Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Bennett v. Evans
as 5:2023ct03308
Plaintiff:
Corey Bennett
Defendant:
Charlotte Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ector v. Evans et al
as 5:2023ct03304
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Ector
Defendant:
Charlotte Evans, Medical Staff and North Carolina Department of Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meza-Rodriguez v. Evans et al
as 5:2023ct03240
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Meza-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Charlotte Evans, Nurse Pierre, Mashell Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehurst v. Clark et al
as 5:2022ct03047
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Demetrius A. Clark, Anthony A. Adams, Timothy Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Hernandez v. B. Johnson
as 21-1761
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL E. HERNANDEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
B. JOHNSON, SERGEANT GARDNER, FELIX TAYLOR and others
EVANS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv10186
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myles v. White et al
as 5:2021ct03058
Defendant:
Brian Blackburn, Daryl Rogers, Dr. Van Reede and others
Plaintiff:
Devontay D. Myles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis Watson v. John Doe #1
as 20-6550
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Doctor/Practitioner, CAPTAIN J. L. ROLLINS, JOHN DOE, Medical Staffer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Watson v. Doe #1 et al
as 5:2020ct03126
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Watson
Defendant:
John Doe #5, Eddie Thomas, John Doe #4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson Moore v. Kenneth Lassiter
as 20-6360
Defendant / Appellee:
TIERRA CATLETT, SGT. SHEPARD, KATY POOLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENSON MOORE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
