Hernandez v. Johnson et al
Michael E. Hernandez |
P. Gardner, Charlotte Evans, B. Johnson, C/O Adams and Felix Taylor |
5:2019ct03399 |
December 31, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Richard E Myers |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Notice of Change of Address (7444 White Elm Ln.) filed by Michael E. Hernandez. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Filing 3 TEXT ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. At the direction of the Court, this case is reassigned to United States District Judge Richard E. Myers II for all further proceedings. United States District Judge James C. Dever III is no longer assigned to the case. All future filings shall reflect the revised case number of 5:19-ct-3399-M. Signed by Peter A. Moore, Jr., Clerk of Court on 1/8/2020. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.) |
Case Submitted to District Judge Richard E. Myers II for complaint review. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 2 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to Michael E. Hernandez at 2603 Giverny Dr., Charlotte, NC 28226. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against C/O Adams, Charlotte Evans, P. Gardner, B. Johnson and Felix Taylor filed by Michael E. Hernandez. (Attachments: #1 Documents in Support, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number RAL076151. (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.