Justice v. Farley et al
| Theodore Justice |
| Kathy Twisdale, Michael Allen, Amy Miller, Julian Mann, III, Augustus B. Elkins, Mary Watson, Timothy Farley, Robynn Williams, James E. Cross, Jr., Dale W. Hensley and Kate Neale |
| 5:2013cv00343 |
| May 10, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| GRANVILLE |
| James C. Dever |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court DENIES plaintiff's motions to resolve the issue of service [D.E. 64], for extension of time to complete service [D.E. 71], for costs [D.E. 65], and for entry of default [D.E. 76]. The court GRANTS plaintiff's motion to amend [D.E. 49], and DISMISSES plaintiff's claims against defendant Richards and DISMISSES Richards as a defendant. The court GRANTS defendants' motions to dismiss [D.E. 37, 39, 43, 50, 52, 54, 57, 60], DEN IES AS MOOT defendants' motions to stay discovery [D.E. 74, 77] and plaintiff's motion for scheduling order, discovery conference, and to compel [D.E. 80]. The Court DISMISSES the complaint and amended complaint. Signed by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 1/21/2014. A copy of the judgment was mailed to the pro se plaintiff. (Sawyer, D.)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER denying 25 Motion for Entry of Default. Signed by Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 7/18/2013. A copy of the order was mailed to the pro se plaintiff. (Sawyer, D.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
