Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Carter v. Moehrig et al
as 5:2026ct03171
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Carter
Defendant:
Russell Moehrig, Daniel Green, Jim Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weathers v. Cooley-Dismukes et al
as 5:2026ct03113
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Weathers
Defendant:
Leslie Cooley-Dismukes, Todd Ishee, Jodi Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2026cv11597
Petitioner:
Wanda Allen
Respondent:
State of North Carolina, A.C. Hall, R.D. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUNTLEY v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2026cv00145
Plaintiff:
OREDERRIUS K. HUNTLEY
Defendant:
TODD ISHEE, STUBBLEFIELD, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ishee et al
as 1:2026cv00012
Plaintiff:
Kirby L. Brown
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, John Doe, FNU Hensle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huntley v. Ishee et al
as 1:2025cv00448
Plaintiff:
Orederrius K. Huntley
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, John Doe, FNU Hensle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noonsab v. Ishee
as 5:2025hc02239
Petitioner:
Somchai Noonsab
Respondent:
Commissioner of Pris Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Cooley-Dismukes et al
as 5:2025ct03280
Plaintiff:
Oscar Perez
Defendant:
Leslie Cooley-Dismukes, Peter Buchholtz, Todd Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faulk v. Ishee et al
as 5:2025ct03181
Plaintiff:
Jajuan Anthony Faulk
Defendant:
Todd Ishee, Kevin A. Barnes, Shelton Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noonsab v. Ishee
as 1:2025cv00196
Petitioner:
Somchai Noonsab
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
