Tyson v. Gay et al
| Justin Michael Tyson |
| Officer Russell, Officer Woolard, Officer Jordan, Officer McDaniels, Officer Singleton, Officer Taylor, Lieutenant Gay and Officer Andrews |
| 5:2019ct03315 |
| October 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Letter from plaintiff requesting copies. (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Response Letter) (Castania, M) |
Filing 5
ORDER - GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 10/30/2019. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.)
|
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for complaint review. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 3 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Justin Michael Tyson at Pitt County Detention Center. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Justin Michael Tyson. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Officer Andrews, Lieutenant Gay, Officer Jordan, Officer McDaniels, Officer Russell, Officer Singleton, Officer Taylor and Officer Woolard filed by Justin Michael Tyson. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
