment without leave of the Court is permitted under FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a) and this Court's Orders, each severed and Amended Complaint shall contain only the specific claims already asserted by the primary plaintiff (and by any secondary or tertiary plaintiff) against any defendant already named in the original multi-plaintiff case. In other words, no Severed and Amended Complaint shall assert any claim or name any defendant not already set forth in the original multi-plaintiff action, unless Rule 15(a) and this Court's Orders permit. 6. Each plaintiff filing a Severed and Amended Complaint is responsible for ensuring that any defendant named in that Severed and Amended Complaint is served with that Severed and Amended Complaint through ECF or in any other fashion permitted under FED. R. CIV. P. 5 or agreed to in previous Orders. 7. The Clerk of Court shall waive any filing fee associated with the filing of any Severed and Amended Complaint pursuant to this Order. 8. Any failure to comply with any one or more requirements of this Order may upon motion by a concerned defendant or by action of the Court, sua sponte, upon notice to the interested party or parties result in dismissal of the Plaintiff's or Plaintiffs' claim(s) in whole or in part. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/29/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
April 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 929 ORDER NO. 19 (Production of Domestic Witness Personnel Files): With respect to the deposition of any domestic witness taken in MDL No. 2434, Defendants shall if that witness is or was employed by any Defendant produce the following portions of that witness's personnel file seven (7) days in advance of the deposition: 1. Any personnel or performance reviews, evaluations, critiques, rewards or action plans related to the witness's performance with respect to Mirena and their overall job title/function as it relates to activities also performed for Mirena; 2. Any self-review, self-evaluation, self-critique and/or action plans created as a part of any formal policy related to the witness's performance with respect to Mirena and the witness's overall job title/function as it relates to activities also performed for Mirena; 3. Any document evidencing periodic reviews of performance or discipline up to and including termination related to the witness's performance with respect to Mirena and their overall job title/function as it relates to activities also performed for Mirena; 4. Any documents reflecting any award given to the witness under any incentive plan, salary, bonus or other forms of compensation related to the witness's performance with respect to Mirena and their overall job title/function as it relates to activities also performed for Mirena; and 5. Any portion of any termination, severance or separation document reflecting: (i) any post-employment consulting relationship with Bayer or any agreement to provide assistance to Bayer in connection with litigation; (ii) the reasons for termination, if the reasons stated refer to Mirena and/or their overall job title/function as it relates to activities also performed for Mirena, or (iii) any non-disparagement clause or provision. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/29/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (lnl)
April 28, 2014 Filing 928 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lawrence L. Jones, II on behalf of Amanda Kelly, Patrick Kelly. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02889-CS(Jones, Lawrence)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 927 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02954(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 926 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02951(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 925 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02950(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 924 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02947(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 923 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02944(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 922 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02943(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 921 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02942(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2014 Filing 920 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Michael K. Johnson dated April 25, 2014 re: Treater Contact. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Johnson, Michael)
April 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 919 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02940(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 918 ORDER NO. 7A (Plaintiff Fact Sheet Core Criteria): The parties have agreed that the Plaintiff Fact Sheet contains the following "Core Criteria Categories." Should a plaintiff fail to provide any Answer to any one or more of the questions delineated below and no response of any type is provided within thirty (30) days to a "Deficiency Letter" from Defendant with regards to the following Core Criteria question(s), their Complaint shall be subject to a Motion to Dismiss per Section V of Case Management Order No. 7: 1. SECTION II PERSONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MIRENA USER Question 15. 2. SECTION III HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS AND PHARMACIES For Questions 1 and 2, Plaintiff must provide the name(s) of: a. All OB/GYN Providers b. Hospitals or clinics where OB/GYN Services rendered. 3. SECTION VII PREGNANCY RELATED CLAIM INFORMATION Question 1. 4. SECTION XI MIRENA USE Identification of Mirena Prescribing and/or Inserting Healthcare Provider Question 1(a) and (b). 5. SECTION XI MIRENA USE Date of Mirena Removal Question 1(c). 6. SECTION XI MIRENA USE Responses to the general YES/NO parts of Questions 2 through 10. 7. SECTION XII INJURIES AND DAMAGES Questions 1 and 1(a), if applicable, and 2 and 2(a), (c), and (e), if applicable. 8. SECTION XIV DOCUMENT DEMANDS Fully and properly executed medical and insurance authorizations pursuant to SECTION XIV, specifically including: a. Checking the box for the Release of HIV-Related Information b. A signature. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/24/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (lnl)
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 917 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02894(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 916 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02892(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 915 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02889(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 914 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02887(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 913 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02886(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 23, 2014 Filing 912 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington dated April 23, 2014 re: Proposed Revised Order concerning PFS Core Criteria. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
April 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 911 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that RussellS. Briggs of the law firm of Fibich, Hampton, Leebron, Briggs & Josephson, LLP, is permitted to withdraw from any further representation for Plaintiffs Kayla Hord and Vilma Shandera. Attorney Russell Scott Briggs in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS; terminated in case 7:14-cv-01969-CS; terminated in case 7:14-cv-02110-CS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/22/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01969-CS, 7:14-cv-02110-CS (lnl)
April 23, 2014 Filing 910 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-41) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Illinois, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/23/2014) (sjo)
April 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 909 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT BAYER HEALTH CARE AG ONLY: Plaintiff Alicia Torres hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant Bayer Healthcare AG only from this action without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/21/2014) (Docketed in Case No. 13-cv-8183) (lnl)
April 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 908 ORDER granting (902) Motion for Michelle R. Mangrum to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 907 ORDER granting (901) Motion for Wendy West Feinstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 17, 2014 Filing 906 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, Without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Delina Coleman.(McEwen, Gregory)
April 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 904 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02731(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 17, 2014 Filing 903 DOCUMENT REFERRED TO JUDGE FOR APPROVAL - NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, Without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Pharma AG. Document filed by Alicia Torres. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08183-CS(Goodling, Kim) Modified on 4/18/2014 (km).
April 17, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (47 in 7:13-cv-05341-CS, 902 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Michelle R. Mangrum to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., (901 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 46 in 7:13-cv-05341-CS) MOTION for Wendy West Feinstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(wb)
April 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 905 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: (21 in 7:14-cv-00501-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-09242-CS, 24 in 7:14-cv-00093-CS, 24 in 7:14-cv-00034-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-08860-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-09236-CS, 894 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 25 in 7:13-cv-08883-CS) LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Bryan A. Pfleeger dated April 15, 2014 re: Permission to Amend Complaints. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. Please docket in all of these cases plus 13-MD-2434. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/15/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
April 16, 2014 Filing 902 MOTION for Michelle R. Mangrum to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(Mangrum, Michelle)
April 16, 2014 Filing 901 MOTION for Wendy West Feinstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(Feinstein, Wendy)
April 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 900 ORDER granting (898) Motion for Kassem M. Dakhlallah to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01977-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 899 ORDER granting (896) Motion for Kevin J. Boissoneault to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02158-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 16, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (16 in 7:14-cv-01977-CS, 898 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) AMENDED MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01977-CS(sdi)
April 15, 2014 Filing 898 AMENDED MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Ali Al-Khafaji, Heba Al-Khafaji. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01977-CS(Dakhlallah, Kassem)
April 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 897 ORDER granting (895) Motion for Michael D. Bell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02158-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 15, 2014 Filing 896 MOTION for Kevin J. Boissoneault to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Devon Druckenmiller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order Granting Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02158-CS(Boissoneault, Kevin)
April 15, 2014 Filing 895 MOTION for Michael D. Bell to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Devon Druckenmiller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order Granting Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02158-CS(Bell, Michael)
April 15, 2014 Filing 894 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Bryan A. Pfleeger dated April 15, 2014 re: Permission to Amend Complaints. Document filed by Melissa Jones, Angie S. Cochran, DeShawn McMillian, Myra M Alexander, Ioana F Olteanu, Timira Campbell, Jordan Lemoine, Erika Martin.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Pfleeger, Bryan)
April 15, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (8 in 7:14-cv-02158-CS, 895 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Michael D. Bell to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., (896 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 9 in 7:14-cv-02158-CS) MOTION for Kevin J. Boissoneault to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02158-CS(bcu)
April 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 893 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02578(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 892 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02572(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 891 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02569(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 11, 2014 Filing 890 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Wendy West Feinstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(Feinstein, Wendy) Modified on 4/11/2014 (sdi).
April 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 889 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02566(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 888 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02565(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 887 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02564(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 886 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02563(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 885 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02562(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 11, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (890 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 45 in 7:13-cv-05341-CS) MOTION for Wendy West Feinstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Expired Certificate of Good Standing for the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(sdi)
April 9, 2014 Filing 884 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna Cook dated April 9, 2014 re: Treater Contact. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Defendents' Proposed Qualified Protective Order)(Cook, Shayna)
April 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 883 ORDER NO. 18 (Initial Disposition Pool): This Order governs the selection of cases pending in MDL No. 2434 to be included in the Initial Disposition Pool I. Selection of Cases for the Initial Disposition Pool. 1. Each side shall select twelve cases for potential inclusion in the Initial Disposition Pool. Only cases in which a Plaintiff Fact Sheet has been completed and the Defense Fact Sheet has been served as of May 2, 2014 are eligible for selection to the Initial Disposition Pool. By 4 p.m. Eastern on June 3, 2014, Lead Counsel for the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee and Lead Counsel for the Defendants shall identify to the Court by email the party's selections for the Initial Disposition Pool. 2. The Court expects the parties to exercise good faith in selecting cases for potential inclusion in the Initial Disposition Pool, and to not select cases presenting unique or idiosyncratic facts that would render the results of these cases unenlightening. The Court cannot police this request and will not entertain applications regarding whether one side or another has abided by it. The Court merely sets forth its expectations. 3. Whether cases with certain characteristics should be excluded from the Initial Disposition Pool will be discussed at the next conference on Wednesday, May 14, 2014. The parties are directed to meet and confer on these issues, and to state their positions by letter not to exceed three pages, one week in advance of the conference. 4. Each side shall choose six cases to strike from the other party's June 3, 2014 Initial Disposition Pool selections. By 4 p.m. Eastern on June 17, 2014, Lead Counsel for the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee and Lead Counsel for the Defendants shall identify to the Court by email the party's strikes. II. Voluntary Dismissal of Initial Disposition Pool Cases 5. After a case is selected for inclusion in the Initial Disposition Pool, the case may not be voluntarily dismissed without prejudice without a showing of good cause. 6. If an Initial Disposition Pool case is voluntarily dismissed by Plaintiffs, Defendants shall identify a replacement case to the Court within fourteen days of the dismissal order. If an Initial Disposition Pool case is dismissed due to resolution, Plaintiffs shall identify a replacement case to the Court within fourteen days of the dismissal order. III. Selection of Initial Disposition Pool Cases for Trial 7. If a party in an Initial Disposition Pool case that is later selected for trial refuses to waive venue objections and consent to trial in the Southern District of New York, that party will be expected to consent to trial by the undersigned in the district where venue is proper. 8. The process for selecting Initial Disposition Pool cases for trial will be established by a future Order. When that Order should be entered will be discussed at the next conference. IV. Potential Second Wave of Early-Discovery Cases 9. Whether to have a second wave of early-discovery cases will be discussed at the next conference. The parties should meet and confer and state their respective positions in the letters described in paragraph 3, above. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/9/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS(lnl)
April 9, 2014 Filing 882 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: (33 in 7:13-cv-07811-CS, 881 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS(Harrington, William)
April 9, 2014 Filing 881 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Responses due by 5/5/2014Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS(Harrington, William)
April 9, 2014 Filing 880 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-40) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Florida, Illinois, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/9/2014) (sjo)
April 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 875 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02439(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 874 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02438(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 873 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02436(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 8, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney William Patrick Harrington to RE-FILE Document #871 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. ERROR(S): Supporting Documents are filed separately, each receiving their own document #. (db)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 879 PLAINTIFF TODDELLA BROWN'S VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE (FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(i)): Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff Toddella Brown only, hereby, dismisses all causes of action in the operative complaint against Defendants without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/7/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08525-CS(lnl)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 878 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT BAYER HEALTHCARE AG ONLY: Plaintiff Korto Tawse-Butha hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant Bayer Healthcare AG from this action without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. Bayer Healthcare AG terminated in case no. 7:14-cv-02375-CS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/7/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02375-CS (lnl)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 877 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT BAYER HEALTHCARE AG ONLY: Plaintiff Maya Wofford hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant Bayer Healthcare AG from this action without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED. Bayer Healthcare AG terminated in case no. 7:14-cv-02322-CS. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/7/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02322-CS (lnl)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 876 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY PARTIAL DISMISSAL AS TO PLAINTIFF NICOLE CAMPBELL ONLY: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF, Nicole Campbell, by and through the undersigned counsel and, with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, as to Plaintiff Nicole Campbell only, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(l)(A)(ii). SO ORDERED. Nicole Campbell terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/7/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06152-CS(lnl)
April 7, 2014 Filing 872 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Fred Thompson, James R. Ronca, Matthew J. McCauley, Diogenes P. Kekatos dated April 4, 2014 re: IDP Selection CMO. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Thompson, Fred)
April 7, 2014 Filing 871 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS(Harrington, William) Modified on 4/8/2014 (db).
April 7, 2014 Filing 870 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated April 7, 2014 re: IDP Selection CMO. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG.(Harrington, William)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 869 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02431(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 868 ORDER granting (863) Motion for Marie S. Woodbury to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 867 ORDER granting (861) Motion for Nancy M. Erfle to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 866 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02426(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 865 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02425(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 7, 2014 Filing 864 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Michelle R. Mangrum to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9539163. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(Mangrum, Michelle) Modified on 4/7/2014 (sdi).
April 7, 2014 Filing 863 MOTION for Marie S. Woodbury to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9539127. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(Woodbury, Marie)
April 7, 2014 Filing 862 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Wendy West Feinstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9539061. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(Feinstein, Wendy) Modified on 4/7/2014 (sdi).
April 7, 2014 Filing 861 MOTION for Nancy M. Erfle to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(Erfle, Nancy)
April 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 860 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02407(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 7, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (861 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 39 in 7:13-cv-05341-CS) MOTION for Nancy M. Erfle to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(wb)
April 7, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (863 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 41 in 7:13-cv-05341-CS) MOTION for Marie S. Woodbury to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9539127. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(sdi)
April 7, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (862 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 40 in 7:13-cv-05341-CS) MOTION for Wendy West Feinstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9539061. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Missing Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Court of Ohio with Clerk of Court's Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(sdi)
April 7, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (42 in 7:13-cv-05341-CS, 864 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Michelle R. Mangrum to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9539163. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Missing Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Court of Missouri with Clerk of Court's Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05341-CS(sdi)
April 4, 2014 Filing 859 MOTION for Jennifer Nolte Williams to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Andrea Porter. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01096-CS(Williams, Jennifer)
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 858 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02403(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 4, 2014 Filing 857 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Jennifer Nolte Williams to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Andrea Porter. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Williams, Jennifer) Modified on 4/4/2014 (bcu).
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 856 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02400(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 855 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02393(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 854 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02390(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 853 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02389(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 852 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02387(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 851 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02386(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 4, 2014 Filing 850 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, Without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare AG. Document filed by Korto Tawse-Butha. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02375-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 849 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02375(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 848 ORDER granting (840) Motion for Michael Lowe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01854-CS (Seibel, Cathy)
April 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 847 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02370(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 4, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (859 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 27 in 7:14-cv-01096-CS) MOTION for Jennifer Nolte Williams to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01096-CS(wb)
April 4, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #857 MOTION for Jennifer Nolte Williams to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Proposed Order. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a Proposed Order. (bcu)
April 3, 2014 Filing 846 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Momo Emily Takahashi on behalf of Natalie Best, Mandy Davis, Karlie Denton, Kimberly Edmondson, Starla Garza, Cassandra Hancock, Danielle Lynch, Wendi Rider, Caitlin Wittler. New Address: Rosen Saba, LLP, 9350 Wilshire, Suite 250, Beverly Hills, California, 90212, 310-285-1727. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02268-CS(Takahashi, Momo)
April 3, 2014 Filing 845 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITHOUT prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Nicole Campbell.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06152-CS(Takahashi, Momo)
April 3, 2014 Filing 844 MOTION for Russell S. Briggs to Withdraw as Attorney. Document filed by Kayla Hord, Vilma Shandera. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Briggs, Russell)
April 3, 2014 Filing 843 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, Without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare AG. Document filed by Maya Wofford. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-02322-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
April 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 842 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02322(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 841 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02320(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 3, 2014 Filing 840 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9527513. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Melissa Benjamin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Kansas Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Missouri Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01854-CS(Lowe, Michael)
April 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 839 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02318(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 838 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02317(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 3, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (840 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 12 in 7:14-cv-01854-CS) MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9527513. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01854-CS(sdi)
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 837 ORDER NO. 17 (Scheduling Order): In addition to previously scheduled conferences, status conferences will be held on the following dates: (1) August 6, 2014; (2) September 24, 2014; (3) October 22, 2014; (4) November 19, 2014; (5) December 17, 2014; (6) January 21, 2015; and (7) February 25, 2015. All conferences, including those previously scheduled, will be held at 10:00 AM. The dates listed for status conferences in Order No. 16 are incorrect and shall be disregarded. SO ORDERED. (Status Conference set for 8/6/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 9/24/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 10/22/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 11/19/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 12/17/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 1/21/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 2/25/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/2/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS(lnl)
April 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 836 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02297(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 2, 2014 Filing 834 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 3/17/2014, re: Counsel for defendants Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, and Bayer Pharma AG writes to request a pre-motion conference with Your Honor concerning (1) Defendants right to take case-specific discovery prior to the selection of Initial Disposition Pool (IDP) cases on June 3, 2014 and (2) the parties ability to engage in informal communications with Plaintiffs treating physicians. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (lnl)
April 2, 2014 Filing 833 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos, James R. Ronca, Matthew J. McCauley, Fred Thompson III; dated 3/7/2014, re: Counsel writes: Plaintiffs do not object to the proposed March 24, 2014 deadline for Plaintiff Truitt to amend her complaint (which Plaintiff intends to accomplish), the April 7, 2014 deadline for Defendants to file their motion and opening memorandum of law, or the period of time for Defendants to file their reply memorandum (14 days after the filing of the opposition to Defendants' motion). Plaintiffs, however, do object to the proposed April 24, 2014 deadline for the filing of a response to the motion. Defendants' proposed deadline for the filing of opposition to the motion overlooks certain realities and practicalities. They propose to afford Plaintiffs only 17 days to respond to the motion which will be Plaintiffs' only opportunity to be heard in writing on the motion while affording themselves a comparatively generous 14 days to file their reply on a case of their choosing. Importantly, Defendants either overlook (or at least minimize) the fact that a brand new plaintiff and her counsel are being brought into this proposed motion practice that Defendants seek for the purpose of providing guidance to an entire MDL. Prior to Bayer's submission of its February 28th letter, Plaintiff Truitt and her attorney had not been previously involved in this matter. The preparation of a response to Defendants motion will necessarily involve coordination between Plaintiff Truitt's counsel and the MDL leadership. Sufficient time for that is not built into Defendants' scheduling proposal on a brand new case that they have offered up on this issue. For this reason, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the deadline for the filing of a response to Defendants' forthcoming motion be April 30, 2014 rather than April 24, 2014, and that Defendants' reply accordingly be due 14 days thereafter (or May 14, 2014 rather than May 8, 2014). The modest 6 additional days (or a total of 23 days) for the filing of a response to the motion is still less time than what the Court had provided in its initial briefing schedule in Borders (31 days) and should not cause the forthcoming Truitt motion to trail significantly behind the revised schedule that had been adopted with respect to the now-dismissed Borders action, which was the concern that the Court expressed at the February 26, 2014 status conference. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS(lnl)
April 2, 2014 Filing 832 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 3/3/2014, re: Counsel for Defendants Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, and Bayer Pharma AG, writes: Pursuant to Your Honors suggestion at the February 26, 2014 conference, Defendants have identified Amanda Truitt as an alternative plaintiff on which to make a Motion to Dismiss on statute of limitations grounds. As Your Honor may recall, Bayers initial proposed Motion to Dismiss was to be directed at plaintiff Dorena Borders, but Ms. Borders counsel recently informed Bayer that voluntary dismissal is becoming a possibility. In her Complaint, Ms. Truitt alleges that in July 2011, she was diagnosed with a perforated uterus and "was advised that she would need to undergo a laparoscopy to have the Mirena surgically removed," with surgery taking place the next day. (Complaint at 24-25.) Ms. Truitt filed her action in the Northern District of Texas in September 2013. According to her Complaint, she was at all times relevant to her claims a resident and citizen of the State of Indiana. Ms. Truitt's claims are barred under both the Indiana and Texas two-year statutes of limitations for personal injury or products liability actions. Keeping with the Courts desire that the schedule for an alternative Motion to Dismiss only trail the Borders schedule by two weeks, Defendants propose that Ms. Truitt amend her Complaint, if necessary, by March 24, 2014. Bayer will then file a Motion to Dismiss by April 7. Plaintiff's opposition will be due on April 24, and Bayer will submit a reply by May 8. If, on the other hand, Ms. Borders amends her Complaint by the current March 10 deadline, then Bayer will move to dismiss Ms. Borders' Complaint by March 24 per the Court's prior Order. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06818-CS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS (lnl)
April 2, 2014 Filing 830 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-39)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/2/2014) (sjo)
April 2, 2014 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Cathy Seibel: Status Conference held on 4/2/2014. Court sets briefing schedule: Defendant April 9, 2014; Plaintiff April 25, 2014; Defendants Reply May 2, 2014. See transcript. (Court Reporter Angela O'Donnell) Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (lnl)
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 835 ORDER: This Court having reviewed extensive submissions on the issues described above, with exhibits, and having discussed the matter with counsel on February 26, 2014, and having conferenced these issues in detail with counsel on March 18, 2014, hereby Orders as follows: Defendants shall produce custodial files for the following employees or former employees, in the same manner in which such custodial files for other employees and former employees have previously been produced, within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed sixty days from the date of this Order; such production is limited to documents relevant to Mirena: Ms. Andrikanich; Ms. Gadhia; Ms. Glavan; Mr. Talian. Defendants shall answer interrogatories, specified below, for the following employees and former employees, whose names appear on Ruane Exhibit 6, within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed forty-five days from the date of this Order: June Bray, Tanveer Ahmed, Joseph Sonk, Max Wegner, Joseph Scheeren, Todd Paporello, Suzanne Hampton, Brenda Marczi, Herb O'Brien, Deborah Flint, Deepika Jalota, Joe Marini, Bradley Jones, Julie Lendino, Laura O'Dougherty Cooper, Archana Reddy, Michael Niebo, Paulina Estrada, Rupal Patal. These persons were inquired about during Ms. Ruane's deposition, and were not identified as having little or no contact with Mirena. The answers to interrogatories shall be limited to the period of time when Mirena was on the market in the United States, and the interrogatories are: 1. For the persons listed above who are alleged to have no custodial files, identify (a) each position held with Bayer and/or its predecessor(s) in which the person had some responsibility for Mirena, and the dates of such positions; (b) the reason for the absence of any custodial files; and (c) the date or dates when such files were destroyed or when their retention was no longer required. 2. For the persons listed above for whom their duties were either supervisory in a broad sense and such persons were not directly involved with Mirena decision making, or for whom their duties were functional/administrative/clerical only, (a) describe each position held with Bayer and/or its predecessor(s), including the duties which touched upon Mirena, and (b) identify the dates of such positions. This Order is entered without prejudice to Plaintiffs renewing one or more of these discovery demands, in the event that particular evidence supports such renewed demands. This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 4/1/2014) (mml)
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 831 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF PATRICIA VILLARREAL: that the law firm of Law Offices of Glenn W. Cunningham, and specifically Glenn W. Cunningham, hereby is substituted in place and in the stead of the law firm of Marynell Maloney Law Firm, P.L.L.C., and specifically Marynell Baker, Maloney, Travis E. Venable, Michelle M. Maloney and Erica O. Maloney, as counsel of record for Plaintiff Patricia Villarreal in the above-captioned action. SO ORDERED. Attorney Marynell Baker Maloney and Michelle Marianna Maloney terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/31/2014) (Per CS/Chambers: it is not necessary to spread this Order to all action; as Plaintiff Villarreal is not a party to all actions. Attorney Cunningham cannot be added to this docket as he is not admitted to the Southern District) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03632-CS (lnl)
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 829 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02268(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 828 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02250(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 827 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02249(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 1, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 826 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02246(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 1, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (20 in 7:13-cv-08274-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-03563-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-06810-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-04319-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-08178-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-01951-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-06157-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-01969-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-00571-CS, 50 in 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-04322-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01071-CS, 74 in 7:13-cv-02645-CS, 20 in 7:14-cv-01981-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-05331-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-08271-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-00891-CS, 25 in 7:14-cv-00096-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06644-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00638-CS, 49 in 7:13-cv-06152-CS, 54 in 7:13-cv-03382-CS, 63 in 7:13-cv-02723-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06158-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-07802-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-07675-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-06557-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-09242-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-07848-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-04320-CS, 26 in 7:14-cv-00104-CS, 54 in 7:13-cv-03672-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06987-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-07681-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-05799-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00989-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-06906-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08865-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-04698-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-08715-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-07744-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00492-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-05333-CS, 85 in 7:13-cv-02517-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-05245-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-01614-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00507-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-01940-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01084-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01060-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-00501-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-07749-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-04153-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-07811-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00898-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-06556-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-04165-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-05905-CS, 66 in 7:13-cv-03016-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-01475-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01087-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-05847-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-04234-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-07755-CS, 20 in 7:14-cv-01978-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-05849-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06986-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01088-CS, 20 in 7:14-cv-00598-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-01943-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-00650-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-06501-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-08858-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-08217-CS, 49 in 7:13-cv-03953-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00977-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-06585-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06156-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-07321-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-08184-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-01983-CS, 21 in 7:14-cv-00098-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-07006-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-05770-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-03555-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-08186-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-06155-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-05798-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-08200-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-01972-CS, 22 in 7:14-cv-00115-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-00505-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01062-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-08176-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-05767-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-07821-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-01244-CS, 60 in 7:13-cv-02722-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-09135-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-06445-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-04328-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-01518-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-07528-CS, 59 in 7:13-cv-03800-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-01094-CS, 49 in 7:13-cv-03564-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-04323-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00976-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-05205-CS, 72 in 7:13-cv-02815-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-04779-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08631-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-00872-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-07683-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-01948-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-08860-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-08183-CS, 61 in 7:13-cv-02777-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00286-CS, 26 in 7:14-cv-00511-CS, 21 in 7:14-cv-00122-CS, 21 in 7:14-cv-00572-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-06153-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-01610-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00639-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-07345-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-08185-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-07327-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00870-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00285-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00862-CS, 59 in 7:13-cv-01168-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00982-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00895-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-07392-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-04843-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-06816-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06587-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-08646-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-07288-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-06163-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-06160-CS, 54 in 7:13-cv-02779-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-04326-CS, 51 in 7:13-cv-02580-CS, 55 in 7:13-cv-00773-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08961-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-08628-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-00567-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-04151-CS, 65 in 7:13-cv-02911-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-06412-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-01095-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-01676-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-01967-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-05219-CS, 20 in 7:14-cv-00993-CS, 73 in 7:13-cv-02727-CS, 52 in 7:13-cv-03562-CS, 29 in 7:14-cv-00987-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-09134-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-07778-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08493-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-05801-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-01990-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-08247-CS, 20 in 7:14-cv-00589-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-02158-CS, 48 in 7:13-cv-04696-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-08784-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-08208-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-00481-CS, 43 in 7:13-cv-03560-CS, 11 in 7:14-cv-02152-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-06808-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-03561-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01058-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-05288-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-08601-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-01263-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-07328-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-01979-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-08878-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-06811-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-01941-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01086-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-04695-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-07313-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-07689-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-01615-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-09252-CS, 43 in 7:13-cv-06164-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-04149-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-08785-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-01472-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-05220-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-05850-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-05206-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-05341-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-01469-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-06815-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-04330-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-07754-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-08959-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-06817-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-05907-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-04780-CS, 11 in 7:14-cv-01854-CS, 20 in 7:14-cv-00522-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01063-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-03554-CS, 68 in 7:13-cv-02943-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-07846-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-02154-CS, 50 in 7:13-cv-03559-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00992-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-07822-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-06583-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-05204-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00282-CS, 48 in 7:13-cv-03192-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-04666-CS, 54 in 7:13-cv-04693-CS, 20 in 7:14-cv-01089-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-09253-CS, 75 in 7:13-cv-02323-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-04842-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-02110-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01977-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-00978-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-07682-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-08712-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-07800-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-07703-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-04924-CS, 21 in 7:14-cv-00034-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-01675-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01115-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08964-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-05762-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-05763-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-04844-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-05330-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-07697-CS, 50 in 7:13-cv-03558-CS, 55 in 7:13-cv-02776-CS, 22 in 7:14-cv-00111-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-07338-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-05848-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-06159-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-07036-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-01946-CS, 21 in 7:14-cv-00114-CS, 65 in 7:13-cv-02322-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-05797-CS, 55 in 7:13-cv-02780-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-00986-CS, 53 in 7:13-cv-02817-CS, 25 in 7:14-cv-00120-CS, 58 in 7:13-cv-04324-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-07692-CS, 49 in 7:13-cv-03194-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-08248-CS, 21 in 7:14-cv-00513-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-07760-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-07700-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01673-CS, 51 in 7:13-cv-02577-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-03195-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-02156-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-02114-CS, 57 in 7:13-cv-03592-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-07690-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-00482-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-00479-CS, 55 in 7:13-cv-02781-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-06558-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-06814-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00107-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-08627-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-00592-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-08377-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-03591-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 44 in 7:13-cv-03178-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-05167-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06591-CS, 22 in 7:14-cv-00885-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00284-CS, 60 in 7:13-cv-02778-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06807-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06813-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 26 in 7:14-cv-01096-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-00001-CS, 35 in 7:14-cv-01479-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-00480-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-03556-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01059-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00861-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-02909-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00591-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-00709-CS, 20 in 7:14-cv-00641-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-09232-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08490-CS, 67 in 7:13-cv-02774-CS, 19 in 7:14-cv-00573-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01070-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01064-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-04321-CS, 21 in 7:14-cv-00093-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-07352-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-03111-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-04317-CS, 72 in 7:13-cv-02353-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00002-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08276-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-05217-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-08182-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-05906-CS, 54 in 7:13-cv-02726-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-08255-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00109-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-06985-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-07341-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-03671-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06162-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-04155-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-09236-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06645-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-00569-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-09248-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-08497-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-03383-CS, 144 in 7:13-cv-02321-CS, 53 in 7:13-cv-03590-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06154-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00820-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-08252-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-05216-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-07694-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06646-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-03733-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08491-CS, 62 in 7:13-cv-02818-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-06588-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-05765-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-00496-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00495-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-01245-CS, 23 in 7:14-cv-00100-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-05768-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08278-CS, 824 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 37 in 7:13-cv-03808-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-06812-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-01381-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-07035-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00575-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-08745-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08863-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-03734-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06805-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-07748-CS, 53 in 7:13-cv-08471-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-06818-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-00994-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-08861-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-07323-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00520-CS, 70 in 7:13-cv-02832-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-08611-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-07807-CS, 66 in 7:13-cv-02728-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-02724-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-05207-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-01939-CS, 11 in 7:14-cv-01608-CS, 43 in 7:13-cv-04325-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-05764-CS, 11 in 7:14-cv-01465-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-01092-CS, 63 in 7:13-cv-02782-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-07747-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-07351-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00871-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-05218-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00118-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-03670-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-07275-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00586-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-03632-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06553-CS, 23 in 7:14-cv-00509-CS, 67 in 7:13-cv-02831-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-07286-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-08503-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-01460-CS, 44 in 7:13-cv-05203-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-08879-CS, 55 in 7:13-cv-02932-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-07803-CS, 49 in 7:13-cv-08525-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-08181-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-07793-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-07688-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-04329-CS, 44 in 7:13-cv-03633-CS, 83 in 7:13-cv-02320-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-06161-CS, 44 in 7:13-cv-03801-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00821-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-02908-CS, 66 in 7:13-cv-02775-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-06819-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-01942-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-07354-CS, 63 in 7:13-cv-02910-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-06409-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-06984-CS
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 825 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), I will grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 702), as to the plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendant with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendant's motion. The clerk is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below and terminate Defendant's Motion. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/31/2014) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07275-CS, 7:13-cv-07352-CS (lnl)
March 31, 2014 Filing 824 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Michael D. Bell to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Devon Druckenmiller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Motion Granting Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Bell, Michael) Modified on 4/1/2014 (wb).
March 28, 2014 Filing 823 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #822 Amended Complaint against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Denise Mrgudich. Related document: #822 Amended Complaint filed by Nakita Williams.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 822 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #821 Amended Complaint against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Nakita Williams. Related document: #821 Amended Complaint filed by Tammy Villani.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 821 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #820 Amended Complaint against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Tammy Villani. Related document: #820 Amended Complaint filed by Ngoc Tran.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 820 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #819 Amended Complaint against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Ngoc Tran. Related document: #819 Amended Complaint filed by Molly Rauschuber.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 819 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #809 Amended Complaint,, against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Molly Rauschuber. Related document: #809 Amended Complaint,, filed by Amanda Truitt.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 818 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #816 Amended Complaint,,, #811 Amended Complaint,, #814 Amended Complaint,,, #809 Amended Complaint,, #813 Amended Complaint,,, #300 Amended Complaint, #815 Amended Complaint,,, #265 Amended Complaint, #266 Amended Complaint, #817 Amended Complaint,,,, #812 Amended Complaint,, #374 Amended Complaint, against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Sara Oviedo-Perez. Related document: #816 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Jennifer Price, #811 Amended Complaint,, filed by Hilda Murphree, #814 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Crystal Cox, #809 Amended Complaint,, filed by Amanda Truitt, #813 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Diana Barron, #300 Amended Complaint filed by Jessi Sargent, #815 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Jennifer Kindhart, #265 Amended Complaint filed by Jonathan Miller, Cantor Julie Miller, #266 Amended Complaint filed by Shaniqua E. Murphy, #817 Amended Complaint,,,, filed by Mary Katherine Garcia, #812 Amended Complaint,, filed by Kimberly Cooke, #374 Amended Complaint, filed by Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 817 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #816 Amended Complaint,,, #811 Amended Complaint,, #814 Amended Complaint,,, #809 Amended Complaint,, #813 Amended Complaint,,, #300 Amended Complaint, #815 Amended Complaint,,, #265 Amended Complaint, #266 Amended Complaint, #812 Amended Complaint,, #374 Amended Complaint, against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Mary Katherine Garcia. Related document: #816 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Jennifer Price, #811 Amended Complaint,, filed by Hilda Murphree, #814 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Crystal Cox, #809 Amended Complaint,, filed by Amanda Truitt, #813 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Diana Barron, #300 Amended Complaint filed by Jessi Sargent, #815 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Jennifer Kindhart, #265 Amended Complaint filed by Jonathan Miller, Cantor Julie Miller, #266 Amended Complaint filed by Shaniqua E. Murphy, #812 Amended Complaint,, filed by Kimberly Cooke, #374 Amended Complaint, filed by Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 816 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #811 Amended Complaint,, #814 Amended Complaint,,, #809 Amended Complaint,, #813 Amended Complaint,,, #300 Amended Complaint, #815 Amended Complaint,,, #265 Amended Complaint, #266 Amended Complaint, #812 Amended Complaint,, #374 Amended Complaint, against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Jennifer Price. Related document: #811 Amended Complaint,, filed by Hilda Murphree, #814 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Crystal Cox, #809 Amended Complaint,, filed by Amanda Truitt, #813 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Diana Barron, #300 Amended Complaint filed by Jessi Sargent, #815 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Jennifer Kindhart, #265 Amended Complaint filed by Jonathan Miller, Cantor Julie Miller, #266 Amended Complaint filed by Shaniqua E. Murphy, #812 Amended Complaint,, filed by Kimberly Cooke, #374 Amended Complaint, filed by Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 815 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #811 Amended Complaint,, #814 Amended Complaint,,, #809 Amended Complaint,, #813 Amended Complaint,,, #300 Amended Complaint, #265 Amended Complaint, #266 Amended Complaint, #812 Amended Complaint,, #374 Amended Complaint, against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Jennifer Kindhart. Related document: #811 Amended Complaint,, filed by Hilda Murphree, #814 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Crystal Cox, #809 Amended Complaint,, filed by Amanda Truitt, #813 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Diana Barron, #300 Amended Complaint filed by Jessi Sargent, #265 Amended Complaint filed by Jonathan Miller, Cantor Julie Miller, #266 Amended Complaint filed by Shaniqua E. Murphy, #812 Amended Complaint,, filed by Kimberly Cooke, #374 Amended Complaint, filed by Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 814 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #811 Amended Complaint,, #809 Amended Complaint,, #813 Amended Complaint,,, #300 Amended Complaint, #265 Amended Complaint, #266 Amended Complaint, #812 Amended Complaint,, #374 Amended Complaint, against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Crystal Cox. Related document: #811 Amended Complaint,, filed by Hilda Murphree, #809 Amended Complaint,, filed by Amanda Truitt, #813 Amended Complaint,,, filed by Diana Barron, #300 Amended Complaint filed by Jessi Sargent, #265 Amended Complaint filed by Jonathan Miller, Cantor Julie Miller, #266 Amended Complaint filed by Shaniqua E. Murphy, #812 Amended Complaint,, filed by Kimberly Cooke, #374 Amended Complaint, filed by Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 813 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #811 Amended Complaint,, #809 Amended Complaint,, #300 Amended Complaint, #265 Amended Complaint, #266 Amended Complaint, #812 Amended Complaint,, #374 Amended Complaint, against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Diana Barron. Related document: #811 Amended Complaint,, filed by Hilda Murphree, #809 Amended Complaint,, filed by Amanda Truitt, #300 Amended Complaint filed by Jessi Sargent, #265 Amended Complaint filed by Jonathan Miller, Cantor Julie Miller, #266 Amended Complaint filed by Shaniqua E. Murphy, #812 Amended Complaint,, filed by Kimberly Cooke, #374 Amended Complaint, filed by Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 812 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #811 Amended Complaint,, #809 Amended Complaint,, #300 Amended Complaint, #265 Amended Complaint, #266 Amended Complaint, #374 Amended Complaint, against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Kimberly Cooke. Related document: #811 Amended Complaint,, filed by Hilda Murphree, #809 Amended Complaint,, filed by Amanda Truitt, #300 Amended Complaint filed by Jessi Sargent, #265 Amended Complaint filed by Jonathan Miller, Cantor Julie Miller, #266 Amended Complaint filed by Shaniqua E. Murphy, #374 Amended Complaint, filed by Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg.(Malik, Shezad)
March 28, 2014 Filing 811 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #809 Amended Complaint,, #300 Amended Complaint, #265 Amended Complaint, #266 Amended Complaint, #374 Amended Complaint, against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Hilda Murphree. Related document: #809 Amended Complaint,, filed by Amanda Truitt, #300 Amended Complaint filed by Jessi Sargent, #265 Amended Complaint filed by Jonathan Miller, Cantor Julie Miller, #266 Amended Complaint filed by Shaniqua E. Murphy, #374 Amended Complaint, filed by Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg.(Malik, Shezad)
March 27, 2014 Filing 810 THIRD MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notices of Overdue Discovery)(Harrington, William)
March 27, 2014 Filing 809 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT amending #300 Amended Complaint, #265 Amended Complaint, #266 Amended Complaint, #374 Amended Complaint, against All Defendants with JURY DEMAND.Document filed by Amanda Truitt. Related document: #300 Amended Complaint filed by Jessi Sargent, #265 Amended Complaint filed by Jonathan Miller, Cantor Julie Miller, #266 Amended Complaint filed by Shaniqua E. Murphy, #374 Amended Complaint, filed by Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg.(Malik, Shezad)
March 27, 2014 Filing 808 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Jennifer Nolte Williams to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9502820. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Andrea Porter. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order)(Williams, Jennifer) Modified on 3/27/2014 (wb).
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 807 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02158(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 806 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02156(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 805 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02154(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 804 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02152(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 27, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #808 MOTION for Jennifer Nolte Williams to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9502820. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Certificate of Good Standing must issued from the Supreme Court of Texas with a Clerk of Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (wb)
March 26, 2014 Filing 803 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a CONFERENCE proceeding held on 3/18/14 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(Rodriguez, Somari)
March 26, 2014 Filing 802 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: CONFERENCE held on 3/18/2014 before Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Albert Gorn, 914-390-4222. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/21/2014. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/1/2014. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/27/2014.(Rodriguez, Somari)
March 26, 2014 Filing 801 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-38) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, California, Florida, Minnesota, Missouri and Ohio, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/26/2014) (sjo)
March 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 798 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02114(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 797 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-02110(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 800 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE: The motion of JOHN B. NOBLE for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned action is granted. Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for the following cases in the above entitled action: F eret et al, v. Bayer Corporation, et al., Southern District of New York, Case No., 7:14-cv-00099-CS. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/25/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00099-CS (lnl)
March 25, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 799 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT BAYER HEALTH CARE AG ONLY: Plaintiff Yadira Sanchez hereby voluntarily dismisses Defendant Bayer Health care AG from this action without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/25/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01094-CS (lnl)
March 25, 2014 Filing 796 MOTION for John B. Noble to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jessica M. Freret. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00099-CS(Noble, John)
March 25, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (796 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 19 in 7:14-cv-00099-CS) MOTION for John B. Noble to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00099-CS(wb)
March 24, 2014 Filing 795 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated March 24, 2014 re: Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' March 17, 2014 letter re Case-Specific Depositions Prior to IDP Selection. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
March 24, 2014 Filing 794 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, Without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare AG. Document filed by Yadira Sanchez. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01094-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
March 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 793 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00773-CS; granting (779) Motion for Waldon Michael Hingle to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (Seibel, Cathy)
March 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 792 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00773-CS; granting (777) Motion for Bryan A. Pfleeger to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (Seibel, Cathy)
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 791 JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL: COMES NOW PLAINTIFF Carol Turner only, by and through the undersigned counsel and with the consent of all parties, files this Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (a)(1)(A)(ii). This Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal will not affect the claims of the remaining Plaintiffs. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/20/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03558-CS (lnl)
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 790 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01990(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 21, 2014 Filing 789 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Louisiana, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/21/2014) (sjo)
March 21, 2014 Filing 788 MOTION for Waldon Michael Hingle to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Terionne Anderson, Nicole Hartford, Michelle Wilmot, Ebony Carey. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01951-CS, 7:14-cv-01967-CS, 7:14-cv-01979-CS, 7:14-cv-01983-CS(Hingle, Michael)
March 21, 2014 Filing 787 MOTION for Bryan A. Pfleeger to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Terionne Anderson, Nicole Hartford, Michelle Wilmot, Ebony Carey. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01951-CS, 7:14-cv-01967-CS, 7:14-cv-01979-CS, 7:14-cv-01983-CS(Pfleeger, Bryan)
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 786 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01983(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 785 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01981(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 784 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01979(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 783 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01978(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 782 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01977(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 21, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (9 in 7:14-cv-01951-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-01983-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-01967-CS, 788 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 9 in 7:14-cv-01979-CS) MOTION for Waldon Michael Hingle to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., (8 in 7:14-cv-01983-CS, 787 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 8 in 7:14-cv-01979-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-01951-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-01967-CS) MOTION for Bryan A. Pfleeger to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01951-CS, 7:14-cv-01967-CS, 7:14-cv-01979-CS, 7:14-cv-01983-CS(bcu)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 781 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01969(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 780 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01967(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 20, 2014 Filing 779 MOTION for Waldon Michael Hingle to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9476879. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Melissa Jones, Angie S. Cochran, DeShawn McMillian, Myra M Alexander, Ioana F Olteanu, Timira Campbell, Jordan Lemoine, Erika Martin. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Hingle, Michael)
March 20, 2014 Filing 778 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for John B. Noble to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9476763. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jessica M. Freret. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00099-CS(Noble, John) Modified on 3/20/2014 (sdi).
March 20, 2014 Filing 777 MOTION for Bryan A. Pfleeger to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Melissa Jones, Angie S. Cochran, DeShawn McMillian, Myra M Alexander, Ioana F Olteanu, Timira Campbell, Jordan Lemoine, Erika Martin. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Pfleeger, Bryan)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 776 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01951(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 775 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01948(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 774 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01946(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 773 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01943(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 772 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01942(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 771 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01941(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 770 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01940(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 769 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01939(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 20, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (18 in 7:13-cv-08860-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-09242-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00093-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-08883-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-00501-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-09236-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00034-CS, 779 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 43 in 7:13-cv-03383-CS) MOTION for Waldon Michael Hingle to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9476879. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(wb)
March 20, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (778 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 15 in 7:14-cv-00099-CS) MOTION for John B. Noble to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9476763. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Missing Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Court of Mississippi with Clerk of Court's Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-00099-CS(sdi)
March 20, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (16 in 7:14-cv-00034-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08883-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-03383-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00093-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-09242-CS, 777 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00501-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-09236-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08860-CS) MOTION for Bryan A. Pfleeger to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(wb)
March 19, 2014 Filing 768 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03558-CS(Harrington, William)
March 19, 2014 Filing 767 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated March 19, 2014 re: Change in PSC Membership. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel. (Attachments: #1 Kaufman Withdrawal Letter to PSC, #2 Glandian's Bio, #3 Glandian's Cert. of Good Standing, #4 Text of Proposed Order Appointing Glandian to PSC)(Kekatos, Diogenes)
March 19, 2014 Filing 765 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-37) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Georgia, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/19/2014) (sjo)
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 766 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos, dated 3/18/2014, re: Counsel for Plaintiffs writes to request that they be afforded until next Monday, March 24, 2014 to respond to the substance of Defendant's letter dated March 17, 2014, in which Defendants request a pre-motion conference to discuss (i) their alleged right to depose individual Plaintiffs prior to the selection of cases for the Initial Disposition Pool ("IDP") and (ii) their alleged right to communicate with and depose Plaintiffs' treating physicians prior to IDP selection. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. Unless otherwise advised, the parties should be prepared to discuss these issues at the 4/2 conference. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/18/2014) (lnl)
March 18, 2014 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith: Discovery Conference held on 3/18/2014. Diogenes Kekatos, James Ronca, and Joseph Fantini appearing in person for Plaintiffs. James Shepherd, Shayna Cook, and William P. Harrigton appearing in person for Defendant. As discussed on the record, Plaintiffs' submission is due March 26, 2014; Defendant's opposition is due April 2, 2014. Adjourned. (Court Reporters: Albi Gorn (part 1 of conference), Courtflow (part 2 of conference).) (Sun, Relic)
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 764 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01860(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 763 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01854(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 762 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01853(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 18, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #701 MOTION for Mark A. Cox to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9388382. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
March 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 761 ORDER: The following attorney(s) are authorized to bring the Personal Electronic Device(s) and/or the General Purpose Computing Device(s) listed below into the Courthouse for use in a proceeding or trial in the action captioned In Re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, No. 13-MD-2434 (CS). The date for which such authorization is provided is March 18, 2014. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 3/17/2014) (mml)
March 17, 2014 Filing 760 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Momo Emily Takahashi on behalf of Terri Armstrong, Staci Balice, Elisha Barrows, Yvonia Blaize, Tiffany Bounds, Stefanie Brown, Nelly Bulkin, Karla Cassady, Heather Coville, Anzata Davis, Brandi Garrity, Krista Grisham, Alison Harrison, Tamara Hillmer, Janelle Honeycutt, Amy Lancaster, Trinda Morrison, Sheryl Murphy, Susan Newman, Samantha Osuch, Eryne Otterson, Tammi Picard, Stacy Piper, Sofia Ramos-Cruz, Jessica Rivera, Heather Rubesch, Kayla Shepherd, Kristi Silva, Stephanie Summarell, Caroline Swain, Jacqueline Zemba. New Address: Rosen Saba, LLP, 9350 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 250, Beverly Hills, California, USA 90212, (310) 285-1727. (Takahashi, Momo)
March 17, 2014 Filing 759 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Momo Emily Takahashi on behalf of Amy Adams, Dawn Artis, Kenya Briggs, Sonia Buenrostro, Lori Burns, Nicole Campbell, Daphne Delee, Dawn Ervin, Stacey Feliciano, Rebecca Fisher, Trisha Heffner, Christi Howard-Williams, Tanya Luke, Christina Miske, Jessica Penot, Jelina Petzinger, Jamie Radack, Christina Smith, Dawn Stephens, Rebecca Turner, Jaimee Varsalone. New Address: Rosen Saba, LLP, 9350 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 250, Beverly Hills, CA, USA 90212, (310) 285-1727. (Takahashi, Momo)
March 17, 2014 Filing 757 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-36) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Kansas, Louisiana, Pennsylvania and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/12/2014) (sjo)
March 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 756 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01823(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 17, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (23 in 7:13-cv-08712-CS, 752 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Jacqueline A. Olson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9445661. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Certificates of Good Standing Must be issued form the Suprme Court not the District Court with a Clerk of Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(wb)
March 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 758 ORDER: I hereby authorize the following attorney(s) to bring the General Purpose Computing Device(s) listed below into the Courthouse for use in a trial or proceeding in the action entitled In re Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, No. 13 MD 2434 (CS), which is anticipated to begin on March 18, 2014, and conclude on March 18, 2014. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 3/14/2014) (mml)
March 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 755 ORDER granting #754 Motion for Thomas Carl Cardaro to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 14, 2014 Filing 754 MOTION for Thomas Carl Cardaro to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9456730. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Ada M Portillo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Supplement Proposed Order)(Cardaro, Thomas)
March 14, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #754 MOTION for Thomas Carl Cardaro to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9456730. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
March 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 753 ORDER granting #751 Motion for Ashley Smart Manning to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 12, 2014 Filing 752 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Jacqueline A. Olson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9445661. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Gina M. Cunningham. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08712-CS(Olson, Jacqueline) Modified on 3/12/2014 (bcu).
March 12, 2014 Filing 751 MOTION for Ashley Smart Manning to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Lindsay Luna. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Manning, Ashley)
March 12, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #751 MOTION for Ashley Smart Manning to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (sdi)
March 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 750 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01676(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 749 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01675(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 748 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01673(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 11, 2014 Filing 745 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-35) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Louisiana, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 3/6/2014) (sjo)
March 10, 2014 Filing 747 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 3/3/2014, re: Counsel writes: Pursuant to Your Honor's suggestion at the February 26, 2014 conference, Defendants have identified Amanda Truitt as an alternative plaintiff on which to make a Motion to Dismiss on statute of limitations grounds. As Your Honor may recall, Bayer's initial proposed Motion to Dismiss was to be directed at plaintiff Dorena Borders, but Ms. Borders' counsel recently informed Bayer that voluntary dismissal is becoming a possibility. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation. (lnl)
March 10, 2014 Filing 746 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos, dated 3/7/2014, re: Counsel writes: The Plaintiffs' leadership, following consultation with counsel for the plaintiff in Amanda Truitt v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 7:13-CV -07811 (CS) ("Truitt"), respectfully submits this response to Defendants' letter dated March 3, 2014, in which Defendants proposed a substitute action and briefing schedule with respect to the statute of limitations issue that they wish for the Court to address in the event that Dorena Borders v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 7:13-CV-06818 (CS) ("Borders"), were voluntarily discontinued. Document filed by Dorena Borders, Amanda Truitt. (lnl)
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 744 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AS TO PLAINTIFF DORENA BORDERS: NO ANSWER OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY WDGMENT HAVING BEEN FILED, Plaintiff, DORENA BORDERS, hereby voluntarily dismisses this action with prejudice, pursuant to Rule 41 (a)(1)(A)(i) & (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case. So Ordered. Dorena Borders terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/6/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06818-CS (lnl)
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 743 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01615(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 742 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01614(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 741 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01612(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 740 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01610(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 739 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01608(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 737 ORDER granting #734 Motion for Kathy A. Brown to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
March 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 736 ORDER: Following Plaintiff's voluntary dismissal in Borders v. Bayer, 13-CV-6818, Defendant is granted leave to file a Motion to Dismiss in Truitt v. Bayer, 13-CV-7811, on statute of limitations grounds. If Ms. Truitt wishes to file an amended complaint, she must do so by March 24, 2014. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is due April 7, 2014; Plaintiffs Opposition is due May 5, 2014; and Defendant's Reply is due May 19, 2014. I am granting Ms. Truitt time to amend her Complaint so that she can, if she chooses, add facts relevant to the statute of limitations. This will be her only opportunity to amend on this issue. Ms. Truitt's counsel should read the transcripts from the past two status conferences, January 22, 2014 and February 26, 2014, and Docs. 552, 572, 573 and 733 on the 13-MD-2434 docket, for further background on this issue. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/7/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06818-CS, 7:13-cv-07811-CS (Per Chambers Instr. deadlines are to be set, only in the Truitt (13-CV-7811) case) (lnl)
March 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 735 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on (731 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Dawn Chmielewski dated March 5, 2014 re: Resignation from PSC. ENDORSEMENT: Ms. Chmielewski's resignation is accepted with the thanks of the Court for her service. Best of luck with the new firm. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/6/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
March 7, 2014 Filing 734 MOTION for Kathy A. Brown to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9429783. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Tiffany Steele. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Brown, Kathy)
March 7, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #734 MOTION for Kathy A. Brown to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9429783. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
March 6, 2014 Filing 733 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, WITH prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. Document filed by Dorena Borders. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06818-CS(Gunn, Amy)
March 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 732 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01518(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 5, 2014 Filing 731 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Dawn Chmielewski dated March 5, 2014 re: Resignation from PSC. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Chmielewski, Dawn)
March 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 730 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01498(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 5, 2014 Filing 729 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Yadira Sanchez. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:14-cv-01094-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
March 5, 2014 Filing 728 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Heather Young. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04698-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
March 4, 2014 Filing 738 SCHEDULING NOTICE: The matter of IN RE: MIRENA IUD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION has been scheduled for an in-person discovery conference on Tuesday, 3/18/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 520, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 3/4/2014) (mml)
March 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 727 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01479(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 726 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01475(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 725 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01472(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 724 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01469(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 723 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01465(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 722 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01460(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
March 4, 2014 Filing 721 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Dawn M. Chmielewski on behalf of Maison Bacque-Alexander, Nicole Bacque-Alexander, Joshua Stewart, Melissa Stewart, Melissa Vinson, Robert Vinson, Tara Walker. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS(Chmielewski, Dawn)
March 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 720 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01381(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 28, 2014 Filing 719 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-34) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas and Utah, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/27/2014) (sjo)
February 27, 2014 Filing 718 RESPONSE to Motion re: (702 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet.. Document filed by Michelle McBride. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07675-CS(Watson, Leila)
February 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 717 ORDER granting #714 Motion for Douglas R. Plymale to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
February 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 716 ORDER granting #713 Motion for James R. Dugan, II to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
February 27, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #712 MOTION for Nancy M. Erfle to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9396165. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Certificate of Good Standing Must be issued from the Supreme Court of Oregon with a Clerk of Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (wb)
February 27, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #714 MOTION for Douglas R. Plymale to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9396311. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
February 27, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #713 MOTION for James R. Dugan, II to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9396162. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
February 26, 2014 ***NOTE TO ATTORNEY TO RE-FILE DOCUMENT - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY ERROR. Note to Attorney Leila H Watson to RE-FILE Document (715 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 22 in 7:13-cv-07675-CS) Response to Motion. ERROR(S): Wrong MD case number indicated on document. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07675-CS(ldi)
February 26, 2014 Filing 715 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - RESPONSE to Motion re: (702 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet.. Document filed by Michelle McBride. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07675-CS(Watson, Leila) Modified on 2/27/2014 (ldi).
February 26, 2014 Filing 714 MOTION for Douglas R. Plymale to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9396311. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kimberlee Ross. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Plymale, Douglas)
February 26, 2014 Filing 713 MOTION for James R. Dugan, II to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9396162. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kimberlee Ross. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Dugan, James)
February 26, 2014 Filing 712 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Nancy M. Erfle to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9396165. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04695-CS, 7:13-cv-05205-CS, 7:13-cv-05848-CS(Erfle, Nancy) Modified on 2/27/2014 (wb).
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 711 ORDER: Pursuant to Case Management Order No. 7 ("C.M.O. 7"), I will grant Defendant's Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice, (Doc. 616), as to the plaintiffs in the table below. As outlined in C.M.O. 7, the plaintiffs in the table below have 90 days following the entry of this Order to serve Defendant with a completed Plaintiff Fact Sheet or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice. If plaintiffs have not taken either of the above steps within 90 days, this Order may be converted into a Dismissal with Prejudice upon Defendants motion. The clerk is instructed to spread this Order to the cases in the caption and the table below. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/26/2014) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 710 ORDER NO. 16 (Scheduling Order): In addition to previously scheduled conferences, status conferences will be held on the following dates: (1) August 5, 2014; (2) September 23, 2014; (3) October 21, 2014; (4) November 18, 2014; (5) December 16, 2014; (6) January 20, 2015; and (7) February 24, 2015. All conferences, including those previously scheduled, will be held at 10:00 AM. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/26/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl)
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 709 ORDER NO. 15 (Scheduling Order): Case Management Order No. 9, dated August 16, 2013, is amended so that all dates in paragraphs referring to the Initial Disposition Pool (Paragraphs 6, 8, 11, 13, 15, 16, 17) are hereby extended 60 days. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/26/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 708 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01263(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 707 ORDER NO. 14, AGREED ORDER REGARDING AMENDMENT AND SERVICE OF COMPLAINTS NAMING FOREIGN DEFENDANTS: 1. This Order shall apply to all cases currently pending in MDL No. 2343, or that are hereafter transferred to these proceedings and/or filed directly with this Court (collectively, "the MDL proceedings"). 2. Notwithstanding any prior Case Management Order, the parties agree that for complaints filed and served upon Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in the Consolidated Proceedings prior to February 26, 2014 any Plaintiff seeking to amend her complaint to name Defendants Bayer OY or Bayer Pharma AG pursuant to this Order must do so at the earlier of: a. Within thirty days after the formal selection of Plaintiff's case as part of the Initial Disposition Pool; or b. Within thirty days after an entry of an order remanding an individual case to a transferor Court. 3. Complaints amended pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Order shall be treated as though the Amended Complaint was filed no later than February 26, 2014. 4. Plaintiffs wishing to serve complaints amended pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Order, shall serve the amended complaints upon Bayer Oy or Bayer Pharma AG pursuant to the "First Amended Agreed Order Regarding Proper-Party Defendant And Abbreviated Service Procedures for Service Upon Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, and Bayer Pharma AG." 5. This Order is entered strictly for ease of administration and the parties do not intend to waive, limit, or expand the parties' rights except provided for in paragraph 3. Specifically, this Order does not preclude plaintiff from seeking to relate the filing date of an Amended Complaint back to the original filing date of the underlying Complaint. Likewise, defendants have not waived their ability to challenge any attempt to relate the filing date back to an earlier date and have not waived any of their rights with respect to motions predicated on statutes of limitations. 6. Complaints filed after the entry date of this Order are not subject to the provisions set forth in paragraphs 2 and 3 and must be served pursuant to the "First Amended Agreed Order Regarding Proper-Party Defendant And Abbreviated Service Procedures for Service Upon Defendants Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer OY, and Bayer Pharma AG." 7. Except as specifically provided, nothing in this Order shall modify the parties' obligations under any other case management order including the parties' fact sheet and discovery obligations. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/26/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 706 ORDER NO. 13, FIRST AMENDED AGREED ORDER REGARDING PROPER PARTY-DEFENDANT AND ABBREVIATED SERVICE PROCEDURES FOR SERVICE UPON DEFENDANTS BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC., BAYER OY, AND BAYER PHARMA AG: This Order applies to claims brought by a U.S. citizen or resident based on usage or purchase of Mirena ("Mirena") in the United States in which the claimed injury allegedly resulted from the perforation, embedment, or migration of the Mirena and (i) currently are pending in MDL No. 2434 or (ii) will be filed in, removed to or transferred to this Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/26/2014) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 705 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01245(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 704 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01244(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 26, 2014 Filing 703 RESPONSE to Motion re: #616 MOTION to Dismiss without prejudice for failure to submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet.. Document filed by Shannon Letters. (Goodling, Kim)
February 26, 2014 Set/Reset Hearings: Status Conference set for 8/5/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 9/23/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 10/21/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 11/18/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 12/16/2014 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 1/20/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. Status Conference set for 2/24/2015 at 10:00 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. (lnl)
February 25, 2014 Filing 702 SECOND MOTION to Dismiss Without Prejudice for Failure to Submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notices of Overdue Discovery)(Harrington, William)
February 25, 2014 Filing 701 MOTION for Mark A. Cox to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9388382. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Destiny Asher. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order-Pro Hac)(Cox, Mark)
February 24, 2014 Filing 700 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 2/24/2014, re: Counsel for defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. writes this letter in response to Plaintiff's request for additional time to file an Amended Complaint in the Dorena Borders case. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06818-CS(lnl)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 699 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01115(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 698 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01096(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 697 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01095(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 696 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01094(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 695 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01093(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 694 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01092(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 693 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01089(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 692 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01088(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 691 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01087(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 690 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01086(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 689 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01084(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 20, 2014 Filing 688 DECLARATION of William P. Harrington in Support re: #616 MOTION to Dismiss without prejudice for failure to submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet.. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Harrington, William)
February 20, 2014 Filing 687 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-33) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Kansas, Massachusetts, New Jersey and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/19/2014) (sjo)
February 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 686 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01071(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 685 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01070(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 684 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01064(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 683 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01063(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 682 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01062(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 681 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01060(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 680 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01059(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 679 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-01058(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 19, 2014 Filing 677 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Bryan A. Pfleeger to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9369904. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Myra M Alexander, Nicole Campbell, Angie S. Cochran, Jordan Lemoine, Erika Martin, DeShawn McMillian, Ioana F Olteanu. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Pfleeger, Bryan) Modified on 2/19/2014 (wb).
February 19, 2014 Filing 676 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-32) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Florida, Louisiana, New Jersey, South Dakota, Texas and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/12/2014) (sjo)
February 19, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (32 in 7:13-cv-03671-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-03564-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06812-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00122-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-03111-CS, 73 in 7:13-cv-02721-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07275-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-06160-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00118-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-03953-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07323-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06162-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-00885-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-07848-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-04165-CS, 5 in 7:14-cv-00862-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08858-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07328-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-06809-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06556-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07675-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-05770-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-03590-CS, 54 in 7:13-cv-02818-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-00104-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07749-CS, 60 in 7:13-cv-02725-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-00873-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-00891-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-04321-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-05906-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-05245-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-00093-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00099-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00572-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-07846-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-02726-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-00482-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06163-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-07354-CS, 48 in 7:13-cv-02909-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-02817-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07793-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-04696-CS, 136 in 7:13-cv-02321-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-07288-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08252-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06161-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-07755-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07746-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07800-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00591-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-08497-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-00709-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06805-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-09253-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-05207-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04695-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-04330-CS, 55 in 7:13-cv-02723-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-00986-CS, 55 in 7:13-cv-02910-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-09248-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06588-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-06410-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-03554-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02776-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-05768-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07778-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-06906-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-00984-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-00592-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00120-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-08715-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-05907-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-04665-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00586-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00282-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08181-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-03633-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00898-CS, 11 in 7:14-cv-00872-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06157-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-07694-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-05330-CS, 48 in 7:13-cv-02724-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-04325-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00989-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02780-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-03560-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00281-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-04666-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-04155-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-08784-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-05288-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00575-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05797-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-09242-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-05798-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06587-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-07688-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07345-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-03734-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00980-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-03382-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-08184-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07811-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07822-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08186-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-06159-CS, 57 in 7:13-cv-02322-CS, 43 in 7:13-cv-02580-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-03193-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-04924-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-05765-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-03672-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-02779-CS, 11 in 7:14-cv-00650-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08863-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07821-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06645-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-04780-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-08525-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-07689-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07700-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-00987-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-07321-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06584-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08711-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-06819-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-06153-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00860-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00639-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-06811-CS, 44 in 7:13-cv-01748-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-03195-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-03591-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-00993-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-08878-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07286-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-04328-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-05847-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04323-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-09135-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08879-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-00589-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-08377-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08491-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-04320-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-08646-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08628-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-03563-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04843-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-03557-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00286-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08276-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00520-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06986-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-07703-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-07036-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06807-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-07313-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00977-CS, 77 in 7:13-cv-02517-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-03670-CS, 43 in 7:13-cv-03562-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00820-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-09236-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-07692-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06817-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00002-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08712-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-00567-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-05219-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-07353-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06815-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-05341-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-07744-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-03801-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-07352-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-00641-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-06818-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06557-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-07341-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-06412-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-05767-CS, 5 in 7:14-cv-00871-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-07747-CS, 48 in 7:13-cv-02908-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06553-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06155-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-00479-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-08182-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-00522-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07035-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-08176-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-03632-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06810-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04153-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00507-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-06152-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06808-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-09232-CS, 48 in 7:13-cv-04324-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05167-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-08745-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04151-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-07006-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08860-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06987-CS, 58 in 7:13-cv-03016-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04149-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-06985-CS, 18 in 7:14-cv-00511-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08271-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-06164-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-00115-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05762-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-00034-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06646-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08178-CS, 53 in 7:13-cv-02777-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-04698-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05764-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-05203-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07760-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-08274-CS, 11 in 7:14-cv-00573-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07802-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-05206-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-05801-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-05205-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04329-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00638-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-03556-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06644-CS, 75 in 7:13-cv-02320-CS, 5 in 7:14-cv-00870-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-06585-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-05204-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05851-CS, 14 in 7:14-cv-00111-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07338-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00982-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-06984-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-00100-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-04327-CS, 60 in 7:13-cv-02943-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06158-CS, 58 in 7:13-cv-02728-CS, 6 in 7:14-cv-00481-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-08471-CS, 64 in 7:13-cv-02815-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-07808-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-07682-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-05850-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-03194-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-07748-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02781-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-07392-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-06501-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00821-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-05217-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-03555-CS, 66 in 7:13-cv-02645-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-03559-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06813-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00107-CS, 58 in 7:13-cv-02775-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08215-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-07690-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-05799-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-00994-CS, 64 in 7:13-cv-02353-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-03733-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00992-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-05218-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08247-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-00501-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-08611-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-08183-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-09134-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08631-CS, 52 in 7:13-cv-02778-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-08861-CS, 65 in 7:13-cv-02727-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06154-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-00569-CS, 43 in 7:13-cv-02577-CS, 51 in 7:13-cv-03800-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-03383-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05849-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00513-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-04319-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-03558-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06409-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-03192-CS, 55 in 7:13-cv-02782-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-04326-CS, 52 in 7:13-cv-02722-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-04779-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08961-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06591-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-04317-CS, 59 in 7:13-cv-02831-CS, 59 in 7:13-cv-02774-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06814-CS, 5 in 7:14-cv-00861-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-07683-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00495-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00114-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-08627-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06156-CS, 49 in 7:13-cv-03592-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-00773-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-04234-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-08617-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-06558-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08217-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-08185-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-03561-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-05763-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00492-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04322-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-05333-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00109-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-03178-CS, 11 in 7:14-cv-00001-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08248-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00284-CS, 17 in 7:14-cv-00096-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00976-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-00571-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-05220-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-00496-CS, 51 in 7:13-cv-01168-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-07697-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-07528-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00098-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-00480-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07327-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-06445-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-05216-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08785-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08883-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07803-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-00505-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08493-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-09252-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-08959-CS, 53 in 7:13-cv-02816-CS, 15 in 7:14-cv-00509-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05848-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-05905-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-05331-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00285-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08278-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08490-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-08208-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07807-CS, 67 in 7:13-cv-02323-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-03808-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06583-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07754-CS, 62 in 7:13-cv-02832-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-08503-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-08200-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-06816-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00895-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00598-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-07351-CS, 677 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07681-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04844-CS, 43 in 7:13-cv-04693-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08964-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08255-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08865-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02932-CS, 57 in 7:13-cv-02911-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-08601-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04842-CS) MOTION for Bryan A. Pfleeger to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9369904. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Certificate of Good Standing Must be issued from the Supreme Court of Louisiana with a Clerk Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(wb)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 678 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00978(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 675 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00994(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 674 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00993(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 673 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00992(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 672 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00989(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 671 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00987(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 670 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00986(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 669 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00984(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 668 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00982(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 667 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00980(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 666 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00977(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 665 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00976(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 664 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF MELISSA FADEL: On considering the foregoing Motion to Withdraw as Counsel; and Plaintiff not having responded to the Order to Show Cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to withdraw as Counsel is GRANTED, and the law firm of Robinson Calcagnie Robinson Shapiro Davis, Inc. may be relieved as counsel for the Plaintiff in the above entitled action. Plaintiff will be pro se until such time as new counsel comes in. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/18/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06164-CS (lnl)
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 663 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00898(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 662 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00895(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 661 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00891(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 660 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00885(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 659 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00873(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 658 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00872(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 657 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00871(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 656 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00870(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 655 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00862(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 654 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00861(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 653 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00860(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 652 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00821(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 651 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00820(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 7, 2014 Filing 650 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Keith D. Griffin dated February 7, 2014 re: In re Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation (Plaintiff Priscilla Baldwin). Document filed by Priscilla Baldwin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Service)(Griffin, Keith)
February 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 649 ORDER granting #646 Motion for KEITH DAVID GRIFFIN to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
February 7, 2014 Filing 648 RESPONSE to Motion re: (616 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Dismiss without prejudice for failure to submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet.. Document filed by Melissa Fadel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06164-CS(Lukei, Shannon)
February 7, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #646 AMENDED MOTION for KEITH DAVID GRIFFIN to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9335280. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
February 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 647 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT ORDER WITHDRAWAL OF DOYLE RAIZNER, LLP AND WARD BLACK LAW AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF SHANNON LETTERS: ORDERED that Doyle Raizner, LLP and Ward Black Law serve Plaintiff Shannon Letters with a copy of this Order on or before February 11, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Shannon Letters SHOW CAUSE on March 14, 2014 at 9:45 am in Courtroom 621, U.S. Courthouse, 300 Quarropas St., White Plains, NY 10601, why Doyle Raizner, LLP's and Ward Black Law's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiff on or before March 7, 2014. So Ordered. Show Cause Hearing set for 3/14/2014 at 09:45 AM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Show Cause Response due by 3/7/2014. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/6/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-04324-CS (lnl)
February 6, 2014 Filing 646 AMENDED MOTION for KEITH DAVID GRIFFIN to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9335280. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jerilyn Dudley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Griffin, Keith)
February 6, 2014 Filing 645 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO)-31) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, California, Georgia, Illinios, Minnesota, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 2/6/2014) (sjo)
February 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 644 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00709(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
February 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 643 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00650(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 642 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00641(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 641 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00639(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 640 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00638(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 639 ORDER granting #638 Motion for James G. O'Brien to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 31, 2014 Filing 638 MOTION for James G. O'Brien to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9312926. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Rebecca Wojtowicz, Stevi Wood. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(O'Brien, James)
January 31, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #638 MOTION for James G. O'Brien to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9312926. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 637 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00598(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 636 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00592(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 635 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00591(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 634 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00589(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 633 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00586(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 632 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00575(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 631 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00573(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 630 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00572(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 629 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00571(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 628 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00569(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 627 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00567(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 626 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00522(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 625 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00520(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 28, 2014 Filing 623 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-30) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Arizona, California, Florida, Louisiana, Minnesota, New Jersey, Ohio, Texas and West Virginia, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/24/2014) (sjo)
January 28, 2014 Filing 622 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-29)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Louisiana, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/14/2014) (sjo)
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 621 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00513(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 620 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00511(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 619 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00509(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 618 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00507(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 28, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 617 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00505(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 27, 2014 Filing 616 MOTION to Dismiss without prejudice for failure to submit a Plaintiff Fact Sheet. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notices of Overdue Discovery)(Harrington, William)
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 615 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00501(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 614 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00496(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 613 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00495(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 612 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00492(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 611 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00482(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 610 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00481(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 27, 2014 Filing 609 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Yvonne M. Flaherty on behalf of Jodie Chaney. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07760-CS(Flaherty, Yvonne)
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 608 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00480(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 607 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00479(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 606 ORDER granting #604 Motion for Michael Stephen Kruse to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 23, 2014 Filing 605 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Melissa Richards Smith to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9284575. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jodie Chaney. (Attachments: #1 Letter of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) Modified on 1/23/2014 (wb).
January 23, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #605 MOTION for Melissa Richards Smith to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9284575. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Certificate of Good Standing must issued from the Supreme Court of Texas with a Clerk of Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (wb)
January 23, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (25 in 7:13-cv-07747-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-03671-CS, 72 in 7:13-cv-02721-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-02779-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-08217-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06819-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06584-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-05205-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-03194-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-03670-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-05798-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-06985-CS, 58 in 7:13-cv-02831-CS, 53 in 7:13-cv-02818-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07811-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-07688-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-06160-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07793-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07286-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-03193-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02908-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-02577-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00093-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-08176-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-03111-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06161-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07755-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-09135-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-03801-CS, 51 in 7:13-cv-02778-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06156-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-05206-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-05245-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08252-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-06811-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07352-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-06558-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06155-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-08711-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-05331-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-08879-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08493-CS, 66 in 7:13-cv-02323-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-05906-CS, 52 in 7:13-cv-02777-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-03555-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-05907-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-04330-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-03557-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-07338-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06986-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-04843-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06163-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06553-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-05762-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-08178-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05220-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-05849-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08497-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-09134-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-06815-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-07035-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-04698-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-00100-CS, 9 in 7:14-cv-00034-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-08785-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-08185-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-03632-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-00285-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-05848-CS, 10 in 7:14-cv-00001-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-07675-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07681-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-07341-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00096-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08964-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00002-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08883-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-09242-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-03559-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-07354-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-02781-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-06585-CS, 55 in 7:13-cv-02728-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-03561-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-07689-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-02780-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08491-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-05764-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08186-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-08181-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-05333-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05219-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-03560-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-06501-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-05905-CS, 43 in 7:13-cv-01748-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-05799-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-07846-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-06445-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00282-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07321-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-05847-CS, 48 in 7:13-cv-03592-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00104-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08276-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06583-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08503-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-04155-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07802-CS, 44 in 7:13-cv-03590-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-05763-CS, 59 in 7:13-cv-02725-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-05216-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-05167-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06591-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-06556-CS, 604 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 42 in 7:13-cv-03562-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-08184-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07323-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06805-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-08377-CS, 44 in 7:13-cv-02817-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06646-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08865-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00099-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06158-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-06588-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-03382-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-04696-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07760-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06157-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-05203-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-04165-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-02776-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02724-CS, 50 in 7:13-cv-03800-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-03556-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-05850-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08628-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-05341-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-03591-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08631-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06809-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-07744-CS, 52 in 7:13-cv-02816-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07807-CS, 58 in 7:13-cv-02774-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-09236-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08255-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05770-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04924-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-03178-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04329-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-07690-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08860-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-00098-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06816-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06814-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-03554-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-04325-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08611-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-08200-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06810-CS, 16 in 7:14-cv-00120-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00118-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-00286-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07345-CS, 6 in 7:13-cv-08745-CS, 50 in 7:13-cv-01168-CS, 63 in 7:13-cv-02353-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06645-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-05801-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08247-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-00773-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08278-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07800-CS, 59 in 7:13-cv-02943-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-06152-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-02726-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-03953-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-07006-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-07848-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-04666-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-06153-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08861-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-04844-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-07754-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07822-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-04322-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04842-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-05217-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00107-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02909-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-02580-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-08617-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-09248-CS, 51 in 7:13-cv-02722-CS, 54 in 7:13-cv-02782-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-07353-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-02932-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-08208-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06987-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-03192-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06644-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-08601-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-05851-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-00122-CS, 74 in 7:13-cv-02320-CS, 63 in 7:13-cv-02815-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-03195-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-08784-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-07700-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-05330-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-07692-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-08627-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07821-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-04324-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-02911-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-04320-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-06906-CS, 57 in 7:13-cv-02775-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07328-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-08183-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06557-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00109-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-03558-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07748-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-07313-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06162-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08490-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-03808-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07683-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07528-CS, 135 in 7:13-cv-02321-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07778-CS, 65 in 7:13-cv-02645-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-08715-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-05797-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-05288-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-04319-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-05207-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-08858-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08271-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-05768-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-08646-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00111-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04695-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06409-CS, 54 in 7:13-cv-02723-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04323-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-04693-CS, 54 in 7:13-cv-02910-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-04780-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-03564-CS, 8 in 7:14-cv-00281-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-07749-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07327-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06587-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-03734-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-03733-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-08215-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-03672-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-03563-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-07694-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08248-CS, 76 in 7:13-cv-02517-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-04234-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-08182-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-06164-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07036-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-04779-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-08712-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-09232-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04153-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-06410-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-05765-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-04326-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07803-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04151-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07288-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06154-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-00288-CS, 12 in 7:14-cv-00114-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-09252-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-04321-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05218-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04149-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-03383-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-05767-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-07392-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08961-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-02322-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-05204-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-07703-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06813-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07746-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-03633-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-07275-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-08274-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07808-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-08959-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-04665-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-07351-CS, 7 in 7:14-cv-00284-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07682-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06808-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-04328-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-07697-CS, 57 in 7:13-cv-03016-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-04317-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06812-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06807-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08863-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-04327-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-09253-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-08525-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-08878-CS, 13 in 7:14-cv-00115-CS, 61 in 7:13-cv-02832-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-06412-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06159-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-06818-CS, 44 in 7:13-cv-08471-CS, 64 in 7:13-cv-02727-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-06817-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-06984-CS) MOTION for Michael Stephen Kruse to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9283400. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(wb)
January 22, 2014 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Cathy Seibel: Pre-Motion Conference held on 1/22/2014. Regarding member case 7:13-cv-06818-cs, plaintiffs individual counsel must notify defendants and the Court by February 7, 2014, as to whether she will amend the complaint. If complaint is to be amended, it is to be filed by February 24, 2014. Motion to dismiss to be served by March 10, 2014; opposition by April 10, 2014; reply by April 24, 2014. If complaint not amended, the motion to dismiss to be served by February 24, 2014; opposition to be filed by March 27, 2014; reply by April 10, 2014. Discussion held regarding serving motions to dismiss based on failure to submit Plaintiff Fact Sheets. Protocol outlined in Case Management Order No. 7 will be followed. Defendants may make motions to dismiss by letter. See transcript. (Amended Pleading due by 2/24/2014) (Court Reporter Sue Ghorayeb) (lnl)
January 22, 2014 Filing 604 MOTION for Michael Stephen Kruse to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9283400. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Maria Oropeza. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Kruse, Michael)
January 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 603 ORDER granting #597 Motion for Tyler C. Vail to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 602 ORDER granting #596 Motion for C. Carter Clay to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 601 ORDER granting #594 Motion for Bobby J. Bell, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 600 ORDER granting #587 Motion for Sofia Bruera to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 21, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #551 MOTION for Genevieve Mary Zimmerman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9221917. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (wb)
January 21, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #551 MOTION for Genevieve Mary Zimmerman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9221917. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bcu)
January 17, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 599 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT ORDER WITHDRAWAL OF ROBINSON CALCAGNIE ROBINSON SHAPIRO DAVIS, INC. AS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD FOR PLAINTIFF: IT APPEARS TO THE COURT, based on the evidence presented by RCRSD, that there is good cause to grant RCRSD's motion to be relieved as counsel under Civil Local Rule 1.4 of the Southern District of New York and ABA-AMRPC Rule 1.16(b). There has been no evidence presented by the Plaintiff to refute RCRSD's assertions that: (1) good cause for withdrawal exists, as a personality conflict has arisen, making it unreasonably difficult for the firm to continue to represent the client; and (2) that minimal discovery has been completed in this case and no trial date has been set, therefore Plaintiff will not be prejudiced by the proposed withdrawal. IT IS on this 17th day of January, 2014, ORDERED that RCRSD serve Plaintiff Melissa Fadel with a copy of this Order on or before 1/24/2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Melissa Fadel SHOW CAUSE on February 18, 2014 in Courtroom 621, U.S. Courthouse, 300 Quarropas St., White Plains, NY 10601 at 9:30 am why RCRSD's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel should not be granted. Any opposing papers shall be filed by Plaintiff on or before February 11, 2014. Show Cause Hearing set for 2/18/2014 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Show Cause Response due by 2/11/2014. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/17/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06164-CS (lnl)
January 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 598 STIPULATION DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: COMES NOW Plaintiffs Denecia Banks and Brandon Dunn and, with the consent and agreement of counsel for Defendants, files this Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41 (a)(l)(A)(ii), dismissing all of her claims against Defendants in their entirety without prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/16/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02782-CS(lnl)
January 15, 2014 Filing 597 AMENDED MOTION for Tyler C. Vail to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Barbara R Schwetz, Amanda G Sledge, Janice Moss. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Admitting PHV, #2 Supplement Certificates of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 7:13-cv-08185-CS(Vail, Tyler)
January 15, 2014 Filing 596 AMENDED MOTION for C. Carter Clay to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Barbara R Schwetz, Amanda G Sledge, Janice Moss. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Admitting PHV, #2 Supplement Certificates of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 7:13-cv-08185-CS(Clay, C.)
January 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 595 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00288(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 15, 2014 Filing 594 AMENDED MOTION for Bobby J. Bell, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Barbara R Schwetz, Amanda G Sledge, Janice Moss. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Admitting PHV, #2 Supplement Certificates of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 7:13-cv-08185-CS(Bell, Bobby)
January 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 593 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00286(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 592 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00285(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 591 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00284(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 590 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00282(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 15, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 589 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00281(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 15, 2014 ***Clerical Error-Document #583 was docketed in the wrong case and has been deleted. (sjo)
January 15, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (19 in 7:13-cv-08185-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 594 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) AMENDED MOTION for Bobby J. Bell, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., (39 in 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-08185-CS, 596 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 24 in 7:13-cv-07845-CS) AMENDED MOTION for C. Carter Clay to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., (40 in 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 597 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 21 in 7:13-cv-08185-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-07845-CS) AMENDED MOTION for Tyler C. Vail to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 7:13-cv-08185-CS(wb)
January 14, 2014 Set/Reset Hearings: Status Conference set for 1/22/2014 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. (fk)
January 14, 2014 Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(fk)
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 588 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on #585 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated 01/14/2014 re: Request for Pre-motion Conference. ENDORSEMENT: The matter will be discussed at the next conference, currently scheduled for January 22 at 3:30 p.m. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/14/2014) (lnl)
January 14, 2014 Filing 587 MOTION for Sofia Bruera to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9257193. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kathryn Cordell, Jaclyn Gargulinski. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS(Bruera, Sofia)
January 14, 2014 Filing 586 NOTICE OF COURT CONFERENCE: A conference will be held before the Hon. Cathy Seibel, U.S.D.J. on JANUARY 22, 2014 AT 3:30 P.M. at the Charles L. Brieant United States Courthouse, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601, Courtroom 621. Status Conference set for 1/22/2014 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
January 14, 2014 Filing 585 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated 01/14/2014 re: Request for Pre-motion Conference. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,, Bayer OY, Bayer Pharma AG. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Defendants' proposed Motion to Dismiss without Prejudice)(Harrington, William)
January 14, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (587 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 47 in 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Sofia Bruera to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9257193. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS(bcu)
January 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 584 ORDER: The corrected motion of Geoffrey Thomas Moore, for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned action is granted. Applicant has declared that he is a member in good standing of the Supreme Court of Florida. Applicant has requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for Plaintiffs' in the above entitled action on behalf of: Dentrisha White, Fiordaiiza Murei-Osorio, Sarah Roque, Angela Stephens, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to Local Rules of the Court, including the rules governing discipline of attorneys. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/10/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
January 10, 2014 Filing 581 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-28) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, California, Illinois, Kentucky, Missouri, New Jersey, Oklahoma and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/06/2014) (sjo)
January 10, 2014 Filing 580 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF MDL ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL LIFTING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER... that the stay of the Panel's conditional transfer order designated as CTO-26, filed on 12/11/2013, is LIFTED and the action is transferred to the United States District Court - Southern District of New York for the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. 1407 being conducted by the Honorable Cathy Seibel. (Signed by MDL Panel on 1/02/2014) (sjo)
January 10, 2014 Pro Hac Vice Fee Paid electronically via Pay.gov: for (16 in 7:13-cv-08185-CS, 579 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 35 in 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-07845-CS) MOTION for Tyler C. Vail to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee $ 200.00. Pay.gov receipt number 0208-9241860, paid on 1/9/2014. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 7:13-cv-08185-CS(wb)
January 10, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #576 MOTION for Geoffrey Thomas Moore to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
January 10, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (16 in 7:13-cv-08185-CS, 579 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 35 in 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-07845-CS) MOTION for Tyler C. Vail to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the Supreme Court of Alabama with a Clerk of Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 7:13-cv-08185-CS(wb)
January 9, 2014 Filing 579 MOTION for Tyler C. Vail to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Barbara R Schwetz, Amanda G Sledge, Janice Moss. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Admitting PHV, #2 Supplement Certificates of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 7:13-cv-08185-CS(Vail, Tyler)
January 9, 2014 Filing 578 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for C. Carter Clay to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Barbara R Schwetz, Amanda G Sledge, Janice Moss. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Admitting PHV, #2 Supplement Certificates of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 7:13-cv-08185-CS(Clay, C.) Modified on 1/9/2014 (bcu).
January 9, 2014 Filing 577 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Bobby J. Bell, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9242467. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Barbara R Schwetz, Amanda G Sledge, Janice Moss. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Order Admitting PHV, #2 Supplement Certificates of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 7:13-cv-08185-CS(Bell, Bobby) Modified on 1/9/2014 (bcu).
January 9, 2014 Filing 576 MOTION for Geoffrey Thomas Moore to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Fiordaliza Murel-Osorio, Sarah Roque, Angela Stephens, Dentrisha White. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Moore, Geoffrey) Modified on 1/9/2014 (bcu). Modified on 1/10/2014 (bcu).
January 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 575 ORDER granting #563 Motion for Shezad Malik to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 574 ORDER granting #554 Motion for Jane Ellen Joseph to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
January 9, 2014 Filing 573 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Amy Collignon Gunn, dated 1/8/2014, re: Counsel for the Plaintiff Ms. Dorena Borders' writes this letter in response to Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., letter written to this Court dated January 2, 2014 specifically relating to Defendant's request to file a motion to dismiss based on a statute of limitations defense. Document filed by Dorena Borders. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06818-CS(lnl)
January 9, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (577 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 33 in 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-08185-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-07845-CS) MOTION for Bobby J. Bell, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9242467. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the Supremem Court of Alabama and from a State Bar Association. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 7:13-cv-08185-CS(bcu)
January 9, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (15 in 7:13-cv-08185-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 578 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for C. Carter Clay to Appear Pro Hac Vice in Mirena IUD MDL Litigation. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the Supremem Court of Alabama and from a State Bar Association. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 7:13-cv-08185-CS(bcu)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 582 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00122(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Filing 572 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos dated 1/8/2014 re: Bayer's January 2, 2014 Letter requesting a pre-motion conference. Document filed by Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel.(Kekatos, Diogenes)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 571 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00120(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 570 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00118(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 569 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00115(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 568 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00114(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 567 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00111(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 566 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00109(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 565 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00107(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 564 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00104(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Filing 563 MOTION for SHEZAD MALIK to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9235910. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Sara Oviedo-Perez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Malik, Shezad)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 562 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00100(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 561 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00099(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 560 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00098(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 559 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00096(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 Filing 558 FIRST MOTION for SHEZAD MALIK to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Sara Oviedo-Perez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Malik, Shezad)
January 8, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 557 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00093(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 8, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #563 MOTION for SHEZAD MALIK to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9235910. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
January 8, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #558 FIRST MOTION for SHEZAD MALIK to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Filing fee not paid. Pay the filing fee by selecting the Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment event from the Other Documents menu item. (wb)
January 7, 2014 Filing 555 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Geoffrey Thomas Moore to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9231471. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Fiordaliza Murel-Osorio, Sarah Roque, Angela Stephens, Dentrisha White.(Moore, Geoffrey) Modified on 1/7/2014 (wb). Modified on 3/27/2014 (wb).
January 7, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #555 MOTION for Geoffrey Thomas Moore to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9231471. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Certificate of Good Standing Must be issued from the Supreme Court of Florida with a Clerk of Court Signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (wb)
January 6, 2014 Filing 554 MOTION for Jane Ellen Joseph to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9227526. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jennifer S. Wilson, Mayerlys Payares, Karen Horner, Jennifer Black, Felicia Duncan, Leslie Perez, Minyonna P. Watson, STEPHANIE DUHON. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Joseph, Jane)
January 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 553 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on ( #552 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06818-CS) LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated 01/02/2014 re: Request for Pre-motion Conference. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall docket this letter in all three of these cases. Pre-motion conference to be held on: 1/15/14 at 9:30 a.m. Opposing counsel to states position (by letter not to exceed 3 pages) in writing one week in advance. So Ordered. (Pre-Motion Conference set for 1/15/2014 at 09:30 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/2/2014) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06818-CS(lnl)
January 6, 2014 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (44 in 7:13-cv-02909-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-03555-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-04153-CS, 44 in 7:13-cv-02908-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-04149-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-03563-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-06817-CS, 554 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Jane Ellen Joseph to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9227526. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(bcu)
January 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 556 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00034(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 2, 2014 Filing 552 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated 01/02/2014 re: Request for Pre-motion Conference. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Memorandum of Law in support of Defendants' proposed Motion to Dismiss, #2 Exhibit 2 - Borders Complaint)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06818-CS(Harrington, William)
January 2, 2014 Filing 551 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Genevieve Mary Zimmerman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9221917. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Gina M. Cunningham. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08712-CS(Zimmerman, Genevieve) Modified on 1/21/2014 (bcu).
January 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 550 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00002(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
January 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 549 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:14-cv-00001(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 548 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-09253(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 547 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-09252(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 546 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-09248(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2013) (sjo)
December 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 545 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-09242(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 544 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-09236(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 543 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-09232(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 30, 2013 Filing 542 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-27)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, California, Florida, Kansas, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/24/2013) (sjo)
December 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 624 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL AS TO PLAINTIFF JESSIE ORTON NO ANSWER OR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT HAVING BEEN FILED, Plaintiff JESSIE ORTON hereby voluntarily dismisses this action without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) & (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/27/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07690-CS (lnl) (Main Document 624 replaced on 1/30/2014) (lnl).
December 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 541 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-09135(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 540 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-09134(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 23, 2013 Filing 539 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Dawn M. Chmielewski on behalf of Cassey Merritt, William Merritt, Kira Balius, Stephanie Denise Barnett, Kevin Crawford, Brandon Sweet, Kara Sweet, Shawna Adkins, Cheryl Annarelli, Amber Aston, Ashley Barr-Maino, Natasha Bjugan, Ashley Brown, James Burks, Laquasha Burks, Alicia Byington, Ola Cheyenne Carney, Talvata Collier, Shelby Comtois, Travis Comtois, Renee Cooley, Stephanie Corley, Brandon Couvillion, Leanndra Couvillion, Melanie Crumpton, Bradley Davis, Tammy Delaughter, Brandie Duryea, Stacie Estey, Dennis Falcon, Sara Falcon, Shannon Fewell, Brianna Franklin-Spey, Jacquelyn Goetz-Moffitt, Agata Graham, Jasmin Grayson, Shawna Griffie, Denise Hargreaves, Tawana Hill-Brooks, Ericia Johnson, Cheryl Keene, Nikita King, Priscilla King, Barbara Luna, Amanda Madril, Korrina Martin, Misty Martin, Angela Martinez, Donna McCurry, Amber McDaniel, Brandy McNamee, Jennifer Meyer, Jennifer Montminy, Dailyn Morrell, Juliana O'Brien, Paul O'Brien, Ileia Oliver-Paige, Shecaniah Phelps, Maria Pikula, Sara Platt, Shawn Platt, Ebone Porter, Brittany Richter, Jamie Roach, Cody Roan, Ollivea Roan, Miranda Roberson, Katie Rourk, Augustin Ruiz, Sonya Ruiz, Jessica Sanborn, Candace Saye, Ashley Schluessler, Amber Seachrist, Meredith Smith, Suzanne Smith-Freda, Delvina Spahe, Sparkle Spears, Melissa Sullivan, Brent Swosinski, Diane Swosinski, Crystal Trevino, Joanna Trujillo, Josette Underwood, Emily Vestal, Kayla Villarreal, Tammy Wagner, Ursler West, Eva White, Somer White, Jade Whitman, Angela Winfield, Katrina Witherspoon, Kimberly Wurth, Mao Yang, Nicole Zamora, Heather Zindars, Jody Slaughter, Lydia Slaughter, Melody Williams, Ronail Williams, Jennifer Briskey, Justin Briskey, Desaree Johnson, Kimberly Petry, Richard Petry, Jaquayla Kelly, Tavonda Ford, Mallari Moffatt, Andrea Penaflor, Eric Joseph, Jakitta Cooper Joseph, Latasha Moss, Bonnie Lynne Danner, Susan Harp. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Chmielewski, Dawn)
December 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 538 ORDER granting #535 Motion for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 23, 2013 Filing 536 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-26) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Louisiana, Minnesota and New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/19/2013) (sjo)
December 23, 2013 Filing 535 MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Shannon Balthazor. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07681-CS(Holland, Eric)
December 23, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (535 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 12 in 7:13-cv-07681-CS) MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07681-CS(wb)
December 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 537 Vacated as per Judge's Order dated 10/2/2015, Doc. #2652. REVISED CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/20/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl) Modified on 10/7/2015 (lnl).
December 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 534 ORDER granting #532 Motion for Elisha N. Hawk to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 533 PLAINTIFF SAMANTHA ANDING'S NOTICE OF PARTIAL VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(i): Now comes Witherspoon Plaintiff, Samantha Anding ("Anding"), by and through undersigned counsel, and hereby notifies this Court of Plaintiff Anding's voluntary dismissal, without prejudice, of her claims against Defendant Bayer pursuant to Civil Rule 4l(a)(l)(A)(i). Defendant Bayer has not served its answer or a motion for summary judgment upon Plaintiff. This Notice applies only to Plaintiff Anding. No other Plaintiff named on the Witherspoon multi-party complaint is dismissing their claims against Defendant Bayer. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/19/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-08471-CS (lnl)
December 20, 2013 Filing 532 MOTION for Elisha N. Hawk to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9196348. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Amanda Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Certificates of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03560-CS(Hawk, Elisha)
December 20, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (29 in 7:13-cv-03560-CS, 532 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Elisha N. Hawk to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9196348. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03560-CS(wb)
December 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 531 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(l)(A)(i): Pursuant to F.R.C.P 4l(a)(l)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Plaintiff Joyce Booth and her counsel, hereby give notice that the above captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals. So Ordered. Joyce Booth terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/17/2013) (Docketed in Case No. 13-CV-5850 (CS)) (lnl)
December 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 530 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08964(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 529 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08961(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 528 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08959(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 527 ORDER granting #526 Motion for Shannon Lukei to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 18, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (35 in 7:13-cv-04696-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08785-CS, 60 in 7:13-cv-02727-CS, 57 in 7:13-cv-02832-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-06445-CS, 526 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 19 in 7:13-cv-06164-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08784-CS) MOTION for Shannon Lukei to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(wb)
December 17, 2013 Filing 526 MOTION for Shannon Lukei to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Melissa Fadel, Miriam Cruz, Ishani Dias, Alexandria Larison, Sheena Montano-Padilla, Jeri Mohler, Janine Walker. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Good Standing Certificate, #3 Good Standing Certificate)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Lukei, Shannon)
December 17, 2013 Filing 525 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Andrew J. Geiger to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9182085. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Ghiselle Watson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02815-CS(Geiger, Andrew) Modified on 12/17/2013 (bcu).
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 524 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08883(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 523 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08879(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 522 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08878(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 521 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08865(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 520 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08863(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 519 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08861(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 518 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08860(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 517 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08858(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 516 ORDER granting #514 Motion for Anthony David Irpino to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 515 ORDER granting #513 Motion for John E. Quinn to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 12, 2013 Filing 514 MOTION for Anthony David Irpino to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9168551. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Tania Paz Acosta. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07754-CS(Irpino, Anthony)
December 12, 2013 Filing 513 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John E. Quinn, Esq.. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9167853. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Benjamin Atwell, Jenelle Atwell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06985-CS(Quinn, John)
December 12, 2013 Filing 512 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-25) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Illinois, Kansas, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New jersey and North Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/12/2013) (sjo)
December 12, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (14 in 7:13-cv-06985-CS, 513 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by John E. Quinn, Esq.. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9167853. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-06985-CS(bcu)
December 12, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (514 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07754-CS) MOTION for Anthony David Irpino to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9168551. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07754-CS(bcu)
December 11, 2013 Filing 511 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Shannon Lukei to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9166769. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Melissa Fadel, Miriam Cruz, Jeri Mohler, Ishani Dias, Janine Walker, Sheena Montano-Padilla, Alexandria Larison. (Attachments: #1 Good Standing Certificate, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Lukei, Shannon) Modified on 12/12/2013 (bcu). Modified on 12/12/2013 (bcu).
December 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 510 ORDER No. 12 (Deposition Protocol): The parties have agreed upon the following Order governing the taking of depositions. 1. This Order applies to all depositions taken in cases pending in MDL No. 2434, which shall be noticed and conducted pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Order. 2. This Order in its entirety shall be attached to any non-party subpoena or deposition notice. 3. "Defendant" in the context of this document shall be defined pursuant to the Agreed Order Regarding Proper Party-Defendant entered on July 17, 2013 (No. 13-MD-2434, Doc. 225; No. 13-MC-2434, Doc. 22) and any future amendments thereto. 4. Although this Order governs all depositions noticed or cross-noticed in this multidistrict litigation ("MDL,") the parties may stipulate to different arrangements. If one party believes that a particular deposition requires an exception from this protocol but the other party does not agree, the party seeking an exception may submit to the Court, by fax or email, a letter of not more than 3 single-spaced pages, setting forth its position and the parties' efforts to resolve the dispute. The other party may then submit a responding letter of no more than 3 single-spaced pages within 3 business days. If the Court permits a reply, it shall not exceed 2 single-spaced pages and should be submitted within 2 business days of the responding letter. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 12/11/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) (lnl)
December 11, 2013 Filing 509 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 12/4/2013, re: Counsel writes: At the November 21,2013 Status Conference, the Court instructed counsel to submit by November 27 a draft Protocol Governing Depositions that reflected the Court's rulings at the conference. On November 22, Counsel for Defendants provided a draft protocol to Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel. Lead Counsel for Plaintiffs wanted to see the transcript from the conference before agreeing to a draft protocol. The transcript became available on December 2. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG. (lnl)
December 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 508 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08785(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 507 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08784(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 11, 2013 Filing 506 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-24)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota and New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 12/05/2013) (sjo)
December 10, 2013 Filing 505 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9157937. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Shannon Balthazor. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing - Missouri, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing - Illinois, #3 Exhibit C - Certificate of Good Standing - Michigan, #4 Text of Proposed Order proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07681-CS(Holland, Eric) Modified on 12/10/2013 (wb).
December 10, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (10 in 7:13-cv-07681-CS, 505 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Eric D Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9157937. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the Supreme Court of Michigan with a Clerk of Court signature. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07681-CS(wb)
December 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 504 ORDER granting #503 Motion for Eric S. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 9, 2013 Filing 503 MOTION for Eric S. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Joanna Guzman, Patty J Hardman, Bethanie Kellione, Mickele Mason-Anthony, Stephanie A. Meadows, Jamaica R. Noland, Margaret J. Ponce, Kimberly A. Sharples. Return Date set for 12/9/2013 at 04:00 PM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Case List, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Johnson, Eric)
December 9, 2013 Filing 502 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Eric S. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9155747. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Joanna Guzman, Patty J Hardman, Bethanie Kellione, Mickele Mason-Anthony, Stephanie A. Meadows, Jamaica R. Noland, Margaret J. Ponce, Kimberly A. Sharples. Return Date set for 12/9/2013 at 03:00 PM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Case List, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Johnson, Eric) Modified on 12/9/2013 (bcu).
December 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 501 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08715(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 500 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08712(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 499 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08711(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 9, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #502 MOTION for Eric S. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9155747. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bcu)
December 9, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #503 MOTION for Eric S. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
December 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 498 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08646(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 497 ORDER granting #493 Motion for Joshua M. Mankoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 496 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08631(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 495 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08628(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 494 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08627(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 4, 2013 Filing 493 MOTION for Joshua M. Mankoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9138714. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kayla Harris. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07352-CS(Mankoff, Joshua)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 492 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08617(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 491 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08611(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 490 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08601(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 4, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (493 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07352-CS) MOTION for Joshua M. Mankoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9138714. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07352-CS(bcu)
December 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 489 ORDER granting #487 Motion for Trent B. Miracle to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 3, 2013 Filing 488 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-23) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arizona, Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/27/2013) (sjo)
December 3, 2013 Filing 487 MOTION for Trent B. Miracle to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9133314. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Joanna Guzman, Patty J Hardman, Bethanie Kellione, Mickele Mason-Anthony, Stephanie A. Meadows, Jamaica R. Noland, Margaret J. Ponce, Kimberly A. Sharples. Return Date set for 12/3/2013 at 09:00 AM. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Case List, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Miracle, Trent)
December 3, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #487 MOTION for Trent B. Miracle to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9133314. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
December 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 486 ORDER granting #485 Motion for Brent William Bailey to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
December 2, 2013 Filing 485 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brent William Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Bailey, Brent)
December 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 484 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08525(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
December 2, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #485 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
November 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 483 ORDER granting #482 Motion for Elizabeth A. Alexander to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
November 27, 2013 Filing 482 MOTION for Elizabeth A. Alexander to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9126084. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Cynthia Solano, Shelley Chow, Gina Lafata, Michaela Ramsey, Shaquayla Reynolds, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg, Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02816-CS, 7:13-cv-02910-CS, 7:13-cv-02911-CS, 7:13-cv-03591-CS(Fleishman, Wendy)
November 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 481 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08503(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 480 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08497(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 479 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08493(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 478 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08491(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 477 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08490(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 27, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (482 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 27 in 7:13-cv-03591-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02816-CS, 51 in 7:13-cv-02911-CS, 49 in 7:13-cv-02910-CS) MOTION for Elizabeth A. Alexander to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9126084. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02816-CS, 7:13-cv-02910-CS, 7:13-cv-02911-CS, 7:13-cv-03591-CS(bcu)
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 476 ORDER granting #474 Motion for Jeffrey A. Bowersox to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
November 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 475 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08471(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 26, 2013 Filing 474 MOTION for Jeffrey A. Bowersox to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9120116. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Shelby Spain, Jennifer Cook-Hoots. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05203-CS, 7:13-cv-05204-CS(Bowersox, Jeffrey)
November 26, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (30 in 7:13-cv-05204-CS, 474 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 30 in 7:13-cv-05203-CS) MOTION for Jeffrey A. Bowersox to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9120116. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05203-CS, 7:13-cv-05204-CS(wb)
November 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 473 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08377(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 472 ORDER NO. 11 (Pro Hac Vice Motions): This Order relates to the procedures that should be followed by attorneys who wish to be admitted pro hac vice in the Southern District of New York for cases part of the above-captioned multi-district litigation. An attorney need file only one pro hac vice motion, even if he or she is the attorney of record for several individual plaintiffs. The pro hac vice motion should be filed in the MDL (13-MD-2434), but "spread" to all cases for which the attorney represents an individual plaintiff. The attorney shall only be required to pay the pro hac vice fee one time. If an attorney is in need of assistance, please call the Help Desk at 212-805-0800. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 11/22/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
November 22, 2013 Filing 471 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL CTO-22)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/22/2013) (sjo)
November 22, 2013 Filing 470 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF MDL ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL LIFTING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER... that the stay of the Panel's conditional transfer order designated as CTO-19, filed on 10/2/2013, is LIFTED and the action is transferred to the United States District Court - Southern District of New York for the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. 1407 being conducted by the Honorable Cathy Seibel. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/20/2013) (sjo)
November 21, 2013 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Cathy Seibel: Status Conference held on 11/21/2013. A two day presumption for depositions by Plaintiffs of defense witnesses, unless application is made to the Court beforehand for a shorter time limit on certain witnesses. Counsel will submit a proposed order to the Court regarding this matter. Submit draft by November 27, 2013. They may, if necessary, go into the next week. Status up-date: Five depositions have taken place. Administration: Submit a proposed order to eliminate the Standing Order Pilot Project Notice on the docket every time a new case is filed. Perhaps the Court could put a standing order in the MDL stating that each individual case is part of the Pilot Project even if it is not separately docketed. Discussed pro hac vice applications with regard to the payment of fees and whether the initial application applies to all cases filed. January 15, 2014 is date of next status conference. (Status Conference set for 1/15/2014 at 09:30 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel) (Court Reporter Christina Arends-Dieck) Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
November 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 469 ORDER granting #462 Motion for David Alan Abramson to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
November 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 468 ORDER granting #467 Motion for Eric Martin Ferrouillet to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
November 20, 2013 Filing 467 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9100551. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Dwan Alexander. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit certificate of good standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order pro hac vice order)(Ferrouillet, Eric)
November 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 466 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08278(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 465 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08276(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 464 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08274(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 463 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08271(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 20, 2013 Filing 462 MOTION for David Alan Abramson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9098309. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Dwan Alexander. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate in Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Abramson, David)
November 20, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #467 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9100551. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
November 20, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (28 in 7:13-cv-05203-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-05204-CS) MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Filing fee not paid.Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the Supreme Court of Oregon with a Clerk of Court Signature. Please call 212-805-0800 for Assistance. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05203-CS, 7:13-cv-05204-CS(wb)
November 20, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #462 MOTION for David Alan Abramson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9098309. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
November 19, 2013 Filing 461 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jennifer Cook-Hoots, Shelby Spain. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-05203-CS, 7:13-cv-05204-CS(Bowersox, Jeffrey) Modified on 11/20/2013 (wb).
November 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 460 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08255(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 459 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08252(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 458 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08248(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 457 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08247(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 456 ORDER granting #453 Motion for Amy Collingon Gunn to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 455 ORDER granting #451 Motion for Todd Stephen Hageman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
November 18, 2013 Filing 454 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Brent William Bailey to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9090556. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brent William Bailey. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Bailey, Brent) Modified on 11/18/2013 (bcu).
November 18, 2013 Filing 453 MOTION for Amy Collingon Gunn to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9090397. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stacy Somma, Dorena Borders. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(Gunn, Amy)
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 452 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08217(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 18, 2013 Filing 451 MOTION for Todd Stephen Hageman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9090220. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Dorena Borders, Stacy Somma, Mirena MDL Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS(Hageman, Todd)
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 450 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08215(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 449 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08208(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 448 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08200(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 11/18/2013 (sjo). Modified on 11/18/2013 (sjo).
November 18, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (451 in 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS) MOTION for Todd Stephen Hageman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9090220. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-mc-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS(wb)
November 18, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (9 in 7:13-cv-07352-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-03733-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-03671-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-07682-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-06553-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-07760-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06645-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-02780-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-08217-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-07006-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-05217-CS, 59 in 7:13-cv-02645-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-06153-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-06906-CS, 49 in 7:13-cv-02728-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07323-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06987-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-07754-CS, 51 in 7:13-cv-03016-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-05767-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-07341-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06155-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-07681-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-00773-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-03382-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-05341-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-04323-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-03955-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-07689-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02910-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07747-CS, 52 in 7:13-cv-02831-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06986-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-05205-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-06501-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-05847-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-05798-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-02777-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06160-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-05206-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06644-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-04165-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08186-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-04924-CS, 57 in 7:13-cv-02323-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-03591-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-07351-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-06164-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-02776-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-03670-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04324-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06156-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-07749-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-03562-CS, 6 in 7:13-cv-08184-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-04329-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-03808-CS, 46 in 7:13-cv-02782-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06813-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06584-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-03801-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07821-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-03734-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-07744-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-02580-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06162-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06817-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06812-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-08185-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-06152-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07321-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04234-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-04666-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-05216-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-02726-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-05207-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-05850-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-02778-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-05907-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-04149-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-07675-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-06410-CS, 129 in 7:13-cv-02321-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-03953-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06557-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-06586-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-08183-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07688-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-07755-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-07036-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-06558-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-02779-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-04844-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-04319-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-05906-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-04698-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-04328-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-05333-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-04317-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-05203-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-05245-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06409-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-04665-CS, 66 in 7:13-cv-02721-CS, 52 in 7:13-cv-02774-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-02781-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-06984-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-05848-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-05768-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-07528-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-07035-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-06412-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-06588-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06985-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-07288-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-04780-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06819-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-02724-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-03192-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06814-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-03561-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-03558-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-08215-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07328-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-06159-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-06585-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-03633-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-08208-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-06445-CS, 67 in 7:13-cv-02517-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-05849-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07822-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-05797-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-05204-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-06815-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-05765-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-04695-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-08182-CS, 56 in 7:13-cv-02727-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06154-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-02908-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-04842-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-07846-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07811-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-03672-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-04151-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06807-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-05762-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07778-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-03592-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-06811-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-07845-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02818-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-05764-CS, 44 in 7:13-cv-01168-CS, 44 in 7:13-cv-03800-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07800-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06583-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-05288-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-05905-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-05218-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-05220-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-07353-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-04321-CS, 65 in 7:13-cv-02320-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-04322-CS, 6 in 7:13-cv-07703-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06809-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-03383-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-03555-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-05770-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-03590-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-04326-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-07313-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-05331-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07807-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04320-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-06818-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-03178-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-04693-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-05799-CS, 6 in 7:13-cv-07697-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-02817-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04696-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-02816-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-07338-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-03564-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-06556-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-04330-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06810-CS, 49 in 7:13-cv-02911-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06646-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-07345-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-04843-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-07354-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06161-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-03632-CS, 6 in 7:13-cv-07692-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-03560-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-05219-CS, 6 in 7:13-cv-07700-CS, 54 in 7:13-cv-02353-CS, 26 in 7:13-cv-04155-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-02909-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-03563-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-03195-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-04327-CS, 53 in 7:13-cv-02832-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-07392-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-07683-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-04779-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-04325-CS, 53 in 7:13-cv-02725-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-06816-CS, 6 in 7:13-cv-07694-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-03193-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-03194-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-08200-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-03557-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-02932-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-07848-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07746-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-04153-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-05801-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07803-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-07748-CS, 45 in 7:13-cv-02722-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-05330-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06805-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-02577-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-08176-CS, 48 in 7:13-cv-02723-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06163-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02322-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-03556-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-07275-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-05851-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-07808-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06158-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07327-CS, 53 in 7:13-cv-02943-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-01748-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06808-CS, 51 in 7:13-cv-02775-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-06157-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-05763-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-03559-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-05167-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06587-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-06591-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-07286-CS) MOTION for Amy Collingon Gunn to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9090397. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. You must pay for $200.00 dollars for each civil case for assistance call the ECF helpdesk at 212-805-0800. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(wb)
November 18, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #454 MOTION for Brent William Bailey to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9090556. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the Supreme Court of Texas and not from a State Bar Association. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bcu)
November 18, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (31 in 7:13-cv-03111-CS) MOTION for Amy Collingon Gunn to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9090397. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03111-CS(wb)
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 447 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08186(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 446 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08185(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 445 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08184(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 444 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08183(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 443 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08182(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 442 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08181(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 441 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08178(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 440 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-08176(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 14, 2013 Filing 439 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Utah, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 11/14/2013) (sjo)
November 11, 2013 Filing 438 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Rebecca M Katz on behalf of George Edwards, Letitia Edwards. New Address: MOTLEY RICE LLC, 600 Third Avenue, 21st Floor, New York, NY, USA 10016, 2125770040. (Katz, Rebecca)
November 5, 2013 Filing 437 MOTION for Richard R. Schlueter to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9049177. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Violet Adams, Amanda Armas, Tatika Avery, Jennifer Danley, June Davis, Maria Davis, Claudette Eaton, Cecilia Gamez, Sharai Patricia Garcia, Stephanie Hall, Ashley Janney, Stephanie Rene Lambert, Vanessa Londono, Daphanie Ludlow, Myra Martinez, Latasha Morss, Amerie Nye, Jessie Orton, Pamela Franklin Redd, Summer Sadira, Channel Nekey Shelton, Sabrina Sikes, Amber Sprowl, Malika Thompson, Jessica Van Dusen, Kimberly Young. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Schlueter, Richard)
November 5, 2013 Filing 436 STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties and/or their respective counsel(s) that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Bayer Pharma AG, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc..Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-07353-CS(Harrington, William)
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 435 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07848(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 434 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07846(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 433 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07845(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 5, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #437 MOTION for Richard R. Schlueter to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-9049177. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
November 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 432 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07822(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 431 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07821(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 430 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07811(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 429 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07808(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 428 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07807(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 427 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07803(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 426 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07802(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 425 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07800(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 424 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07793(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 423 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07778(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 422 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07760(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 421 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07755(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 420 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07754(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 419 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07749(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 418 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07748(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 417 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07747(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 416 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07746(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
November 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 415 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07744(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 414 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07703(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 413 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07700(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 412 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07697(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 411 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07694(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 410 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07692(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 409 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07690(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 408 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07689(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 407 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07688(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 406 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07683(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 405 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07682(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 404 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07681(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 403 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07675(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 402 ORDER granting #401 Motion for Panagiotis "Pete" V. Albanis to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
October 29, 2013 Filing 401 MOTION for Panagiotis "Pete" V. Albanis to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Rebekah Humbard, April Nicole Rowden.(Albanis, Panagiotis)
October 29, 2013 Filing 400 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-20) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Oklahoma and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/29/2013) (sjo)
October 29, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #401 MOTION for Panagiotis "Pete" V. Albanis to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
October 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 398 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07528(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 399 REVISED ORDER REGARDING DOCUMENTS CLAIMED TO BE PRIVILEGED/PROTECTED...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/23/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
October 23, 2013 Filing 397 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF MDL ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL LIFTING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER... that the stay of the Panel's conditional transfer order designated as CTO-19, filed on 10/2/2013, is LIFTED and the action is transferred to the United States District Court - Southern District of New York for the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. 1407 being conducted by the Honorable Cathy Seibel. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/23/2013) (sjo)
October 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 396 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on MOTION for Elizabeth C. Ward to Withdraw as Attorney. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. So Ordered. Attorney Elizabeth C. Ward terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/21/2013) Docketed in Case No. 7:13-cv-6412-CS. (lnl)
October 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 395 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07392(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 394 ORDER REGARDING DOCUMENTS CLAIMED TO BE PRIVILEGED/PROTECTED...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/18/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
October 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 393 ORDER granting #269 Motion for Frederick S. Longer to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
October 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 392 ORDER granting #268 Motion for Lawrence L. Jones II to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
October 18, 2013 Filing 391 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Missouri, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/16/2013) (sjo)
October 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 390 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07354(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 389 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07353(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 388 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07352(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 387 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07351(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 18, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #269 FIRST MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #268 MOTION for Lawrence L. Jones II to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 386 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07345(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 385 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07341(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 384 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07338(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 383 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07328(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 382 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07327(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 381 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07323(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 380 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07321(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 379 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07313(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 378 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07288(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 377 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07286(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 376 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07275(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 15, 2013 Filing 375 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-19)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama, California, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Missouri, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Texas., and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/10/2013) (sjo)
October 9, 2013 Filing 374 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Berlex Laboratories, Inc., Berlex, Inc..Document filed by Kalaki Clarke, Sylvia Montes, Tiffany Gregg, Toyana Robinson, Evelyn Ramirez.(fk)
October 9, 2013 Filing 373 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Panagiotis "Pete" Vlasios Albanis to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8958905. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Rebekah Humbard, April Nicole Rowden.(Albanis, Panagiotis) Modified on 10/9/2013 (bcu).
October 9, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #373 MOTION for Panagiotis "Pete" Vlasios Albanis to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8958905. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Expired Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the Supreme Court of Florida and not from a State Bar Association. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bcu)
October 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 372 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06987(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 371 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE: COMES NOW, Plaintiff Kati-an Cook and, with the consent and agreement of counsel for Defendants, files this Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), dismissing all her claims against Defendants in their entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs. SO ORDERED. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall close the case (13-cv-2831) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 10/3/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02831-CS (lnl)
October 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 370 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07036(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 369 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07035(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 368 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:1:13-cv-07005(NRB), 1:11-md-02262(NRB) (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 367 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-07006(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 366 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06987(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 365 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06985(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 364 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06986(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 363 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06984(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
October 2, 2013 Filing 362 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-18) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arkansas, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 10/2/2013) (sjo)
September 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 361 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06806(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 360 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06805(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 359 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06808(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 358 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06809(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 357 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06810(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 356 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06811(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 355 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06812(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 354 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06813(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 353 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06814(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 352 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06815(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 351 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06816(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 350 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06817(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 349 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06818(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 348 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06819(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 25, 2013 Filing 347 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-17) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Georgia, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/25/2013) (sjo) Modified on 9/25/2013 (sjo). Modified on 9/25/2013 (sjo).
September 25, 2013 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Cathy Seibel: Status Conference held on 9/25/2013. Conference beings 9:50 a.m. Privilege log discussed regarding documents that are not wholly withheld. Defendants request 90 days to produce privilege log instead of 45 days. The Court determines that the log should be produced within 75 days. Discussion held regarding emails and uninterrupted dialog. Discussion held regarding requests for depositions to extend beyond one day. The Court discusses protocol for contacting the Court regarding disputes arising during depositions. Date of next conference is November 21, 2013. By October 28, 2013 counsel to send joint letter regarding issues in dispute. See transcript. (Court Reporter Christina Arends-Dieck) (lnl)
September 25, 2013 Set/Reset Hearings: Status Conference set for 11/21/2013 at 09:30 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. (lnl)
September 23, 2013 Filing 346 NOTICE OF COURT CONFERENCE: Confirmation: After consultation with counsel, the Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation September conference will be held on September 25, 2013 at 9:30a.m. Status Conference set for 9/25/2013 at 09:20 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. (lnl)
September 20, 2013 Filing 345 NOTICE OF COURT CONFERENCE: There is a conference in this case scheduled before Judge Seibel for SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 at 9:30 a.m., as indicated on the Notice of Conference, Doc. No. 244. Clarification is made because if that document is opened, the conference is incorrectly listed as September 26, 2013. Status Conference set for 9/25/2013 at 09:30 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel. (lnl)
September 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 344 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06646(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 343 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06645(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 342 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06644(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 341 ORDER NO. 10: Before the Court is Plaintiff Leah Laskan's unopposed Motion to Sever and Substitute Counsel. (No. 13-CV-2816, Doc. 39.) Ms. Laskan, who was initially included as part of a group of plaintiffs represented by Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP now seeks to sever her claim and be represented by Capretz & Associates. Ms. Laskan's Motion is GRANTED, but she is instructed to re-file her Complaint so that she may be assigned a separate docket number. Because Ms Laskan was already a plaintiff in this action, the filing fee is hereby waived. The remaining plaintiffs in No. 13-CV-2816 are also instructed to re-file their Amended Complaint so that it may be assigned a document number. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/19/2013) (lnl)
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 340 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06591(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 339 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06583(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 338 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06584(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 337 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-06585(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 336 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06586(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 335 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06587(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 334 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06588(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 333 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06558(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 332 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06557(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 331 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06556(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 330 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06553(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 17, 2013 Filing 329 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-16) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Minnesota, North Carolina and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/17/2013) (sjo)
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 328 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06501(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 13, 2013 Filing 327 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06445(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by MDL Panel on 8/29/2013) (sjo)
September 12, 2013 Filing 326 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Keith David Griffin to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Priscilla Baldwin, Josie Borelli, Ashley Clement, Jerilyn Dudley, Kristin Harms, Abigail Heverly, Desiree Iniguez, Jacqueline Knous, Lynnette Lynn-Horton, Corinne Odell, Monica Thompson, Shawna Walczak, Daitra Wersal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order [Proposed] Order)(Griffin, Keith) Modified on 9/12/2013 (bcu).
September 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 325 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06409(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 324 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06412(CS),7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 323 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06410(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 12, 2013 Filing 322 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF MDL ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL LIFTING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER... that the stay of the Panel's conditional transfer order designated as CTO-2, filed on 5/1/2013, is LIFTED insofar as it relates to this action. The action is transferred to the United States District Court - Southern District of New York for the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. 1407 being conducted by the Honorable Cathy Seibel. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/2/2013) (sjo) Modified on 9/17/2013 (sjo).
September 12, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #326 MOTION for Keith David Griffin to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Filing fee not paid.Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days and pay the filing fee. (bcu)
September 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 321 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Comes now plaintiff, Rebecca Foret, and hereby voluntarily dismisses all defendants without Prejudice. Under Rule 41(a)l(A)(i), voluntary dismissal is permissible as Defendant has not filed either an Answer or a Motion for Summary Judgment at the time of such dismissal. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/4/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02775-CS (lnl)
September 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 320 PROTOCOL FOR DOCUMENT FORMAT PRODUCTION: This Order governs the format of Documents, Data, and/or Tangible things that will be produced in cases filed in, transferred to, or consolidated before this Court as components of In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, and to every action that is or will be filed, transferred or consolidated into this court (collectively the "Litigation"). This Order does not govern the scope of production of Documents, Data, and/or Tangible things in the Litigation. All parties reserve their rights with respect to the scope of the document production. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/4/2013) (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
September 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 319 ORDER REGARDING THE PRESERVATION OF DOCUMENTS AND ELECTRONICALLY STORED INFORMATION: This Order governs the preservation of documents, data, and tangible things in cases filed in or consolidated before this Court as components of In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, and to every action that is or will be filed or transferred into this court (collectively the "Litigation"). (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 9/4/2013) (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
September 4, 2013 *** Party Rebecca Foret terminated. (lnl)
September 4, 2013 Filing 318 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-15) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of North Carolina and Tennessee, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 9/4/2013) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 317 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06164(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 316 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06163(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 315 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06162(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 314 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06161(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Filing 313 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a CONFERENCE proceeding held on 8/14/13 has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter. The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days...(Rodriguez, Somari)
September 3, 2013 Filing 312 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: CONFERENCE held on 8/14/2013 before Judge Cathy Seibel. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Albert Gorn, 914-390-4222. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 9/27/2013. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 10/7/2013. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/5/2013.(Rodriguez, Somari)
September 3, 2013 Filing 311 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Document filed by Rebecca Foret. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-02775-CS(Holland, Eric)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 310 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06160(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 309 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06159(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 308 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06158(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 307 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06157(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 306 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06156(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 305 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06155(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 304 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06154(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 303 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06153(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
September 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 302 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-06152(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 30, 2013 Filing 301 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-14) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Georgia, Illinois and Minnesota, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 8/29/2013) (sjo)
August 27, 2013 Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment: for #269 FIRST MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8817972.(Longer, Frederick)
August 26, 2013 Filing 299 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos, dated 8/23/2013, re: Counsel for the plaintiffs writes to request that the Court extend the deadline for the parties' completion of discussions and submission of a proposed document production protocol and proposed document preservation order by one week, to next Friday, August 30, 2013. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. So Ordered. Document filed by Plaintiffs. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
August 26, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #298 MOTION for Jeffrey A. Bowersox to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8812898. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the Supreme Court not from a State Bar Association. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bcu)
August 23, 2013 Filing 300 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Jessi Sargent. (Docketed in Case 7:13-cv-5245) (lnl)
August 23, 2013 Filing 298 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Jeffrey A. Bowersox to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8812898. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jennifer Cook-Hoots, Shelby Spain. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Bowersox, Jeffrey) Modified on 8/26/2013 (bcu).
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 297 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05907(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 296 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05906(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 295 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05905(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 294 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05847(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 293 ORDER granting #285 Motion for Mitchell Gilbert Allen to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 292 ORDER granting #284 Motion for Leila Hirayama Watson to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 291 ORDER granting #283 Motion for Jackqualyn Quinton to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 290 ORDER granting #273 Motion for Rachel Abrams to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 289 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05851(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 288 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05850(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 287 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05849(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 286 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05848(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 20, 2013 Filing 285 MOTION for Mitchell Gilbert Allen to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8799345. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Mitch G. Allen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Allen, Mitchell)
August 20, 2013 Filing 284 MOTION for Leila Hirayama Watson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8798590. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Leila H. Watson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Watson, Leila)
August 20, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #284 MOTION for Leila Hirayama Watson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8798590. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
August 20, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #285 MOTION for Mitchell Gilbert Allen to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8799345. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
August 20, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #283 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bwa)
August 19, 2013 Filing 283 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Lisa P. Bryant, Jessica M. Matlock. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Quinton, Jackqualyn)
August 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 282 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05797(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 281 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05798(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 280 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05799(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 278 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05801(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 19, 2013 Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment: for #283 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8797362.(Quinton, Jackqualyn)
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 279 ORDER No. 9 (Scheduling Order): The following scheduling order is adopted: 1. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiffs Initial Interrogatories and Requests for Production by September 16, 2013. 2. Defendant, by October 1, 2013, shall produce the custodial files of Rusty Thomas, John Rotondo, Brian Groves, William Ahmer, Catherine Holtz, Herm Cukier, Antonio Costales, Leo Plouffe, Edio Zampaglione, Jo-Ann Ruane, Joseph Zuccarini, Fadwa Almanakly, Lynn Carmichael, and Chuck Walsh. Defendant will collect and process those files as detailed on pages 5-7 of Pilot Program Exhibit B. (No. 13-MC-2434, Doc. 26.)3. Plaintiffs shall complete 30(b)(6) depositions of Defendant by November 1 2013. 4. Defendant, by December 1, 2013, shall produce the remaining initial discovery, that is certain data from databases as summarized on pages 7-9 of Pilot Program Exhibit B. (No. 13-MC-2434, Doc. 26.) This discovery will not include the Plaintiff-specific information required by the Defense Fact Sheet. Defendant will produce Plaintiff-specific information pursuant to the deadlines established by Order No. 8 regarding the Defendant Fact Sheet. (No. 13-MC-2434, Doc. 30.) 5. Plaintiffs shall serve second wave discovery requests by January 30, 2014. 6. The parties shall select cases for the Initial Disposition Pool on April 4, 2014. 7. All generic discovery shall be completed by September 1, 2014. 8. All case-specific discovery in Initial Disposition Pool cases shall be completed by September 30, 2014. 9. Plaintiffs' generic expert reports are due October 15, 2014. 10. Defendant's generic expert reports are due November 14, 2014. 11. Plaintiffs case-specific expert reports for cases in the Initial Disposition Pool are due December 1, 2014. 12. Defendant shall depose Plaintiffs' generic experts between December 1, 2014 and February 2, 2015. 13. Defendant's case-specific expert reports for cases in the Initial Disposition Pool are due January 15, 2015. 14. Plaintiffs shall depose Defendant's generic experts between February 2, 2015 and March 15, 2015. 15. Defendant shall depose Plaintiffs' case-specific experts for cases in the Initial Disposition Pool between February 2, 2015 and March 16, 2015. 16. Plaintiffs shall depose Defendants case-specific experts for cases in the Initial Disposition Pool cases between March 1, 2015 and April 15, 2015. Plaintiffs shall not depose any Defendant expert on a case as to which Defendant has not already deposed Plaintiff's case-specific expert(s). 17. Dispositive motions and Daubert motions for cases in the Initial Disposition Pool are due by May 15, 2015. Opposition and reply dates will be set at a future time. SO ORDERED. Motions due by 5/15/2015. Deposition due by 11/1/2013. Discovery due by 9/30/2014. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/16/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(lnl)
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 277 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05762(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 276 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05763(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 275 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05764(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 274 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05765(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 16, 2013 Filing 273 MOTION for Rachel Abrams to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stephanie Laska, William Laska. (Attachments: #1 Order Granting Motion for Admission, #2 Certificate of Standing)(Abrams, Rachel)
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 272 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05767(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 271 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05768(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 270 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05770(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
August 16, 2013 Filing 269 FIRST MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Danielle Dominie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order Order)(Longer, Frederick)
August 16, 2013 Filing 268 MOTION for Lawrence L. Jones II to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Lester Harmon, Sandra Harmon, Celina Martin, Carol Turner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Admission & Certificate of Good Standing (KY), #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing (PA), #3 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03558-CS(Jones, Lawrence)
August 16, 2013 Filing 267 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, New Jersey, North Carolina and Texas,, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/16/2013) (sjo)
August 16, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #273 MOTION for Rachel Abrams to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
August 16, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #269 FIRST MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Filing fee not paid. Pay the filing fee by selecting the Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment event from the Other Documents menu item. (bwa)
August 15, 2013 Filing 266 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bayer AG, Bayer Healthcare AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Shaniqua E. Murphy. (Docketed in Case 7:13-cv-0773) (lnl)
August 15, 2013 Filing 265 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bayer Healthcare AG, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Oy, Bayer Pharma AG with JURY DEMAND. Document filed by Cantor Julie Miller, Jonathan Miller. (Docketed in Case 7:13-cv-1168) (lnl)
August 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 264 ORDER NO. 8 (Defendant Fact Sheet): 1. The parties have agreed upon a Defense Fact Sheet ("DFS"), which is attached to this Order as Exhibit 1. 2. The DFS includes document requests. Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ("Defendant") shall produce to Plaintiff a completed DFS and documents responsive to the DFS ("Responsive Documents") pursuant to the terms of this order. "Defendant" in the context of this document shall be defined pursuant to the Agreed Order Regarding Proper Party-Defendant, (No. 13-MC-2434, Doc. 22), and any future amendments thereto. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/15/2013) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
August 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 263 ORDER NO. 7 (Plaintiff Fact Sheet): 1. The parties have agreed upon a Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") which is attached as Exhibit 1 to this Order. 2. The PFS includes document requests in Section XIV and a variety of authorizations for the release of records. Each Plaintiff shall produce to Counsel for Defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Defendant") as identified in Section II below a completed PFS, executed Authorizations for the Release of Records ("Authorizations") and documents responsive to Section XIV of the PFS ("Responsive Documents") pursuant to the terms of this Order. "Defendant" in the context of this document shall be defined pursuant to the Agreed Order Regarding Proper Party-Defendant, (No. 13-MC-2434, Doc. 22), and any future amendments thereto. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/15/2013) (See ORDER as set forth) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
August 15, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #258 MOTION for Rachel Abrams to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued by the Supreme Court. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bwa)
August 14, 2013 Filing 262 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 8/12/2013, re: Counsel for defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. writes: In follow up to my letter to the Court of August 9, 2013, attached are the Plaintiff Fact Sheet and related authorizations, a proposed Case Management Order related to the Plaintiff Fact Sheet, and a proposed Case Management Order related to the Defendants Fact Sheet. The parties have agreed on these documents. My August 9 letter set forth two remaining areas of disagreement related to the Defendants Fact Sheet. This morning, Plaintiffs advised Defendant of an additional area of disagreement that remains, which is discussed in the below table. A revised draft Defendants Fact Sheet is attached with the three remaining areas of dispute highlighted. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (lnl)
August 14, 2013 Filing 261 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 8/9/2013, re: Counsel for defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. writes: As discussed in my letter to the Court of August 7, 2013, the parties have met and conferred by phone, email and in person about the Plaintiff Fact Sheet, Defense Fact Sheet, and ESI and document production protocol. The parties address the status of these issues as set forth in this letter. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (lnl)
August 14, 2013 Filing 260 PILOT PROGRAM EX. B from Diogenes Kekatos. Document entitled: Brief Joint Statement Describing the Action, [e.g., "Putative securities class action pertaining to the restatement of earnings for the period May 1, 2009 to May 30, 2009"] (lnl)
August 14, 2013 Filing 259 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 8/7/2013, re: Counsel for defendant Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. writes: At the July 2, 2013 Status Conference, the Court instructed the parties to confer on the various outstanding discovery issues and schedule and submit a joint letter to the Court. The parties have met and conferred by phone, email and in person about the Plaintiff Fact Sheet, Defense Fact Sheet, document production, ESI and document production protocol, and the proposed schedule. The parties address the status of these issues as set forth in this letter. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (lnl)
August 14, 2013 Filing 258 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Rachel Abrams to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stephanie Laska, William Laska. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Abrams, Rachel) Modified on 8/15/2013 (bwa).
August 13, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 257 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE: The motion of Alyson Oliver, for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned action is granted. Applicant has declared that she is a good member in good standing of the bar of the state of Michigan; and that her contact information is as follows: Alyson Oliver, Oliver Law Group PC, 950 West University Drive, Suite 200, Rochester, Michigan 48307, Telephone: 248-327-6556/ Facsimile: 248-436-3385, Applicant having requested admission Pro Hac Vice to appear for all purposes as counsel for Jessi Sargent in the above entitled action; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules ofthis Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall terminate Doc. 11. Attorney Alyson Louise Oliver for Jessi Sargent admitted Pro Hac Vice. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 8/12/2013) (Docketed in Case No. 13-cv-5245-CS) (lnl)
August 8, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #256 MOTION for Rachel Abrams to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8764431. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the Supreme Court. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bwa)
August 7, 2013 Filing 256 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Rachel Abrams to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8764431. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stephanie Laska, William Laska. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order for Admission, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Abrams, Rachel) Modified on 8/8/2013 (bwa).
August 5, 2013 Filing 255 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Lawrence L. Jones II to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8752282. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Lester Harmon, Sandra Harmon, Celina Martin, Carol Turner. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit KY Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit PA Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03558-CS(Jones, Lawrence) Modified on 8/5/2013 (bcu).
August 5, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #255 MOTION for Lawrence L. Jones II to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8752282. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the State Court of Kentucky not from a State Bar Association. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bcu)
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 254 CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/31/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
August 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 253 ORDER granting #252 Motion for Robert K. Shelquist to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 31, 2013 Filing 252 MOTION for Robert K. Shelquist to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8741255. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kami Armstrong, Luke Armstrong. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Shelquist, Robert)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 251 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05341(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 250 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05333(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 249 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05330(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 248 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05331(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 31, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #252 MOTION for Robert K. Shelquist to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8741255. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
July 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 247 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05288(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 26, 2013 Filing 246 MOTION for David T. Butsch to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8729866. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Chassity R. Kimbrough. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificates of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03953-CS(Butsch, David)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 245 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05245(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 26, 2013 Filing 244 NOTICE OF COURT CONFERENCE: The Court has established the following schedule of conferences to be held before the Han. Cathy Seibel, U.S.D.J. at the Charles L. Brieant United States Courthouse 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601, Courtroom 621. August 14, 2013 9:30 a.m.; September 25, 2013 9:30 a.m.; November 21, 2013 9:30 a.m.; January 15, 2014 9:30 a.m.; February 26, 2014 9:30 a.m.; April 2, 2014 9:30 a.m.; May 14, 2014 9:30 a.m.; June 25, 2014 9:30 a.m.; (Status Conferences set for 8/14/2013, 9/25/2013, 11/21/2013, 1/15/2014, 2/26/2014, 4/2/2014, 5/14/2014, 6/25/2014 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel) (lnl)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 243 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05220(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 242 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05219(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 241 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05218(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 240 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05217(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 239 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05216(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 238 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05203(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 237 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05204(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 236 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05207(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 235 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05206(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 234 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05205(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 25, 2013 Filing 233 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-12)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arkansas, California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Oregon and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/25/2013) (sjo)
July 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 232 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-05167(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 24, 2013 Filing 231 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-11)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnesota, New York and Pennsylvania, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/24/2013) (sjo)
July 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 230 ORDER granting #147 Motion for Rachal Garcia Rojas to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 229 ORDER granting #144 Motion for Steve Faries to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 228 ORDER granting #226 Motion for Mark John Geragos to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 22, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #147 MOTION for Rachal Garcia Rojas to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8573373. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #144 MOTION for Steve Faries to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8573205. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
July 22, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #226 MOTION for Mark John Geragos to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8708904. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
July 19, 2013 Filing 227 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tina Glandian on behalf of Bonnie Lynne Danner, Melody Williams, Ronail Williams. (Glandian, Tina)
July 19, 2013 Filing 226 MOTION for Mark John Geragos to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8708904. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Melody Williams, Ronail Williams. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)(Kaufman, Shelley)
July 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 225 AGREED ORDER REGARDING PROPER PARTY-DEFENDANT AND ABBREVIATED SERVICE PROCEDURES FOR SERVICE UPON DEFENDANT BAYER HEALTH CARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.: I. Scope of Order This Order applies to claims brought by a U.S. citizen or resident based on usage or purchase of Mirena ("Mirena") in which the claimed injury allegedly resulted from the perforation, embedment, or migration of the Mirena and (i) currently are pending in MDL No. 2434 or (ii) will be filed in, removed to or transferred to this Court. II. Proper Party-Defendant Stipulation A. Some plaintiffs have named the following U.S. defendants in lawsuits involving Mirena: Bayer Corporation; Bayer HealthCare, LLC; Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.; Berlex Laboratories, Inc.; and Bedex, Inc. ("Bayer/Berlex entities"). B. Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals Inc. admits that on April 4, 2007, as part of a corporate acquisition, the name of Berlex, Inc. was changed to Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. C. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., admits that at certain times it designed, researched, manufactured, tested, advertised, promoted, marketed, sold and distributed Mirena in the U.S. D. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the proper party in lawsuits involving Mirena inserted in the United States. Its principal place of business is in New Jersey. E. Accordingly, to the extent that a plaintiff recovers a judgment in a lawsuit for injuries allegedly caused by Mirena, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. stipulates that it is the proper party to the lawsuit and it will not raise any defenses that any of the Bayer/Berlex entities named above or any other Bayer/Berlex entity(ies) with a principal place of business in the United States are/were the proper party to the lawsuit. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/15/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) (lnl)
July 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 224 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04924(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 16, 2013 Filing 223 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-10) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of New York, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/16/2013) (sjo)
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 222 NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF MCKESSON CORPORATION; and ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION: It is hereby stipulated and consented that Pavan L. Rosati of GOODMAN NEUMAN HAMILTON LLP, 417 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor, San Francisco, California 94104 (Telephone: 415-705-0400: Fax: 415-705-0411; Email: prosati@gnhllp.com) be and hereby is substituted in place and stead of Daniel J. Herling and Michelle Gillette of Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC. as attorneys for the defendant MCKESSON CORPORATION, in this action and that this substitution be entered into effect without further notice. ENDORSEMENT: ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS. IT IS SO ORDERED. Attorney Pavan Linardos Rosati for McKesson Corporation added. Attorney Michelle Gillette and Daniel J. Herling terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/11/2013) (lnl)
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 221 ORDER granting #220 Motion for Pavan L. Rosati to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 12, 2013 Filing 220 MOTION for Pavan L. Rosati to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8685811. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by McKesson Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03800-CS(Rosati, Pavan)
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 219 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04844(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 218 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04843(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 217 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04842(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 12, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (31 in 7:13-cv-03800-CS) MOTION for Pavan L. Rosati to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8685811. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS, 7:13-cv-03800-CS(wb)
July 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 216 ORDER granting #213 Motion for Jeffrey L. Raizner to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 215 ORDER granting #212 Motion for Michael Patrick Doyle to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 214 ORDER No. 6 The Clerk of Court is directed to open a master case file bearing docket number 13-MC-2434. Any filing fees associated with opening the master case file docket are waived. The caption shall read In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation. For administrative purposes only, in 13-MC-2434, the Plaintiff shall be listed as Mirena MDL Plaintiffs and the Defendant shall be listed as Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. The only appearancesentered for Plaintiff in 13-MC-2434 shall be the Court-appointed Co-Lead and Liaison Counsel, (Doc. 103 (Order No. 4)): Fred Thompson III, Matthew J. McCauley, James R. Ronca, and Diogenes P. Kekatos. The only appearances entered for Defendant in 13-MC-2434 shall be Shayna S. Cook, Brian ODonoghue, Elmore James Shepherd, III, and William Harrington. The Clerk of Court is directed to transfer the following docket entries from 13-MD-2434 to 13-MC-2434: Docs. 1 (Transfer Order); 8 (Order No. 1); 65 (Order No. 2); 67 (4/30/13 Letter from Diogenes Kekatos); 74 (5/8/13 Letter from Matthey McCauley et al.); 76 (5/10/13 Letter from Alyson Oliver); 77 (5/10/13 Letter from Fred Thompson, III et al.); 78 (5/10/13 Letter from Shayna Cook); 79 (5/10/13 Letter from Shayna Cook); 80 (Defendants Preliminary Position Statement); 94 (5/16/13 Letter from Mark B. Hutton); 95 (5/16/13 Letter from Matthew McCauley et al.); 96 (5/16/13 Letter from James Ronca); 100 (Order No. 3); 103 (Order No. 4); 104 (5/21/13 Letter from Diogenes Kekatos); 191 (6/28/13 Letter from Shayna Cook); 193 (6/17/13 Letter from James Ronca); 198 (Order of Referral to Magistrate Judge); and 207 (Order No. 5). These docket entries shall be numbered consecutively in 13-MC-2434, and shall be followed by this Order (Order No. 6). This Order shall also be docketed in 13-MD-2434, and all matters consolidated therewith. The Clerk of Court is also directed to transfer the minute entries from the following datesfrom 13-MD-2434 to 13-MC-2434: May 17, 2013; and July 2, 2013. This Order and all subsequent entries docketed in 13-MC-2434 are to be docketed simultaneously in 13-MD-2434. Docket 13-MC-2434 is to contain only my case management orders, letters from counsel that I have docketed, and other substantive filings that relate to all actions (e.g., master pleadings, motion papers). It should not include pro hac vice motion papers, the Courts standing orders, conditional transfer orders, notices of appearance, and the like. Papers filed inappropriately will be stricken from the docket. If there is any doubt as to whether a substantive filing shall be made in 13-MC-2434, Counsel may seek the Courts guidance. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/11/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al.(fk)
July 11, 2013 Filing 213 MOTION for Jeffrey L. Raizner to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8680429. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Shannon Letters, Jessica Reed, Heather Schaeffer, Amanda Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Raizner, Jeffrey)
July 11, 2013 Filing 212 MOTION for Michael Patrick Doyle to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8680309. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Shannon Letters, Jessica Reed, Heather Schaeffer, Amanda Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Doyle, Michael)
July 11, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #213 MOTION for Jeffrey L. Raizner to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8680429. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
July 11, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #212 MOTION for Michael Patrick Doyle to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8680309. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
July 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 211 ORDER granting #210 Motion for Blake A. Shuart to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 10, 2013 Filing 210 MOTION for Blake A. Shuart to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8677841. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jessica R. Caruthers, April Rogers. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Shuart, Blake)
July 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 209 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04779(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 208 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04780(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 7/10/2013 (sjo).
July 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 207 ORDER NO. 5 (Organization of Plaintiffs' Counsel, Protocols for Common Benefit Work and Expenses): The Court has received an application for appointment of Plaintiffs' Steering Committee from Plaintiff's Liaison Counsel. (Doc. 193.) Having carefully reviewed all of the submissions, upon discussion of the applications during this Courts case management conference of July 2, 2013, and there being no opposition from counsel for any known Plaintiff, the Court hereby APPOINTS the following as Plaintiffs' Steering Committee ("PSC"): Rachel Abrams (Levin Simes LLP) Richard Arsenault (Neblett, Beard & Arsenault) Dawn Chmielewski (Climaco, Wilcox, Peca, Tarantino & Garofoli Co., LPA) Steve Faries (Matthews & Associates) Yvonne Flaherty (Lockridge, Grindal, Nauen P.L.L.P.) Catherine Heacox (The Lanier Law Firm) Eric Holland (Holland Groves Schneller & Stolze) Michael Johnson (Johnson Becker PLLC) Randi Kassan (Sanders, Viener, Grossman LLP) Shelly Kaufman (Geragos and Geragos) Fred Longer (Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & Berman) Dianne Nast (NastLaw LLC) Roger Smith (Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P.C.). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/10/2013) (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
July 10, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #210 MOTION for Blake A. Shuart to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8677841. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
July 9, 2013 Filing 206 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos, dated 7/8/2013, re: Counsel for the plaintiffs writes: Enclosed is a copy of a current Certificate of Good Standing from the Supreme Court of Minnesota for Yvonne M. Flaherty. With the submission of this certificate, the Court should now have current Certificates of Good Standing from the respective state courts of all Plaintiffs' Steering Committee nominees based on either a nominee's filing of a pro hac vice admission motion (or amended motion), Plaintiffs' inclusion of certificates in the amended compendium of attorney biographies enclosed in their June 18 letter to the Court, or Plaintiffs' submission of certificates for three nominees in their June 27 letter to the Court. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
July 9, 2013 Filing 205 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos, dated 6/27/2013, re: Counsel submits this letter to supplement the June 17, 2013 letter of Co-Lead Counsel James R. Ronca. Accompanying this letter is a pdf of certificates of good standing for Rachel Abrams, Catherine T. Heacox, and Randi A. Kassan, who have been proposed for appointment to the Plaintiff's Steering Committee. Document filed by Plaintiffs. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS-LMS et al. (lnl)
July 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 204 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04693(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 7/12/2013 (sjo).
July 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 203 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04695(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 7/12/2013 (sjo).
July 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 202 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04696(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 7/12/2013 (sjo).
July 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 201 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04698(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo) Modified on 7/12/2013 (sjo).
July 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 200 ORDER granting #157 Motion for Peter John Brodhead to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 199 ORDER granting #175 Motion for Shelley Lynn Kaufman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 198 ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Referral for discovery. Referred to Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/3/2013) (lnl) Modified on 7/9/2013 (lnl).
July 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 197 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04666(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 196 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04665(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 8, 2013 Filing 195 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-9)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Minnesota, Ohio, Texas and Washington, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 7/5/2013) (sjo)
July 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 194 ORDER granting #192 Motion for Kim Goodling to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 3, 2013 Filing 192 MOTION for Kim Goodling to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8661945. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Shannon Letters, Jessica Reed, Heather Schaeffer, Amanda Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Goodling, Kim)
July 3, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #175 AMENDED MOTION for Shelley Lynn Kaufman to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
July 3, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #192 MOTION for Kim Goodling to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8661945. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
July 2, 2013 Filing 193 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James R. Ronca dated 6/17/2013 re: Proposed guidelines and protocols for Steering Committee. (Attachments: #1 Addendum A, #2 Addendum B & C, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Addendum to Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al.(fk)
July 2, 2013 Filing 191 LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook dated 6/28/2013, re: Counsel writes: Pursuant to Order No. 3, the parties submit a joint status update and proposed agenda for the July 2, 2013 conference. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. (lnl)
July 2, 2013 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Cathy Seibel: Status Conference held on 7/2/2013. A Master case docket 13 MC 2434 will be set up for substantive docket entries. The Court will issue an order explaining what should or should not go on the Master Case docket. If counsel want to include a phone conference option for the next conferences, they can set up a conference dial-in number and the Court will dial in. Anyone who wishes to come in person in welcome, but the Court also approve of telephonic appearances by counsel. Steering Committee: The Court has received lead counsel's proposals and has not received any objections or applications from other attorneys wishing to become a member of the Committee. The Court finds the proposed committee represents an excellent cross-section and approves the list of Committee members. This Court's next conference will be August 14, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. We will schedule conferences every six weeks or so over the next six months. The Court issues a referral to the Hon. Lisa M. Smith for discovery rulings on this case. Adjourned to August 14, 2013 at 4:30. (Status Conference set for 8/14/2013 at 09:30 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel) (Court Reporter Mary Staten) (lnl)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 190 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04326(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 189 ORDER granting #174 Motion for Jonathan Robert Mencel to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 188 ORDER granting #173 Motion for Charles H. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 187 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04328(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 186 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04317(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 185 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04319(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 184 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04321(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 183 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04330(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 182 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04323(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 181 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04325(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 180 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04327(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 179 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04329(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 178 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04324(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 177 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04320(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 176 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04322(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 29, 2013 Filing 175 AMENDED MOTION for Shelley Lynn Kaufman to Appear Pro Hac Vice Corrected. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Melody Williams, Ronail Williams. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Geragos, Mark)
June 28, 2013 Filing 174 MOTION for Jonathan Robert Mencel to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8647731. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stacy Fowler, Peggy Green, Brooklyn G. Jones, Heather M. Meyer, Priscilla Sammons, Marina Schoeberl. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Mencel, Jonathan)
June 28, 2013 Filing 173 MOTION for Charles H. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8647697. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stacy Fowler, Peggy Green, Brooklyn G. Jones, Heather M. Meyer, Priscilla Sammons, Marina Schoeberl. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Johnson, Charles)
June 28, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #173 MOTION for Charles H. Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8647697. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bwa)
June 28, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #174 MOTION for Jonathan Robert Mencel to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8647731. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bwa)
June 26, 2013 Filing 172 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington, dated 6/25/2013, re: Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Plaintiff Heather Schaeffer jointly request that the Court transfer this case to In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434 ("MDL-2434"). The Court has accepted this case as a "Related" case to MDL-2434. As it has done in previous cases, the parties request that the Court transfer this case to MDL-2434 so as to consolidate this action and stay its deadlines pending the Court's management of MDL-2434. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/26/2013) (Instructed to docket this endorsed letter in this case in order to consolidate the related case) (Docketed in case no. 13-CV-3808 as DE#4) (lnl)
June 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 171 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from William P. Harrington, dated 6/25/2013, re: Counsel writes: Enclosed for your consideration is a proposed Order under Local Civil Rule 1.8 allowing Bayer defense team members to bring laptops and cell phones into the courthouse for the July 2 conference and the duration of the Mirena MDL Litigation. ENDORSEMENT: Per Standing Order M10-468 (filed 2/18/10 and available on the Court's Web Site), only 3 laptops per team are allowed. (I will consider allowing more for trial.) So defense may re-submit this application. Also, all lawyers covered by the Order must be members of the S.D.N.Y. bar and have a valid service pass. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/26/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (Per Chambers' Instruction - this letter should be docketed in all cases) (lnl)
June 26, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #170 MOTION for Shelley Lynn Kaufman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8639180. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Certificates of Good Standing must be issued from the State Court. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bwa)
June 25, 2013 Filing 170 MOTION for Shelley Lynn Kaufman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8639180. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Melody Williams, Ronail Williams. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Geragos, Mark)
June 20, 2013 Filing 169 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Connecticut, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, North Carolina and Wisconsin, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/20/2013) (sjo)
June 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 168 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04234-CS, 7:13-md-02434-CS. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 167 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04155-CS, 7:13-md-02434-CS. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 166 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04153-CS, 7:13-md-02434-CS. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 165 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7-13-cv-04151-CS, 7:13-md-02434-CS. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 164 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed in Associated Cases:7:13-cv-04149-CS,7:13-md-02434-CS. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 14, 2013 Filing 163 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-7) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Michigan and New Jersey, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/14/2013) (sjo)
June 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 162 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03955(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 161 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03953(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 160 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from David W. Zoll, dated 6/7/2013, re: Counsel writes: Please be advised that Zachary J. Murry is no longer with Zoll, Kranz & Borgess effective May 20, 2013. In accordance, please accept this correspondence as the Notice of Withdrawal. Further he should be removed from the service list and email notifications with regard to the above-referenced matter. ENDORSEMENT: The Clerk shall effectuate the above request. So Ordered. Attorney Zachary J Murry terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/10/2013) (lnl)
June 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 159 ORDER granting #156 Motion for Stuart Edward Scott to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
June 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 158 ORDER granting #155 Motion for Rhonda Baker Debevec to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
June 7, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #155 MOTION for Rhonda Baker Debevec to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8582341. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bwa)
June 7, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #156 MOTION for Stuart Edward Scott to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8582402. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #157 MOTION for Peter John Brodhead to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8582427. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bwa)
June 6, 2013 Filing 157 MOTION for Peter John Brodhead to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8582427. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Margarita S. Krncevic, Raymond Krncevic. Return Date set for 6/7/2013 at 09:00 AM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-03382-CS(Brodhead, Peter)
June 6, 2013 Filing 156 MOTION for Stuart Edward Scott to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8582402. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Margarita S. Krncevic, Raymond Krncevic. Return Date set for 6/7/2013 at 09:00 AM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-03382-CS(Scott, Stuart)
June 6, 2013 Filing 155 MOTION for Rhonda Baker Debevec to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8582341. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Margarita S. Krncevic, Raymond Krncevic. Return Date set for 6/7/2013 at 09:00 AM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-03382-CS(Debevec, Rhonda)
June 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 154 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03801(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 153 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03800(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 6, 2013 Filing 152 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-6) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Alabama and Illinois, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 6/6/2013) (sjo)
June 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 151 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03734(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 150 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03733(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 4, 2013 Filing 149 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Rachal Garcia Rojas to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8573401. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brandy N. Scott. Return Date set for 6/4/2013 at 04:31 PM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-03564-CS(Rojas, Rachal) Modified on 7/22/2013 (wb).
June 4, 2013 Filing 148 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Rachal Garcia Rojas to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8573391. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Laurie Nordman. Return Date set for 6/4/2013 at 04:29 PM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-03592-CS(Rojas, Rachal) Modified on 7/22/2013 (wb).
June 4, 2013 Filing 147 MOTION for Rachal Garcia Rojas to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8573373. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Tenisha Jennings. Return Date set for 6/4/2013 at 04:25 PM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-03562-CS(Rojas, Rachal)
June 4, 2013 Filing 146 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Steve Faries to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8573300. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brandy N. Scott. Return Date set for 6/4/2013 at 04:12 PM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-03564-CS(Faries, Steve) Modified on 7/22/2013 (wb).
June 4, 2013 Filing 145 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Steve Faries to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8573269. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Laurie Nordman. Return Date set for 6/4/2013 at 04:06 PM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-03592-CS(Faries, Steve) Modified on 7/22/2013 (wb).
June 4, 2013 Filing 144 MOTION for Steve Faries to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8573205. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Tenisha Jennings. Return Date set for 6/4/2013 at 03:55 PM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-03562-CS(Faries, Steve)
June 4, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 143 ORDER granting #139 Motion for Richard J. Arsenault to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
June 4, 2013 Pro Hac Vice Fee Refunded: for #49 MOTION for Shayna S. Cook to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8470179. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee refunded for Receipt number 0208-8470179, for the following reason(s): DUPLICATE PAYMENT. (dig)
June 4, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. (23 in 7:13-cv-01168-CS, 139 in 7:13-md-02434-CS) MOTION for Richard J. Arsenault to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8567462. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-01168-CS(bcu)
June 4, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (9 in 7:13-cv-03556-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-02932-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-03382-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-02780-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-03554-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-02727-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-03562-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-02781-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-02943-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-02831-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-00773-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-02909-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-02777-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-03672-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-02832-CS, 20 in 7:13-cv-01748-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-03195-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-02353-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-01168-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-02908-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-02577-CS, 37 in 7:13-cv-02815-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-03590-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-02775-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-02723-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-02726-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-02776-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-03194-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-02724-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-03560-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-03561-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-03670-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-03557-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-03178-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-03192-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-02779-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-02725-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-03592-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-03633-CS, 10 in 7:13-cv-03564-CS, 112 in 7:13-cv-02321-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-02818-CS, 49 in 7:13-cv-02721-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-02774-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-03591-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-03558-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-02782-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-02910-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-02778-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-03555-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-03193-CS, 42 in 7:13-cv-02645-CS, 50 in 7:13-cv-02517-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-03563-CS, 32 in 7:13-cv-02911-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-02322-CS, 25 in 7:13-cv-02728-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-03671-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-03559-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-02816-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-03111-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-03016-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-02722-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-02817-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-03632-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-02580-CS, 40 in 7:13-cv-02323-CS, 48 in 7:13-cv-02320-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-03383-CS) MOTION for Rachal Garcia Rojas to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8566167. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., (21 in 7:13-cv-02779-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-02775-CS, 24 in 7:13-cv-02728-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-02580-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-02726-CS, 14 in 7:13-cv-03195-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-02780-CS, 49 in 7:13-cv-02517-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-02725-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-02724-CS, 48 in 7:13-cv-02721-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-02932-CS, 33 in 7:13-cv-03016-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-02577-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-03560-CS, 17 in 7:13-cv-03559-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-03558-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-00773-CS, 19 in 7:13-cv-01748-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-03561-CS, 8 in 7:13-cv-03556-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-02777-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-03194-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-03590-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-02832-CS, 28 in 7:13-cv-02782-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-02910-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-03193-CS, 39 in 7:13-cv-02323-CS, 9 in 7:13-cv-03564-CS, 111 in 7:13-cv-02321-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-02722-CS, 16 in 7:13-cv-03632-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-03563-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-03672-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-03178-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-02817-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-03555-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-03557-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-02781-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-02908-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-02776-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-03382-CS, 41 in 7:13-cv-02645-CS, 27 in 7:13-cv-02778-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-03562-CS, 30 in 7:13-cv-02723-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-03670-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-02818-CS, 12 in 7:13-cv-03554-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-03633-CS, 15 in 7:13-cv-03192-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-03671-CS, 34 in 7:13-cv-02774-CS, 11 in 7:13-cv-03383-CS, 21 in 7:13-cv-01168-CS, 35 in 7:13-cv-02943-CS, 7 in 7:13-cv-03591-CS, 31 in 7:13-cv-02911-CS, 18 in 7:13-cv-03592-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-02815-CS, 23 in 7:13-cv-02816-CS, 36 in 7:13-cv-02353-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-02322-CS, 47 in 7:13-cv-02320-CS, 38 in 7:13-cv-02727-CS, 29 in 7:13-cv-02831-CS, 22 in 7:13-cv-02909-CS, 13 in 7:13-cv-03111-CS) MOTION for Steve Faries to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8565868. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee not paid. Each Motion for Pro Hac Vice must reference the appropriate case number and caption for which it is being filed. Every additional Motion for Pro Hac Vice must also be paid for individually. Re-file Motion for Pro Hac Vice in main MDL case and spread text to one single civil case for which you are seeking admission. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al.(bwa)
June 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 142 ORDER granting #140 Motion for LaToya J. Burrell to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
June 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER granting #135 Motion for Pamela A. Borgess to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
June 3, 2013 Filing 140 MOTION for LaToya J. Burrell to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8567532. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jonathan Miller, Julie Cantor Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-01168-CS(Burrell, Latoya)
June 3, 2013 Filing 139 MOTION for Richard J. Arsenault to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8567462. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Jonathan Miller, Julie Cantor Miller. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-01168-CS(Arsenault, Richard)
June 3, 2013 Filing 138 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Rachal Garcia Rojas to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8566167. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brandy N. Scott, Tenisha Jennings, Laurie Nordman. Return Date set for 6/3/2013 at 11:15 AM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al.(Rojas, Rachal) Modified on 6/4/2013 (bwa).
June 3, 2013 Filing 137 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Steve Faries to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8565868. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brandy N. Scott, Tenisha Jennings, Laurie Nordman. Return Date set for 6/3/2013 at 10:55 AM. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al.(Faries, Steve) Modified on 6/4/2013 (bwa).
June 3, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #140 MOTION for LaToya J. Burrell to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8567532. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
June 3, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #135 MOTION for Pamela A. Borgess to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8563523. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER granting #134 Motion for Dianne M. Nast to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 31, 2013 Filing 135 MOTION for Pamela A. Borgess to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8563523. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brandie Peets, Kevin Peets. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-02728-CS(Borgess, Pamela)
May 31, 2013 Filing 134 FIRST MOTION for Dianne M. Nast to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8560785. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Brittany Agerton, Danielle Dominie, Amber Goss, Robert Goss, Sheena Montano-Padilla, Tricia Prendergast, Benjamin Shipp, Brandy Shipp, Nathan Smith, Olivia Smith, Corina Weimann. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit PA Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Exhibit NJ Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order for Admission Pro Hac Vice)(Nast, Dianne)
May 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 133 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03672(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/29/2012) (sjo)
May 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 132 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03670(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/29/2012) (sjo)
May 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 131 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03671(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER granting #127 Motion for Michael Kenneth Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 31, 2013 Filing 129 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-5) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California and Georgia, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/31/2013) (sjo)
May 31, 2013 Filing 128 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF MDL ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL LIFTING STAY OF CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER... that the stay of the Panel's conditional transfer order designated as CTO-3, filed on 5/09/2013, is LIFTED and the action is transferred to the United States District Court - Northern District of Ohio for the coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings under 28 U.S.C. 1407 being conducted by the Honorable Cathy Seibel. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/30/2013) (sjo)
May 31, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #134 FIRST MOTION for Dianne M. Nast to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8560785. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 31, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #127 MOTION for Michael Kenneth Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8559016. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 30, 2013 Filing 127 MOTION for Michael Kenneth Johnson to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8559016. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Mayra Castillo, Miriam Cruz, Suannet Velazquez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Johnson, Michael)
May 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 126 ORDER granting #123 Motion for Gregory Steven Spizer to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy) Modified on 5/31/2013 (fk).
May 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 125 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03633(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 124 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03632(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 29, 2013 Filing 123 FIRST MOTION for Gregory Steven Spizer to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8553024. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Mayra Castillo, Suannet Velazquez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Spizer, Gregory)
May 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 122 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03592(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 121 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03591(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 120 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03590(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 29, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #123 FIRST MOTION for Gregory Steven Spizer to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8553024. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 119 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR ATTORNEY BEVERLY STORM TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL. ENDORSEMENT: Application Granted. The Clerk shall terminate Doc. 43. So Ordered. Attorney Beverly R. Storm terminated. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/25/2013) (lnl)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 118 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03564(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 117 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03563(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 116 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03562(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 115 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03561(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 114 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03560(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 113 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03559(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 112 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03558(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 111 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03557(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 110 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03556(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 109 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03555(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/29/2012) (sjo)
May 28, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 108 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03554(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 3/29/2012) (sjo)
May 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 107 ORDER granting #106 Motion for Andrew L. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 24, 2013 Filing 106 AMENDED MOTION for Andrew L. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SCIL Certificate of Good Standing - Andrew L. Goldman, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Goldman, Andrew)
May 24, 2013 Filing 105 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-4) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Illinois, Kansas, Kentucky, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Texas, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/24/2013) (sjo)
May 24, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #106 AMENDED MOTION for Andrew L. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 22, 2013 Filing 104 Letter addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos, dated 5/21/2013, re: Counsel for the organizing Plaintiffs writes to submit a proposed Order reflecting the Court's appointment of lead and liaison counsel, and confirming the timetable and guidelines for the submission to the Court of a proposed committee leadership structure. Document filed by Brittany Agerton, Nicole Almeida, James Ary, Summer Ary, Denecia Banks, Stephanie Denise Barnett, Justin Baugh, Kelli Baugh, Angela Benson, Mayra Castillo, Shelley Chow, Kalaki Clarke, Kati-An Cook, Kevin Crawford, Miriam Cruz, Kelly L. Daniel, Lewis B. Daniel, Danielle Dominie, Kristie B. Donovan, Jonathan Doyle, Jr, Brandon Dunn, Rebecca Foret, Amber Goss, Robert Goss, Peggy Green, Tiffany Gregg, Cassie Halton, Susan Harp, Desaree Johnson, Brooklyn G. Jones, Melissa Jones, Margarita S. Krncevic, Raymond Krncevic, Gina Lafata, Leah Laskan, Adam McLaughlin, Kymbra M. McLaughlin, Cantor Julie Miller, Jonathan Miller, Sheena Montano-Padilla, Sylvia Montes, Shaniqua E. Murphy, Brandie Peets, Kevin Peets, Tricia Prendergast, Melissa Price, Evelyn Ramirez, Michaela Ramsey, Shaquayla Reynolds, Toyana Robinson, Priscilla Sammons, Marina Schoeberl, Benjamin Shipp, Brandy Shipp, Nathan Smith, Olivia Smith, Brandon Sweet, Kara Sweet, Ysabel Torres, Suannet Velazquez, Jennifer Vezina, Ghiselle Watson, Minyonna P. Watson, Corina Weimann, Jamie Lynn Wells, Melody Williams, Ronail Williams, Jennifer S. Wilson, Tiffany M Yarborough. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (lnl)
May 22, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER NO. 4: The Court has received applications for Plaintiffs' Co-Lead and Liaison Counsel from Diogenes P. Kekatos. (See Doc. 65 Ex. A.) Having carefully reviewed all of the submissions, upon open discussion of the applications during this Court's initial case management conference of May 17, 2013, and there being no opposition from counsel for any known Plaintiff, the Court hereby appoints the following as Plaintiffs' Co-Lead and Liaison Counsel: Fred Thompson III Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel Matthew J. McCauley Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel James R. Ronca Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel Diogenes P. Kekatos Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel Plaintiffs' Co-Lead and Liaison Counsel shall, by June 17, 2013, submit their proposal for the Court's appointment of a Plaintiffs' Steering Committee, and the proposed composition thereof. In that proposal, Plaintiffs' Co-Lead and Liaison Counsel shall advise the Court whether the proposed nominees for appointment to such committee reflect a consensus of the attorneys representing all known Plaintiffs in or anticipated to be consolidated with this multidistrict litigation ("MDL") or, if they do not, shall provide the Court with (i) a list of all those attorneys who seek appointment to such committee, (ii) the attorneys' credentials, and (iii) a proposed procedure for the Court's selection of committee members. Should Plaintiffs' Co-Lead and Liaison Counsel seek constitution of a formal Plaintiffs' Executive Committee, Counsel should submit a similar proposal, additionally setting forth the reasons as to why a formal Executive Committee would be required, and what its responsibilities and duties would be beyond those of Plaintiffs' Co-Lead Counsel and Plaintiffs' Steering Committee. Plaintiffs' Co-Lead and Liaison Counsel shall also submit a proposed structure applicable to Plaintiffs' Co-Lead and Liaison Counsel, Plaintiffs' Steering Committee, and if sought Plaintiffs' Executive Committee, for dividing the responsibilities and tasks necessary to the advancement of this MDL that will avoid unnecessary duplication of work and overstaffing. The proposed structure shall also include the following: (i) guidelines for billable time reporting, including required time increments and associated narrative descriptions; (ii) guidelines for and limitations on Common Benefit expenses, such as travel, photocopies, phone/fax/overnight delivery expenses, electronic legal research costs, expert witnesses, and court reporters for depositions; and (iii) guidelines for the staffing of case-specific tasks, such as depositions, conference calls, and Court conferences, including proposed limitations on the number of attorneys preparing for and present at such tasks. Plaintiffs' Co-Lead and Liaison Counsel shall also submit proposals as to how to they propose to maintain and submit billing records, by task as well as by attorney, to assist the Court in its review. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/22/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (lnl)
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 102 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03382(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 101 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03383(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 17, 2013 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Cathy Seibel: Initial Conference held on 5/17/2013. Counsel to submit a proposal regarding committees in advance of next conference. A status conference is scheduled for July 2, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. See transcript. (Status Conference set for 7/2/2013 at 09:30 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel) (Court Reporter Sue Ghorayeb) Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (lnl)
May 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER NO. 3: Any order entered into, or decision rendered, in this multidistrict litigation ("MDL") that relates to all actions shall apply to all actions that are later consolidated in the MDL, unless counsel in the later-consolidated action show good cause why it should not. This applies to both my orders and decisions, and, with her consent, those of Magistrate Judge Lisa Smith. The next status conference in this matter is scheduled for July 2, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. By the close of business on June 28, 2013, Plaintiffs' lead counsel (whom I anticipate appointing well in advance) and counsel for Defendant shall send a joint letter to the Court with a status update and a proposed agenda for the July 2, 2013 conference. SO ORDERED. (Status Conference set for 7/2/2013 at 09:30 AM before Judge Cathy Seibel) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/17/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (lnl)
May 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 99 ORDER granting #98 Motion for David Cates to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 17, 2013 Filing 98 MOTION for David Cates to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8521073. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Rebecca Foret. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Cates, David)
May 17, 2013 Filing 97 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL (CTO-3) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Louisiana,Ohio, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/17/2013) (sjo)
May 17, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #98 MOTION for David Cates to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8521073. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 16, 2013 Filing 96 Letter addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from James R. Ronca, dated 5/16/2013, re: Counsel writes: Attached please find the Certificate of Good Standing from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania for James R. Ronca, Esquire. This certificate was requested by the Court in order number 2. It was received this morning and supplements our letter to the Court dated May 8, 2013 regarding proposed co-lead counsel. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (lnl)
May 16, 2013 Filing 95 Letter addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Matthew J. McCauley, Fred Thompson, III, James R. Ronca, Diogenes P. Kekatos; dated 5/16/2013, re: Counsel writes on behalf of the organizing plaintiffs, writes this letter to respond to and give context to the proposed schedule set out in Defendant's submission of May l0, 2013 (D.E. 78). There are several statements therein to which we believe the record should be made more reflective of the actual state of the litigation, and we believe that certain of Defendant's proposed deadlines are unrealistic. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (lnl)
May 16, 2013 Filing 94 Letter addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Mark B. Hutton, dated 5/16/2013, re: Counsel writes: Please forgive the fact that this letter is not a formal filing. We have no case number yet against which to file, given that we filed our first case in this litigation somewhat later than have other firms, having learned long ago the importance of screening cases very carefully before filing. Today we received notice of CT0-4, which should put our first case before this Court very shortly. That said, through this letter we respectfully seek to comment on the recent submissions from the "organizing plaintiffs" regarding the need for and/or formation of the PSC, in the hopes that you will receive and accept our comments prior to the scheduled conference this Friday. Document filed by Mark B. Hutton. (lnl)
May 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER: The above-captioned case was filed in this District, and is hereby ORDERED to be consolidated with In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, 13-MD-2434, for pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff resides in Utah and had her IUD inserted at a medical office in that state. Accordingly, I will treat the case as if it had been transferred to the Multidistrict Litigation from the United States District Court in Utah. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to docket this Order in 13-CV-3178 and 13-MD-2434. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/16/2013) (lnl)
May 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER granting #89 Motion for Fred Thompson, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER granting #88 Motion for Carmen S. Scott to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER granting #87 Motion for James R. Ronca to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy) Modified on 5/31/2013 (fk).
May 16, 2013 Filing 89 MOTION for Fred Thompson, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8518357. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kelli Baugh. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al.(Thompson, Fred)
May 16, 2013 Filing 88 MOTION for Carmen S. Scott to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8518217. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Kelli Baugh. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al.(Scott, Carmen)
May 16, 2013 Filing 87 AMENDED MOTION for James R. Ronca to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Mayra Castillo, Suannet Velazquez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificates of Good Standing)(Ronca, James)
May 16, 2013 Filing 86 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for James R. Ronca to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8515993. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Mayra Castillo, Suannet Velazquez. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Certificates of Good Standing)(Ronca, James) Modified on 5/16/2013 (bcu).
May 16, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #87 AMENDED MOTION for James R. Ronca to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 16, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #86 MOTION for James R. Ronca to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8515993. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the State Court of Pennsylvania. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bcu)
May 16, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #88 MOTION for Carmen S. Scott to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8518217. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
May 16, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #89 MOTION for Fred Thompson, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8518357. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (wb)
May 15, 2013 Filing 85 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by William Patrick Harrington on behalf of Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Harrington, William)
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 84 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03192(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 83 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03194(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 82 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03193(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 81 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03195(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 13, 2013 Filing 80 DEFENDANT BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.'S PRELIMINARY POSITION STATEMENT. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (lnl)
May 13, 2013 Filing 79 Letter addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 5/10/2013, re: Lead Counsel for Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. writes: Pursuant to Order No. 1, Bayer Health Care Pharmaceuticals Inc. submits its position on the direct filing in the Southern District of New York of related cases that emanate from other districts and that would properly be included in this MDL. Bayer acknowledges that waiving its venue objections to direct filing in the MDL would promote judicial efficiency and eliminate delays. While Bayer wishes to cooperate, it also seeks to avoid future confusion over choice-of-law questions and ensure that it preserves its venue objections to cases that are not properly within this MDL. As this Court's Order No. 1 recognizes, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's Transfer Order limited the scope of this MDL to cases "alleging migration or perforation injuries caused by [Mirena]." For this reason, Bayer proposes that the Court establish a procedure for the efficient transfer of cases that do not allege perforation or migration injuries out of MDL 2434 to the proper venue. The concern that cases outside the scope of the MDL will be filed is not theoretical as Bayer has already had to file oppositions to conditional MDL transfer orders of cases that do not allege perforation or migration. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharamaceuticals, Inc. (lnl)
May 13, 2013 Filing 78 Letter addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Shayna S. Cook, dated 5/10/2013, re: Lead Counsel for Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. writes: Pursuant to Order No. 1, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Bayer") submits (l) an agreed proposed agenda for the Initial Conference and (2) Bayer's proposed schedule for pretrial activities in this MDL. The parties have reached agreement on a proposed agenda, which is included as Attachment A to this letter. Bayer's proposed schedule is set forth below. Counsel for Plaintiffs has not provided Bayer with Plaintiffs' proposed schedule. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharamaceuticals, Inc. (lnl)
May 13, 2013 Filing 77 Letter addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Fred Thompson, III, James R. Ronca, Diogenes P. Kekatos, Matthew McCauley dated 5/10/2013 re: Counsel writes: Please find attached Plaintiff's Position Statement and a spreadsheet listing all Related Cases pursuant to Order No. 1. By copy of this letter, we are copying counsel for Defendant with same. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (Per Chambers' Inst. - docket in all cases) (lnl)
May 13, 2013 Filing 76 Letter addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Alyson Oliver, dated 5/10/2013, re: Counsel writes: This letter is drafted in an effort to comply with the Court's Case Management Order 1, as well as to ensure that - in light of the submissions made thus far by 'organizing plaintiffs' and the Court's Case Management Order 2 - the undersigned is heard on issues relative to appointment of lead, liaison and Plaintiffs' Steering Committee (hereinafter 'PSC'). Ordinarily, I would not have written individually and in advance of our hearing on the issue and desirability of a PSC (as well as its size, composition and scope) in as much as the Order indicates that same will be taken up at our hearing. However, the request by 'organizing plaintiffs' for appointments prior to the hearing, and the subsequent dialogue regarding the potential PSC, has prompted the submission of this letter at this time. Summarily, while the undersigned did not propose to submit three alternative selections for lead and liaison counsel, it appears that the means the Court described for this process apparently may not come to fruition, and I am hopeful not to lose the opportunity to address this Honorable Court on these issues at hearing or otherwise. Respectfully, I realize that this is an imperfect response to the Court's directives thus far (via the Case Management Orders), but in light of the developments since their entry, I am hopeful it can be considered nonetheless. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (lnl)
May 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER: The Almeida and Vezina cases above were filed in this District and consolidated with In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, 13-MD-2434 for pretrial proceedings. The Shea case above was filed in this District, and is hereby ORDERED to be consolidated with In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, 13-MD-2434 for pretrial proceedings. Plaintiff in Almeida resides in Massachusetts; Plaintiff in Vezina resides in Vermont; and Plaintiff in Shea resides in Nevada. Accordingly, I will treat those cases as if they had been transferred to the Multidistrict Litigation from the United States District Court in their respective home states. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to docket this Order in all three of the above-captioned cases, as well as in 13-MD-2434. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/9/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-02577-CS, 7:13-cv-02580-CS (lnl)
May 9, 2013 Filing 74 Letter addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Matthew McCauley, James R. Ronca, Fred Thompson, Diogenes P. Kakatos, dated 5/8/2013; re: The proposed Co-Lead Counsel and Liaison Counsel submits this letter to provide the information requested in the Court's Case Management Order No. 2. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (lnl)
May 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER granting #69 Motion for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER granting #68 Motion for Gerard B. Schneller to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 9, 2013 Filing 71 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christopher Matthew Van de Kieft on behalf of Jennifer S. Wilson, Ysabel Torres, Minyonna P. Watson Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-02908-CS, 7:13-cv-02909-CS, 7:13-cv-02932-CS(Van de Kieft, Christopher)
May 9, 2013 Filing 70 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-2) transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Minnestoa, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 5/9/2013) (sjo)
May 9, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #69 MOTION for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8493202. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 9, 2013 Pro Hac Vice Fee Payment: for #68 MOTION for Gerard B. Schneller to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8494065.(Schneller, Gerard)
May 9, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #68 MOTION for Gerard B. Schneller to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 8, 2013 Filing 69 MOTION for Eric D. Holland to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8493202. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Rebecca Foret. (Attachments: #1 Certificates of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Holland, Eric)
May 8, 2013 Filing 68 MOTION for Gerard B. Schneller to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Rebecca Foret. (Attachments: #1 Certificates of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Schneller, Gerard)
May 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 66 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-03016(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 3, 2013 Filing 67 Letter addressed to Judge Cathy Seibel from Diogenes P. Kekatos, dated 4/30/2013, re: Counsel for the plaintiffs writes: In accordance with the Court's Order No. 1, we have reached out to all known Plaintiffs' counsel and invited them into dialogue relating to organizational matters, in order to comply with the Court's requirement of providing certain information, to facilitate meet-and-confer discussions with Defendants' counsel, and to submit proposals for leadership and liaison positions. We are pleased to advise the Court that we have had cordial and collegial meetings among our fellow Plaintiffs' attorneys, having called face-to-face meetings in two locations,having created a list-serve, and having had many group telephone calls, with respect to which all known interested persons have been included in our discussions. In addition, we are pleased to report that we have had a series of meet-and-confers with Defendants' counsel that have been productive in meeting the Court's directive. At the same time, however, we are writing the Court because many of the "nuts-and bolts" issues that that the Plaintiffs' side needs to take up with Defendants-relating to agreements on discovery and pre-trial issues, as well as administrative issues - can be undertaken on a binding basis only after the Court appoints a leadership group and confers upon it the authority to act. In this respect, in order that these matters not lie dormant until the May 17th status conference, we are writing to request that the Court consider reviewing the proposed leadership that we have achieved by our own efforts. If it is satisfactory to the Court, we ask that it consider making an order of appointment immediately so as to allow us to use the intervening two weeks to negotiate substantively with Defendants on the issues that the Court has directed.. Document filed by Jennifer S. Wilson, Kati-An Cook, Kalaki Clarke, Tiffany Gregg, Leah Laskan, Sylvia Montes, Evelyn Ramirez, Toyana Robinson, Amber Goss, Robert Goss, Stephanie Denise Barnett, Kevin Crawford, Brandon Sweet, Kara Sweet, Cassie Halton, Denecia Banks, Brandon Dunn, Tiffany M Yarborough, Ysabel Torres, Minyonna P. Watson, James Ary, Summer Ary, Angela Benson, Jonathan Doyle, Jr, Shaquayla Reynolds, CARRIE RICHARDS OSBORNE, EDWARD JASON OSBORNE, Shelley Chow, Gina Lafata, Michaela Ramsey, Corina Weimann, Benjamin Shipp, Jennifer Vezina, Justin Baugh, Kelli Baugh, Mayra Castillo, Rebecca Foret, Adam McLaughlin, Kymbra M. McLaughlin, Kristie B. Donovan, Kelly L. Daniel, Lewis B. Daniel, Jonathan Miller, Julie Cantor Miller, Miriam Cruz, James T Wells, Jamie Lynn Wells, Nathan Smith, Olivia Smith, Melody Williams, Ronail Williams, Suannet Velazquez, Brittany Agerton, Desaree Johnson, Brandie Peets, Kevin Peets, Melissa Price, Nicole Almeida, Danielle Dominie, Jonathan Doyle, Jr, Susan Harp, Cantor Julie Miller, Sheena Montano-Padilla, Shaniqua E. Murphy, Brandie Peets, Kevin Peets, Tricia Prendergast, Brandy Shipp, Ghiselle Watson. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (lnl)
May 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER NO. 2: The Court has received a letter dated April 30, 2013 from Diogenes P. Kekatos of Seeger Weiss LLP (attached hereto as "Exhibit A"), written "on behalf of the organizing Plaintiffs," requesting that the Court, in advance of the May 17, 2013 conference, appoint Mr. Kekatos as Liaison Counsel, and appoint the following attorneys as Co-Lead Counsel: Fred Thompson of Motley Rice LLC, James R. Ronca of Anapol Schwartz, and Matthew McCauley of Parker Waichman LLP. Mr. Kekatos requests immediate appointment "so as to allow us to use the intervening two weeks to negotiate substantively with Defendants on the issues that the Court has directed." The Court will consider Mr. Kekatos's proposal upon receipt of the following additional information: * Whether the "organizing Plaintiffs" include all known Plaintiffs (or their counsel), and if not, on behalf of which of the Plaintiffs Mr. Kekatos's proposal is presented, and whether other Plaintiffs (or their counsel) have objected to this proposal or wish to make alternative proposals; * If the proposal does not represent a consensus of all Plaintiffs' counsel, an explanation as to why three recommendations for each position were not made, (see Order No. 1 (Doc. 8), VII.D); * An explanation as to why three Co-Lead Counsels are proposed, what the proposed division of responsibility and authority among the three would be, why a Plaintiffs' Steering Committee and Plaintiffs' Executive Committee would also be necessary, and what their roles would be; * Certificates of good standing from the courts where the proposed Liaison and Co-Lead Counsels are admitted to practice, (see Order No. 1, VII.D); and * A description of the proposed compensation arrangements as to Liaison and Co-Lead Counsels, and the extent to which remaining Plaintiffs' counsel have concurred in or consented to such arrangements. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/3/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. The Clerk's Office Has Mailed Copies. (lnl)
May 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER: The above-captioned case is hereby transferred to In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, 13-MD-2434, also assigned to me, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/3/2013) (Docketed in 13-cv-773(CS)) The Clerk's Office Has Mailed Copies. (lnl)
May 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 63 ORDER granting #61 Motion for Jennifer L. Greenblatt to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER granting #59 Motion for Shayna S. Cook to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 3, 2013 Filing 61 AMENDED MOTION for Jennifer L. Greenblatt to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit IL Bar Certificate of Good Standing - Jennifer L. Greenblatt, #2 Exhibit SC TX Certificate of Good Standing - Jennifer L. Greenblatt, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Greenblatt, Jennifer)
May 3, 2013 Filing 60 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Jennifer L. Greenblatt to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8477746. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit IL Bar Certificate of Good Standing - Jennifer L. Greenblatt, #2 Exhibit SC TX Certificate of Good Standing - Jennifer L. Greenblatt, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Greenblatt, Jennifer) Modified on 5/3/2013 (bwa).
May 3, 2013 Filing 59 AMENDED MOTION for Shayna S. Cook to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8477681. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit IL Bar Certificate of Good Standing - Shayna S. Cook, #2 Exhibit SC TX Certificate of Good Standing - Shayna S. Cook, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Cook, Shayna)
May 3, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #59 AMENDED MOTION for Shayna S. Cook to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8477681. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bwa)
May 3, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #60 MOTION for Jennifer L. Greenblatt to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8477746. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificates of Good Standing must be issued from the State Court. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bwa)
May 3, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #61 AMENDED MOTION for Jennifer L. Greenblatt to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 2, 2013 Filing 58 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Diogenes P. Kekatos on behalf of Ysabel Torres, Minyonna P. Watson, Jennifer S. Wilson Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS, 7:13-cv-02908-CS, 7:13-cv-02909-CS, 7:13-cv-02932-CS(Kekatos, Diogenes)
May 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER granting #52 Motion for Brian P. O'Donoghue to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER granting #51 Motion for Tarek Ismail to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER granting #50 Motion for Andrew L. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
May 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 54 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02943(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 53 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02932(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 1, 2013 Filing 52 MOTION for Brian P. O'Donoghue to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8470627. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SCIL Certificate of Good Standing - Brian P. O'Donoghue, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(O'Donoghue, Brian)
May 1, 2013 Filing 51 MOTION for Tarek Ismail to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8470566. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SCIL Certificate of Good Standing - Tarek Ismail, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Ismail, Tarek)
May 1, 2013 Filing 50 MOTION for Andrew L. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8470524. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharamaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit SCIL Certificate of Good Standing - Andrew L. Goldman, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Goldman, Andrew)
May 1, 2013 Filing 49 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Shayna S. Cook to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8470179. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit IL Bar Certificate of Good Standing - Shayna S. Cook, #2 Errata TX Bar Certificate of Good Standing - Shayna S. Cook, #3 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Cook, Shayna) Modified on 5/1/2013 (bcu).
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 48 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02908(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 47 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02909(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 46 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02910(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 45 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02911(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
May 1, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #51 MOTION for Tarek Ismail to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8470566. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 1, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. #49 MOTION for Shayna S. Cook to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8470179. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the State Court of Texas. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. (bcu)
May 1, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #50 MOTION for Andrew L. Goldman to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8470524. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
May 1, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #52 MOTION for Brian P. O'Donoghue to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8470627. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
April 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 44 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02832(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 43 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02831(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 42 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02816(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02815(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02817(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02818(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02782(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 37 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02781(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 36 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02780(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 35 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02779(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 34 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02778(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02777(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02776(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02775(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 30 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02774(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02728(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02727(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02726(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order.Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02725(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02724(CS), 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02723(CS),7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02722(CS),7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 24, 2013 Filing 22 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF MDL ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL CORRECTING CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER... that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in Southern Ohio, bearing an incorrect Southern District of Ohio civil action number 1:13-00156. The correct Southern District of Ohio civil action number for this action is 3:13-00078 be, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Cathy Seibel, for coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/24/2013) (sjo)
April 24, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-02721(CS)and 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 24, 2013 Filing 20 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL(CTO-1)transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of California, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and South Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/24/2013) (sjo)
April 23, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order.Filed In Associated Cases:7:13-cv-02645(CS)and 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Motion for Marie S. Woodbury to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
April 19, 2013 Filing 17 MOTION for Marie S. Woodbury to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8434787. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Woodbury, Marie)
April 19, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #17 MOTION for Marie S. Woodbury to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8434787. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #12 Motion for John R. Climaco to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Dawn M. Chmielewski to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Margaret M. Metzinger to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
April 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Elmore James Shepherd, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Cathy Seibel)(Text Only Order) (Seibel, Cathy)
April 18, 2013 Filing 12 MOTION for John R. Climaco to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8431586. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stephanie Denise Barnett, Kevin Crawford, Susan Harp, Desaree Johnson, Brandon Sweet, Kara Sweet, Melody Williams, Ronail Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Climaco, John)
April 18, 2013 Filing 11 MOTION for Dawn M. Chmielewski to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8431547. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stephanie Denise Barnett, Kevin Crawford, Susan Harp, Desaree Johnson, Brandon Sweet, Kara Sweet, Melody Williams, Ronail Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Chmielewski, Dawn)
April 18, 2013 Filing 10 MOTION for Margaret M. Metzinger to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8431388. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Stephanie Denise Barnett, Kevin Crawford, Susan Harp, Desaree Johnson, Brandon Sweet, Kara Sweet, Melody Williams, Ronail Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Metzinger, Margaret)
April 18, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #10 MOTION for Margaret M. Metzinger to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8431388. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #11 MOTION for Dawn M. Chmielewski to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8431547. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff., #12 MOTION for John R. Climaco to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8431586. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
April 17, 2013 Filing 9 MOTION for Elmore James Shepherd, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc.,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing for E James Shepherd, #2 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order for Admission for Admission Pro Hac Vice for E James Shepherd)(Shepherd, Elmore)
April 17, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. #9 MOTION for Elmore James Shepherd, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (bcu)
April 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER NO. 1: It appearing that the civil actions listed on Schedule A, attached hereto -- which were transferred to this Court by the April 8, 2013 Order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML"), (Doc. 1; MDL Doc. 119), or consolidated with the multidistrict litigation ("MDL") by my April 10, 2013 Order, (Doc. 7) -- merit special attention as complex litigation, it is hereby ORDERED that: The provisions of this Order shall govern the practice and procedure in those actions: (1) transferred to this Court by the JPML pursuant to its April 8, 2013 Order; (2) all related actions against Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and/or Bayer Corporation ("Bayer") alleging migration or perforation injuries caused by the Mirena intrauterine contraceptive system that were filed in the Southern District of New York and have previously been or will be transferred to MDL-2434; and (3) any "tag-along" actions later filed in, removed to, or transferred to this Court. The Clerk will send a copy of this Order to counsel for any plaintiffs or newly named defendants in any case newly filed or transferred to this Court. This Order vacates any case management or scheduling order issued by a federal court prior to the transfer of a case to MDL-2434. Moreover, all pending motions and discovery requests in the transferor courts are denied without prejudice, and will be adjudicated under procedures set forth in this Order and subsequent orders issued by this Court. SO ORDERED. (Initial Conference set for 5/17/2013 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 621, 300 Quarropas Street, White Plains, NY 10601 before Judge Cathy Seibel) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/12/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434-CS et al. (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) The Clerk's Office Has Mailed Copies to Mark Lanier (lnl)
April 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER: The above-captioned cases were assigned to me as related to Murphy v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 13-CV-773 (CS). Pursuant to the April 8, 2013 Order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Murphy along with a number of other cases alleging injuries allegedly caused by the Mirena intrauterine contraceptive system has been transferred to In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, 13-MD-2434, also assigned to me, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. It appearing that the above-captioned cases likewise belong in that Multidistrict Litigation, it is hereby ORDERED that they too are transferred to 13-MD-2434 for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to docket this Order in both of the above captioned cases. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 4/10/2013) (fk)
April 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-02353(CS) and 7:13-md-02434(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434(CS) and 7:13-cv-02323(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02434(CS)and 7:13-cv-02322(CS). (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
April 8, 2013 Filing 1 CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF CONDITIONAL MDL TRANSFER IN ORDER FROM THE MDL PANEL... transferring this action from the United States District Court - that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions listed on the attached schedule A and pending in the District of Arkansas, California, Georgia, Kentucky, Ohio and South Carolina, and the same hereby are, transferred to the Southern District of New York, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Judge Cathy Seibel, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with the actions pending in that district and listed on Schedule A. (Signed by MDL Panel on 4/8/2013) (sjo)
April 8, 2013 Magistrate Judge Lisa M. Smith is so designated. (sjo)
April 8, 2013 Case Designated ECF. (sjo)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Claudia Andrade
Represented By: C. Brooks Cutter
Represented By: Yvonne M. Flaherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Thompson
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawntae Rollings
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ioana F Olteanu
Represented By: Bryan August Pfleeger
Represented By: Waldon Michael Hingle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jody Kennedy
Represented By: Randi Alyson Kassan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexis Rinas
Represented By: Mike J. Miller
Represented By: Todd Michael Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diane Thomas
Represented By: Megan England
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Krystelyn Morishita
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Drew R Ferrandini
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christin H. Downs
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine Lorenz
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trinda Morrison
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Spear
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jencenta Fomeche
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leslie Strader
Represented By: David Todd Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Steele
Represented By: Valentina Wheeler
Represented By: Kathy A. Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mitch G. Allen
Represented By: Mitchell G Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamika Dotson
Represented By: Patricia Ann Traina
Represented By: Theresa A. Beckler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ms Suannet Velazquez
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Frank J. Federico, Jr.
Represented By: Gregory S. Spizer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marissa Bonita Lee
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martha E Cota
Represented By: Sarah J Showard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chenine Sandoval
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: July Cortez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Dominie
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Frederick S Longer
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Represented By: Laurence S. Berman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Roeling
Represented By: Nancy A. Mismash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annesley DeGaris
Represented By: Annesley Hodges DeGaris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jaquayla Kelly
Represented By: David M. Cuppage
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Represented By: Margaret M. Metzinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keri Karnopp
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila Estrada
Represented By: Robert Eugene Shuttlesworth
Represented By: Lawrence L. Jones, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sara Klabunde
Represented By: Yvonne M. Flaherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alphaann Lobato
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Bailey
Represented By: Steven Robert Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Santoro
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley MacDonald
Represented By: Daniel Julian McGlynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Roach
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenisha Cannon
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandi Garrity
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald L. Benthusen
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tawana Hill-Brooks
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toyana Robinson
Represented By: Heather A Foster
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Wendy West Feinstein
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Fabrice Vincent
Represented By: Wendy R. Fleishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheresa Bownds
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rheanne Martin
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joshua Stewart
Represented By: W. Roger Smith, III
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darlene A Peterson
Represented By: Brian Alan Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elina Lloyd
Represented By: Michael Ray Clinton
Represented By: Edward Frances Blizzard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Doyle, Jr.
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Guerriero
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Douglas Robert Plymale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LaShallah Bailey
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Giddens
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamaica R. Noland
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Gary L. Payne
Represented By: Jayne H. Conroy
Represented By: Paul J. Hanly, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alicia Barrera
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Casey Thurman
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: Randall S. Crompton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carina Perez
Represented By: Mark Lynn Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Ciantae Williams
Represented By: Panagiotis V Albanis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandie Duryea
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gina Beldon
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Young
Represented By: Brian Alan Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sara Falcon
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: June Davis
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nakita Williams
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sonja Zimmerman
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yvette Thames
Represented By: Douglas H. Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angelique Neptune
Represented By: Peter J. Towne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Young
Represented By: Maria S Diamond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Grande
Represented By: Amanda M Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Knipp
Represented By: Rolf T. Fiebiger
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leanndra Couvillion
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emily Fauntleroy
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chardey Johnson
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elda Rivera-Coca
Represented By: Peter J. Towne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol Scherrer
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irma Ivette Perez
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Meza
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lourdes Gonzalez
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Abernathy
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Judy Hamilton
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shakemeia Johnson
Represented By: Trent Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ericia Johnson
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rita Miller
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martina Tyler
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry Nelson
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mariah Kight
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shedella V. Jessee
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Summarell
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam McLaughlin
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Richard Daniel Meadow
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: W. Mark Lanier
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ms. Jessica Fountaine
Represented By: Paula S. Bliss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Penot
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natacha Dupervil
Represented By: Kevin P. O'Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joni Powell
Represented By: James E. Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Coville
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sofia Ramos-Cruz
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Campbell
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cristina Pena
Represented By: Anne M Tarvin
Represented By: Kirk J. Goza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeff Dangar
Represented By: Jonathan Palmer Sexton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latasha Morss
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jasmine Torres
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Dawn Eaton
Represented By: Thomas Philip Cartmell
Represented By: Luke F. Callahan
Represented By: Thomas Joseph Preuss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry Pittman
Represented By: Matthew J. Garver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Wright
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katrina Harris-Kemp
Represented By: Brian John Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Corley
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: George Druckenmiller
Represented By: Kevin J. Boissoneault
Represented By: Michael D. Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel Hermosillo
Represented By: James T Capretz
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: Mark S Thetford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laureen Green
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittnie Riley
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leandra Lovett
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer G Donoway
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristen Jones
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randi Williams
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janelle Hubert
Represented By: April Goodwin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candace Butler
Represented By: David Todd Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberlee Ross
Represented By: Douglas Robert Plymale
Represented By: James R. Dugan, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Elms
Represented By: Rolf T. Fiebiger
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal M. Smith
Represented By: Thomas David Hoyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Brown
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katrina Glass
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gabina Mendoza
Represented By: Benjamin Jared Meiselas
Represented By: Mark J. Geragos
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Johnson
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maitai Garcia
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Whittney Junker
Represented By: Ethan M. Manning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Childers
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Represented By: Allan Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robyn J Short
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelby Spain
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Bowersox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lotoya Vickers
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Breanna Welke
Represented By: Yvonne M. Flaherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Sunny
Represented By: Shannon Lukei
Represented By: Daniel Stewart Robinson
Represented By: Karen L Karavatos
Represented By: Mark P Robinson, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peggy Susanne Barrett
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Celeste Plucha
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica T Balogh
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joanna Trujillo
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sabrina Anderson
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deena D. Driscoll
Represented By: David W. Stewart
Represented By: Michael John Sobieray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melanie Shotzbarger
Represented By: Patrick S. Montoya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janell Egloff
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Raymond Charles Silverman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Felicia Duncan
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Represented By: Jane E Joseph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emily Hernandez
Represented By: Bobby Jewell Bell, Jr
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alicia Torres
Represented By: Jordan Lucas Chaikin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Solano
Represented By: Wendy R. Fleishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Whitney Suggs
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hilkka Griffith
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Britney Ellison
Represented By: Charles W Whetstone, Jr
Represented By: Cheryl F Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charlencia Waters
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Radack
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DeShawn McMillian
Represented By: Bryan August Pfleeger
Represented By: Waldon Michael Hingle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Benson
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Guerriero
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Douglas Robert Plymale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jasmin Ellis
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kellye R. Norris-Barghothi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Temple
Represented By: Susan E Hamm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emma Ellizabeth Reel
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leah Laskan
Represented By: Heather A Foster
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Fabrice Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hilda Murphree
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Munoz
Represented By: Don K Ledgard
Represented By: James T. Capretz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shanda Modlin
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Lentz
Represented By: Maria S Diamond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen L. Davis
Represented By: Blake A. Shuart
Represented By: Andrew W. Hutton
Represented By: Mark B. Hutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Thompson
Represented By: Kim Goodling
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Michael Patrick Doyle
Represented By: Kathleen Rose Kerner
Represented By: Elisha Nicole Hawk
Represented By: Jeffrey Lewis Raizner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Harmer
Represented By: Elizabeth C. Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nanette Sasser
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Moss
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yolanda Peterson
Represented By: Nancy A. Mismash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Telarra Johnson
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Curtiss Melder
Represented By: Corrie Johnson Yackulic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donniesha Allen
Represented By: Mitchell G Allen
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Staci Durbala
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Louise Davis
Represented By: Panagiotis V Albanis
Represented By: Jack Landskroner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kandie Shade
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kareem Saunders
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mindy Silvas
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Parrish
Represented By: C. Dorian Britt
Represented By: Mark A. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristina Marie Crisel
Represented By: Clinton L. Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ciara Parnell
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn La-Crockett
Represented By: John David Hurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherita Jackson
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Birdsong
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Solis
Represented By: DAVID FRANCIS MICELI
Represented By: JAYNE H CONROY
Represented By: TRENT B MIRACLE
Represented By: Paul J. Hanly, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel Dollins
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Korbe
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica M. Freret
Represented By: John B. Noble
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Spurlock
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Kohler
Represented By: William C. Forbes
Represented By: W. Jesse Forbes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jaime Weiler
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Bounds
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Spring Jarrell
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dawn Marie Covert
Represented By: Panagiotis V Albanis
Represented By: Michael Steven Goetz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CRYSTAL MILLER
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Thompson
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abigail Urban
Represented By: Larry D. Helvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica M. Matlock
Represented By: Jackqualyn R. Quinton
Represented By: Tony Wayne Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Taylor-riendeau
Represented By: Marc David Grossman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kara Seachord
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darci Henderson
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Petry
Represented By: Karen Leser Grenon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Baca
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandy Wiggins
Represented By: Amber Griffin Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Whittington
Represented By: Derek J Emge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Dunn
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: C. Dorian Britt
Represented By: Mark A. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie D. McLead
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gloria A Stroud
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Augustin Ruiz
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ivy Vincent
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenya Briggs
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katrina Witherspoon
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evanna Ferguson
Represented By: Randi Alyson Kassan
Represented By: Douglas H Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roberta Delloyd
Represented By: Richard Daniel Meadow
Represented By: Michael Akselrud
Represented By: W. Mark Lanier
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Represented By: Lee Adam Cirsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lavue Pearson
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Knous
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Symonne Jett
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol Erwin
Represented By: L. Leonard Lundy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Williams
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Lee Harris
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Stewart
Represented By: W. Roger Smith, III
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cecilia Gamez
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Petty
Represented By: Payton Dwight Hoover
Represented By: Clair Gilliland Campbell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Horton
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Pfeifer
Represented By: Terry A. White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Gooch
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheena Montano-Padilla
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Daniel Stewart Robinson
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Karen L Karavatos
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Mark P Robinson, Jr
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Represented By: Shannon Lukei
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yevonda Williams
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Roque
Represented By: Geoffrey T. Moore
Represented By: Geoffrey Thomas Moore
Represented By: Steven Robert Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ricci Jones
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vanessa Mercado
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Hamlett
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clarese Chevelle Weathers
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lindsey D. Stepp
Represented By: Tony Wayne Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalie Harrison
Represented By: Roy E. Barnes
Represented By: Walter Matthew Wilson
Represented By: John Raymond Bevis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carenia Williams
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lesley Renteria
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Sweet
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Represented By: Beverly R. Storm
Represented By: Margaret M. Metzinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shunta Lynn Hall
Represented By: Rene Fernandez Rocha
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassandra Block
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nadia Lopez
Represented By: Peter J. Towne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alanna Miles
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly L. Daniel
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: C. Dorian Britt
Represented By: Mark A. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lyndsey H Wilson
Represented By: Joel Lee DiLorenzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vincent Smith
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: Randall S. Crompton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aisha Boykin
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Boynton
Represented By: Bridget Elizabeth Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelly Chapman
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Philip Elson
Represented By: Delena Hurst
Represented By: Joshua Sanford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tara D Hicks
Represented By: Melissa Garcia Mosier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlena Alvarez
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra Harmon
Represented By: A. Layne Stackhouse
Represented By: Jasper D. Ward, IV
Represented By: Lawrence L. Jones, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shiva Krupa
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Mrgudich
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly A. Sharples
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Trent Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelley Chow
Represented By: Elizabeth Alexander
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: James E. Cecchi
Represented By: Wendy R. Fleishman
Represented By: Lindsey Handley Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiara Pettis
Represented By: Brent William Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lee Ann Jacoby
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doris Cummins
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Straughan
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meia Crow
Represented By: Robert A Mosier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taylor Erickson
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gail Lorraine
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Genelle Seward
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexandra Marin
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina King
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mercedes Jimenez
Represented By: Jeffrey T Gwynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Vanhook
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Travis Comtois
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Leis
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Rivera
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bonita Hernandez
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erika Patterson
Represented By: Mitchell G Allen
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alejandra Huerta
Represented By: Brian John Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keisha Roberson
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Boeske
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Capaldo
Represented By: Douglas Fredric Eaton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle J. Melnyk
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Peets
Represented By: Zachary J Murry
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Pamela A. Borgess
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: David W Zoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Delespin
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Jason W. Fernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary Furner
Represented By: John David Hurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Adams
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Melder
Represented By: Corrie Johnson Yackulic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Monroe
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Mattes
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaunte Davis
Represented By: C. Dorian Britt
Represented By: Mark A. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jionnis Lewis
Represented By: Nathan Craig Van Der Veer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Wood
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Giovanna A. Alvarez
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erlen Jimenez
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Biondo
Represented By: Nathan D. Sturycz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meghan Lance
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Foster
Represented By: Jack Austin Mattingly, Jr.
Represented By: Tanner Wade Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kassandra Gomez
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Wackler
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashlee A. Hamilton
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica S Rice
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Vezina
Represented By: David Bagley Rheingold
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Paul D. Rheingold
Represented By: Thomas Peter Giuffra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maya Wofford
Represented By: Robert Keith Jenner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Muire McKinley
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catherine Surber
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: Brian J. Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jaimee Varsalone
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacy Piper
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen K O'Brien
Represented By: Gregory N McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katie Rourk
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Demrovsky
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leah Wade
Represented By: Jackqualyn R. Quinton
Represented By: Mark S Thetford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Walton
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Thomas J Loucks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Koop
Represented By: Kirk J. Wolden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Gahr
Represented By: Rolf T. Fiebiger
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Vaughn Harris
Represented By: Clinton L. Kelly
Represented By: F. Dulin Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wendy Roberts
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tawanda S Ball
Represented By: Bobby Jewell Bell, Jr
Represented By: C Carter Clay
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sokha Thon
Represented By: Mitchell G Allen
Represented By: John T Kirkley, III
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Heffington
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Edwards
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lester Harmon
Represented By: A. Layne Stackhouse
Represented By: Jasper D. Ward, IV
Represented By: Lawrence L. Jones, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Devon Druckenmiller
Represented By: Kevin J. Boissoneault
Represented By: Michael D. Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kisha Bailey
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lakeisha R. McLeod
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christy Washington
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Hiza
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra Gideon
Represented By: Kristian Rasmussen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Currie
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Leigh Walsh
Represented By: Michael F. Jameson
Represented By: Panagioyis "Pete&quot Albanis
Represented By: Michael Steven Goetz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Delaughter
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan Smith
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie Aase
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebekah Brazil
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yasmen Featherstone
Represented By: Daniel K. Bryson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Wagner
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erica Henley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf T. Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ishani Dias
Represented By: Daniel Stewart Robinson
Represented By: Karen L Karavatos
Represented By: Mark P Robinson, Jr
Represented By: Shannon Lukei
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tatum Davignon
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Autumn Tincher
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ulises Baca Almanza
Represented By: Thomas C Cardaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Gilman
Represented By: Marc David Grossman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shannon Balthazor
Represented By: Laurel Lisa Simes
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: William A. Levin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angelina Medina
Represented By: Carla R. Minniefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Johnson
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Thomas J Loucks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latoya Redo
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vernetta Davis
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sara E. Bahat
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashton Anderson
Represented By: John H Robinson
Represented By: Katherine A Strike
Represented By: John H. Robinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pauline Bocalan
Represented By: Henry Nicholas Didier, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Burton
Represented By: L. Leonard Lundy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nell Dewey
Represented By: Blake A. Shuart
Represented By: Andrew W. Hutton
Represented By: Mark B. Hutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Estes
Represented By: Hadley Lundback Matarazzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miranda Roberson
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Falisha Robinson
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal Jackson
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Constance Edwards
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Margaret J. Ponce
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Trent Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelondia D Winston
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maryssa Starr Hux
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bethanie Kellione
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Gary L. Payne
Represented By: Jayne H. Conroy
Represented By: Paul J. Hanly, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kara Carter
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shannon Santiago
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathryn Cordell
Represented By: Sofia Bruera
Represented By: Michael Ray Clinton
Represented By: Edward Frances Blizzard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Misty Martin
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Athena Condich
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elise A Martins
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesus Lopez
Represented By: Bridget Elizabeth Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca L Mehrer
Represented By: Carmen Sessions Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kayla Villarreal
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hope Ingle
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Dean Howell
Represented By: Carmen Sessions Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terri Silva
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KeVonne Union
Represented By: Richard W. James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Denny
Represented By: Theora E Ohaneson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa Zubia
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Kinnard
Represented By: Brett A. Emison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany M Yarborough
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Eric Poulin
Represented By: Carmen Sessions Scott
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wendy Reagan
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: Brian J. Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carla M Tellis
Represented By: Jane E. Joseph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Huntley
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Whitaker
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalie Gonzalez
Represented By: Geoffrey Thomas Moore
Represented By: Andrew S Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daphne Delee
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kara Lamp
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vanessa Flathers
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Ash
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Dorsey
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Constance Nelson
Represented By: Charles S Zimmerman
Represented By: Hart Lawrence Robinovitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Faun R. Cope
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Esposito
Represented By: Bridget Elizabeth Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Whittington
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Nelson
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Crowley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Byron Anderson
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alejandra Ursua
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carliss Wooten-Griffin
Represented By: Robert Walker Redick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alicia Sloan
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa K. Taylor
Represented By: Karolina Viehe
Represented By: Lane C. Siesky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Burns
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Leonard
Represented By: Alec S. Pine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deniece James
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fiordaliza Murel-Osorio
Represented By: Geoffrey Thomas Moore
Represented By: Steven Robert Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vicky Lankford
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooke A. Montiforte
Represented By: Joanne E Matusko
Represented By: Daniel N. Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Sigmon
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dentrisha White
Represented By: Geoffrey Thomas Moore
Represented By: Daniel Julian McGlynn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim Kammerdiener
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yessica Cano
Represented By: Edward Frances Blizzard
Represented By: Michael Ray Clinton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LaShaundra Matthews
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Foret
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: David I. Cates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sparkle Spears
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keesha L. Odom
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathryn Janicke
Represented By: Joseph A Osborne, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Reyes
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karina Hernandez
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Adams
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Wallace
Represented By: Geoffrey Thomas Moore
Represented By: Thomas Joseph Preuss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janae Hill
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Brewer
Represented By: Brian John Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Serrano
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooke Larrimore
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Unity Boyle
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: Brian J. Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Hall
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Curran
Represented By: Steven Robert Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Blair
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul O'Brien
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammi Picard
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shanterrica Ogarro
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristen Korbus
Represented By: Shannon Lukei
Represented By: Daniel Stewart Robinson
Represented By: Karen L Karavatos
Represented By: Mark P Robinson, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carly Boudreaux
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Represented By: Allan Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Barrett
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacquelyn Goetz-Moffitt
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathy Pigott
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronshelle Arvie
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Represented By: Allan Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Crawford
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Represented By: Margaret M. Metzinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jay Strickland
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Janda
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jazme' D. Reed
Represented By: Denis E. Vega
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katey Daughtery
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: W. Bryan Smith
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamara Embler
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kacie Dugas
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: Brian J. Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Sellers
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Ferguson
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Raquel Demorest
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeannette Akers
Represented By: Paula S. Bliss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura M Mulhall
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shecaniah Phelps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Misty Long
Represented By: Scott C. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lindsay Crain
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Dragon
Represented By: Mark A. Draper
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kaylee Stringham
Represented By: Steven Robert Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cherie Sperato
Represented By: James E. Cecchi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Iesha Paris
Represented By: Rebecca A. Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joyce Booth
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marvetta T. Davis
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Represented By: Daniel N. Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Sullivan
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mayra Villegas
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Lefler
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Raye Starkey
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Mitchell
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Talbert
Represented By: Michael D. Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taminika Williams
Represented By: Terry Bryant
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danna Salvaleon-Cua
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brynn Smith
Represented By: Amber Griffin Shaw
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Naza Keserovic
Represented By: William D. Nefzger
Represented By: Nathan D. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon LaPlante
Represented By: Peter J. Towne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Harrier
Represented By: Henry N. Didier, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sara Barker
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Lopez
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Vanham
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Christina Phillips
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharie Warmack
Represented By: James E. Cecchi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Delvina Spahe
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Chruszcyzyk
Represented By: Terrence M. Rubino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tony Ramirez
Represented By: Elizabeth Alexander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Geneva Alexander
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morran Brown
Represented By: John Amato
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Ozaroff
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Bonanno
Represented By: Marc David Grossman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mikea Grubb
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Cool
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victoria Genao
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawna Hules
Represented By: Scott David Levensten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Janney
Represented By: James M. Evangelista
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer S. Wilson
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Represented By: Christopher Matthew Van de Kieft
Represented By: Jane E Joseph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kerri Jo Milner
Represented By: Michael C Bradley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Bloor
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Larissa Brown
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Solomiya Melnychuk
Represented By: Randi Alyson Kassan
Represented By: Douglas H Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Clarke
Represented By: Elizabeth Alexander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Josie Borelli
Represented By: Thomas V Girardi
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Grimaldi
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Jackson
Represented By: Turner W. Branch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lashawn Marie Davis
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Till
Represented By: R Glenn Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalie Rich
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rody Clark
Represented By: R. Seth Crompton
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kendra Lange
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James McLoskey
Represented By: Paul E Benson
Represented By: Frederick S Longer
Represented By: Timothy S Trecek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Rader
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Edgar Hyde Carby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candace Fuller
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leila H. Watson
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christie Thies
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal Starling
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Rhodes
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Moore
Represented By: Lowell Wayne Finson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mezel Tyler
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kandace R. Galatas
Represented By: Larue Haigler, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alison Harrison
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanee Chappell
Represented By: David Todd Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erika Castellano
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon Norcott
Represented By: Peter J. Towne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timara Louden
Represented By: Steven Robert Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dilsia Mejia
Represented By: Douglas Robert Plymale
Represented By: Jeffrey Allen Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra O Rangel
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: Laurel Lisa Simes
Represented By: William A. Levin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brianna Cobb
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Kohlbrecher
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: Randall S. Crompton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie L. Andrews
Represented By: Hadley Lundback Matarazzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chelsea DelPape
Represented By: Mark J. Geragos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Cosmas
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew W Walker
Represented By: Thomas C Cardaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Drake
Represented By: Christopher William Cantrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Leigh Waddell
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trisha N. Shuttleworth
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashlee D'Jan Blodgett
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Yurksaitis
Represented By: Carla R. Minniefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gina M. Cunningham
Represented By: Jacqueline A. Olson
Represented By: Genevieve M Zimmerman
Represented By: Genevieve M. Zimmerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dawn Stephens
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lucero Freedom
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sonya Ruiz
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Howell
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danyale R. Pinckard
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vanessa Londono
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natasha Rogers
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheri Michelle Pike
Represented By: Irving Jay Warshauer
Represented By: Rachel A. Sternlieb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christy Hilton
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matilda Galvan
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vivian Dinis
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooke Kap
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Katherine Garcia
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kati-An Cook
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: C. Dorian Britt
Represented By: Mark A. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Eye
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mary Williams
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Misty Murphy
Represented By: Troy A Brenes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christa Mccoy
Represented By: Joseph A Osborne, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Olivia West
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leslie A. Hartley
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teneera Cunningham
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martha Sanchez
Represented By: Ben Meiselas
Represented By: Mark J. Geragos
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle M. Denison
Represented By: Trent Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Geoffrey Sandler
Represented By: Fabrice Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candice Ditalia
Represented By: Howard S. Ross
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angelica L. Torres
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Roberts
Represented By: Kyle J. Keller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deanna Wofford Schmidt
Represented By: Reynolds E. Pitts, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chelsey Day
Represented By: Richard Daniel Meadow
Represented By: W. Mark Lanier
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Hathcock
Represented By: Steven Robert Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel Coughanour
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Misty McDowell
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebekah Humbard
Represented By: Panagiotis V Albanis
Represented By: David A McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Desiree Hansen
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynica Taft
Represented By: Richard Daniel Meadow
Represented By: W. Mark Lanier
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Barta
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassie McGrane
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie A. Meadows
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Gary L. Payne
Represented By: Jayne H. Conroy
Represented By: Paul J. Hanly, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya Dunn
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Strong
Represented By: Clinton B. Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth M. Troha
Represented By: Martin G. Rubenstein
Represented By: Willard P Techmeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Delina Coleman
Represented By: Gregory N McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melany Gayle McCann
Represented By: Panagiotis V Albanis
Represented By: Michael Steven Goetz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nneka Harris
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lauren Troxell
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christie L. Hayes
Represented By: Sin-Ting Mary Liu
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chenille Israel
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Clark
Represented By: Alyson Louise Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sally McAdam
Represented By: Michael Ray Clinton
Represented By: Rebecca Cameron Blount
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ngoc Tran
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alyssa Stoffer
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daejah Terrell
Represented By: DAVID FRANCIS MICELI
Represented By: Thomas Joseph Preuss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sonya Omar
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bonnie Lynne Danner
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Represented By: Benjamin Jared Meiselas
Represented By: Shelley Lynn Kaufman
Represented By: Mark J. Geragos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Stephens
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Geoffrey Thomas Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peggy Green
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly J. Cook
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Represented By: Allan Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristy Wash
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Somer White
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda G Sledge
Represented By: Bobby Jewell Bell, Jr
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Grimaldi
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dwan Alexander
Represented By: Beth Elster Abramson
Represented By: David Alan Abramson
Represented By: Eric M. Ferrouillet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tara Custer
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Slone
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Goddard
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Represented By: Shelley Lynn Kaufman
Represented By: Mark J. Geragos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Cook-Hoots
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Bowersox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer L. Springer
Represented By: Kevin P. Riche
Represented By: John D. Sileo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Felicia S Keene
Represented By: Thomas James Rzepka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ursler West
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Greenfield
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jody Slaughter
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Represented By: Shelley Lynn Kaufman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carrie Dunlap
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Drew R Ferrandini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Magan Brawner
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Hogue
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kami M Hickman
Represented By: Bobby Jewell Bell, Jr
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Claudette Eaton
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Humaira Mahmood
Represented By: Jackqualyn R. Quinton
Represented By: Tony Wayne Edwards
Represented By: Mark Stevan Thetford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marciela Barrera
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Parlante
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kamiria Morris
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Penny Ridley
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carey Flint
Represented By: Timothy B. Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christie Young
Represented By: John T Kirkley, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Cutler
Represented By: David Bagley Rheingold
Represented By: Nancy A. Mismash
Represented By: Paul D. Rheingold
Represented By: Thomas Peter Giuffra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shanea Roundtree
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Johnson
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amalia Beltran
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Korrina Martin
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Giovanni
Represented By: David Todd Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ray Cordero
Represented By: Keith E. Patton
Represented By: James Griffin O'Brien
Represented By: Carasusana B. Wall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danelia Vargas
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Guida Socorro Mendoza
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Krysti Lee McLain
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heidi Williams
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kari Roberts
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tricia Prendergast
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Almeida
Represented By: David Bagley Rheingold
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Paul D. Rheingold
Represented By: Thomas Peter Giuffra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Ramos
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Matthews
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alicia Henry
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawna Adkins
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cristina Acuna
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sara Oviedo-Perez
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Martinez
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luciana Offlee
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Represented By: Allan Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Jackey
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacy Bell
Represented By: John T Kirkley, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bobbi Wilson
Represented By: Adam M. Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooke Horn
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Berry Garner
Represented By: James H. Colmer, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Dempsey
Represented By: Mark B. Hutton
Represented By: Andrew W. Hutton
Represented By: Blake A. Shuart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Petite Smothers-Taylor
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suzanne L. Roskos
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shae L Thomas
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Represented By: Allan Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tara Allen
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wade Bunting
Represented By: Sarah J Showard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Casey Slone
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candace Shepard
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shiann A. Intres
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Seachrist
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Jones
Represented By: Shannon Lukei
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Daniel Stewart Robinson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Karen L Karavatos
Represented By: Bryan August Pfleeger
Represented By: Ronald J. Favre
Represented By: Waldon Michael Hingle
Represented By: Mark P Robinson, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Delsa Bere
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nakita White
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Letreil Jackson
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie L. Lawler
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: David F. Miceli
Represented By: TRENT B MIRACLE
Represented By: Paul J. Hanly, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dina Abbott
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Jordan
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristie B. Donovan
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Carmen Sessions Scott
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Sean E. Cooney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jean Love-Morris
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maison Bacque-Alexander
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Represented By: Mark J. Geragos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mellissa Naylor
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bernice Cantrell
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erica Parks
Represented By: Bobby Jewell Bell, Jr
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Guider
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie Deal
Represented By: Jennifer L Bartlett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Welborn
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alishia Warrick
Represented By: Eric David Yost
Represented By: Lawrence L. Jones, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Hicks
Represented By: Melissa Garcia Mosier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Courtney Wood
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynn Schroeder
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Joseph
Represented By: Scott C. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tara Waldal
Represented By: Daniel E Phillips
Represented By: Todd Michael Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Princess Moore
Represented By: Anthony M. Segura
Represented By: Anthony Marc Russell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kayla Shepherd
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Niki Becker
Represented By: Bruce L Braley
Represented By: Michael Ray Clinton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Antoinette Gaines
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Fleming
Represented By: Douglas Robert Plymate
Represented By: William Harvell Burris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooke A. Quinn
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela Basden
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer A. Perry
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heba Al-Khafaji
Represented By: Kassem M. Dakhlallah
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denecia Banks
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: C. Dorian Britt
Represented By: Mark A. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Nicole Sebastian
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrell Hunt
Represented By: Bridget Elizabeth Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cristina Castillo
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michaela Ramsey
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: James E. Cecchi
Represented By: Wendy R. Fleishman
Represented By: Lindsey Handley Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonna Day
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latrese Mixon
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosanna Martinez
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Harmony A Taylor
Represented By: Andrew Scott Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leslie Gillis
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexandria Larison
Represented By: Daniel Stewart Robinson
Represented By: Karen L Karavatos
Represented By: Mark P Robinson, Jr
Represented By: Shannon Lukei
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosalind Collado
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darci Hughes
Represented By: George E. McLaughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaniqua E. Murphy
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candence Johnson
Represented By: Martin Daniel Crump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christi Howard-Williams
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jenny L. Klocek
Represented By: Gregory N McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ola Cheyenne Carney
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rokeisha Maldon
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Represented By: Allan Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alicia Ellis
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nancy Macias
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Detective Stephanie Sanchez
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynne Frey
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Lynch
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Breanne Beck
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Dobbs
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel Havermale
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenyetta Brown
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheila Bradshaw
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Tranfaglia
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alicia Hurt
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juliana O'Brien
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lauren Kenner
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tana Session
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katherine Sanders
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Linnell
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mandy Davis
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kira Balius
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Represented By: Shelley Lynn Kaufman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emily Vestal
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert M. Gabbard
Represented By: Andre F. Regard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allysa Baxley
Represented By: Donald Alan Migliori
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Wimberly
Represented By: Mark B. Hutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Jo Majors
Represented By: Daniel N. Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meghan Prichard
Represented By: James T. Moore
Represented By: Kyle J. Nutt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Malia Carter
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erin Joy Slaght
Represented By: Elizabeth P. Kagan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Autumn Hardy
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janice Benson
Represented By: Alyson Louise Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Hendrickson
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Morris
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stevie Robinett
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candice Nutter
Represented By: Karen L. Stern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brianna Franklin-Spey
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sonya Watson
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jasmine Blair
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Desiree Iniguez
Represented By: Thomas V Girardi
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keisha Johnson
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah L. Maughan
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Penaflor
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Represented By: Patricia N. Syverson
Represented By: Margaret M. Metzinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jose Martinez
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latoya S. Jones
Represented By: Christopher Nemat Shakib
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kefah Salem
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alyxe Smith
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Casey
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chelsea N. Maholmes
Represented By: J. Gerard Stranch, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristen Filicko
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Stouder
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sabrina Sikes
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Pikula
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Roach
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Imari Hawkins
Represented By: Gregory N McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jasmin Grayson
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Sara Hemme
Represented By: Carmen Sessions Scott
Represented By: Michael A. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rolanda Ware
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randyl Lacombe
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacquelyn Schlee
Represented By: Yvonne M. Flaherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anna Nicole Lowe
Represented By: Gregory S. Spizer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angelica Ferretiz
Represented By: Samuel Ranchor Harris, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Summer Mote
Represented By: Michael A Akselrud
Represented By: Lee A Cirsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Wood
Represented By: Pamela A. Borgess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sylvana M. Phillips
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Anderson
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karah Aliene Caudle
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sabrina Minor
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Rains
Represented By: John T Kirtley, III
Represented By: Lawrence L. Jones, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Marquez
Represented By: Joanne E Matusko
Represented By: Daniel N. Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dinah Shaw
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Richter
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Fennell
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: Randall S. Crompton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Taylor
Represented By: Carmen Sessions Scott
Represented By: Meghan Johnson Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Magagi-Ali
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keren Dimas
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacie Estey
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laverna Binford
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexis Wharton
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tegan Kirby
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alicia Sandy
Represented By: Rolf T. Fiebiger
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Blundell
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Esther Shalitzky
Represented By: Brian Alan Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toddella Brown
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Rowland
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandi Falls
Represented By: Gregory N McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Devocht
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Courtney Wade
Represented By: Crystal Gayle Foley
Represented By: Andrew S Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clarice Snow
Represented By: Ann E Brown-Graff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Clifford
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alysa Heil
Represented By: Trent Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deborah Wooten Foster
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bridgett Lane
Represented By: Elizabeth G. Grimes, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa P. Bryant
Represented By: Jackqualyn R. Quinton
Represented By: Gregory Lawing Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nichole Kreeger
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Teague
Represented By: Sarah J Showard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Celina Martin
Represented By: A. Layne Stackhouse
Represented By: Jasper D. Ward, IV
Represented By: Lawrence L. Jones, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Price
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Scott C. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adeline Moore
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Josette Underwood
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Dishong
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashleigh French
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Phares-Aldrich
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cara Lawson
Represented By: Michael Ray Clinton
Represented By: Lea A. Player
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Flores
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ann R. Nowrang
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denielle Davenport
Represented By: Joseph Michael Lyon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Reed
Represented By: Kim Goodling
Represented By: Michael Patrick Doyle
Represented By: Richard A. Voytas, Jr.
Represented By: Jeffrey Lewis Raizner
Represented By: Nathan Kennedy Bader
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zabrinah Brown
Represented By: Mandissa Fayola Logan
Represented By: June Patricia Bashant
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle McBride
Represented By: Annesley Hodges DeGaris
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Represented By: Mitchell G Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christin Sterling
Represented By: Sean T. Keith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Haywood
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anna Rowland
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Neff
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Represented By: Allan Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noelle Fanjoy
Represented By: L. Richard LeClair, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Loveland
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victor Hernandez
Represented By: Alyson Louise Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Harrison
Represented By: Roy E. Barnes
Represented By: Walter Matthew Wilson
Represented By: John Raymond Bevis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Richards-Robinett
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miriam Ibrahim
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jodie Chaney
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kalaki Clarke
Represented By: Heather A Foster
Represented By: Elizabeth Alexander
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Wendy West Feinstein
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Fabrice Vincent
Represented By: Wendy R. Fleishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cherelle Johnson
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Thompson
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karen McLoud
Represented By: Michael S. Mehrmann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sara Ann Dewolf
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Huntoon
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hayley Goncalves
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shariece Wilson
Represented By: Brian John Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yadira Sanchez
Represented By: Maria Sophia Diamond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynn Riggs
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Valdez
Represented By: Charles Steven Dunn
Represented By: Denis E McGuinness
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alicia Groning
Represented By: Jeremy Jordan Troxel
Represented By: Kelly K. McNabb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Briskey
Represented By: Mark A. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Valerie Arias
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Henry
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ana Sanchez
Represented By: Benjamin Jared Meiselas
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Represented By: Mark J. Geragos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Renee Moline
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamara Hillmer
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Clement
Represented By: Thomas V Girardi
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nichole Miller
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Warren
Represented By: Nina Marie Towle
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Represented By: John M. Rainwater
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stefani Johnson
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Euyetoyuia Johnson
Represented By: Shannon Lukei
Represented By: Daniel Stewart Robinson
Represented By: Karen L Karavatos
Represented By: Mark P Robinson, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Korto Tawse-Butha
Represented By: Joseph Michael Lyon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nikita King
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey Gabrielle Symonds
Represented By: Jonathan D Orent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Spraggins
Represented By: Christopher Nemat Shakib
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Channelle Coleman
Represented By: Gregg A Anderson
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Veach
Represented By: Randell C Roberts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Spann
Represented By: Peter J. Towne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Denise Barnett
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Represented By: Margaret M. Metzinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyler Scott Johnson
Represented By: Edward Frances Blizzard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Minghelli
Represented By: Gregory N McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Merritt
Represented By: Kathy Dianne Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Sanders
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noel Ossman
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Ferrao
Represented By: David Todd Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalia Burga
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin Fetterolf
Represented By: Thomas P. Pfender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Platt
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pepper Gale
Represented By: Laurel Lisa Simes
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: William A. Levin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Luke Armstrong
Represented By: W Mark Lanier
Represented By: Alex J Brown
Represented By: Robert K Shelquist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ariann Knox
Represented By: Eric M. Ferrouillet
Represented By: David Alan Abramson
Represented By: Ian F. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal Moore
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leticia Marie Rivera
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica L. White
Represented By: Rolf T. Fiebiger
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Ellison
Represented By: Gregory N McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dena Simons
Represented By: Robert Roy Luke
Represented By: Robert Luke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sulma Arandi
Represented By: Joshua Noah Lief
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karlie Denton
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenzie Barlow
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan McIntosh
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alisha Wooten
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dominique Dawson
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brianna Backer
Represented By: Todd S. Hageman
Represented By: Michael P Kella
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Isaura Manzo-Mendez
Represented By: Seth Alan Katz
Represented By: Panagiotis V Albanis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Louise Griffin
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol Turner
Represented By: A. Layne Stackhouse
Represented By: Jasper D. Ward, IV
Represented By: Lawrence L. Jones, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diane Swosinski
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hillary Whittington
Represented By: Derek J Emge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katie L Gobeli
Represented By: Jonathan D Orent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yvonia Blaize
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marylyn Espinoza
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessi Sargent
Represented By: Bridget Elizabeth Hayes
Represented By: Alyson Louise Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carey Okurowski
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexis Burdette
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Burrell
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Gooch
Represented By: David Bagley Rheingold
Represented By: Nancy A. Mismash
Represented By: Paul D. Rheingold
Represented By: Thomas Peter Giuffra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maura Snyder
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Misty Turner
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darlene Trice
Represented By: David Todd Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beth Cogar
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candace Saye
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Myra Martinez
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica R. Caruthers
Represented By: Mark B. Hutton
Represented By: Blake A. Shuart
Represented By: Andrew W. Hutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittani Webb
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Smith
Represented By: Mitchell G Allen
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katherine Wayman
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Courtney Chase
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Shirley
Represented By: David F. Miceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martha M Loiselle
Represented By: Thomas Jon-William Bellinder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Love
Represented By: Christopher L. Coffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carla Laneaux
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Stiwinter
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monique Figures
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandy Herrod
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Audlyne Joseph
Represented By: Kevin P. O'Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bianca M. Williams
Represented By: Jacqueline A. Olson
Represented By: J Gordon Rudd, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theresa Ann Bonet
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natasha L. Vang
Represented By: Daniel N. Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Esparza
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monica Townes
Represented By: Randi Alyson Kassan
Represented By: Douglas H Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jillian Copeland
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer King
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Toma Raenell Fowler
Represented By: Badge Humphries
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leign Hollon
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Ann Littell
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria A. Galvan
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Sanchez
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tyson Thompson
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda M. Ritzert
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeri Cook
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tami Carlaw
Represented By: Gregory N McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cherie Allen
Represented By: Clinton L. Kelly
Represented By: Mitchell G Allen
Represented By: F. Dulin Kelly
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Estes
Represented By: Hadley Lundback Matarazzo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Nunes
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Noemi Banda
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hector Villegas
Represented By: Matthew John Skikos
Represented By: Steven J. Skikos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nada Marwan Muwaquet
Represented By: Bruce W. Steckler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anita Goddard
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Represented By: Shelley Lynn Kaufman
Represented By: Mark J. Geragos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rikkita McLean
Represented By: Walter Edmunds Daniels, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Rubesch
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Strickland
Represented By: Amber Marie Seu Yin Pang Parra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Lourdes Cabrera Tinajero
Represented By: Genevieve M Zimmerman
Represented By: Yvonne M. Flaherty
Represented By: Hart Lawrence Robinovitch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charlotte Henderson
Represented By: William D. Nefzger
Represented By: Nathan D. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Desoree Madkins
Represented By: James Craig Orr, Jr.
Represented By: James C. Orr, Jr.
Represented By: John Wilson Pate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Widdis
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey Feliciano
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lilia Godinez
Represented By: Crystal Gayle Foley
Represented By: Andrew S Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Canseco
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terri Armstrong
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janice Moss
Represented By: Bobby Jewell Bell, Jr
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Represented By: C. Carter Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Fay
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marlena Mudd
Represented By: S. Ranchor Harris, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Sprowl
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denise Hargreaves
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beverly Amanda Moncrief
Represented By: Kathryn Snapka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dawn Ervin
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela Rodriguez-Polanco
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anh Dinh
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angelica Tafoya
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Denice Zelms
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa N. Carter
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laquasha Burks
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Heger
Represented By: Corrie Johnson Yackulic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cortina Thomas
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy Hill
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hailee Paxton
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lashaunta Candys
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rahshene Davis
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Walton
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kymberlee Bateni
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shannon Esposito
Represented By: Bridget Elizabeth Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kira Weed
Represented By: Willard P Techmeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandie Burns
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Lancaster
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Krystle Bennett
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tomekia Lenoir
Represented By: Clayton Morris Connors
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marcia Boynton
Represented By: Bridget Elizabeth Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stevi Wood
Represented By: Pamela A. Borgess
Represented By: James Griffin O'Brien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia Martin
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taylor Thomas
Represented By: Jason Travis Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lekisha Morgan
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tykena Grigg
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Bruggeman
Represented By: Yvonne M. Flaherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tracy A Clark
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Whitstone
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laurie Nordman
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: Pedro de la Cerda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Kolenda
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamara Rankin
Represented By: Turner W. Branch
Represented By: Michael Ray Clinton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Cochran
Represented By: R. Seth Crompton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassie L. Hill
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Eni
Represented By: Jackqualyn R. Quinton
Represented By: Tony Wayne Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Johnson
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy L Wilmet
Represented By: Peyton J Healey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alicia Byington
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shantell Steadman
Represented By: Joanne E. Matusko
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Felicia White
Represented By: Nestor Rudolph Schnasse
Represented By: Lawrence Alan Strick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gwendolyn Essary
Represented By: Joseph Dean Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Veres
Represented By: David Todd Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ghiselle Watson
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Allan Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corina Weimann
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carey Byrne
Represented By: Charles N. Nauen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marisela Oller-Reyes
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Demi Sienna
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sylvia Montes
Represented By: Heather A Foster
Represented By: Elizabeth Alexander
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Wendy West Feinstein
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Fabrice Vincent
Represented By: Wendy R. Fleishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Grogan
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Twitty
Represented By: Anne M Tarvin
Represented By: Kirk J. Goza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Winfield
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Glorimar Rivera
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Myesha Yvette Calhoun
Represented By: Jay R. Vaughn
Represented By: Panagiotis V Albanis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelli Adams
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keyunta Karmon Wallace
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Schluessler
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Strickland
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lacy Batangan
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dawn Artis
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Zoltak
Represented By: Rolf T. Fiebiger
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristin Harms
Represented By: Thomas V Girardi
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Davis
Represented By: C. Dorian Britt
Represented By: Mark A. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Marie McNally
Represented By: Bridget Elizabeth Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joanna Tyler
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Martini
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassidy Reinstedler
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Collene Henson
Represented By: Lowell Wayne Finson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heidi Heaton
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erica Annan
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Medinger
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah Schreyer
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooklyn Powers
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: RuthAnne Lichtenwaldt
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lindsay Luna
Represented By: Ashley S Manning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zella N Cray
Represented By: Bobby Jewell Bell, Jr
Represented By: C Carter Clay
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marla Ornelas
Represented By: Mark P. Robinson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa Dees
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Courtnee Yates
Represented By: Bobby Jewell Bell, Jr
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miles Abbott
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Benjamin
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Fedor
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chelsea Neerings
Represented By: David Bagley Rheingold
Represented By: Nancy A. Mismash
Represented By: Paul D. Rheingold
Represented By: Thomas Peter Giuffra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Burks
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamara Rogers
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassie Halton
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Donald Alan Migliori
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marieliz Singh
Represented By: Carla R. Minniefield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Dawes
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Farzatian
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brenda Jones
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deirdre Jackson
Represented By: Charles T Paglialunga
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Represented By: James A Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Richert
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: K C Von Gesjen
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Davis
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ayauna Modlin
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Troha
Represented By: Martin G. Rubenstein
Represented By: Willard P Techmeier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latasha Arnold
Represented By: L Lisa McPherson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allen Goughanour
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Lenzner
Represented By: Timothy S Trecek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Wojtowicz
Represented By: Pamela A. Borgess
Represented By: James Griffin O'Brien
Represented By: David W Zoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynda J. Miller
Represented By: Brian Alan Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Klopack
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lyndsey Woods
Represented By: Jackqualyn R. Quinton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yolanda Daniels
Represented By: MITCH ALLEN
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cheryl Annarelli
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Fitzgerald
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: Brian J. Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shannon Fewell
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suzanne Summers
Represented By: Thomas Joseph Preuss
Represented By: Thomas Philip Cartmell
Represented By: Luke F. Callahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monica Thammavong
Represented By: Brian Alan Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Villani
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lannie T McAfee
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya Luke
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susana Gegner
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Synder
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Davis
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal Rutherford
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jaime Armijo
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leona M Thomas
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leah Shay Middleton
Represented By: Jackqualyn R. Quinton
Represented By: William D. Nefzger
Represented By: Tony Wayne Edwards
Represented By: Mark Stevan Thetford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emily Teague
Represented By: Sarah J Showard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alexandria Chelone
Represented By: Bobby Jewell Bell, Jr
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Represented By: C. Carter Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lakisha Kidd
Represented By: Adam M. Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tabitha McDowell
Represented By: William Paul Leverett, Jr.
Represented By: Edward Shuff Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kiesha Allen
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norma Tibbs
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donna McCurry
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ya'Sheka Robinson
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Gilbert
Represented By: Brett A. Emison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erin Ryan
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megean Bauer
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Suzanne Smith-Freda
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Celeste Howser
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandon Couvillion
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mitchell Cole
Represented By: Sarah J Showard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Hubicki
Represented By: Laura Marie Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristin Fanning
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Hervey
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frederick Mullins
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Agata Graham
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Morris
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kerry Walden
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brett A Pike
Represented By: Irving Jay Warshauer
Represented By: Rachel A. Sternlieb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristy Mowell
Represented By: Robert Keith Jenner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kylie K. Cook
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ms. Xonda Lahoe
Represented By: Corrie Johnson Yackulic
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Young
Represented By: Maria S Diamond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eva White
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah B Miller
Represented By: John T Kirtley, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thy N. Truong
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda M. Elkins
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Serena Pearson
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carmen Dominguez
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Leslie Perez
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Represented By: Jane E Joseph
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel Elsey
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica L. Thornton
Represented By: Michael A. Bottar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacy Morehouse
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Martinez
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lien Huynh
Represented By: Scott David Levensten
Represented By: Mitchell G Allen
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daitra Wersal
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Represented By: Thomas V. Girardi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Summer Ary
Represented By: Jeffrey D. Guerriero
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Douglas Robert Plymale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawna Borrowman
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donna Tingen
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mikaela Berry
Represented By: Marco B Mercaldo
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Ronald D Mercaldo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Osuch
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Wagner
Represented By: Henry N. Didier, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shannon Crockett
Represented By: John David Hurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alisha Barclay
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matt Downs
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abby Smith
Represented By: A. Clifford Edwards
Represented By: A. Christopher Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yen Phi-Thai Ngo
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Fife
Represented By: Maria Sophia Diamond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katina Kirk
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Badger
Represented By: Alyson Louise Oliver
Represented By: Sylvia Davidow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacy Nunez
Represented By: Elizabeth Alexander
Represented By: Wendy R. Fleishman
Represented By: Fabrice N. Vincent
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin Jones
Represented By: Howard Sheldon Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rita Coyner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jenny De Los Santos
Represented By: Herbert O. Phillips, IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Gaddis
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brooke Shepherd
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nakia Lewis
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarina Cervantes
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gladis Davis
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal Abraro
Represented By: Todd Michael Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ruth Hospodarsky
Represented By: Marc David Grossman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bailey Johnson
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natasha Bryant
Represented By: Steven Robert Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patricia Villarreal
Represented By: Glenn W. Cunningham
Represented By: Travis Edward Venable
Represented By: Marynell Baker Maloney
Represented By: Michelle Marianna Maloney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Cabral
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Ramirez
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Milana Murphey
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Venessa McGeough
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf T. Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Danley
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tangela Morton
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Rockwell
Represented By: Paul G. Kay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Gupton
Represented By: Gene A. Riddle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheena Jones
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Audriana Hush
Represented By: Mark B. Hutton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Scholfield
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terre L Pendergrass
Represented By: Jeffrey G Blackwell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Belinda Sunny
Represented By: Shannon Lukei
Represented By: Daniel Stewart Robinson
Represented By: Karen L Karavatos
Represented By: Mark P Robinson, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lettie Lee
Represented By: John Lee Hoffoss, Jr.
Represented By: Claude Pierson Devall
Represented By: Donald W McKnight
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Lewis
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zoila Recinos
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kamaria Regan
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meredith Smith
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Mays
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacey Meacham
Represented By: Robert John Gingras
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Kuhl
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Borek
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandie Peets
Represented By: Zachary J Murry
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Pamela A. Borgess
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: David W Zoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bradley Davis
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candice Back
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Veronica Delrio
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John-Paul Long
Represented By: Scott C. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amberlee Price
Represented By: Kimberly R. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Davis
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandy N. Scott
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: Michael L. Stevens
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Myers
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Zemba
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra Naurek
Represented By: Michael J. Regan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carmen Sepulveda
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patrick Kelly
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Represented By: Lawrence L. Jones, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monica Silerio
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorena Borders
Represented By: Todd S. Hageman
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Hartford
Represented By: Bryan August Pfleeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corina Norman
Represented By: Corrie Johnson Yackulic
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea J Wand
Represented By: Brett A. Emison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Cochran
Represented By: Alberto R. Nestico
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sarah W Beck
Represented By: Bobby Jewell Bell, Jr
Represented By: C Carter Clay
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynnette Lynn-Horton
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corrina Pollock
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kayla Harris
Represented By: Joshua Michael Mankoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ebone Porter
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Hubicki
Represented By: Laura Marie Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassandra Hancock
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Dowsett
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Lopez
Represented By: Bridget Elizabeth Hayes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donavon Arvie
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Represented By: Allan Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie Parrish
Represented By: C. Dorian Britt
Represented By: Mark A. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karla Rivera
Represented By: Kristian Rasmussen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawna Griffie
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kori L. Mcwilliams
Represented By: Frederick S Longer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Evelyn Ramirez
Represented By: Heather A Foster
Represented By: Elizabeth Alexander
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Wendy West Feinstein
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Fabrice Vincent
Represented By: Wendy R. Fleishman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Madril
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Goss
Represented By: Joanne E Matusko
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Karla M Gluek
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Sung-Yun K Smith
Represented By: Daniel E. Gustafson
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Represented By: Daniel N. Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Fadel
Represented By: Mark P Robinson, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lexi K. Rutherford
Represented By: Daniel N. Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Starla Garza
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shemek Ague
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Chee
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelby Ketelboeter
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Summer Creekmore
Represented By: Jackqualyn R. Quinton
Represented By: Mark S Thetford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ana Camacho
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer R. Widmer
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cody Roan
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrea Rodriguez
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kayla Hord
Represented By: Russell Scott Briggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Kendrick
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miriam Cruz
Represented By: Rolf T. Fiebiger
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Daniel Stewart Robinson
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Karen Lee Karavatos
Represented By: Shannon Marie Lukei
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Shannon Lukei
Represented By: Mark P. Robinson, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Corey Brown
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sonia Buenrostro
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paola Choute
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Represented By: B. Kristian W. Rasmussen, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandy Wolford
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vilma Shandera
Represented By: Russell Scott Briggs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Talbert
Represented By: Michael D. Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelonda D. Joy
Represented By: Kirsten D. Hedberg
Represented By: J Gordon Rudd, Jr
Represented By: Jacqueline A. Olson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carmen Garcia
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Keith E. Patton
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: James Griffin O'Brien
Represented By: Carasusana B. Wall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Abeare
Represented By: Alyson Louise Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anita Eleby
Represented By: Edward Frances Blizzard
Represented By: Michael Ray Clinton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mariam Smith
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Naurek
Represented By: Michael J. Regan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeneay Jackson
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natasha Bjugan
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Turner
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tierra Hampton
Represented By: David Todd Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kayla Cubie
Represented By: David C. DeGreeff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Desiree Woody
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monique L Garth
Represented By: Bobby Jewell Bell, Jr
Represented By: Tyler C. Vail
Represented By: C. Carter Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jakitta Cooper Joseph
Represented By: Scott C. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra Garcia
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Briana Elliott
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tatika Avery
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Lasseter-Perez
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carissa Mason
Represented By: Amber Marie Seu Yin Pang Parra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kay Nuzzo
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Montminy
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Penny Morico
Represented By: Anthony Tarricone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Priscilla H Freeze
Represented By: Sarah J Showard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terionne Anderson
Represented By: Bryan August Pfleeger
Represented By: Waldon Michael Hingle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessie Orton
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Bourget
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Natalys E Lopez
Represented By: Donna M. DiDonato
Represented By: Douglas E. Chabot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lashanda Henry
Represented By: John Farrest Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richole Madison-Ogburn
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassandra Worsham
Represented By: Brett D Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Zahra Hosseinpour
Represented By: L Lisa McPherson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Block
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jaime Slaven
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Justin Briskey
Represented By: Mark A. Tate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gina Lafata
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: James E. Cecchi
Represented By: Wendy R. Fleishman
Represented By: Lindsey Handley Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shermaine Asby
Represented By: L Lisa McPherson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kami Armstrong
Represented By: W Mark Lanier
Represented By: Alex J Brown
Represented By: Robert K Shelquist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Hamblen
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alyshia Battiest
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ysabel Torres
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Represented By: Christopher Matthew Van de Kieft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Bacque-Alexander
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Represented By: Mark J. Geragos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ms. Whitney Cross
Represented By: James S Higgins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stasia Boyles
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erika Martin
Represented By: Bryan August Pfleeger
Represented By: Waldon Michael Hingle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lanika R. Saunders
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Osborn
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eryne Otterson
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharon Lynn Hoskison
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan M. Burtis
Represented By: Mark Lynn Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chelsea Dawn Mcclune
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karol Macquarrie
Represented By: Wilfried Hermann Florin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kymbra M. McLaughlin
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Richard Daniel Meadow
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: W. Mark Lanier
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Truitt
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kaila Allen
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelli Baugh
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: James Thomas McBratney, III
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Carmen Sessions Scott
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Galbreath
Represented By: Richard J Arsenault
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Represented By: Charles Michael Bollinger
Represented By: Richard Joseph Arsenault
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Theresa Rokovich
Represented By: Steven Christopher Toups
Represented By: Bryan Adam Terrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allison Greene
Represented By: Kevin P. O'Connor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shandra Grooms
Represented By: L Lisa McPherson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Keller
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Plunkett
Represented By: Andrew J. Geiger
Represented By: Allan Berger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nanci Fils-Aime
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Molinar
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Genesia E Lozano
Represented By: Gary S Grynkewich
Represented By: Jackqualyn R. Quinton
Represented By: Tony Wayne Edwards
Represented By: Mark S Thetford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie L. Meyers
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Represented By: James D Barger
Represented By: Neil Duane Overholtz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Howarth
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rakia Esver
Represented By: Nestor Rudolph Schnasse
Represented By: Lawrence Alan Strick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lauren Monsey
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Glaspie
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharmila Jackson
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Viktoriya Tymoshchuk
Represented By: Sofia Bruera
Represented By: Matthew Paul Skrabanek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regina Bearyman
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LEEANNE ACCETTURO
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandy McNamee
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shonita Boyce
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Lowder
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laporsche M. Anderson
Represented By: Daniel N. Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jodie Blackburn
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Hardy
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Ide
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katherine A. Rodriguez-Vargas
Represented By: Joseph R. Bongiorno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelby Comtois
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela Franklin Redd
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Spring Weller
Represented By: Daniel N. Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristen Nicole Cox
Represented By: Edward Frances Blizzard
Represented By: Michael Ray Clinton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Beauprez
Represented By: Mitchell G Allen
Represented By: Bryan L Williams
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Levette Griffin
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Clark
Represented By: R. Seth Crompton
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maria Oropeza
Represented By: Michael S. Kruse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Andrew Urban
Represented By: Larry D. Helvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tania Paz Acosta
Represented By: Anthony D. Irpino, Sr.
Represented By: Anthony D. Irpino
Represented By: Bobby Hawkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Taylor Salas
Represented By: Larry A Tawwater
Represented By: Darren M Tawwater
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Patty J Hardman
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Welke
Represented By: Yvonne M. Flaherty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Varita Williams
Represented By: Brian John Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Roby
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Harding
Represented By: Joshua Michael Mankoff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sasha Diehl
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Felicia Okoro
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lori Louvier-Durand
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Randle
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Susan Allen
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Reisner
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rosy E Gomez
Represented By: Steven J. Skikos
Represented By: Matthew John Skikos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fiona Tucker
Represented By: Leila H Watson
Represented By: MITCH ALLEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Mason
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dearra Scott
Represented By: Robert T. Dassow
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emily Gaines
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alice M. Dishong
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Delgado
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Fowler
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cortney Jameson
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Ronald D Mercaldo
Represented By: Marco B Mercaldo
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Howell
Represented By: John T Kirkley, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Smith
Represented By: Gregory S. Spizer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Sollis
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lorrie Frakes
Represented By: Gregory N McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Jury
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Gross
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Cherry
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie Lynn Wells
Represented By: Carmen Sessions Scott
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: James Ronca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelisha Crawford
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: Brian J. Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tammy Calamari
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janelle Menge
Represented By: Jame P Tutaj
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mallari Moffatt
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Represented By: Shelley Lynn Kaufman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lydia Slaughter
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Represented By: Shelley Lynn Kaufman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard McCormack
Represented By: Sarah J Showard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tarhir Ismail
Represented By: W. Roger Smith, III
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Malika Thompson
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erin Weed
Represented By: David Bagley Rheingold
Represented By: Paul D. Rheingold
Represented By: Nancy A. Mismash
Represented By: Thomas Peter Giuffra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angel Alvarez
Represented By: Nancy A. Mismash
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal Cox
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Sue Weishuhn
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barbara Bivens
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aneesah Anani
Represented By: Brent William Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Latara Lucero
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LaToya Campbell
Represented By: Gene A. Riddle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laura Sherrill Howell
Represented By: Carmen Sessions Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adria Perez
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shannon Letters
Represented By: Jeffrey Lewis Raizner
Represented By: Michael Patrick Doyle
Represented By: Janet Ward Black
Represented By: Kim Goodling
Represented By: Jeff Raizner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Karla Cassady
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candiz Veliz
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laurice Goodhue
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michele D. Holt
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gerlin Munoz Chavarria
Represented By: Edward Frances Blizzard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robin Corbello
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rita Stylianou
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kerri Carmen
Represented By: David Todd Mathews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adam Ejnik
Represented By: Edward Anthony Wallace
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Abrams
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mickele Mason-Anthony
Represented By: Trent Miracle
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kimberly Petry
Represented By: Karen Leser Grenon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Almalnda Moctezuma
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Estell Reams
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Brewer
Represented By: David Todd Mathews
Represented By: Jean L. Maguire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Williams
Represented By: C. Dorian Britt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cynthia L. Wilson
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Piscionere
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sheryl Woods
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Candace Williams
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrena Sellers
Represented By: Don K. Ledgard
Represented By: James T Capretz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alisha Wyatt
Represented By: Jackqualyn R. Quinton
Represented By: Sarah J Showard
Represented By: Tony Wayne Edwards
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Krystal N Bentley
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wendy S. Shirah
Represented By: Daniel N. Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Black
Represented By: Jane E Joseph
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Olatunbosun
Represented By: Edward Frances Blizzard
Represented By: Michael Ray Clinton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Sell
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yvette Ezell
Represented By: Edward Frances Blizzard
Represented By: Michael Ray Clinton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diana Barron
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lauren T Pittman
Represented By: Matthew J. Garver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Abbie Taylor
Represented By: James J. Rosemergy
Represented By: Jeffrey J. Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ashley Rios
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emily Marolda
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber L. Mills
Represented By: John David Hurst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kari R Davis
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michele Eland
Represented By: Charles N. Nauen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shaunessey Singleton
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tamara Brown
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yolanda Blue
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Kyle
Represented By: Steven Robert Maher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kashena Hubbard
Represented By: Trent Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sasha Anderson
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisseth Heredia
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Represented By: Luke F. Callahan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melisa Johnson
Represented By: Robert Dallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Briana Hankerson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tasha L. Raine
Represented By: Elizabeth Squires Dudley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wade Gale
Represented By: Laurel Lisa Simes
Represented By: William A. Levin
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Esmerelda Garcia
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brandi Smith
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: Randall S. Crompton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kitanea McKenzie
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emily Birse
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kourtney Castillo
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Armas
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Capaldo
Represented By: Douglas Fredric Eaton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelley Bunting
Represented By: Sarah J Showard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal Richards
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: Brian J. Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chassity R. Kimbrough
Represented By: Christopher E Roberts
Represented By: David T. Butsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Guy
Represented By: Robert Dallas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Collins
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Represented By: Nathan C. Bess
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Heather Lulo
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jill Kopish
Represented By: David Bagley Rheingold
Represented By: Paul D. Rheingold
Represented By: Nancy A. Mismash
Represented By: Thomas Peter Giuffra
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Destiny Dawn Newton
Represented By: Panagiotis V Albanis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marissa Jones
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Represented By: Pedro de la Cerda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassandra Sutton
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shelby Ameling
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melinda Colon
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dominique Rayford
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Represented By: Brian J. Perkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorothy J Schumacher
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rachel A. Sigure
Represented By: Trent Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn K. Jewell
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Bradway
Represented By: Christopher Nemat Shakib
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry Broadwater
Represented By: Monte J. Rabner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ebony Carey
Represented By: Bryan August Pfleeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deeana Palello
Represented By: Jacqueline A. Olson
Represented By: J Gordon Rudd, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Gregg
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: Wendy R. Fleishman
Represented By: Wendy West Feinstein
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Heather A Foster
Represented By: Fabrice Vincent
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Elizabeth Alexander
Represented By: James Ronca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Morgan VanZile
Represented By: Timothy R. Holton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry Lopez De Ricci
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Meghan Flores
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie Biffle
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amy Renee Porter
Represented By: J. Farrest Taylor
Represented By: G. Patrick Jacobs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Mennen
Represented By: Rachel A. Placitella
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William Laska
Represented By: Laurel Lisa Simes
Represented By: William A. Levin
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Miske
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Irwin
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Represented By: Rolf T. Fiebiger
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Regina Zwart
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stephanie Rogers
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paris Hooks
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Priscilla Baldwin
Represented By: Thomas V Girardi
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Summer Sadira
Represented By: Michael Brandon Smith
Represented By: Richard R. Schlueter
Represented By: Charles Andrew Childers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessica Stebbins
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Vargas
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Caitlyn Dixon
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janviere Harris
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Valentina Mendez
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tonetta S. Davis
Represented By: John C. Wunsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tonya Schuldt
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim Druyvesteyn
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sara Sturgil
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kristine Schow
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christina Bell
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jami A. Barber
Represented By: James Douglas Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tiffany Crowther
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolyn Crusha
Represented By: Kevin E Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lakeesha Whitehead
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charisma Serrano
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Megan Barker
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Arafa
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rebecca Fisher
Represented By: Laura Lee Cable
Represented By: Ryan Donald Saba
Represented By: Momo Emily Takahashi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melody Williams
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Shelley Lynn Kaufman
Represented By: Tina Glandian
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Mark J. Geragos
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Margaret M. Metzinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angela Martinez
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Geneva Scott
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Monica Thompson
Represented By: Thomas V Girardi
Represented By: Keith David Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wendy Parikh
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Represented By: Timothy J. Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dimeshia Craig
Represented By: Christopher Adam Seeger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kaysey Davis
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tad VanZile
Represented By: Timothy R. Holton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Melissa Lopez
Represented By: Crystal Gayle Foley
Represented By: Andrew S Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benjamin Atwell
Represented By: John E. Quinn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda Rogers
Represented By: Catherine Theodora Heacox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda J. Steinborn
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Linda A. Thurman
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: Randall S. Crompton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christine Montano
Represented By: Lowell Wayne Finson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela Barlow
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tavonda Ford
Represented By: Dawn M. Chmielewski
Represented By: Alex J Brown
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pamela J Richardson
Represented By: Mark S. Thetford
Represented By: Gary S Grynkewich
Represented By: Jackqualyn R. Quinton
Represented By: Tony Wayne Edwards
Represented By: Sarah J Showard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ahou Gladys Adou
Represented By: Scott David Levensten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Welton
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Represented By: Robert J. Evola
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tanya Lewis
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa Macias
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Beatrice L. Griner
Represented By: John J. Driscoll
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Gregory J Pals
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dawnjai Grady
Represented By: Donald J. Nolan
Represented By: Welson Tan Chu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Johari Guy
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mandy Robinson
Represented By: Payton Dwight Hoover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alle Lopez-Davis
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lisa Dawn Harris
Represented By: David Paul Matthews
Represented By: Steve Michael Faries
Represented By: Rachal G. Rojas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Heetland
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Davis
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Represented By: Daniel N. Gallucci
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brittany Agerton
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: Dianne M. Nast
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: James Ronca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marina Schoeberl
Represented By: Fred Thompson, III
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Diogenes P. Kekatos
Represented By: Charles H. Johnson
Represented By: James Ronca
Represented By: Jonathan R Mencel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jessicca Tanner
Represented By: Shezad Malik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: McKenna Ripple
Represented By: Melanie Haberman Muhlstock
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Matthew Joseph McCauley
Represented By: Raymond Charles Silverman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Mattox
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amber Aston
Represented By: Eric D. Holland
Represented By: John R. Climaco
Represented By: Gerard B. Schneller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: April Rogers
Represented By: Mark B. Hutton
Represented By: Andrew W. Hutton
Represented By: Blake A. Shuart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cassie Painter
Represented By: Brett A. Emison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alisha Thompson
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Represented By: Laura Greene Lumaghi
Represented By: Douglas P. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Amanda Solis
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ada Stucky
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Represented By: Michael K. Johnson
Represented By: Rolf Fiebiger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erica Mitchell
Represented By: Timothy J Becker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Represented By: John J. Jablonski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayer AG
Represented By: Lorna A. Dotro
Represented By: Terry R. Lueckenhoff
Represented By: John J. Jablonski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayer Corporation
Represented By: William Patrick Harrington
Represented By: Lorna A. Dotro
Represented By: Joyce D. Edelman
Represented By: Elmore James Shepherd, III
Represented By: Michael George Elliott
Represented By: Albert G. Bixler
Represented By: Tony M Diab
Represented By: Nancy M. Erfle
Represented By: Erik J. Frick
Represented By: Jennifer Michelle Stevenson
Represented By: Andre T Hanson
Represented By: Ronn B Kreps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Berlex Laboratories, Inc.
Represented By: Lorna A. Dotro
Represented By: Joyce D. Edelman
Represented By: Albert G. Bixler
Represented By: Terry R. Lueckenhoff
Represented By: Nancy M. Erfle
Represented By: Erik J. Frick
Represented By: Andre T Hanson
Represented By: Ronn B Kreps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayer Healthcare LLC
Represented By: William Patrick Harrington
Represented By: Lorna A. Dotro
Represented By: Joyce D. Edelman
Represented By: Elmore James Shepherd, III
Represented By: Michael George Elliott
Represented By: Peter Joseph Rotolo, III
Represented By: Albert G. Bixler
Represented By: John Francis Olinde
Represented By: Nancy M. Erfle
Represented By: Erik J. Frick
Represented By: Jennifer Michelle Stevenson
Represented By: Andre T Hanson
Represented By: Ronn B Kreps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayer OY
Represented By: Marie S. Woodbury
Represented By: William Patrick Harrington
Represented By: Nancy M. Erfle
Represented By: Lorna A. Dotro
Represented By: Michelle Renee Mangrum
Represented By: Sonila Themeli
Represented By: Sarah Elizabeth Lynch
Represented By: Wendy West Feinstein
Represented By: Jared Lynn Sutton
Represented By: Ina D. Chang
Represented By: Kenneth F. Baum
Represented By: Shayna Susanne Cook
Represented By: Phyllis Jones
Represented By: Benjamin Wayne Walther
Represented By: Seth A. Litman
Represented By: Allyson Danielle Miller
Represented By: Alicia J. Donahue
Represented By: Foster Robberson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lisa Hernandez
Represented By: Eric S Johnson
Represented By: Trent B. Miracle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Danielle Thate
Represented By: Paul D Stevens
Represented By: Brian S. Kabateck
Represented By: Lina Berjouhi Melidonian
Represented By: Richard L. Kellner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alexandro E. Mendoza
Represented By: Rachel Abrams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Distributors
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayer Pharm AG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayer Healthcare AG
Represented By: John J. Jablonski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe Manufacturers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Applicant: Gregory N McEwen
Represented By: Gregory McEwen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Alternative dispute resolution (adr) provider: Attorney Chantell Boutte
Represented By: W. James Singleton
Represented By: Chantell M. Boutte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Alternative dispute resolution (adr) provider: Nina Marie Towle
Represented By: Nina Marie Towle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Alternative dispute resolution (adr) provider: Plaintiffs' Steering Committee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?