Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Justin Tyson v. Lieutenant Gay
as 23-6159
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL TYSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT GAY, OFFICER MCDANIEL, OFFICER JORDAN and others
Justin Tyson v. Gay
as 22-7299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL TYSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT GAY, OFFICER MCDANIEL, OFFICER JORDAN and others
Kijuan Sharp v. Howard Turner
as 22-6952
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIJUAN HAASSAN SHARP
Defendant / Appellee:
HOWARD TURNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, PITT COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, LIEUTENANT ROUMPF and others
Justin Tyson v. Gay
as 22-6760
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL TYSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT GAY, OFFICER MCDANIEL, OFFICER JORDAN and others
Napoleon Rankin Bey v. Correctional Officer Singleton
as 21-6705
Defendant / Appellee:
SHIRLEY BENNETT, HALLOWAY, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HENDERSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAPOLEON J. RANKIN BEY
Sharp v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2020ct03282
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Daniel William Smith, Pitt County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Kijuan Haassan Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Gay et al
as 5:2019ct03315
Defendant:
Officer Russell, Officer Woolard, Officer Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Tyson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinney v. Wilcher et al
as 4:2019cv00076
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ryan Kinney
Defendant:
Officer Singleton, Harn, Sheriff John Wilcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00688
Plaintiff:
Thomas Cameron
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Draper Correctional Facility, Jeffery Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. McCollough et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jim Henry Ball, Jr.
Defendant:
R. McCollough , Steward Bradford , Social Worker Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
