Bray v. Town of Wake Forest, et al
| Erin Elizabeth Bray |
| Town of Wake Forest, Mark Williams, Virginia Jones and Jeffrey M. Leonard |
| 5:2014cv00276 |
| May 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
34
CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 11/10/2015. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - Defendant's motion to dismiss (DE 10) is GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part. The court GRANTS defendants motion to dismiss as it pertains to defen dants Williams, Jones, and Leonard, and as it pertains to plaintiff's claim for civil conspiracy. Defendant Town of Wake Forest's motion is DENIED as it pertains to plaintiffs claims under the PDA and ADA, and plaintiff's claim for wro ngful discharge. The stay on further proceedings is hereby LIFTED. The parties are to file a joint supplemental Rule 26(f) report within twenty-one (21) days of this order, providing the information specified in the initial order entered in this case June 18, 2014. Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 04/03/2015. (Baker, C.)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 16 Motion to Stay Further Proceedings Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss - Signed by District Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 07/09/2014. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
