Witherspoon v. United States Department of Justice et al
Shontonio Witherspoon |
Tamara S. Lyn, Richard Engel, Warden Thomas Scarantino, United States Department of Justice, FNU Brown-Stobbie, Latrice Heyward, Michael Carvajal, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Dr. Tamara S. Lyn |
5:2021ct03131 |
May 14, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
James C Dever |
Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER - GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 5/17/2021. Copy sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Indig, A.) |
Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for initial review. (Indig, A.) |
Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent to plaintiff at Butner Low via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Shontonio Witherspoon. (Castania, M) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Shontonio Witherspoon. (Castania, M) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU Brown-Stobbie, Michael Carvajal, Richard Engel, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Latrice Heyward, Tamara S. Lyn, Thomas Scarantino, United States Department of Justice, filed by Shontonio Witherspoon. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Envelope) (Castania, M) |
Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Lopez, R.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.