Rakhsha et al v. Blinken et al
Minoo Rakhsha and Masoud Atrli |
Antony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Jaddou, Christopher Wray, Sean Murphy, Merrick Garland and Jolene Ann Laura |
5:2024cv00076 |
February 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
Louise Wood Flanagan |
Mandamus & Other |
05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Financial Disclosure Statement by Masoud Atrli, Minoo Rakhsha (Attachments: #1 Financial Disclosure Form) (Baloch, Mohammad) |
Filing 4 Notice filed by Masoud Atrli, Minoo Rakhsha Civil Cover Sheet. (Baloch, Mohammad) |
Filing 3 Notice of Appearance filed by Mohammad Omar Baloch on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Baloch, Mohammad) |
Filing 2 Financial Disclosure Statement by Masoud Atrli, Minoo Rakhsha (Baloch, Mohammad) |
Notice to Counsel - Counsel is reminded that he did not properly identify attachments pursuant to Section V.E. of the CM/ECF Policies and Procedures Manual. Attachments must be clearly labeled (i.e., "Exhibit 1" is not a sufficient description). Additionally, when filing a document with more than five attachments, the first attachment must be an index of all of the subsequent attached documents. No further Action. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing fee: $405.00, receipt number 5-00008662. (Rudd, D.) |
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY - Failure to File Financial Disclosure Statement as to Masoud Atrli. Pursuant to 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Civil Rule 7.3, all parties shall file a financial disclosure statement. A negative statement is required if a party has no disclosures to make. The disclosure statement must be on a form provided by the clerk. This form is available at the clerk's office and on the court's website. *A separate financial disclosure statement needs to filed for the each plaintiff. (Rudd, D.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405.), filed by Masoud Atrli, Minoo Rakhsha. (Attachments: #1 Appearance of Counsel, #2 Financial Disclosure Form, #3 Complaint, #4 Exhibit 1- Copy of passport, #5 Exhibit 2- Copy of DHS form I-797, Notice of Action, #6 Exhibit 3-Letter from Minoo Rakhsha, #7 Exhibit 4- Letter to Minoo Rakhsha from the United States Department of State dated 5/25/2011, #8 Exhibit 5- Interview Letter, #9 Exhibit 6- Update: Immigrant/DV VISA Application, #10 Exhibit 7- Email dated 6/20/2019, #11 Exhibit 8- Email dated 1/20/2020, #12 Exhibit 9- Email dated 6/30/2022, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 10- Email 9/9/2022, #14 Exhibit 11- Senatorial Inquiry, #15 Exhibit 12- Senatorial Inquiry, #16 Exhibit 13- Senatorial Inquiry, #17 Exhibit 14- Email dated 11/7/2022, #18 Exhibit 15- Email dated 11/15/2022, #19 Exhibit 16- Email dated 5/29/2023, #20 Exhibit 17- Email dated 5/30/2023, #21 Exhibit 18- Email dated 6/23/2023, #22 Exhibit 19- Email dated 6/27/2023, #23 Exhibit Exhibit 20- Senatorial Inquiry dated 9/22/2023, #24 Exhibit 21- Email dated 10/31/2023, #25 Exhibit 22- Visa Status Check, #26 Exhibit 23- Senatorial Inquiry dated 11/28/2023, #27 Exhibit 24- Letter from Senator Tillis dated 1/30/2024, #28 Proposed Summons Summons, #29 Proposed Summons Summons, #30 Proposed Summons Summons, #31 Proposed Summons Summons, #32 Proposed Summons Summons, #33 Proposed Summons Summons, #34 Proposed Summons Summons, #35 Proposed Summons Summons, #36 Proposed Summons Summons, #37 Proposed Summons Summons, #38 Proposed Summons Summons, #39 Proposed Summons Summons, #40 Proposed Summons Summons) (Baloch, Mohammad) Modified on 2/9/2024 to describe exhibits. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.