Rasul v. Vereen et al
| Bilal Rasul |
| Darren Scott Vereen, Christopher Rich, Monica Bond, Timothy Cisrel, Todd Ishee, Joseph Valliere, Spephen Ojo and Tracey W. Dailey |
| 5:2019ct03344 |
| November 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER - In the interest of justice, the court TRANSFERS plaintiff's case to the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, where venue is proper. Signed by District Judge James C. Dever III on 11/26/2019. Copy sent via US Mail to Bilal Rasul at Dan River Prison Work Farm. (Indig, A.)
|
| Case transferred to the Middle District of North Carolina. File transmitted electronically. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 3 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Bilal Rasul at Dan River Prison Work Farm. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Bilal Rasul. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Monica Bond, Timothy Cisrel, Tracey W. Dailey, Todd Ishee, Spephen Ojo, Christopher Rich, Joseph Valliere and Darren Scott Vereen filed by Bilal Rasul. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (Copy of complaint sent to plaintiff in self-addressed, stamped envelope he provided.) (Indig, A.) |
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for complaint review. (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
