Carter v. Astrue
Dianna L Carter |
Michael J. Astrue |
2:2010cv00045 |
September 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Northern Division Office |
DARE |
Supplemental Security Income |
42 U.S.C. ยง 206 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER granting 33 Motion for Attorney Fees - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/10/2015. (Baker, C.) |
Filing 31 ORDER granting 28 Motion for Attorney Fees (as stipulated) - Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/01/2011. (Baker, C.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carter v. Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Dianna L Carter | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.