Pride v. Miller et al
| Phillip D. Pride |
| Matt Miller, Travis R. Sparks, Aaron Cantwell, Chuck Arnold, Larry M. Pierce and Western Surety Company |
| 5:2014cv00781 |
| November 9, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAYNE |
| Terrence W. Boyle |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER granting 44 Motion for Reconsideration regarding 43 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs claim of negligence against the sheriff on a respondeat superior theory under state law is the only claim against the sheriff that survives the motion to dismiss stage. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 6/28/2016. (Romine, L.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 27 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and granting in part and denying in part 29 Motion to Amend. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 3/8/2016. Counsel is reminded to read the order in its entirety for critical deadlines and information. (Romine, L.)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying as moot 15 Motion to Dismiss and denying 19 Motion to Dismiss. This matter is hereby STAYED for 120 days from the date of entry of this order. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to notify the Court at either the close of the stay or the termination of his state criminal proceedings, whichever is earlier. Signed by District Judge Terrence W. Boyle on 6/5/2015. (Marsh, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
