Brown v. Astrue

Plaintiff: Maurice Brown
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 4:2011cv00018
Filed: February 18, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Office: Eastern Division Office
County: LENOIR
Presiding Judge: James C. Dever
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2012 Filing 37 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 35 Memorandum and Recommendations; denying 28 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; granting 31 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical information. Signed by Chief Judge James C. Dever III on 3/7/2012. (Edwards, S.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maurice Brown
Represented By: Charlotte Williams Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Charlotte M. Connery-Aujla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?