Cases 1 - 10 of 172
Robert Gene Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, LICENSE AND THEFT DIVISION, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Robert Bailey v. Joseph Gardner
as 17-7276
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, R. M. ASHLEY and others
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00577
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C. C. BLAKE, R. M. ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00335
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES LICENSE AND THEFT DIVISION, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, K. D. MACKEY, C. C. BLAKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00284
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., K. D. MACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GRAHAM et al
as 1:2016cv00283
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
P. J. GRAHAM and NORTH CAROLINA DEPTARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 16-6377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
