Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Taras Raggio v. Chris Davis
as 24-1214
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO, PHD
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, Pamlico County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, Craven County Sheriffs Office, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT, Cumberland County Sheriffs Office and others
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 24-106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, "OBSERVER", "Q" and others
Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al.
as 23-3569
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, LINDSEY, SHIFT COMMAND and others
RAGGIO v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
TARAS N. RAGGIO
Defendant:
SHERIFF CHRIS DAVIS, SHERIFF ALFRED CHIP HUGHES, SHERIFF ENNIS WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Katherine Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al
as 23-15711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, LINDSEY, SHIFT COMMAND and others
Patterson v. Adams et al
as 5:2023ct03088
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Antonio Patterson
Defendant:
Cristol Adams, Ennis Wright and Major T. Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCormick v. Wright et al
as 5:2023ct03028
Plaintiff:
Markus Odon McCormick
Defendant:
Sheriff Ennis Wright, Deputy Sheriff Jamie McLeod, Officer Ramon Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Katherine Fletcher v. Dreesen, et al
as 22-17022
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KATHERINE DEE FLETCHER
Defendant / Appellee:
DREESEN, LINDSEY, SHIFT COMMAND and others
Capri v. Sisolak et al
as 3:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Richard Capri
Defendant:
Steve Sisolak, Charles Daniels, Michael Minev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Dreesen et al
as 2:2022cv01777
Plaintiff:
Katherine Dee Fletcher
Defendant:
Dreesen, Lindsey, Shift Command and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
