Patterson v. Adams et al
| Emmanuel Antonio Patterson |
| Cristol Adams, Ennis Wright and Major T. Adams |
| 5:2023ct03088 |
| March 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Richard E Myers |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Memorandum in Support regarding #1 Complaint filed by Emmanuel Antonio Patterson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Lopez, R.) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. on 3/24/2023. Copy of order sent to plaintiff and DPS via US Mail. (Lopez, R.)
|
| Case Submitted to Chief Judge Richard E. Myers II for initial review. Once a review is completed an order will enter and the next appropriate step will be taken. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 4 Letter regarding case opening sent to plaintiff via US Mail. (Lopez, R.) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Emmanuel Antonio Patterson. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees filed by Emmanuel Antonio Patterson. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cristol Adams, T. Adams and Ennis Wright filed by Emmanuel Antonio Patterson. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
| Motion Referred to US Magistrate Judge Robert B. Jones, Jr. regarding #2 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees. (Lopez, R.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
