Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Jeffrey Edwards v. Major Greenfield
as 16-7451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAJOR GREENFIELD, LIEUTENANT SCOTT, OFFICER CARCIRIERI and others
Defendant:
CAREY WINDERS, Sheriff, DR. CLEMENT L. MCCASKILL and CHUCK ARNOLD, Sergeant
Jeffrey Edwards v. Mike Cox
as 15-6183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. MIKE COX, LT. CHRIS WORTH and SGT. CHUCK ARNOLD
Pride v. Miller et al
as 5:2014cv00781
Defendant:
Matt Miller , Travis R. Sparks , Aaron Cantwell and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Pride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeffrey Edwards v. Carey Winder
as 14-7363
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY EDWARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAJOR GREENFIELD, LIEUTENANT SCOTT, CARCIRIERI, Officer and others
Defendant:
CAREY WINDERS, Sheriff
Coleco Best v. Travis Spark
as 14-6168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
COLECO TAYLOR BEST
Defendant - Appellee:
TRAVIS SPARKS, MATT MILLER, CHUCK ARNOLD and others
Edwards v. Cox et al
as 5:2013ct03241
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Edwards
Defendant:
Mike Cox, Chris Worth and Chuck Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. Winders et al
as 5:2013ct03184
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Edwards
Defendant:
Carey Winders, Major Greenfield, Lt. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Robinson et al
as 1:2013cv01214
Plaintiff:
Tommy Eugene Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Gibson County, Steve Grooms, Chuck Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best v. Sparks et al
as 5:2013ct03140
Plaintiff:
Coleco Taylor Best
Defendant:
Travis R. Sparks, Matt Miller, Chuck Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combs v. Arnold et al
as 1:2013cv01145
Defendant:
Chuck Arnold, Sherry Jo Smith, Jeff Maitland and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
