Bailey v. Toman et al
Robert Gene Bailey |
Unknown Female Officer, Ron Smith, P. J. Graham, K. D. Mackey, R. M. Ashley, William C. Toman, Jr., C. C. Blake and Joseph Gardner |
5:2013cv00397 |
June 3, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Western Division Office |
HYDE |
James C. Dever |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this case is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). IT IS ALSO ORDERED that a pre-filing injunction is entered against the Plaintiff, and the Clerk shall return to Plaintiff, unfiled, any new c ivil action which: (1) Names any of the following as a defendant, regardless of any other defendants named: R.M. Ashley, C.C. Blake, Joseph Gardner, P.J. Graham, K.D. Mackey, North Carolina Department of Motor Vehicles, North Carolina Division of Mo tor Vehicles, Ron Smith, Bill Toman, William C. Toman, Jr., or Unknown Female Officer; or (2) Contains any allegation of the illegal taking and holding of titles, vehicles, files, cash, jewelry, home files, pool files, or bath files; or (3) Fails to contain a statement on a separate page from the complaint that makes specific, clear factual allegations showing a possibility that Bailey is in imminent danger of serious physical injury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Debby Sawyer, Deputy Clerk for Julie A. Richards, Clerk of Court on 8/19/2013. A copy of the Judgment was mailed to the pro se plaintiff. (Sawyer, D.) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.