Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. Ayers (Smith)
as 23-7119
Defendant:
DERRICK AYERS, BERMON CLARKE, NIA GOVAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMEL SMITH
WALTON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv05469
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
AMANDA WALTON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Walton v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 7:2014cv04525
Plaintiff:
Amanda Walton
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hailee Paxton et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 7:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
Hailee Paxton , Penny Ridley , Danna Salvaleon-Cua and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Does and Danielle Thate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hailee Paxton et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as CAC/2:13-cv-08104
Plaintiff:
Hailee Paxton , Penny Ridley , Danna Salvaleon-Cua and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc , Does and Danielle Thate
Hailee Paxton et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 2:2013cv08104
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Does and Danielle Thate
Plaintiff:
Constance Edwards, Laureen Green, Paris Hooks and others
Fiechtner v. Camden County Probation Division et al
as 9:2013cv00039
Plaintiff:
Charles Adam Fiechtner, Sr
Defendant:
Camden County Probation Division, Child Support Enforcement Divison, 5 Executives and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
