Solomon v. U.S. ATF Marshals et al
Patrick Deon Solomon |
DEA, U.S. ATF Marshals, FBI Customs, US Army, US Marines and ATF Narcotics |
5:2018cv00531 |
November 6, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Terrence W Boyle |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Motion Submitted to Chief Judge Terrence W. Boyle regarding #4 MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Patrick Deon Solomon. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 5 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Patrick Deon Solomon. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 4 ORDER and MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Patrick Deon Solomon. Objections to Memorandum and Recommendations due by 12/17/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge James E. Gates on 12/3/2018. Copy sent via US Mail to Patrick Solomon at 3984 Neeley St., Raleigh, NC 27606. (Stouch, L.) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge James E. Gates regarding #1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and for frivolity review. (Stouch, L.) |
Filing 3 Financial Disclosure Statement filed by Patrick Deon Solomon. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 2 Notice of Self-Representation filed by Patrick Deon Solomon (Not dated or signed). (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Patrick Deon Solomon. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Rudd, D.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.