Wendt v. Bullard et al
| Samuel Clement Wendt |
| Jamie Bullard, Todd Ishee, Edward Buffaloe, Brandeshawn Harris, Wakenda Greene, Unit Manager Brown, Glenda Jackson, Clayton Brewer, Unit Manager Collins, Asst. Unit Manager Shaw, Raymond Bailey, Deputy Warden Baysden, Unit Manager McLaughlin, Mark Barnhill, Custody Officer Miller, Custody Officer Spivey and Property Owners |
| 5:2023ct03275 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| James C Dever |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Submitted to District Judge James C. Dever III for initial review. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing fee received $402.00, receipt number 500006715. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 3 Letter regarding case opening sent via US Mail to plaintiff. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement filed by Samuel Clement Wendt. (Indig, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Raymond Bailey, Mark Barnhill, Deputy Warden Baysden, Clayton Brewer, Unit Manager Brown, Edward Buffaloe, Jamie Bullard, Unit Manager Collins, Wakenda Greene, Brandeshawn Harris, Todd Ishee, Glenda Jackson, Unit Manager McLaughlin, Custody Officer Miller, Property Owners, Asst. Unit Manager Shaw and Custody Officer Spivey filed by Samuel Clement Wendt. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (Indig, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
