Quirk v. Stephens et al
| James E. Quirk |
| Donald W. Stephens, Paul Gessner, Kendra D. Hill, Kellie Z. Myers, Lisa Tucker, Teresa B. Fuller, Alexander Cabrejas, Kristina Cabrejas, Victor C. Sequera, Sr. and Victor C. Sequera, Jr. |
| 5:2016cv00757 |
| August 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Western Division Office |
| WAKE |
| W. Earl Britt |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT - IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that pursuant to the court's order dated 6/2/2017 plaintiff's motion to amend and supplement the complaint, (DE # 23), is DENIED. State judicial defendants' motion to dismiss, (DE # 24), is GRANTED, and those defendants are DISMSSED from this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the court adopts the M&R as its own, and for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failu re to prosecute and to comply with the court's prior orders. Signed by Susan K. Edwards, Deputy for Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 4/20/2018. Copies sent to J. Quirk, A. Cabrejas, K. Cabrejas, V. Sequera Sr., and V. Sequera Jr., via US Mail. Copies for counsel for the remaining parties was sent via email notice of electronic filing. (Edwards, S.)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying 23 Motion to Amend/Correct and granting 24 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Senior Judge W. Earl Britt on 6/2/2017. Order to plaintiff via US Mail at P. O. Box 1684, Fuquay-Varina, NC 27526. (Marsh, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
